X Close

How Trump crushed Obama’s legacy The president-elect rides the cowboy spirit

'In one night, the Obama machine, which he built on the model of the Chicago Democratic Party machine, and which he used to help him run the country, including the prestige institutions and the press, was melting down.' (Photo: ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images)

'In one night, the Obama machine, which he built on the model of the Chicago Democratic Party machine, and which he used to help him run the country, including the prestige institutions and the press, was melting down.' (Photo: ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images)


November 8, 2024   11 mins

It was long past midnight in Livingston, Montana, when Donald Trump finally stood up to address the nation as President-elect of the United States, having won the landslide victory that had eluded him in his successful run in 2016 and again in his re-election bid in 2020. This time, the American people had overwhelmingly voted for change. They had voted overwhelmingly for Trump.

As a patriotic American, and as a working journalist who believes in the sanctity of that role, I should note here that the only vote I’ve ever cast in a presidential election was for Willie Nelson, the country and western star and a symbol of reconciliation between rednecks and hippies. Still, I was eager to hear what Trump would say. To be more accurate, given my level of inebriation in sub-freezing Montana weather, with snow-globe snow gently falling outside the windows of a local bar, I was eager to mix the some whiskey with the tonalities of America’s greatest living bullshit artist and teller of tall tales. Trump’s voice is a powerful source of connection to the American literary and comic tradition, going back to the Rat Pack and to Mark Twain. I was ready to hear his magnificent instrument resonate with the promise of a better future, a future filled with laughter — and joy, even.

At 3am, West Palm Beach time, Trump’s large family stood with him onstage looking chipper and attractive. They were joined there by the celebrity validators that made Trump’s third run for the White House seem less angry and more inclusive than his prior one-man shows.

At 78, Trump’s relentless pitchman’s energy is at once diminished, and at the same more genial. And no wonder. Since his loss, in 2020, when he claimed that the election was stolen from him — and his opponents claimed that he tried to seize power through illegal means — Trump had been subjected to a whole-of-society assault by the American elite that would have killed most men 20 years younger, including those who don’t eat cheeseburgers most days for lunch. After 116 indictments, an armed raid on his home, the jailing of his business associates, and the looming threat of bankruptcy, followed by two and even three in-person rallies a day for the better part of a year, which led to him being shot in the head by a would-be assassin, the fact that Trump is still standing upright, let alone greeting a crowd as President-elect, is clearly a miracle – the biggest miracle since the Resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ, I can hear Trump saying. Now, he is about to speak. The TV above the bar remains silent.

“Honey, have you ever been in a bar before?” the bartender is asking me. For the past 10 minutes or so, we’ve been politely going back and forth about whether she can turn up the volume on the bar’s television set. All I can hear around me as Trump starts to speak is the noise of a late Tuesday night at the Wagon Wheel.

Sure, I’ve been in plenty of bars before, I answer. “Well, then you know that politics is a subject that men get angry over, and I don’t want that in my bar,” the waitress answers matter-of-factly. “You can read the captions on the TV.”

As sensible as her precautions might seem, there’s an undertone to her replies that reminds me that I am in a town, and not in the countryside. Even out here in the West, in a solid red state that epitomises cowboy culture, it is the divide between urban and exurban places, not the division between so-called red and blue states, that is culturally defining. People living in Brooklyn Heights, or in Austin, Texas or in Missoula, Montana or in Grand Rapids, Iowa, all tend to have more in common with each other than they do with people living even a mere 20 miles away.

“For fuck’s sake, this is history,” I suggest, as I watch Trump’s lips moving. “It’s not politics. Everyone can all put their prejudices aside for five minutes s and hear the man.” She purses her lips, and signals it’s a no-go. Then she offers me a free seltzer.

“We must protect our geniuses, protect our super-geniuses”, the caption-writer translates, as Trump’s lips form grandiloquent and hilarious phrases introducing Elon Musk and his love for rockets. “We have so few of them.”

Trump is clearly one. He’s an American genius, an original of a type that began with P.T. Barnum, and also includes Elon Musk. But neither Barnum nor Musk could ever become President twice, and defeat the entire American power structure. I wish to God I could hear him speak. After overcoming 100+ indictments, and having his X account revoked, the man deserves to have his moment here, in this bar.

