So this is ok on YouTube, but PayPal won’t let you pay for joining the Free Speech Union?
Samir Iker
1 year ago
Didnt read the last paragraph properly, but this is sickening.
“It should come as a relief, then, that the majority of British Muslims reject these activists ”
If you had members of the White majority form grooming gangs targeting minority girls with impunity, carry out terror attacks on muslim mosques, join white Christian militia that murdered non Christians and form mobs and attack minority homes at the least provocation…..
Would you be making feeble excuses like this?
hayden eastwood
1 year ago
The problem, according to the British authorities, and even under a conservative leadership, is the response to Islamic fundamentalism, not the Islamic fundamentalism itself.
As such, they are quick to arrest figures like Tommy Robinson, but slow to arrest the grooming gangs and sharia clerics that brought him into existence.
I would expect that from labour but, in theory, not from a conservative government.
You would think that a conservative government would prioritise British values and law and order over Sharia law.
David Graham
1 year ago
When will the LGBTQZ+ Thoughtpolice get to work its rainbow magic on these displays of Toxic Masculinity?
Last edited 1 year ago by David Graham
Milton Gibbon
1 year ago
The number of followers and likes somewhat coflicts with the last paragraph which is trying to say that they have no support among British muslims. The fact that people went into Leicester from farther afield i.e. weren’t locals, is being rolled out in the media as mitigation when I would have thought it more concerning than if it was just a local fracas.
Secondly, more to the editors, can we get some ideas of the things that have happened to bring this to a head? In every media report it says issues have been simmering from either before or after a cricket match. The only thing that I have read has been Muslims burning and tearing down flags and reacting to social media reports that a muslim girl has been abducted by a group of hindu men which imams, police have confirmed is false. What are the hindu side meant to have done (looling for actions here, not speech)? That is the truly unheard voice and one that I would like to hear.
Thurdly, while it might be irresponsible is an unheard writer really criticising the free speech of these muslim personalities just because he disagrees with them? Calling another group “weak” and “cowardly”? You’ll hear worse on the terraces at the Emirates! Hardly the worst cases of extremism the writer could have used- I assume the stuff said about hindus/jews/Zionists is just the tip of the iceberg but why censor it if they have said worse?
‘What are the hindu side meant to have done”
Just what Hindus did in Pakistan: reduced to 1 % of the population, blasphemy laws, young Hindu girls being (legally, as per Pakistani law) abducted and converted.
Just what Hindus did in Bangladesh: hundreds of thousands raped and murdered in 1971
Just what Hindus did in Kashmir in 1990: wiped out completely by muslim “freedom fighters” .
Just being Hindu, being “unbelievers”, is enough reason.
Apparently, there was an incident between Indian and Pakistani cricket fans.
Turns out, Indian Hindu mobs did not then go on a rampage through muslim areas, they did not desecrate muslim mosques or attack random muslims.
“Calling another group “weak” and “cowardly”? You’ll hear worse on the terraces at the Emirates!”
True. Haven’t heard Arsenal fans commit terror attacks on Spurs fans following those chants though.
It takes a special kind of myopia to simply view events in Leicester as just events in Leicester. They are bringing together large numbers of people across the region, and follow a pattern of incidents over decades.
I think we are well versed in what cultural imperialism is after 2 decades of magic rainbow teaching. Well, a new imperialist culture arrived in town a while ago and it is now flexing its muscles. It is vigorous, comfortable with violence, has demographics on its side and our public guardians avoid any criticism of it.
Last edited 1 year ago by Nell Clover
John Hughes
1 year ago
We’re royally screwed, throw a supply chain / global food crises into the mix which ratchets up tensions even further (this isn’t even counting nationalist utube / bitchube / odessy and rumble channels) then the whole fracking world is a tinderbox
Samitto
1 year ago
The last paragraph is exactly what Islamists have succeeded in arm twisting western thinkers into writing, pinning the responsibility of presenting Muslims as moderates on the observers and not the observed i.e. the people who follow the religion and how they operate in society (both as majority and minority depending on the country, and what rights they give non-Muslims when in majority); not just the interpersonal relations which most people would attest are cordial, but a very conspicuous tacit backing of political Islam which has far reaching ambitions that most democratic and secular countries are only waking up to. Breeding inordinately is not an innocent custom but stems from the idea of expansionism that their politics actively nurtures. India (infer Hindus) has had a millennium of experience of dealing with political Islam. West ignores her lessons and lampoons her struggle at its own peril.
