Subscribe
Notify of
guest

17 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Julian Farrows
Julian Farrows
1 year ago

By not supporting Lady Hussey, the royal family made themselves look weak in the face of critical race warriors like Ngozi Falani. Unfortunately, King Charles seems more susceptible to this form of bullying than was his late mother.

Cathy Carron
Cathy Carron
1 year ago
Reply to  Julian Farrows

Not supporting Lady Hussey is indicative of King Charles’ wokeness which he has been cultivating for decades – his softness, his talking to his plants, his yearning for public acceptance has made and will make him susceptible to political activists with a bone to grind now and into the future. ‘Strength’ is not the quality emanating from his court and could turn out to be the nail in the monarchy’s coffin. Queen Elizabeth clearly carried a velvet hammer ….so far, not so her heir.

Last edited 1 year ago by Cathy Carron
Doug Pingel
Doug Pingel
1 year ago
Reply to  Cathy Carron

I’ve given you a uptick but talking to plants to improve their growth is based on scientific fact. Some commercial growers are now feeding their greenhouses with extra CO2 which partially accounts for it’s scarcity. I grow some veggies indoors between September and Christmas and talk to them morning and evening and I sure ain’t Woke. I sometimes use language that would make a trooper/stoker blush and they thrive on it. You are spot on with the velvet hammer. Queen Anne would have wielded it with better effect tha her younger brother.

Glyn R
Glyn R
1 year ago
Reply to  Cathy Carron

Or perhaps it’s indicative of the fact that he a Prize Useful Idiot?

Doug Pingel
Doug Pingel
1 year ago
Reply to  Cathy Carron

I’ve given you a uptick but talking to plants to improve their growth is based on scientific fact. Some commercial growers are now feeding their greenhouses with extra CO2 which partially accounts for it’s scarcity. I grow some veggies indoors between September and Christmas and talk to them morning and evening and I sure ain’t Woke. I sometimes use language that would make a trooper/stoker blush and they thrive on it. You are spot on with the velvet hammer. Queen Anne would have wielded it with better effect tha her younger brother.

Glyn R
Glyn R
1 year ago
Reply to  Cathy Carron

Or perhaps it’s indicative of the fact that he a Prize Useful Idiot?

CHARLES STANHOPE
CHARLES STANHOPE
1 year ago
Reply to  Julian Farrows

I have heard it said that Ms Falani was carrying a tape recorder about her person.
Can this be true?

Cathy Carron
Cathy Carron
1 year ago
Reply to  Julian Farrows

Not supporting Lady Hussey is indicative of King Charles’ wokeness which he has been cultivating for decades – his softness, his talking to his plants, his yearning for public acceptance has made and will make him susceptible to political activists with a bone to grind now and into the future. ‘Strength’ is not the quality emanating from his court and could turn out to be the nail in the monarchy’s coffin. Queen Elizabeth clearly carried a velvet hammer ….so far, not so her heir.

Last edited 1 year ago by Cathy Carron
CHARLES STANHOPE
CHARLES STANHOPE
1 year ago
Reply to  Julian Farrows

I have heard it said that Ms Falani was carrying a tape recorder about her person.
Can this be true?

Julian Farrows
Julian Farrows
1 year ago

By not supporting Lady Hussey, the royal family made themselves look weak in the face of critical race warriors like Ngozi Falani. Unfortunately, King Charles seems more susceptible to this form of bullying than was his late mother.

Jonas Moze
Jonas Moze
1 year ago

Please, Please, Unherd – keep this wretched duo, and their pictures, off Unherd. I so loath seeing them, seeing stories of them, it makes me stressed.

It is impossible to read Daily Mail as at least half of the thing is devoted to them…

Two top articles at once today in the top header – just try to not do it, try to be the one refuge from these creeps and their creepy entourage and message.

Walter Schwager
Walter Schwager
1 year ago
Reply to  Jonas Moze

Why would you call them wretched? At least they don’t have Tampongate to live down.

Cathy Carron
Cathy Carron
1 year ago

All the Miserable Markles have to live down is gaslighting the public, flirtation with Naziism, spinning lies, dishonoring Queen Elizabeth by mocking her, conveniently using the race card to besmirch those who don’t heel to their desires and a truly grotesque grasp for publicity and riches.

Cathy Carron
Cathy Carron
1 year ago

All the Miserable Markles have to live down is gaslighting the public, flirtation with Naziism, spinning lies, dishonoring Queen Elizabeth by mocking her, conveniently using the race card to besmirch those who don’t heel to their desires and a truly grotesque grasp for publicity and riches.

Walter Schwager
Walter Schwager
1 year ago
Reply to  Jonas Moze

Why would you call them wretched? At least they don’t have Tampongate to live down.

