Subscribe
Notify of
guest

16 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael McElwee
Michael McElwee
11 months ago

Students in America are taught what think, not how to think. At many of the elite schools, the cost of such an “education” is $92,000 per year. Is it any wonder that many are taking a pass?

Simon S
Simon S
11 months ago

Yes they are indeed taught what rather than how to think – as part of their being funnel-filtered into the most lucrative and powerful jobs. They are being trained to belong to the elite. Yet it is my impression that in relative terms there are fewer of those lucrative and powerful jobs than there used to be, and that unless a degree comes from a top 25 school it will count for less and less.

Simon S
Simon S
11 months ago

Yes they are indeed taught what rather than how to think – as part of their being funnel-filtered into the most lucrative and powerful jobs. They are being trained to belong to the elite. Yet it is my impression that in relative terms there are fewer of those lucrative and powerful jobs than there used to be, and that unless a degree comes from a top 25 school it will count for less and less.

Michael McElwee
Michael McElwee
11 months ago

Students in America are taught what think, not how to think. At many of the elite schools, the cost of such an “education” is $92,000 per year. Is it any wonder that many are taking a pass?

Stephen Walsh
Stephen Walsh
11 months ago

It’s still concerning that 62% of American school leavers are put through that sh*t.

Stephen Walsh
Stephen Walsh
11 months ago

It’s still concerning that 62% of American school leavers are put through that sh*t.

AC Harper
AC Harper
11 months ago

Part of the attraction of college was that young men could experience ‘manly activities’ before they had to buckle down to earning a living. More recently young women could go to establish their credentials for earning a living.
Those experiences have been knocked askew by the collective ambitions of activists, often cutting across personal hopes and expectations of individuals.
Perhaps college numbers are falling because fewer wish to pay for someone else to indoctrinate them?

RM Parker
RM Parker
11 months ago
Reply to  AC Harper

I think your last sentence, in particular, hits the nail squarely on the head. College has been repurposed, to the detriment of all.

RM Parker
RM Parker
11 months ago
Reply to  AC Harper

I think your last sentence, in particular, hits the nail squarely on the head. College has been repurposed, to the detriment of all.

AC Harper
AC Harper
11 months ago

Part of the attraction of college was that young men could experience ‘manly activities’ before they had to buckle down to earning a living. More recently young women could go to establish their credentials for earning a living.
Those experiences have been knocked askew by the collective ambitions of activists, often cutting across personal hopes and expectations of individuals.
Perhaps college numbers are falling because fewer wish to pay for someone else to indoctrinate them?

Peter Johnson
Peter Johnson
11 months ago

I have two university degrees – but I went to great lengths to make sure my daughters understand they don’t have to go to university. If I had boys I would have pushed them hard towards the trades. Before you get upset – I think trades are too sexist an environment for women. My older daughter is going to a top university in Canada and I have to admit that I resent the amount of money I will have to pay for this given the diminishing returns we get from universities. As to men participating- why in God’s name would you want to spend your time and money at institutions that explicitly hate you? The interesting thing will be to see if women start dropping out due to declining male enrolment since – let’s face it – both genders traditionally went there in large part to find a spouse.

Last edited 11 months ago by Peter Johnson
polidori redux
polidori redux
11 months ago
Reply to  Peter Johnson

“let’s face it – both genders traditionally went there in large part to find a spouse.”
I went in order to get laid. The spouse bit was an accident.

Peter Johnson
Peter Johnson
11 months ago
Reply to  polidori redux

Despite best intentions one often leads to the other.

polidori redux
polidori redux
11 months ago
Reply to  Peter Johnson

If only I had known!

Kat L
Kat L
11 months ago
Reply to  polidori redux

LOL!

Last edited 11 months ago by Kat L
Kat L
Kat L
11 months ago
Reply to  polidori redux

LOL!

Last edited 11 months ago by Kat L
polidori redux
polidori redux
11 months ago
Reply to  Peter Johnson

If only I had known!

