Not only does the lack of scrutiny risk wasting resources but there are also the side effects to consider.
joao.amadera
4 years ago
Spot-on. If you look for more than 20 outcomes, by chance one of them will give you the results you want…
johntshea2
4 years ago
$4,300 per dose? Hydroxychloroquine costs 63 cents a tablet, actually works, and is being mass-produced and used all over the world. So, the choice is obvious! Remdesivir! Oh, wait…
By the way, it’s not really an “Ebola drug” since it’s pretty useless against that too.
This article is so very useful, I did think reducing treatment time by a few days was not that significant but had not thought that probably the effect on mortality had been deliberately not used. This needs to be explained to WHO and others who in good faith waste public money I was aware that drug companies did not always behave ethically, sometimes buying up research results that were unfavourable, In the middle of a world wide pandemic I am saddened that this can happen.
Not only does the lack of scrutiny risk wasting resources but there are also the side effects to consider.
Spot-on. If you look for more than 20 outcomes, by chance one of them will give you the results you want…
$4,300 per dose? Hydroxychloroquine costs 63 cents a tablet, actually works, and is being mass-produced and used all over the world. So, the choice is obvious! Remdesivir!
Oh, wait…
By the way, it’s not really an “Ebola drug” since it’s pretty useless against that too.
Except it doesn’t work.
https://www.bmj.com/content…
This article is so very useful, I did think reducing treatment time by a few days was not that significant but had not thought that probably the effect on mortality had been deliberately not used. This needs to be explained to WHO and others who in good faith waste public money
I was aware that drug companies did not always behave ethically, sometimes buying up research results that were unfavourable, In the middle of a world wide pandemic I am saddened that this can happen.