X Close

Politically divided housing: more proof of American polarisation

Meet the neighbours. Credit: Getty

December 18, 2024 - 7:00pm

A new real estate platform called Oyssey has discerned what homebuyers really want to know about their future neighbours: whether they’re Republicans or Democrats. The service, which is soft-launching this month in South Florida and New York City, claims to provide detailed block-by-block political data alongside standard housing listings. Buyers can see not just bedroom counts and square footage, but also a heat map showing how their potential neighbours voted and donated in recent elections.

For much of the 20th century, American housing segregation operated through redlining — the systematic denial of mortgages and services to “undesirable” members of minority communities by banks and Government agencies. Real estate agents would steer white buyers away from black neighbourhoods, while restrictive covenants explicitly banned property sales to various ethnic and religious groups. Those practices were eventually outlawed by the Fair Housing Act of 1968, but their demographic effects linger in many of America’s still-segregated cities. Now Oyssey offers a different kind of demographic sorting, one which is both perfectly legal and perhaps even increasingly desired by more politically polarised buyers themselves.

The platform’s CEO Huw Nierenberg has claimed in an interview that this approach reflects how modern house-hunting actually works. Initial concerns about foundation cracks, code violations, and outdated kitchens inevitably give way to subtle questions about the neighbourhood, as buyers attempt to determine whether they’d fit in politically and culturally with the people next door.

This isn’t the first attempt to segment American consumers along political lines. A dating app called The Right Stuff seeks to create a conservatives-only dating pool. The Veebs shopping app promises to help users buy products aligned with their political values. Both services still struggle with clunky interfaces and limited adoption, though each has improved somewhat since I initially wrote about them. Oyssey, with its cleaner design, more limited functions, and integration with existing real estate market data analytics, might succeed where these earlier ventures have stumbled.

The timing feels particularly apt in the wake of Donald Trump’s election victory and corporate America’s ongoing recalibration of its political messaging. Just weeks ago, Bud Light tapped comedian Shane Gillis for an advertisement that seemed designed to win back conservative customers alienated by the brand’s previous partnership with trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney. The beer giant’s apparent ideological pivot suggests that America’s major corporations are growing more comfortable with in-your-face partisan targeting.

What makes Oyssey’s approach notable is how it transforms previously implicit housing preferences into explicit data points. While all American neighbourhoods have long sorted themselves along de facto political lines, Oyssey strips away the polite fiction that these divisions happen organically, instead giving homebuyers the tools to deliberately seek out — or avoid — neighbourhoods based on residents’ voting patterns.

This raises interesting if uncomfortable questions about the future of American communities. If homebuyers can easily self-segregate based on political ideology, what happens to the already dwindling spaces in which Americans of different political persuasions can interact in the public sphere? The “big sort” that’s been happening gradually for decades could accelerate dramatically when powered by granular political data and modern tech platforms.

Yet Oyssey’s innovation isn’t really about creating these divisions: like many other Silicon Valley innovations such as social media, it is about monetising them. The real question isn’t whether this kind of ideological sorting will continue, but instead whether it will prove profitable enough to expand into other sectors of the economy. Imagine a world in which every purchase, from car repair to dentistry, comes with data about the political leanings of the business owner and their typical customers. The technology for such segmentation already exists. All that’s missing is a sophisticated series of platforms to package and present it.

If Oyssey breaks through where other partisan platforms have struggled, it could provide a template for a future where America’s political tribes don’t just live in different information bubbles, but in entirely separate economic ecosystems. Imagine Republican hamburgers delivered by heavily-armed Republican Ford F-350 drivers to neighbourhoods full of Republican McMansions. On the other side of town, Democratic vegan or lab-grown meat is dropped off outside apartment buildings by undocumented immigrants on net-zero unicycles. It might sound far-fetched, but it’s merely the logical extension of trends we’re already seeing.

This might be the most fitting resolution possible to our ongoing culture war: not a decisive victory for either side, but a number of profitable new market opportunities. After all, what could be more American than finding a way to turn endless conflict into mountains of cash?


Oliver Bateman is a historian and journalist based in Pittsburgh. He blogs, vlogs, and podcasts at his Substack, Oliver Bateman Does the Work

MoustacheClubUS

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
T Bone
T Bone
41 minutes ago

The more expansive the government gets the more political a society will become. The Left thinks every life incident is interdependent (systemic) and therefore political while the Right does not. However the Right is beginning to think more like the Left because the Left’s Hyperawareness of all injustice has largely actualized interdependency as a societal principle and made it a reality.

For the Right, the best way to getting back to a less political society is to live amongst people that don’t think systemically through the prism of victim/oppressor.