X Close

Guardian ‘Britishcore’ list captures UK’s imperial decline

Empire of Twee. Credit: Getty

September 19, 2024 - 4:15pm

Modern Britain is functionally a vassal state of her erstwhile colony, the United States. Stagnant, sclerotic, and ideologically schizophrenic, its downwardly-mobile middle class has set out to square the circle of grandiose self-image and declinist reality by reimagining the “stiff upper lip” style of imperial “Britishness” in toy-poodle form, as “Britishcore” twee.

This development arguably began in earnest with Blair’s “Cool Britannia”. But twee reached a new nadir yesterday with a Guardian listicle celebrating experiences that supposedly “define and unite modern Britons”. Though perhaps inadvertently, it captured the middle-class mood of defeatism to a T: “Britishcore” aestheticises learned helplessness, emotional impotence, and both individual and collective downward mobility as — somehow — sources of unity and national celebration.

The modern stereotype of the English as a people of “stiff upper lip” has its origins in the Victorian invention of “fair play”. The typical pre-Victorian Englishman was a very different creature: hearty, sentimental, and often roaringly, drunkenly violent. It was Britain’s 19th-century imperial hegemony that prompted the turn toward self-restraint, which, in context, expressed something akin to noblesse oblige.

A century on from the beginning of the end of that status, though, the stiff upper lip has lost its hard-power edge. Today, it serves largely as a cutesy means of rationalising Britain’s modern impotence. The ne plus ultra of this register was once Richard Curtis films, a sensibility later distilled into the “Very British Problems” X account. This outlet — and now book — generally focuses on themes of repressed emotion, bad food, and cups of tea, while studiously avoiding any mention of the problems that actually afflict our floundering post-imperial rump Britannia. For instance, every political issue downstream of the conviction — pervasive among the Guardian listicle class — that we should make up for the Empire by having no border control at all.

Dylan B Jones’s listicle fetishises cheap ready meals, telly, overpriced drinks, provincial origins in the “Malvern Hills Massif”, wincing at the cost of a classic posho staycation in Cornwall, and keeping up some semblance of Sloaney appearances with “the Barbour jacket you got for a fiver at Oxfam”, while finding ways to express class snobbery indirectly, such as “carefully avoiding eye contact with your neighbour who just bought an XL Bully”. These are less evocative of some universally shared experiences that “define and unite modern Britons” than the type of daily indignities suffered by expensively-educated young adults, waking up to the reality that (say) freelance journalism does not, in fact, support the lifestyle to which their ancestors were accustomed — but whose expensively-inculcated progressive politics do not permit nostalgia for the British ascendancy that did.

In other words: this listicle is intended as a light-hearted, rueful piece at which the reader can smile in recognition. But unless the author is playing a more sophisticated Straussian game than is typical of its publisher’s output, its revelations are mostly inadvertent. Whether or not the author went to public school, the listicle strongly suggests at least an implied readership that did. One that, since leaving school, is now trapped both by the ingrained reflex of the stiff upper lip and that of economic decline, such that the only way to express any feeling at all about the grim realities of downward mobility is through a heavily-ironised and cringingly twee “man of the people” act, which apes a working class they do not understand and secretly despise.

If the unedifying spectacle of “Britishcore” tells us anything, it’s that it’s time to kill off the stiff upper lip. Today, Ozymandias-like, nothing remains of this but two vast and trunkless legs of twee: a mode of emotional self-sabotage our declining fortunes can ill afford. Let us instead return to those older modes of Englishness that the stiff upper lip supplanted, and that twee now prohibits. Let us, for example, abandon “fair play” for Shrovetide football. And let’s, for pity’s sake, bin the twee ressentiment of “Britishcore” for the unforced warmth, cheerful graft, and colossal 5am breakfasts of the real eternal Anglo: Thomas Skinner. Bosh.


Mary Harrington is a contributing editor at UnHerd.

moveincircles

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David L
David L
5 hours ago

As is any sane person gives a fcuk what the Guatdian and its bigoted trustafarian readers think about anything.

Lancashire Lad
Lancashire Lad
3 hours ago

The word “twee” – is it used anywhere else in the world, apart from the UK? Brits know instinctively what it means, and i can recall the outbreak of the Beatles/Stones being the perfect antidote to that kind of mood in the 60s.
That’s a long time ago now, but surely people aren’t still clinging onto the post-imperial schtick more than half a century, punk and Britpop later?
I strongly suspect this is an attempt by the Guardian to deflect and distract from the real problems we face. It has the same tenor of serious misjudgement as the misjudgement that was applied to those who voted for Brexit.
I’d advise against taking the slightest bit of notice of this rubbish. To anyone reading from outside the UK, this really is not what the majority of the population are about.

Christopher Barclay
Christopher Barclay
2 hours ago

The stiff upper lip existed when no one was a victim not even if you worked down a mine in the dark or were mangled by a factory machine or the odds of getting back to Blightly from the colonies alive was 100 to 1 against. It is the antithesis of the victim culture that the Guardian champions.

Claire Grey
Claire Grey
4 hours ago

I doubt whether this Guardian article has any relevance to most people in this country at all.

Robbie K
Robbie K
4 hours ago

My initial reaction to Mary’s article was to ask if she had a couple of teaspoons of cynicism with her cup of Earl Grey. However after skip reading the Guardian piece it entirely deserves to be completely ignored or trampled on like an offensive cockroach.

Katharine Eyre
Katharine Eyre
3 hours ago

What it captured is that:
A. 20 years after leaving Britain, I have no clue about 80% of the references in the list. Who are all these people/things? Am I now a Brit Of The Past?
B. I’m also old…because I do say “Dishy Rishi” which would make me an embarrassing mum (if I had kids).

Hmm.

Last edited 3 hours ago by Katharine Eyre
B. Timothy S.
B. Timothy S.
2 hours ago

“carefully avoiding eye contact with your neighbour who just bought an XL Bully”

This of course would also apply to the victims of grooming gangs as well as terroristic violence. Not to mention women assaulted by men pretending to be women.

Instead, the Guardian would have you direct any anger at a tiny country in the Levant. Ignore your own decline. Blame the Jews instead.

Graham Cunningham
Graham Cunningham
3 hours ago

The

Last edited 1 hour ago by Graham Cunningham