Main Edition
US
FR
October 12, 2024 - 7:45pm
Some politicians ride the waves; other politicians make them. Alex Salmond, who died today at the age of 69, unquestionably fell into the latter camp.
Without Salmond, there would have been no SNP government sitting in the Scottish Parliament, no referendum on Scottish independence in 2014, and no continuing debate over the future of the United Kingdom. He took the SNP and the cause of independence from the fringes and brought both into the political mainstream. Everyone had to take a view of Salmond. His legacy is that, today, everyone in Scotland has to take a view about independence too.
In the words of one of his adversaries who, like many, had come away with an encounter counting their bruises, Salmond sucked oxygen from every room he walked into. Combative, charismatic, and controversial, he was impossible to ignore. My own personal memory is on the morning of 4 May 2007, after the SNP had achieved the impossible in beating what up till then was the impregnable Scottish Labour party in that year’s elections. As we journalists dashed to Edinburgh’s Prestonfield Hotel, Salmond arrived by helicopter, skipped past a couple of peacocks, and bounced across to us to declare himself the victor. It was intoxicating. That was the first day of the SNP’s rule which has now lasted fully 17 years.
The former SNP leader was entirely responsible for getting the party to that place. Cannily, he welcomed the drive for Scottish devolution in the Eighties and Nineties — something the fundamentalists in his party opposed. The smarter path, as he saw, would be gradual. Then, as First Minister from 2007 onwards, he and his team understood that by offering and then delivering competent government he could slowly win cautious Scottish voters over to The Cause. Arguably, they were too successful: the party’s dramatic majority victory in the 2011 elections triggered a referendum that few on either side had expected quite so quickly. And confronted by Alastair Darling’s robust practical opposition, Salmond’s chutzpah soon wore thin.
Serious allegations about his personal conduct during his time in office surfaced not long after when he was charged with sexual assault. It brought to the surface Salmond’s darker side: even his own advocate, Gordon Jackson KC, declared his client had behaved poorly in office, calling him “touchy feely”. Yet Salmond was found not guilty and quickly returned to politics, forming his hardline independence Alba party. The fact that Salmond died today while giving a political speech somehow feels entirely appropriate: it is hard to think of any other UK politician of the last 40 years who was so utterly consumed by the drug of politics.
But with Alba flopping in elections, Salmond had become a fringe player. And following the rift that opened up between him and his successor Nicola Sturgeon, the SNP had moved on too, effectively cancelling him from its history. Salmond’s passing is unlikely, therefore, to have a significant impact on where Scotland goes next. The next few days will be uncomfortable for the nationalist movement, as it says farewell to a man who carried it on his back for so many years but towards whom it now feels deeply conflicted.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeAlex Salmond was right about almost everything apart from the cause to which he devoted his political life, and it was the people who agreed with him about that alone who tried to imprison him for what would have been the rest of his natural life. They belong behind bars.
But such allegations are a routine tactic of neoliberal neoconservatives, who are still trying to suggest that there was something in the ones that they simply made up against Julian Assange. And as soon as Cornel West announced his Presidential candidacy on Russell Brand’s Rumble channel, then even Brand became a marked man. Yet well over a year since “the documentary of the decade”, no arrest has been made.
Recall the interviewees on The Alex Salmond Show, as also on Sputnik and on Going Underground. The ones from or about abroad were objectionable enough to our betters, but the ones from and about real life in the real Britain were intolerable to them. If Sky News really is in as much trouble as is being suggested, then Freeview’s channel 233 should be taken over by a station on which George Galloway and Afshin Rattansi could take up where they had been forced to leave off, with plenty more in similar vein. It is only sad that Salmond would not be able to be among them.
Can’t respect him in any way, I’ll always remember him as being a bit rapey.
Interesting view from a Trump cult member.
Deflection,?
No.
Salmond was never convicted of anything, although the evidence does suggest he was a touch sleazy around the ladies. Not good.
Trump is a proven sex abuser in at least one case with many, many other allegations against him. Plus his own admission about how he likes to grab women by the… well, you know.
Trump supporters have never worried about their cult leader being “a bit rapey”….
No other reason to bring up Trump.
I disagreed with most of Salmonds political opinions and ideology. However, he was an obvious political giant and always had my respect.
Scotland, and the UK, are worse off for his early departure.
Salmond devoted his life to peddling a ‘Brigadoon’ fantasy, that was utterly divorced from reality.
He dangled in front of the Scots, a vision of a Scotland rich and free, from where the villainous English would be banished forever. It was a vision that only made sense when it floated on an ocean of oil from the North Sea – hence the SNP slogan, “It’s Scotland’s oil”.
By the time the referendum rolled round, the oil was almost gone. Salmond continued to push his false prospectus, reasoning that, by the time the Scots realised they had been duped, it would be too late.
Like nationalists the world over, all he cared about was his place in the history books. The ordinary Scots could go hang.
Salmond the energy economist knew that Scotland’s oil was owned by oil majors and that the U.K. had indulged them with minimal tax farming. He knew that Scotland had immeasurable natural energy resources especially hydro and offshore wind. He also knew that the future of Aberdeen lay in oilfield support and decommissioning. Your trite comment about “Brigadoon” is a borrowed cliche from the Scottish media. Like many wiseacres you are tumbling in the slipstream of Salmond’s strategic thinking.
Independence movements need more than a charismatic leader. They also need an impressive leadership group plus a people committed to independence. Scotland didn’t and doesn’t have either because most of its first division identifies with Britain as well as with Scotland and the Scottish people are divided on independence.