When Alana Smith, who competed in the women’s street skateboarding event for Team USA at the Olympics last week, was referred to as ‘she’ by NBC and BBC commentators a number of people took to Twitter to complain that Smith had been ‘misgendered’. Smith identifies as non-binary and goes by the ‘they/them’ pronouns, and had painted them on the side of her skateboard. But Smith was a competitor in the women’s event. Perhaps the IOC should have given training to commentators, as has the BBC to its broadcast staff, on pronoun use?
The ever-increasing pressure to add pronouns (he/him; she/her; they/them; zir/zer) is as offensive as it is unnecessary.
I grew up being labelled a ‘tomboy’ because I hated feminine frippery such as skirts, tights and ribbons in my hair. I didn’t understand why girls were supposed to dress differently from boys. I would try my very best to inveigle my way into the boys’ rough and tumble games. As a result of my non-compliance with gender rules, I was constantly asked whether I was “a boy or a girl”.
Having grown noticeable breasts by the time I was 12 and being regularly sexually harassed as a result of it, it was clear that men well knew the answer to that question.
In adulthood, many of the same prejudices follow me around. Lesbians routinely experience harassment because we are not considered to be “real women”. Our ‘authenticity’ as women is often measured by superficial sexist indicators. A key role of feminism is to rid the world of gender stereotypes. I therefore refuse to use terminology that capitulates to the notion of individual gender identities. There are two sexes, male and female, and although I do not care in the slightest who might refer to themselves as non-binary or transgender or whatever, I will not have it imposed upon me. It would be like demanding that I believe in God.
I realise now that any time I have been asked which sex I am, often in an aggressive manner by men in gangs, the question is never genuine — rather, it is a form of hostile interrogation. How dare I shun make-up and heels? Why do I wear jeans and never dresses? I have broken the rules.
Despite decades of feminism, women have not yet achieved the right to be able to do away with sexist prefixes such as “ladies”, “Mrs” or “Miss”. I have lost count of the number of times I’ve witnessed ignorant individuals who have asked “who is the man?” when referring to lesbian couples. And yet much of the focus in the workplace about non-discriminatory language is the appeasement of those that pretend sex is a floating signifier.
To me, the creeping use of ‘preferred pronouns’ is ultimately a form of sexist bullying. My advice to anyone being asked to include pronouns in email sign-offs, meetings or wherever, is to politely refuse. The more of us that refuse to go along with this offensive doctrine, the better.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI don’t know about the details here, but it’s refreshing to read a positive piece on UK politics for once.
He is a blood thirsty NeoCon vampire pushing to destroy Ukraine as Boris’s mini-me. Try some youtube of Alexander Mercouris on the Disaster of the Proxy War in Ukraine whereby USA and UK destroyed an entire nation and people in their political and corruption games.
At the end of this Excellent analysis of the Ukraine Disaster of an offensive, Mercouris gives a rundown on how this million dead and nation wrecked is basically Boris Johnson’s doing.
It is a MUST WATCH – all of it ideally, the 15 minutes before the Johnson part is great too, but to just hear of Boris, Sunak’s Mega-me, go to minute 1:08. Listen to ”This extraordinary petulant MP…” talk of Alexander’s – you know he would love to really say of the utter EVIL of Boris – and the olympic swimming Pools of blood he has caused to flow – but he has a good say without getting as furious as I would – summing up this demon of a man.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiD20aVoekQ
minute 1:08 for Boris…… who Sunic fallowed as a running dog….
and Sunak – he has dipped his toes very deep in this pool of blood too. Evil War, caused by Evil men – and Sunak is one of them!
Evil, Evil, Evil men, and Biden and his circle are as culpable – warmongers!!!!!!!!! Lovers of Death and Money.
He is a blood thirsty NeoCon vampire pushing to destroy Ukraine as Boris’s mini-me. Try some youtube of Alexander Mercouris on the Disaster of the Proxy War in Ukraine whereby USA and UK destroyed an entire nation and people in their political and corruption games.
At the end of this Excellent analysis of the Ukraine Disaster of an offensive, Mercouris gives a rundown on how this million dead and nation wrecked is basically Boris Johnson’s doing.
It is a MUST WATCH – all of it ideally, the 15 minutes before the Johnson part is great too, but to just hear of Boris, Sunak’s Mega-me, go to minute 1:08. Listen to ”This extraordinary petulant MP…” talk of Alexander’s – you know he would love to really say of the utter EVIL of Boris – and the olympic swimming Pools of blood he has caused to flow – but he has a good say without getting as furious as I would – summing up this demon of a man.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiD20aVoekQ
minute 1:08 for Boris…… who Sunic fallowed as a running dog….
and Sunak – he has dipped his toes very deep in this pool of blood too. Evil War, caused by Evil men – and Sunak is one of them!
