BuzzFeed was internet native! BuzzFeed was viral! There were 15 reasons BuzzFeed understood social media like nobody else, and you won’t believe Number 7. In the end, none of this mattered, and now BuzzFeed News is finally closing down, with the loss of 180 jobs.
For the audience that BuzzFeed now tries to woo, the proposition that it was ever an award-winning news pioneer is a surprise. “The quiz site?”, asked my teens, who are three years younger than BuzzFeed, and who were astonished to discover that it had ever carried any serious news. Yet in its heyday, around a decade ago, media giants beat a path to its door. If they did not wish to emulate the BuzzFeed formula, then they came to learn. BuzzFeed was thought to be in possession of something very like ancient occult knowledge: how to build a digital audience, and apparently, grow revenue online.
BuzzFeed had been launched by Jonah Peretti in 2006 as a sideline, an amuse-bouche. Peretti had no journalism background, and as the dot com bubble exploded, he was completing a Masters degree at the MIT Media Lab, John Negroponte’s playpen for clever dilletantes, apparently having missed all the fun.
But a new bubble was emerging. The previous year, he had had helped start the Huffington Post with Andrew Breitbart. The New York Times called Peretti a “viral marketing hot dog”. Peretti found that with no journalism baggage, he had an advantage when it came to seducing venture capitalists. He could hop shamelessly from one “business model to another. Some of the tricks endured: listicles, pets, more pets and show business — the relentless repackaging of trivia and sponsored native content. BuzzFeed acquired a Pulitzer, then ran Christopher Steele’s notorious “piss dossier” on Donald Trump, after everyone else passed on it.
New hires, including in the UK editorial staff poached from the Guardian, the Times and the BBC during BuzzFeed’s period of rapid growth, couldn’t believe their luck. For a brief period, top line revenue trebled annually, but it was short-lived. News was always an awkward passenger on this ride, a high-maintenance trophy date, and in 2019 a chastened Peretti confessed that news had been a mistake.
Unlike Ariana Huffington, who sold her eponymous operation to AOL for £350 million in 2011, Peretti never succeeded in selling the operation at or near its peak valuation. He never found a bigger fool, and had to keep hustling investors. So BuzzFeed was trapped in a cycle of over-raising capital, overspending, then cutting back and grasping for the next hustle. It even ended up, this year, publishing AI-generated articles.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeBuzzFeed was just terrible and needed to go. Its news amounted to little more than listicles such as ’50 creepy things straight guys do’.
I agree it was terrible but, as the author suggests, I do think it was an informative experiment to test the idea that you can make a profit on the internet with nothing more than clickbait.
Turns out that running a profitable internet news/opinion site requires good content plus building a personal connection with your readers, for example by providing a comments section which I’m sure is a nuisance to support and moderate.
I agree it was terrible but, as the author suggests, I do think it was an informative experiment to test the idea that you can make a profit on the internet with nothing more than clickbait.
Turns out that running a profitable internet news/opinion site requires good content plus building a personal connection with your readers, for example by providing a comments section which I’m sure is a nuisance to support and moderate.
BuzzFeed was just terrible and needed to go. Its news amounted to little more than listicles such as ’50 creepy things straight guys do’.
It did occasionally produce original reporting on important stories.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kenbensinger/michigan-kidnapping-gretchen-whitmer-fbi-informant
It did occasionally produce original reporting on important stories.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kenbensinger/michigan-kidnapping-gretchen-whitmer-fbi-informant
Never heard of it
Never heard of it
does clickbait work with Salmon and trout?
does clickbait work with Salmon and trout?
Sadly, there are swathes of people who actually thought it was real journalism. They’ll do well in an AI generated future
Sadly, there are swathes of people who actually thought it was real journalism. They’ll do well in an AI generated future
Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.
I enjoyed the quizzes (mostly during slack moments at work!) but I never looked at the other stuff.