Kamala Harris’s defeat this week presents a fork in the road for Democrats, who must now choose whether to embrace economic populism and moderate on social issues, or double down on their neoliberal strategy.
The Democratic elite, including Barack and Michelle Obama and Bill and Hillary Clinton, seemed inclined to stay on the current course in the immediate aftermath of the election. The Obama and Clinton statements praised the Harris campaign and made no acknowledgement of the party’s failure to win over working-class Americans. The Obamas called Harris and running mate Tim Walz “extraordinary public servants who ran a remarkable campaign”, and suggested they lost due to factors outside their control — namely, the Covid-19 pandemic and inflation. “Those conditions have created headwinds for democratic incumbents around the world, and last night showed that America is not immune,” their statement read.
Harris suggested the party should double down in her concession speech. “While I concede this election, I do not concede the fight that fuelled this campaign — the fight for freedom, for opportunity, for fairness, and the dignity of all people,” she said, along with references to abortion and democracy, two issues the campaign hammered which ultimately failed to persuade voters.
Those responses suggest a commitment to the current state of affairs on the Left, where Democrats have chosen to focus on social justice issues rather than economics. Democratic strategist David Axelrod, for instance, praised the Haris campaign and blamed racism and sexism for her loss — issues the candidate herself previously denied played a role in the election.
White women in particular have become a favourite target for blame from this camp of Democrats, much like in 2016. North Carolina state Sen. Sydney Batch called for white women to “dig deep and figure out why they, to this day, given all Donald Trump’s sexism, all of his racism, is still the person they voted for over Harris”, calling this demographic’s support for the former president “dumbfounding.” Joy Reid of MSNBC also blamed white women for Harris’ loss, and complained that this group missed their second opportunity to “change the way that they interact with the patriarchy” by voting for a woman president.
The argument is reminiscent of the response to the Democratic defeat in 2016. Then, Hillary Clinton blamed sexism for the result, while mainstream media outlets widely cast Trump’s supporters as both racist and sexist.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe“Democrats in general need …listening to the American people” – The most brilliant idea I’ve ever heard!
Can’t argue with the Obama and Clinton Statements. Harris and Walz were Extraordinary, and their campaign was definitely Remarkable. Perhaps the way I interpret those words within the context of the statements differs slightly though.
It seems extraordinary. When a party is so unpopular that the electorate chose someone like Trump ahead of them surely the thought must cross their minds that they’ve been doing something wrong?
I have the impression that the Tories in the UK know they have to face up to a tough re-evaluation of their policies and it’s possible they’ll offer us something better in a few year. I don’t see that the left is capable of that