Main Edition
US
FR
December 2, 2024 - 6:30pm
Having already threatened to impose tariffs on Mexico and Canada, the America’s biggest trading partners, Donald Trump next trained his sights on the Brics. “The idea that the BRICS Countries are trying to move away from the Dollar while we stand by and watch is OVER,” he posted on X over the weekend. “We require a commitment from these Countries that they will neither create a new BRICS Currency, nor back any other Currency to replace the mighty U.S. Dollar or, they will face 100% Tariffs, and should expect to say goodbye to selling into the wonderful U.S. Economy.”
It was an odd post, given that the probability of a Brics currency replacing the dollar is pretty much zero. For now, there’s no serious blueprint on the table for any sort of rival currency to the dollar. The greenback remains unrivalled in world finance, accounting for 54% of global trade invoicing, 58% of foreign exchange reserves and 84% of foreign exchange transactions. And while it’s true that many governments have been steadily diversifying away from the dollar in their reserve holdings, so far, they’ve gone mainly into the currencies of the US’s closest allies, most notably the euro. Use of China’s renminbi in global foreign exchange reserves has actually fallen, from an already paltry 2.8% peak in 2022 to 2.3% today.
However, it’s precisely this kind of belligerence that bolsters those who call to abandon the dollar. And in a fight like this, the US doesn’t hold the cards, let alone enjoy the sort of advantage it does when talking tough with Mexico or Canada, both of which have an asymmetric trade dependency on America. The US actually enjoys trade surpluses with several Brics countries, which means that if they chose to retaliate with tariffs of their own, US exporters would feel the pain.
The two Brics members which would stand to lose most in a trade war with the US are China and India. The first is already bracing for Trump tariffs, so probably won’t be much cowed by this rhetoric. The second, India, is America’s closest natural ally in the Brics, and the fledgling group’s staunchest opponent of a Brics currency. Picking a fight with Delhi at a time like this hardly seems a clever move.
Besides, there is a basic flaw in Trump’s plan to simultaneously lower the US’s huge trade deficit and maintain dollar hegemony. Dollar dominance actually depends on that trade deficit. Because the world as a whole runs such a large trade surplus with the US, they accumulate those dollars in US bank accounts. If their surpluses diminish, not only will dollar reserves decline, but interest rates in America will likely rise (since so much of foreign holdings is placed in US Treasury paper).
So why Trump posted that rant is unclear. It would seem, if anything, to reveal an insecurity on his part about the future of the dollar which, incidentally, his talk of building a strategic bitcoin reserve is doing little to alleviate, since replacing the dollar is bitcoin’s raison d’etre. But what his message didn’t reveal was much in the way of strategic vision. It’s not the best look for a claimant to superpower status.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeAlso, China’s state-subsidized steel industry has bankrupted the steel industries of countries in South America, North America and Europe, putting countless steelworkers out of work. But that’s quite all right, because the megacorporations in those countries can now buy dirt-cheap steel.
This will be true, until the only steel to be had is from China. Then, the monopoly will be formed, and prices will rise, as high as China wishes, which is the privilege of the monopoly ….
The truth is that from a Brics perspective and pro Western India in particular, the propensity of the U.S Deep State to weaponise the dollar makes Brics nations unsure.
Right now we don’t know for sure how President Trump will rein in the Neo Cons and the military intelligence complex.
Given the hostile attitudes of the present Biden administration to India( sponsoring Al Qaeda backed Islamists to carry out anti Hindu pogroms in Bangladesh being just one instance) a lot will depend on whether a Trump Presidency can stump the U.S Deep State’s vested interests.
Does the word “monopoly” mean anything to this brilliant writer? China has been boosting its industry at the expense of the US, the UK, and numerous other nations. Again, I am singularly unimpressed with the “brics” nations (India excluded). I foresee a fruitful relationship there, but the others, not so much …
Tariffs are a tax on consumers. All they have to do is make them revenue neutral and they can preclude foreign made from home made.
Most surprising thing here is the Author implies he thought Trump driven by some strategic plan if only one could discern it.