Jonas Moze
Jonas Moze
1 year ago

Please, Please, Unherd – keep this wretched duo, and their pictures, off Unherd. I so loath seeing them, seeing stories of them, it makes me stressed.

It is impossible to read Daily Mail as at least half of the thing is devoted to them…

Two top articles at once today in the top header – just try to not do it, try to be the one refuge from these creeps and their creepy entourage and message.

Andrew Wise
Andrew Wise
1 year ago

I don’t find anything particularly new here, ruling a country has always been a political task.

I think you will find every king or queen has both employed spin doctors and been the subject of spin from rivals.

Andrew Wise
Andrew Wise
1 year ago

I don’t find anything particularly new here, ruling a country has always been a political task.

I think you will find every king or queen has both employed spin doctors and been the subject of spin from rivals.

Anna Bramwell
Anna Bramwell
1 year ago

Luckily for the glamorous duo, they hire people like Scobie, the head of ITV, the British judiciary and several v expensive PR firms to help them out, poor things.

Peter B
Peter B
1 year ago
Reply to  Anna Bramwell

They’re not “glamorous” for me, whatever that might mean. They’re essentially merely vacuous nonentities with zero talent. Like all other “celebs”. If you don’t like it, don’t watch or read it. I find such self-serving attention seekers tiresome. We’ve all got real problems to solve, instead of wasting time on this rubbish. Please stop feeding the trolls.

Peter B
Peter B
1 year ago
Reply to  Anna Bramwell

They’re not “glamorous” for me, whatever that might mean. They’re essentially merely vacuous nonentities with zero talent. Like all other “celebs”. If you don’t like it, don’t watch or read it. I find such self-serving attention seekers tiresome. We’ve all got real problems to solve, instead of wasting time on this rubbish. Please stop feeding the trolls.

Anna Bramwell
Anna Bramwell
1 year ago

Luckily for the glamorous duo, they hire people like Scobie, the head of ITV, the British judiciary and several v expensive PR firms to help them out, poor things.

Douglas McNeish
Douglas McNeish
1 year ago

Charles cravenly bending the knee to race grifter, and African cultural appropriator, Ngozi, in firing his mother’s lifelong friend will only encourage the anti-Windsor industry managed by Meghan and sidekick Harry to come after them for more.

Douglas McNeish
Douglas McNeish
1 year ago

Charles cravenly bending the knee to race grifter, and African cultural appropriator, Ngozi, in firing his mother’s lifelong friend will only encourage the anti-Windsor industry managed by Meghan and sidekick Harry to come after them for more.

Leejon 0
Leejon 0
1 year ago

It’s an odd choice to use your position as part of something to try and destroy that something, and as a result become nothing. Hey ho, it’s amusing at least.

Margaret TC
Margaret TC
1 year ago
Reply to  Leejon 0

Team H and M are making capital – cultural and monetary – from the institution they pretend to want to see dismantled. Of course they want no such thing – having cast themselves as victims of the monarchy they will want to milk these roles for all they can get. In this they are like so many others who create and then make money/fame out of their role as victim.

Margaret TC
Margaret TC
1 year ago
Reply to  Leejon 0

Team H and M are making capital – cultural and monetary – from the institution they pretend to want to see dismantled. Of course they want no such thing – having cast themselves as victims of the monarchy they will want to milk these roles for all they can get. In this they are like so many others who create and then make money/fame out of their role as victim.

Leejon 0
Leejon 0
1 year ago

It’s an odd choice to use your position as part of something to try and destroy that something, and as a result become nothing. Hey ho, it’s amusing at least.

Roy Cooper
Roy Cooper
1 year ago

Whatever the problem within your family you never, ever, wash your dirty linen in public. And that’s Megan’s speciality and Harry’s naivety and weakness. The real fireworks will soon come home to roost in Montecito. It’s guaranteed when you look behind the curtains.

Roy Cooper
Roy Cooper
1 year ago

Whatever the problem within your family you never, ever, wash your dirty linen in public. And that’s Megan’s speciality and Harry’s naivety and weakness. The real fireworks will soon come home to roost in Montecito. It’s guaranteed when you look behind the curtains.

Christopher Barclay
Christopher Barclay
1 year ago

Are the appointments forced on Charles or William? Do these PR people plant stories that William and Charles do not want planted? Either William and Charles are complicit in the game being played or they are idiots.

Christopher Barclay
Christopher Barclay
1 year ago

Are the appointments forced on Charles or William? Do these PR people plant stories that William and Charles do not want planted? Either William and Charles are complicit in the game being played or they are idiots.

Gerald Arcuri
Gerald Arcuri
1 year ago

“Harry and Meghan: The Sad Tale of Two Spoiled Grifters”. Watch at the risk of nausea.

Gerald Arcuri
Gerald Arcuri
1 year ago

“Harry and Meghan: The Sad Tale of Two Spoiled Grifters”. Watch at the risk of nausea.