So this is ok on YouTube, but PayPal won’t let you pay for joining the Free Speech Union?
Didnt read the last paragraph properly, but this is sickening.
“It should come as a relief, then, that the majority of British Muslims reject these activists ”
If you had members of the White majority form grooming gangs targeting minority girls with impunity, carry out terror attacks on muslim mosques, join white Christian militia that murdered non Christians and form mobs and attack minority homes at the least provocation…..
Would you be making feeble excuses like this?
The problem, according to the British authorities, and even under a conservative leadership, is the response to Islamic fundamentalism, not the Islamic fundamentalism itself.
As such, they are quick to arrest figures like Tommy Robinson, but slow to arrest the grooming gangs and sharia clerics that brought him into existence.
The authorities in Labour-run Northern cities have for two decades acted as accessories to anti-white racist paedophilia.
I would expect that from labour but, in theory, not from a conservative government.
You would think that a conservative government would prioritise British values and law and order over Sharia law.
When will the LGBTQZ+ Thoughtpolice get to work its rainbow magic on these displays of Toxic Masculinity?
The number of followers and likes somewhat coflicts with the last paragraph which is trying to say that they have no support among British muslims. The fact that people went into Leicester from farther afield i.e. weren’t locals, is being rolled out in the media as mitigation when I would have thought it more concerning than if it was just a local fracas.
Secondly, more to the editors, can we get some ideas of the things that have happened to bring this to a head? In every media report it says issues have been simmering from either before or after a cricket match. The only thing that I have read has been Muslims burning and tearing down flags and reacting to social media reports that a muslim girl has been abducted by a group of hindu men which imams, police have confirmed is false. What are the hindu side meant to have done (looling for actions here, not speech)? That is the truly unheard voice and one that I would like to hear.
Thurdly, while it might be irresponsible is an unheard writer really criticising the free speech of these muslim personalities just because he disagrees with them? Calling another group “weak” and “cowardly”? You’ll hear worse on the terraces at the Emirates! Hardly the worst cases of extremism the writer could have used- I assume the stuff said about hindus/jews/Zionists is just the tip of the iceberg but why censor it if they have said worse?
‘What are the hindu side meant to have done”
Just what Hindus did in Pakistan: reduced to 1 % of the population, blasphemy laws, young Hindu girls being (legally, as per Pakistani law) abducted and converted.
Just what Hindus did in Bangladesh: hundreds of thousands raped and murdered in 1971
Just what Hindus did in Kashmir in 1990: wiped out completely by muslim “freedom fighters” .
Just being Hindu, being “unbelievers”, is enough reason.
Apparently, there was an incident between Indian and Pakistani cricket fans.
Turns out, Indian Hindu mobs did not then go on a rampage through muslim areas, they did not desecrate muslim mosques or attack random muslims.
“Calling another group “weak” and “cowardly”? You’ll hear worse on the terraces at the Emirates!”
True. Haven’t heard Arsenal fans commit terror attacks on Spurs fans following those chants though.
Read this by the same writer and see how he is over egging the hindutva terrorist angle. There is a desperate wish for non-islamic terrorism.
https://thecritic.co.uk/how-indian-politics-fuels-violence-in-leicester/
It takes a special kind of myopia to simply view events in Leicester as just events in Leicester. They are bringing together large numbers of people across the region, and follow a pattern of incidents over decades.
I think we are well versed in what cultural imperialism is after 2 decades of magic rainbow teaching. Well, a new imperialist culture arrived in town a while ago and it is now flexing its muscles. It is vigorous, comfortable with violence, has demographics on its side and our public guardians avoid any criticism of it.
We’re royally screwed, throw a supply chain / global food crises into the mix which ratchets up tensions even further (this isn’t even counting nationalist utube / bitchube / odessy and rumble channels) then the whole fracking world is a tinderbox
The last paragraph is exactly what Islamists have succeeded in arm twisting western thinkers into writing, pinning the responsibility of presenting Muslims as moderates on the observers and not the observed i.e. the people who follow the religion and how they operate in society (both as majority and minority depending on the country, and what rights they give non-Muslims when in majority); not just the interpersonal relations which most people would attest are cordial, but a very conspicuous tacit backing of political Islam which has far reaching ambitions that most democratic and secular countries are only waking up to. Breeding inordinately is not an innocent custom but stems from the idea of expansionism that their politics actively nurtures. India (infer Hindus) has had a millennium of experience of dealing with political Islam. West ignores her lessons and lampoons her struggle at its own peril.
Not my problem. Bourgeois liberal problem .