Peter Johnson
Peter Johnson
11 months ago
Reply to  polidori redux

Despite best intentions one often leads to the other.

Mônica
Mônica
11 months ago
Reply to  Peter Johnson

“In large part” to find a spouse? I somehow doubt it. There have always been cheaper and faster ways to find a suitable match, if you’re so inclined (most 17 year-olds aren’t, though).

Betsy Arehart
Betsy Arehart
11 months ago
Reply to  Peter Johnson

It used to be that women went to college to get their “MRS” degree.

polidori redux
polidori redux
11 months ago
Reply to  Peter Johnson

“let’s face it – both genders traditionally went there in large part to find a spouse.”
I went in order to get laid. The spouse bit was an accident.

Mônica
Mônica
11 months ago
Reply to  Peter Johnson

“In large part” to find a spouse? I somehow doubt it. There have always been cheaper and faster ways to find a suitable match, if you’re so inclined (most 17 year-olds aren’t, though).

Betsy Arehart
Betsy Arehart
11 months ago
Reply to  Peter Johnson

It used to be that women went to college to get their “MRS” degree.

Peter Johnson
Peter Johnson
11 months ago

I have two university degrees – but I went to great lengths to make sure my daughters understand they don’t have to go to university. If I had boys I would have pushed them hard towards the trades. Before you get upset – I think trades are too sexist an environment for women. My older daughter is going to a top university in Canada and I have to admit that I resent the amount of money I will have to pay for this given the diminishing returns we get from universities. As to men participating- why in God’s name would you want to spend your time and money at institutions that explicitly hate you? The interesting thing will be to see if women start dropping out due to declining male enrolment since – let’s face it – both genders traditionally went there in large part to find a spouse.

Last edited 11 months ago by Peter Johnson
Julian Farrows
Julian Farrows
11 months ago

DEI is an inescapable ‘fact’ at US colleges. It permeates every institutional nook and cranny. It’s a given that the US is systemically racist and transphobic, therefore the whole system must be replaced the self-proclaimed enlightened ones. I do wonder what kind of world they would create after viewing footage such as this: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=moWe3rk7LzQ&pp=ygUaU29jaWFsIGp1c3RpY2Ugbm8gY2xhcHBpbmc%3D

Andrew Raiment
Andrew Raiment
11 months ago
Reply to  Julian Farrows

That video never gets old, narcissism writ large.

Andrew Raiment
Andrew Raiment
11 months ago
Reply to  Julian Farrows

That video never gets old, narcissism writ large.

Julian Farrows
Julian Farrows
11 months ago

DEI is an inescapable ‘fact’ at US colleges. It permeates every institutional nook and cranny. It’s a given that the US is systemically racist and transphobic, therefore the whole system must be replaced the self-proclaimed enlightened ones. I do wonder what kind of world they would create after viewing footage such as this: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=moWe3rk7LzQ&pp=ygUaU29jaWFsIGp1c3RpY2Ugbm8gY2xhcHBpbmc%3D

Michael James
Michael James
11 months ago

What a wonderful unintended consequence of DEI, to reduce the number of graduates!

Michael James
Michael James
11 months ago

What a wonderful unintended consequence of DEI, to reduce the number of graduates!

Geoff Wilkes
Geoff Wilkes
11 months ago

“[A]nother reason Americans are saying ‘no’ to college might be the aggressive ideological project adopted throughout American higher education.”
And it might be that young Americans’ brains are controlled by aliens from the planet Zorc. But the author doesn’t offer any objective evidence about that either.
And I’m not sure that “college for all” means that *everyone* should go, or simply that everyone should have the *opportunity* to go if they wish.

Geoff Wilkes
Geoff Wilkes
11 months ago

“[A]nother reason Americans are saying ‘no’ to college might be the aggressive ideological project adopted throughout American higher education.”
And it might be that young Americans’ brains are controlled by aliens from the planet Zorc. But the author doesn’t offer any objective evidence about that either.
And I’m not sure that “college for all” means that *everyone* should go, or simply that everyone should have the *opportunity* to go if they wish.