X Close

Has Angela Merkel betrayed the United States?

Chancellor Angela Merkel and US President Joe Biden chew the cud in Cornwall. Credit: Getty

July 15, 2021 - 11:50am

Britain may think it has a special relationship with the USA, but Germany shares this ambition too. America has always held an irresistible pull for Germans. Just think all the way back to the 19th century, when German immigrants flocked West in their millions.

Today, 43 million US citizens describe themselves as having German ancestry. Helmut Schmidt, the vastly popular chancellor of West Germany from 1974-1982 once said that there would only be one other country he would choose to call home apart from his native Germany — the USA.

This special US-German relationship seems to have weathered the storm of the Trump era. There was a palpable sense of relief in Berlin when Joe Biden was elected to succeed the 45th President last year. Antony Blinken, the US secretary of state, enthusiastically declared on a Berlin visit last month: ‘I think it’s fair to say that the United States has no better partner, no better friend in the world than Germany.’ Now Angela Merkel is dining with Joe and Jill Biden at the White House during her last ever visit there as German chancellor. All is well.

Or is it? Behind the friendly smiles and warm words, tension has been brewing between the USA and Germany that transcends the Merkel-Trump animosities. A conflict of interest between Germany and the United States has grown in recent years. It’s part of a wider — and real — identity crisis: what kind of country does Germany want to be? Its geopolitical position in the centre of Europe has always made this a tricky question: East or West? The first German chancellor Otto von Bismarck experienced this headache trying to find a way forward for his newly created state, wedged between the great European powers of France, Britain and Russia. Famously he settled on the maxim: “The secret of politics? Make a good treaty with Russia.”

The German government seems to have taken a leaf out of the Iron Chancellor’s policy book. The controversial Russo-German gas pipeline Nord Stream 2, which is now nearly complete and sidelines the Eastern European nations, especially Ukraine, will make Germany ever more energy dependent on Russia. From Washington’s perspective this is a grave security risk.

Gerhard Schröder, Merkel’s predecessor as Chancellor has been entangled with the Russian energy company Gazprom and the Nord Stream project for years. Controversy was generated both in Germany, and in the US. (In 2005, the Washington Post described Schröder as a “sellout” due to his decision to work for Gazprom.)

But somehow nobody raised an eyebrow when Merkel’s government declared an end to nuclear energy in Germany following the Fukushima disaster of 2011. Having begun to phase out fossil fuels, particularly in the huge soft brown coal fields in North-Rhine Westphalia, in previous years, Germany is now in a position where its energy supply dictates its foreign policy.

In addition to Nord Stream 2, Merkel also pushed European investment deals with China without consulting Germany’s Western friends and Allies. This was an affront to the new Biden Administration as a deal was struck in December, before the new President had even been inaugurated.

The tone of Merkel’s visit to Washington may be friendly and congratulatory, but this is an easy diplomatic feat given that the German chancellor will be retiring in September. Merkel’s successor has serious geo-strategic thinking to do. The interests of the central-European states and the West are drifting further and further apart.

Germany is rapidly running out of fences to sit on.


Katja Hoyer is a German-British historian and writer. She is the author, most recently, of Beyond the Wall: East Germany, 1949-1990.

hoyer_kat

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
J Bryant
J Bryant
3 years ago

Viewing Europe, particularly the EU nations, from across the pond, my sense is there’s the beginning of what I might call a psychological Brexit–a gradual detachment from the spirit of the EU.
Europe was clearly troubled by the election of Trump and I think Europeans are now very wary of toxic US identity politics infecting other Western countries. They are gradually drifting away from US influence and I can’t say I blame them.
My sense is EU members don’t necessarily want to destroy the EU but they want to find some way of asserting some level of national control (and perhaps identity) within the confines of the EU. So we’ll see more deals, like Nord Stream 2, driven by national, not EU, interest and a gradual weakening of the alliance. Maybe that’s not a bad thing for either the individual countries or the future stability of the EU.

Matt B
Matt B
3 years ago
Reply to  J Bryant

Fair points. But EU relations with Russia, although potentially improvable by such unilateral detente, will also be subjected at any point to Moscow’s whim. Whim has entered US-EU relations too, but there are more remedy options for crises.

Last edited 3 years ago by Matt B
Prashant Kotak
Prashant Kotak
3 years ago
Reply to  J Bryant

And fitting in with this slow mutual US-EU detachment, it looks to me, is the unspoken European desire to reach an accomodation with China, and that is much easier if they also reach an accomodation Russia. The European nations, apart from the UK are less wary of China then I would expect, and even the UK, though wary, wants to continue doing business with China – as recent messaging out of the government here shows on the back of the recent breakdown of City access to EU markets negotiations with the EU. I personally think this European stance is naive, but what do I know.

Matt B
Matt B
3 years ago
Reply to  Prashant Kotak

Indeed

Mark Falcoff
Mark Falcoff
3 years ago

It is high time for the US to withdraw all military forces from Germany and expel Germany from NATO. Nothing personal. It will give the country its independence back, and relieve the United States of the burden of an unwanted alliance.

Hardee Hodges
Hardee Hodges
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark Falcoff

Trump desperately tried to withdraw. The huge military hospital would hold some of that back, but Trump wanted the rest to move to Poland. At least the Poles were pro-American whilst the Germans have largely decided being anti-American was cool. Perhaps resentment at being saved many years ago brought back memories or perhaps being criticized for not really wanting to actually use weapons in Afghanistan as a NATO member hurt feelings. Or perhaps being the EU strongman wanted the US out of the way. Who knows what the future will bring with new governments all around.

Matt B
Matt B
3 years ago

There is a wider eastward drift among EU states, and not all of them former Warsaw Pact. Russian-influenced votes may stack up in EU institutions against less-aligned state interests. The question of adherence to Art 5 raised by the (removed?) comment is pertinent.

Last edited 3 years ago by Matt B
Ian Barton
Ian Barton
3 years ago

Interesting article, but to say ….
nobody raised an eyebrow when Merkel’s government declared an end to nuclear energy in Germany following the Fukushima disaster of 2011.”
…. is way off the mark.
It was roundly criticised as both an environmental and strategic political error.

Andrew McDonald
Andrew McDonald
3 years ago
Reply to  Ian Barton

The decision to phase out nuclear power was taken under Schroeder’s govt in 2000, not by Merkel in 2011. Fukushima just brought forward the plans already in place.

Earl King
Earl King
3 years ago

I’ve posited this for a decade. No way Germany supports Article 5 if Russia walks in to Estonia or any of Baltic States. I am only slightly less concerned if Russia invades Poland. Germany is not ever going to war.