Evil, Evil, Evil men, and Biden and his circle are as culpable – warmongers!!!!!!!!! Lovers of Death and Money.
I don’t know about the details here, but it’s refreshing to read a positive piece on UK politics for once.
Better to make a sandwich and succeed, than to make a banquet and fail.
Better to make a sandwich and succeed, than to make a banquet and fail.
It’s quaint that Aris thinks Sunak is deciding any of this. The Foreign Office are passively waiting for a PM to give them guidance and instruction? Hmm.
The reality is the elected Ministers get told what the brief is – irrespective of whatever manifesto they were elected on – by the Permanent Secretary. The civil service is either left to continue in peace or it will make trouble for its Minister.
Sunak is particularly weak in allowing his speeches to be entirely written by the servants he is supposed to be leading. He is not even reading aloud his own words. Actor or puppet, but not leader.
It’s quaint that Aris thinks Sunak is deciding any of this. The Foreign Office are passively waiting for a PM to give them guidance and instruction? Hmm.
The reality is the elected Ministers get told what the brief is – irrespective of whatever manifesto they were elected on – by the Permanent Secretary. The civil service is either left to continue in peace or it will make trouble for its Minister.
Sunak is particularly weak in allowing his speeches to be entirely written by the servants he is supposed to be leading. He is not even reading aloud his own words. Actor or puppet, but not leader.
I’m no fan of the Tories (I prefer conservatives to be conservative) in general these days, but I respect Sunak. Good to see brains, rationality and hard work in the top job instead of the recent burlesque.
I’m no fan of the Tories (I prefer conservatives to be conservative) in general these days, but I respect Sunak. Good to see brains, rationality and hard work in the top job instead of the recent burlesque.
One wonders in which direction Labour might take us in the coming decade. Thankfully a CCP tilt isn’t on the cards since Corbyn left but will a pragmatic foreign policy be followed under Starmer or will we get something else? I notice our relationship with Ireland is closer than ever (another nail in the remainiac coffin). This sort of deal would have been unthinkable even eighten months ago.
Our relationship with Ireland isn’t closer than ever MG but it is much better than a year ago.
Since independence when could we conveivably had a military agreement with them? The prominence of Irish politicians coming out for the Queen’s funeral was particularly moving, again not something I thought I would see.
Since independence when could we conveivably had a military agreement with them? The prominence of Irish politicians coming out for the Queen’s funeral was particularly moving, again not something I thought I would see.
Our relationship with Ireland isn’t closer than ever MG but it is much better than a year ago.
One wonders in which direction Labour might take us in the coming decade. Thankfully a CCP tilt isn’t on the cards since Corbyn left but will a pragmatic foreign policy be followed under Starmer or will we get something else? I notice our relationship with Ireland is closer than ever (another nail in the remainiac coffin). This sort of deal would have been unthinkable even eighten months ago.
“Rishi Sunak deserves praise for his foreign policy”
I didn’t know he had one – Just soundbites for the media.
Do ‘we’ still have a Foreign Policy?
Surely that is decided in the White House.
Do ‘we’ still have a Foreign Policy?
Surely that is decided in the White House.
“Rishi Sunak deserves praise for his foreign policy”
I didn’t know he had one – Just soundbites for the media.
Yep some sensible pragmatism and realism after a few years where we lost our bearings whilst suffering from Brexit fuelled intoxication. We are weaker but Sunak beginning to make the most of that hand and we still have many strengths.
Not sure when the Author wrote the Article though but it does seem to underplay the recent agreement with US won’t have been struck by our Atlantic partner to allow us to sit passively neutral in any coming engagement, hot or cold, with China. AUKUS prevents that being an option too. We’ve chosen our side, been given the prize of warm photo-op in the Oval office and a mutual Declaration, but you can bet our cousins expect us to line up with them when required.
JW – not sure about the rest of us, but I’d say you’re still suffering from “Brexit intoxication” – certainly some Brexit-related derangement. You just can’t let it go, can you ?
JW – not sure about the rest of us, but I’d say you’re still suffering from “Brexit intoxication” – certainly some Brexit-related derangement. You just can’t let it go, can you ?
Yep some sensible pragmatism and realism after a few years where we lost our bearings whilst suffering from Brexit fuelled intoxication. We are weaker but Sunak beginning to make the most of that hand and we still have many strengths.
Not sure when the Author wrote the Article though but it does seem to underplay the recent agreement with US won’t have been struck by our Atlantic partner to allow us to sit passively neutral in any coming engagement, hot or cold, with China. AUKUS prevents that being an option too. We’ve chosen our side, been given the prize of warm photo-op in the Oval office and a mutual Declaration, but you can bet our cousins expect us to line up with them when required.