X Close

JD Vance could be the first Very Online vice president

The poster boy for posters. Credit: Getty

July 18, 2024 - 8:30pm

Much of America recognises J.D. Vance as the self-identified hillbilly who loves his mom and Mamaw, an image he has played up to at this week’s Republican National Convention. But for a certain corner of the millennial internet, he’s either one of them — their guy — or an enemy. And his social media presence is the reason behind this.

Like anyone thrust into the public spotlight, the newly announced Republican vice-presidential nominee’s public social media has been put under the microscope. Everyone has something to say about how he posts and who he follows. Some even have things to say about who he doesn’t follow, after this week misunderstanding a viral meme where gimmick and anonymous accounts posted fake screenshots claiming Vance followed them on X.

When he first gained national attention for his social media presence, many commentators viewed it as a liability. The New York Times‘s Frank Bruni characterised Vance’s online behaviour as a “descent” into the “muck” of modern politics. “Vance has devolved further,” Bruni wrote, citing his online description of Times columnist Paul Krugman as “one of many weird cat ladies who have too much power in our country”. Similarly, The Nation asserted that “J.D. Vance’s bad tweets explain modern conservatism.”

So the consensus in elite media circles seems to be that Vance’s online presence was representative of a brain rot unique to the Information Age. Gone was the intellectual “working-class whisperer” who had published the best-selling memoir Hillbilly Elegy; now a crass, embittered “shitposter” remained in his stead.

However, this framing of Vance’s internet persona as a detriment to his political career and, crucially, to his character, is out of touch. The Ohio Senator’s internet presence might have been “distasteful” to progressive commentators, and even some on the Right, but candidness on social media is the lingua franca of younger generations. If Hillbilly Elegy put him on the map, social media kept him there.

Really, Vance’s online presence is an asset. The truth is that the VP nominee’s occasional forays into “shitposting” such as the easter eggs on his X profile and his references to writers beloved of the online Right such as Curtis Yarvin are not signs of cultural decline. Rather, they are evidence that we’ve fully transitioned from the era of television to social media.

To be fluent in the language of the internet is the modern equivalent of playing the saxophone on Arsenio Hall, signalling a generational shift as millennials ascend to positions of power in American politics. The rise of politicians who are unafraid to call people “cat ladies” is a natural progression in this new landscape.

This trend is not totally new, nor is it limited to one side of the political aisle — think of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s relationship with the “Very Online” millennial Left. Vance simply represents its crescendo. The internet and its myriad subcultures are not somehow separate from real life, but part of real life. Politicians like Vance are not merely using the internet: they are of the internet, embodying its culture and norms, even implicitly. This integration of online and offline personas represents a seismic shift in political communication.

It is also not simply a tool to reach new constituents, whether they adopt you as a meme as they did with Trump, or you attempt to reach them via the same approach as with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’s disastrous campaign. Instead, it is an integral part of candidates’ identity and appeal.

Many of us spend huge swathes of our day online, even if we’re not posters or we aren’t actively part of any particular “scene”. As millennials increasingly occupy positions of power, we should expect to see more candidates who have the trappings of those aware of and enmeshed in internet culture.


Katherine Dee is a writer. To read more of her work, visit defaultfriend.substack.com.

default_friend

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
T Bone
T Bone
1 month ago

The rule is that the Political Right is supposed to remain stuck in 2007 or 2011. Any adjustments adapting to modernity are obvious signs of Autocracy.

A good Republican would allow the Left to create new rules of conduct. The good Republican of 2011 must accept his role as a backwards, homophobic war criminal that will put “y’all back in chains” while keeping “binders of women.” He will be construed as a bad person but as controlled opposition, he shall be allowed to exist amongst polite society.

El Uro
El Uro
1 month ago
Reply to  T Bone

Be careful! There is no “sarcasm” emoji in the Internet 🙂

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
1 month ago

You gotta love someone who says this; “… his online description of Times columnist Paul Krugman as “one of many weird cat ladies who have too much power in our country”.

Hugh Bryant
Hugh Bryant
1 month ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

I think his characterisation of Krugman takes flattery to an absurd extreme.