X Close

Just Stop Oil’s activism is turning into blackmail

Are climate activists holding society hostage? Credit: Getty

October 18, 2024 - 6:00pm

Is Just Stop Oil a protest group, or a protection racket? On Thursday the group published an “open letter” to the directors of the National Gallery, asking for a meeting. The letter came in response to one written by the National Museum Directors’ Council, begging the group to stop vandalising paintings in major galleries.

Just Stop Oil, founded in 2022, demands an end to new fossil fuel licences issued by the British Government. The group is notorious for a high-visibility and confrontational protest style with stunts including blocking roads and football games, occupying refineries, and vandalising beloved paintings in major art galleries. Recent such attacks have included Vincent van Gogh’s Sunflowers, John Constable’s The Hay Wain and Diego Velázquez’s Rokeby Venus.

The NMDC letter highlights the physical damage, staff and visitor distress, and — the point they are no doubt keenest to emphasise — harm to the overall mission of providing open access to great art that results from such vandalism. While the letter says “the world is in a very dark place”, suggesting its writers are sympathetic to the climate cause, it also warns that a result of such attacks is “greater barriers” between visitors and the artworks themselves.

JSO’s response describes the art vandals in heroic terms as “action takers” and “members of the public” that, implicitly, represent Britain’s silent majority. We are perhaps to assume that the kind of Middle Englanders who bring their kids up to town for a rare trip to a big museum have taken to vandalising the paintings when they do so. These heroes are, we learn, “unafraid to use the cultural power of their national institutions when those institutions fail to do so”. Or, in other words, they desire to commandeer institutions whose founding ideal was — however partially and problematically — universal good, in service to their specific ideological project.

The note itself promises “We’ll leave the soup at home” but conspicuously does not undertake to stop committing acts of vandalism. JSO declares only that the group has “some ideas” on how the National Gallery can “mitigate” its failure to behave, and think, in precisely the manner the group dictates. The overall tone is unmistakably that of a pirate or protection racketeer: nice art collection you have there, shame if something happened to it.

But this is obviously incompatible with an ideal of universal access which relies on high levels of civic trust. Never mind the supposed “woke capture” of cultural institutions; ideological piracy such as Just Stop Oil is now attempting can only result in the collapse of that ideal.

Should it succeed, it would inevitably result in other fringe groups attempting the same manoeuvre. Modern Britain is awash with ideological fringe groups, many of which have mutually contradictory aims. Very obviously, then, public art galleries cannot accede to every one of the ideological programmes that might threaten to vandalise public exhibitions if not obeyed. So the gallery has no option but to try and maintain at least a formal neutrality, in the interests of its founding mission. And this in turn means the would-be ideological pirates have no option but either to give up or keep attacking.

Given their zealotry, as the NMDC points out, the principal effect is less likely to be the National Gallery adopting climate alarmism à la JSO, than the demise of the gallery’s enabling social norm of trust in visitors’ orderly behaviour and respect for the exhibits. And since JSO’s response, this race to the bottom has already escalated. Shortly after JSO’s letter, the National Gallery announced new security measures banning visitors from bringing in liquids — a significant decline in the level of implicit trust placed in those who come to view the art.

Will one side or the other back down? This seems implausible, given their competing missions and ideological commitments. And if this is so, the endpoint of declining trust in the norms of public art appreciation is no more public art, and a narrowing of access to the world’s treasures to a pre-vetted elite. It is difficult to see how this would help prevent the extraction of fossil fuels.


Mary Harrington is a contributing editor at UnHerd.

moveincircles

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Graham Cunningham
Graham Cunningham
3 hours ago

Just Stop Oil has always been blackmail. The basic blackmail is this “accept that I am a very important person; an ‘activist’, a saviour of you mere ordinary people without my moral courage to save your selves…. Think I am important or else I will make a nuisance of myself”. And so on ad nauseam. A total narcissist in other words.

Last edited 3 hours ago by Graham Cunningham
Erik Hildinger
Erik Hildinger
2 hours ago

These JSO “heroes” are nothing of the kind. They don’t expect punishment, at least of any consequence. Here’s a cynical idea: why not set up a pillory at every major art gallery? The miscreants could be tackled by a crowd of angered art lovers and put in the pillory as a form of “performance art.”

Lancashire Lad
Lancashire Lad
2 hours ago
Reply to  Erik Hildinger

I like the idea. JSO are nothing if not performative; they should have no trouble in submitting themselves to the court of public opinion.
These days, galleries often have “post-it note” facilities for members of the public to stick onto a wall, in the name of ‘participation and inclusivity’. A similar facility next to the pillory could be utilised to good effect, i’m sure.

C C
C C
2 hours ago

Damian Hirst has been very quiet lately – can’t he just pickle a couple of JSO’s in a tank? It could look rather beautiful- the gaze of youthful fanaticism preserved for all eternity, blue hair waving gently in the formaldehyde like a delicate sea anemone. They are all about preservation, after all.

Bret Larson
Bret Larson
2 hours ago

Or they could throw them in jail until they see the light.

Erik Hildinger
Erik Hildinger
2 hours ago

These JSO “heroes” are nothing of the kind. They don’t expect punishment, at least of any consequence. Here’s a cynical idea: why not set up a pillory at every major art gallery? The miscreants could be tackled by a crowd of angered art lovers and put in the pillory as a form of “performance art.”

Buck Rodgers
Buck Rodgers
17 minutes ago

Why are these clowns taken seriously? Just hit them with a stick and tell them to eff off. Yet another thing I don’t understand.