The Iran-US conflict seems to have cooled down already, with the Islamic Republic doing the equivalent of firing over its opponent’s head by deliberately avoiding US troops in their retaliatory attack.
If it had led to widespread conflict (and I don’t think it ever was going to), then it would have been caused, or at least aggravated by, social media.
Qassem Soleimani had been an enemy of the United States for many years, but things heated up after the Iranian general posted a message on Instagram message threatening the US, leading the deranged American president to respond with an all-caps tweet: “NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE.”
After this Soleimani posted a mocked-up picture of himself outside an exploding White House in a rather Boratesque-looking movie of his imagination, leading Trump to tweet a Game of Thrones-themed pic of himself with “Sanctions are Coming”.
The relationship between the two enemies had deteriorated so badly by last summer that the Iranian government publicly suggested that “The White House is afflicted by mental retardation”.
If this all sounds like a childish playground dispute almost led two countries to war, then the converse argument is that social media helped prevent the conflict escalating.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe