Perhaps no issue has damaged the Biden presidency more than the massive incursions of undocumented migrants across the border. Barely a quarter approve of his handling of the issue — a lower figure than those pertaining to the economy, foreign policy, crime or climate.
Biden might wish to familiarise himself with how the pushback against uncontrolled immigration has contributed to Right-wing victories in the Netherlands, Italy, Denmark, Germany and, perhaps soon, France as well. The stunning victory of anti-Islam Dutch politician Geert Wilders, whose election may have benefitted from pro-Palestine protests after 7 October, was seen as validation. Recent riots in Dublin suggest a similar sentiment emerging in Ireland too.
Democrats should take note of how an uncontrolled border plays straight into Donald Trump’s re-election bid, and how it is boosting his popularity — including among legal immigrants. A third of Democrats and a majority of all voters even favour reducing legal immigration. Given these realities, it would make total sense for the President to reach over to his much-castigated “MAGA” opponents and cut a deal to increase enforcement in exchange for approval of aid to Ukraine and Israel.
Yet the President will first have to steel himself against relentlessly yammering progressives, who essentially favour open borders. His ties to the Left are already strained over his stance on Israel, and he has to weigh their support, particularly if he faces a determined challenge from the likes of Cornell West and Jill Stein. These well-placed challengers will likely fight border controls until the bitter end.
At the same time, Biden’s border policy is increasingly unpopular, even among traditional Democratic constituencies. This is true in most deep-blue cities which have embraced “sanctuary” status. In New York, Mayor Eric Adams has claimed that further in-migration “will destroy” a city that has long been identified with the immigrant experience. Chicago, and even ultra-liberal Boston, have also experienced increased pushback against illegal migrants, including from African-American residents.
Much of this has to do with underlying economics. In New York alone, the costs are projected to reach into the billions. The expenses are likely to grow as more undocumented people, many of them indigent, tap into the welfare state. In California, the move to provide medical services to undocumented migrants between 26 and 49 will cost the state $1.2 billion from the general fund — one that already suffers a severe deficit. No surprise, then, that some cities, New York being one, are looking for ways to send them elsewhere.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe“energy, entrepreneurship and cultural richness brought by newcomers remains critical”
The people pouring over the border are from failed states and failed cultures. They are from some of the most violent, corrupt, conflict ridden parts of the World.
Among them will be a sizeable number of terrorists, serious criminals, and cartel members ready to spread out their violent criminal networks throughout the US.
Their sheer numbers means that they will not have the same incentive to integrate as previous generations of immigrants had, and rather than cultural richness, the more likely result will be individual, ghettoised mono cultures.
“Energy, entrepreneurship and cultural richness…” should be brought in through controlled, legal immigration from cultures that are compatible with a modern Western democracy.
However the precipitous deterioration in the USA, both economically and socially – of which mass uncontrolled immigration of low skilled people in to a welfare state is a substantial contributing factor – is making the US an increasingly unattractive choice for the high quality migrants the author describes.
Is the current President anything more than a puppet of the yammering progressives of the Obama era? If he is their puppet there is little hope of change unless the puppeteers change their views.
And from observation the response of yammering progressives is to double down on their opinions whenever they are challenged by events.
‘With Western workforces declining and birthrates falling, the need for the energy, entrepreneurship and cultural richness brought by newcomers remains critical.’
Translation – we need people who will have large families.
Lat week I read a great post on twitter, the post pointed out that open borders was quantitative easing, but with people
It’s the dumbest social/economic idea ever
Yes, pretend to briefly change course right before election season just so you can reverse it again right afterwards. No one will ever see through that plan.
Every leftist who is against borders has a front door to her house, with a nice strong lock. It’s YOUR house that she is so generously giving away. YOUR money that should be spent on the poor. Leftists in political office spend their time giving away the money of the citizens to other people. It’s so easy to be generous with other people’s things. 😉
Dems like Chris Murphy, who were all in favour of open borders until their backhanders from the military-industrial complex in the form of Ukraine aid was threatened, make me laugh.
If there is one thing President Biden is good at , it is working with people on the opposite side of the House. He spent decades doing just that before becoming President.
As the President said in his inaugural address ‘“We must end this uncivil war that pits red against blue.” ‘