Ann Coulter is no one’s idea of a leftie. She’s spent her decades-long career offending progressive opinion at every opportunity. So it says something when even she’s had enough of Republican (and Democrat) tax policies.
Her breaking point was the news that Donald Trump had paid a grand total of $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017. No, I haven’t missed out any zeros — according to the New York Times, it really was a three figure sum (though Trump said it was “millions” in yesterday’s debate).
Coulter had no time for the usual Rightwing anti-tax talking points. In fact, she to took to Twitter to repudiate them:
I don't think the conservative take on @realDonaldTrump paying no taxes should be: BECAUSE HE'S SMART!
I've paid nearly 50% of my income in taxes, year after year, and any system that allows billionaires to pay ZERO is unspeakable corrupt.
How about changing it, Democrats?
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 29, 2020
That’s the sort of thing you might expect from Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, but in a subsequent tweet Coulter made it clear she wasn’t about to cross the aisle:
Democrats won't touch the shockingly corrupt tax system that allows real estate billionaires (and hedge fund billionaires) to pay zilch in taxes because most of the billionaires donate to them.
How about attacking THAT, Republicans?
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 29, 2020
If the Republicans were smart, that is what they would do; but, of course, they’ve got their own billionaires to look after. The party’s also captive to a network of ultra-libertarian, tax-phobic influencers. Were any elected Republican — from the President downwards — to go after the super-rich, then an army of think tanks, campaign groups and commentators would swing against them with the all the force that money can buy.
Trump may have pulled off a hostile takeover of the GOP, but the establishment retained its stranglehold on tax policy. Indeed, according to the economists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman, the richest 400 families in America now pay a lower effective tax rate than the poorest half of the country.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe