Tulsi Gabbard is gaining momentum ahead of her hearing for director of national intelligence, Kentucky senator Rand Paul has claimed.
“She’s gaining momentum,” Paul said in an Undercurrents interview with Emily Jashinsky, pointing to growing grassroots support and the backing of military veterans. “Her 20-year military career, her rank as lieutenant colonel, and the unfair treatment she’s faced from the intelligence state speak volumes about her qualifications.”
Paul commended Gabbard’s stance against what he described as the “bipartisan consensus” in Washington for unchecked military interventions. “These are the people who arm everyone and are involved in everyone’s wars,” the Republican senator remarked. “Tulsi has always questioned that, and that’s why they’re afraid of her”.
Gabbard, who represented Hawaii in the House for eight years as a Democrat, is visiting Washington D.C. to meet with senators this week. Her potential nomination as director of America’s intelligence apparatus has been clouded by the collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria at the hands of rebel groups. In 2017, the then-House member met the Syrian President, leading to accusations that she was legitimising a leader widely condemned for human rights abuses and alleged war crimes. Gabbard defended the meeting, arguing that direct engagement was necessary to pursue peace and avoid further US entanglement in the region.
During the Undercurrents interview, Paul addressed the US presence in Syria, an issue Gabbard has frequently highlighted. He criticised the deployment of 900 American troops in the region, describing it as strategically ineffective and dangerously symbolic. “I don’t think 900 troops are doing anything of value there. I think they literally are a target,” Paul said, adding that their presence serves more as a “tripwire” than a deterrent.
The senator highlighted the contradictory roles of various US agencies in Syria, where the Pentagon and CIA have historically backed opposing factions in the country’s civil war. He expressed concern over the fate of religious minorities, particularly Christians, who were afforded some protection under the Assad regime but face uncertainty under extremist groups gaining power. “One of the very few positive aspects of the Assad regime was the protection of Christians,” he noted.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThis is a walk on thin ice. If you don’t interfere, there will be others who will.
Obama sent planeloads of cash to Iran and didn’t interfere again, and neither did Biden, who didn’t interfere either.
We see the results of their non-intervention.
I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say that sending planeloads of money to an enemy is bad policy. Pretty controversial, but what can I say, I’m a maverick.
I would have been worried about her damaging influence. But then Assad scurried off to Moscow. So let her do her worst.