Today, Keir Starmer launched Labour’s agenda on constitutional reform, based on a report by Gordon Brown.
This won’t exactly solve Starmer’s dullness problem, but it does tackle a much more pressing need — which is for Labour to start unveiling some actual policies.
It is, at most, two years until the next general election. Furthermore, Starmer has had more than two years as Labour leader — enough time for him to clear his throat. With his party way ahead in the polls, voters want to know what Labour would do in power.
This, of course, is fraught with danger. There’s always a risk that original thinking will be poorly received — especially if the sums don’t add up. But, equally, having nothing to say stokes suspicions of cluelessness. So, new policy or no policy: it’s a dilemma. Or, at least, it would be if the Conservatives hadn’t provided Starmer with a way out.
Since 2010, the Tories in government have massively underinvested in policy development. Indeed, the policy landscape resembles an abandoned building site. While the show-homes, like Brexit, are more or less complete, the rest of the estate is a mud-splattered mess of half-finished construction, cracked walls and unpaved roads.
Admittedly, some of the worst of it was left behind by the previous set of cowboys. The fact that Gordon Brown drew-up today’s announcements is ironic, because constitutional reform under New Labour was badly bodged. For instance, the House of Lords was only half-reformed. As for devolution to Scotland and Wales, there was no balancing package of localism for England. As a result, a bizarre situation arose in which Scottish and Welsh MPs could vote on England-only matters, but not on policy areas devolved to Edinburgh, Cardiff and Stormont.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeDoes it really matter? After the past two Tory governments failing to deliver even the most modest, uncontroversial policy pledges, combined with Starmer’s tendency to shapeshift as surveys dictate, promises don’t count for much anymore especially coming from Labour. There’s little they could do if they wanted to lose the election. Settle in for another decade of aimless, meandering government folks.
Totally right. It is utter guff. Pure displacement activity to mask the fact that – like the battered aand meek Tory sheep – Labour subscribe to the identical politic dogma ; welfarism socialism identitarianism class envy and Rule by the non elected Technocracy he created. All diffusing actual power away from Parliament. Who cares what the squeaky silly men say or promise. Policy is determined by the Permanent State, aided and abetted by Human Rights and prigressive laws and enforced by the propagandists at the BBC. Small wonder we ignore them all.
You’re not one o’ dem defeatists are ye?
You’re not one o’ dem defeatists are ye?
So what you’re saying is: if Labour advance Tory policies they will still be wrong? If the Tories had done so it would have been right? Am I correct in thinking you might be anti-Labour matter what they do?
Yes but not long ago over a few pints a lot of us started to appreciate the leadership shown by Putin! What a shambles our establishment has become. I suggest the world and even closer to home has yet to credibly consign socialism to the bin.
Totally right. It is utter guff. Pure displacement activity to mask the fact that – like the battered aand meek Tory sheep – Labour subscribe to the identical politic dogma ; welfarism socialism identitarianism class envy and Rule by the non elected Technocracy he created. All diffusing actual power away from Parliament. Who cares what the squeaky silly men say or promise. Policy is determined by the Permanent State, aided and abetted by Human Rights and prigressive laws and enforced by the propagandists at the BBC. Small wonder we ignore them all.
So what you’re saying is: if Labour advance Tory policies they will still be wrong? If the Tories had done so it would have been right? Am I correct in thinking you might be anti-Labour matter what they do?
Yes but not long ago over a few pints a lot of us started to appreciate the leadership shown by Putin! What a shambles our establishment has become. I suggest the world and even closer to home has yet to credibly consign socialism to the bin.
Does it really matter? After the past two Tory governments failing to deliver even the most modest, uncontroversial policy pledges, combined with Starmer’s tendency to shapeshift as surveys dictate, promises don’t count for much anymore especially coming from Labour. There’s little they could do if they wanted to lose the election. Settle in for another decade of aimless, meandering government folks.
If Scotland leaves the UK, will we see the end of Gordon Brown?
Well, we Scots dinnae want him!
Well, we Scots dinnae want him!
If Scotland leaves the UK, will we see the end of Gordon Brown?
Scrap the Lords, don’t replace it. A second chamber will simply fill up with more unaccountable cronies and lead to even more paralysis. It will be a never ending example of the aftermath of the Brexit referendum, with elected government decision’s constantly stalled and challenged through unelected courts
Or just keep the Lords like sensible people.
It’s too far gone. Replaced unelected hereditary peers with unelected government cronies, amazingly they’ve actually made the shambles worse
That is my line.
Totally agree
That is my line.
Totally agree
It’s too far gone. Replaced unelected hereditary peers with unelected government cronies, amazingly they’ve actually made the shambles worse
Or just keep the Lords like sensible people.
Scrap the Lords, don’t replace it. A second chamber will simply fill up with more unaccountable cronies and lead to even more paralysis. It will be a never ending example of the aftermath of the Brexit referendum, with elected government decision’s constantly stalled and challenged through unelected courts