That’s interesting. Ken Burns is lately being questioned about whether it was right for him, as a white man, to produce a documentary about Muhammad Ali. Cultural appropriation and all that. His work for PBS is being questioned since he and his production company are too white, essentially. I recently listened to him defend himself in a radio interview and there was no amount of pushback on his part other than to say he hires minorities, etc. Basically, the knives are out for him and I think he sees it coming.
Andrew D
2 years ago
Black vs white? Terfs vs trans? Rich vs poor? Men vs women? Cancellers vs freedom-lovers? Muslims vs the rest? Pro-abortion vs pro-life? Most civil wars have two identifiable sides, but we appear to have a veritable smorgasbord to choose from. Happy days!
Another example of the left eating the left. Burns has always been strongly left-leaning to the detriment of some of his documentaries, imo. He was advocating bame causes before it was as fashionable as it is today. If they can come for him they can come for anyone.
Is that really the case? In his Civil War series he gave more time to Shelby Foote than any other interviewee. Foote seemed to be fairly partisan for the Confederates, or did I misunderstand?
Surely that was a case of giving someone enough rope to hang them-self. Shelby was a fantastic apologist for the South. He sucked you into the old lie that the War wasn’t about slavery but then cut the ground from under his own feet. It was entirely necessary to show the arguments for the Southern cause. It would have been much weaker as a documentary if it had been more one sided.
Claire D
2 years ago
I just wish more young documentary film makers, or old ones for that matter, would learn from Ken Burns’ example how to make outstanding documentaries instead of giving us the stuff they do across British TV.
Too right. At least Ken Burns focuses on the story, not vanity shots.
Last edited 2 years ago by Matt B
ralph bell
2 years ago
Yesterday Report: “American Families are not being torn apart” seems in direct contrast to this view of civil war being imminent. Surely this just shows how intellectuals, the media and political groups are creating a narrative that the main population are not following.
That’s interesting. Ken Burns is lately being questioned about whether it was right for him, as a white man, to produce a documentary about Muhammad Ali. Cultural appropriation and all that. His work for PBS is being questioned since he and his production company are too white, essentially. I recently listened to him defend himself in a radio interview and there was no amount of pushback on his part other than to say he hires minorities, etc. Basically, the knives are out for him and I think he sees it coming.
Black vs white? Terfs vs trans? Rich vs poor? Men vs women? Cancellers vs freedom-lovers? Muslims vs the rest? Pro-abortion vs pro-life? Most civil wars have two identifiable sides, but we appear to have a veritable smorgasbord to choose from. Happy days!
Rather like Syria, not that that’s any comfort.
Another example of the left eating the left. Burns has always been strongly left-leaning to the detriment of some of his documentaries, imo. He was advocating bame causes before it was as fashionable as it is today. If they can come for him they can come for anyone.
Is that really the case? In his Civil War series he gave more time to Shelby Foote than any other interviewee. Foote seemed to be fairly partisan for the Confederates, or did I misunderstand?
Surely that was a case of giving someone enough rope to hang them-self. Shelby was a fantastic apologist for the South. He sucked you into the old lie that the War wasn’t about slavery but then cut the ground from under his own feet. It was entirely necessary to show the arguments for the Southern cause. It would have been much weaker as a documentary if it had been more one sided.
I just wish more young documentary film makers, or old ones for that matter, would learn from Ken Burns’ example how to make outstanding documentaries instead of giving us the stuff they do across British TV.
Too right. At least Ken Burns focuses on the story, not vanity shots.
Yesterday Report: “American Families are not being torn apart” seems in direct contrast to this view of civil war being imminent. Surely this just shows how intellectuals, the media and political groups are creating a narrative that the main population are not following.