Community must now be one of the most overused words in politics. It risks becoming meaningless.
Those of us who want politics to focus on bringing ideas of place and belonging back into the heart of our discourse have a vocabulary problem, relying on abstract nouns that leave us vulnerable to the charge of having lofty ideas but a lack of substance.
It is true that we have a romantic vision of what is missing from our individualistic and narcissistic society, but often struggle to describe these ideas quantitatively; we are good on rhetoric but poor on social science.
That’s why the new Onward project called Repairing our Social Fabric, which I’m chairing, has set itself the task of making these words mean something concrete.
We want to create a proper taxonomy for what a strong community means. Good communal life is about strong, positive relationships, but it is also about something more tangible: high streets, youth clubs, roads and pavements; the quality of local government and civic life; access to good, meaningful work, and a sense of pride in where you live.
To describe this network of interweaving threads that make for a good society we are using another term: social fabric. This is designed to convey the physical as well as the intangible, and matches the sense that many of us have that in towns across Britain something has become frayed; that the weft and warp of what makes for a good life are becoming thin and loose.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe