I find all of this quite distasteful. While I’m in not in favour of Russia’s invasion treating Russian people and companies like they are an enemy power rubs me the wrong way. We haven’t declared war and yet we’re taking economic measures like those of a hostile country. How does ruining the career of a famous composer for refusing compelled speech against his own country make sense? People are becoming shockingly illiberal in their supposed defence of the liberal Ukraine.
I agree. While companies are free to boycott products and source it from elsewhere if they wish, as is the case with the vodka in the bars, the banning of the formula 1 driver and composer appears to be punishing normal Russian citizens for the crimes committed by Putin
Presumably the theory is that the composers and F 1 drivers of Russia will rise up in anguish and force Putin to reverse his invasion. Does that sound like a credible strategy?
It is weird the degree of Russophobia that has become acceptable across our society.
In fact people seem to be competing to win the ‘league’ for who can be the most extreme canceller of all things Russian.
Only this morning on the BBC Munchetty, she who sneered only last year at the U.K. flag and Queen’s portrait but now ardently (fashionably?) supports symbols of Ukrainian patriotism, was challenging Raab about the number of oligarchs that have been sanctioned by the U.K. compared to the EU.
What a strange race! Let’s put aside the laws respecting property ownership, which define Englishness to a large extent, so we can beat up some rich Russians, which won’t have any effect on Putin anyway?
I wonder if the pearl clutches on Park Avenue will boycott Russian caviar! Heaven forbid.
Judy Englander
2 years ago
Well, I’m sorry about the meerkats. Couldn’t they have been rebranded as Ukrainian meerkats?
Tom Lewis
2 years ago
Isn’t Scotland one of the biggest vodka producers ?
Looks like a war in a far away place might have a silver lining for a striving to be independent nations balance sheet (If only it’s drinks industry wasn’t owned by the French, or maybe the Russians, or maybe just owned by some postbox in some far away tax haven that isn’t actually owned by some dodgy Russian).
Warren T
2 years ago
What on earth is the impact to Putin of severing or canceling a conductor or a race car driver from their profession ? As is always the case, the law of unintended consequences rules.
This insanity will lead to catastrophic results when this precedent becomes the norm in the future.
Imagine the Brazilian football team not being allowed to play in the Olympics, some day, due to some high ranking official disagreeing with mask mandates?
I find all of this quite distasteful. While I’m in not in favour of Russia’s invasion treating Russian people and companies like they are an enemy power rubs me the wrong way. We haven’t declared war and yet we’re taking economic measures like those of a hostile country. How does ruining the career of a famous composer for refusing compelled speech against his own country make sense? People are becoming shockingly illiberal in their supposed defence of the liberal Ukraine.
I agree. While companies are free to boycott products and source it from elsewhere if they wish, as is the case with the vodka in the bars, the banning of the formula 1 driver and composer appears to be punishing normal Russian citizens for the crimes committed by Putin
Presumably the theory is that the composers and F 1 drivers of Russia will rise up in anguish and force Putin to reverse his invasion. Does that sound like a credible strategy?
I think it is insanity to place that level of burden on an individual citizen.
I agree. It’s ‘madness of crowds’ behaviour similar to twitter pile-ons. Everyone wants/needs to join the stampede.
…I agree. What we should clearly do is declare war, and attack them properly…
it has more to do with virtue signaling than anything else.
It is weird the degree of Russophobia that has become acceptable across our society.
In fact people seem to be competing to win the ‘league’ for who can be the most extreme canceller of all things Russian.
Only this morning on the BBC Munchetty, she who sneered only last year at the U.K. flag and Queen’s portrait but now ardently (fashionably?) supports symbols of Ukrainian patriotism, was challenging Raab about the number of oligarchs that have been sanctioned by the U.K. compared to the EU.
What a strange race! Let’s put aside the laws respecting property ownership, which define Englishness to a large extent, so we can beat up some rich Russians, which won’t have any effect on Putin anyway?
I would like an analysis about whether this stuff will benefit Ukraine and its people, because I don’t see it
Russia is being “cancelled”, that’ll show ’em.
Yes, I’m going to stop listening to Tchaikovsky, and have taken my (unread) copy of War and Peace to the charity shop. Take that, Vladimir!
And to join in, I will allow 2-3 individual eggs to fall from my plate of beluga cavier this evening.
There goes that nice game of Russian roulette I was going to play…
Yes but Laverov suggests we are already playing Russian Roulette.
Can we still watch Cleese speaking Russian in Fish Called Wanda?
I’ll miss the meerkats
Things aren’t quite that … simples.
Titania McGrath will now only eat a chicken kyiv, a chicken kiev will never cross her plate again. She is so selfless and brave.
I wonder if the pearl clutches on Park Avenue will boycott Russian caviar! Heaven forbid.
Well, I’m sorry about the meerkats. Couldn’t they have been rebranded as Ukrainian meerkats?
Isn’t Scotland one of the biggest vodka producers ?
Looks like a war in a far away place might have a silver lining for a striving to be independent nations balance sheet (If only it’s drinks industry wasn’t owned by the French, or maybe the Russians, or maybe just owned by some postbox in some far away tax haven that isn’t actually owned by some dodgy Russian).
What on earth is the impact to Putin of severing or canceling a conductor or a race car driver from their profession ? As is always the case, the law of unintended consequences rules.
This insanity will lead to catastrophic results when this precedent becomes the norm in the future.
Imagine the Brazilian football team not being allowed to play in the Olympics, some day, due to some high ranking official disagreeing with mask mandates?