I don’t need to hear Trump’s stunned-looking critics in the Party commentariat speak, though. The expressions on their pallid faces say it all. They are reckoning with the extent of their loss, which is turn related to their collective sense of self-importance — which is belied both by tonight’s result and by their viewership numbers. Having cratered public trust in their profession over the past decade by routinely lying to their audience on behalf of the government, which they identified in turn with the Democratic Party, the country’s self-identified defenders of democracy can fume all they want about Trump’s authoritarian, anti-democratic, fascist, Hitlerian leanings. The rest of America is as deaf to their blather as I am.

Praising Elon Musk, the country’s most successful technologist, Trump looks more like an avuncular Caribbean vacation package or waterbed salesman than a would-be Hitler. Meanwhile, party hacks like Joy Reid and the political consultants turned “commentators” like David Axelrod, along with supposed “straight news” types like Jake Tapper of CNN, who had all long ago become indistinguishable from each other, by virtue of drinking the Party Kool-Aid are waving their hands at the cameras like they were calling for smelling salts. But once lost, the trust of an audience is hard to win back.

Trump has also lost a step or two himself. His speeches, once gorgeous arias of invective, innuendo and insult comedy, delivered with the snappy timing of a Vegas Rat Pack headliner, have been transformed into rambling arabesques, like the musings of a slightly dotty family patriarch at the Thanksgiving table. Let us bow our heads, while Loopy Uncle Donald tells us about the deal he made with a Saudi Prince on a golf course. Then everyone can eat more pumpkin pie.

“Trump has also lost a step or two himself.”

Trump had also learned a trick or two along the way, though. He graciously shares the stage, and allows the importance and accomplishments of others to validate his own role as MC. His timing clearly couldn’t have been better. Five years of Covid laws, a stagnant economy, direct and indirect government censorship of social media, official lying and gaslighting on every subject from trans surgeries to the efficacy of masking to the startling numbers of illegal immigrants entering the country to the spectacle of a dottering Joe Biden being barely able to remember his own name, had left most of the country dispirited and ready for change.

As the evening ends, Trump and the political movement he founded will likely control not just the White House but also the Senate, the House, and also the Supreme Court, giving Trump an actual, real-world chance to fulfill his mandate to Make America Great Again. Even though, after a decade of near-constant repetition of the slogan by adherents and detractors, no one can say with any real certainty what it now means.

* * *

As it turns out, the American people are still allowed to vote, regardless of whether their betters decry their choices as racist, sexist, short-sighted, and above all anti-democratic. It’s a paradox that the country’s genius-level elites routinely fail to acknowledge, because they are all profoundly in agreement. We must protect our democracy from those evil anti-democratic forces, American voters, who vote for Donald Trump against the expert guidance of their betters, meaning us.

Meanwhile, the lurching of an increasingly overbearing and at the same time increasingly anarchic and incompetent American state had managed to alarm many Americans who were previously more alarmed by Trump. Over the past weeks, they have been turning out in larger numbers than anyone had imagined — defying the expressed preferences and instructions of the American’ elite’s chief tutelary figure, Barack Obama, who had campaigned very publicly and hard for Kamala Harris, often overshadowing the candidate herself. Obama’s role in the Harris campaign was truthfully less strange than the fact that the former President somehow remained in Washington after his time in the White House was over, instead taking meetings in his Kalorama mansion, which is hardly the most valuable entry in his bulging portfolio of luxury properties — which also includes high Gilded Age mansions in Hawaii and Martha’s Vineyard. But it was surely the most important, serving as the centre of his unprecedented Shadow Presidency.

As the leader of the Democratic Party, Obama was hardly a pretender to power in Washington. Rather, between 2008 and the evening of 5 November 2024, he was usually the foremost power in the land. After serving two elected terms in the White House, Obama then set up and captained the so-called “Resistance” to Trump — an activity that was contrary to all prior American norms and practices. After Trump left, Obama stayed in Washington and continued his role as unelected Party Leader during what had been advertised as the Biden Presidency.

Obama’s method of avoiding scrutiny from the pliant DC press was entirely in character, alternately drawing back into the shadows and then, out of whatever ego weakness, announcing that he was the true mover of events. Free from normative oversight or responsibility, he and his retainers could also avoid answering questions about the size or sources of his personal fortune, which was rumoured to amount to somewhere between $500 million and $1 billion. As a private citizen, Obama didn’t have to answer questions. He could have it both ways — state power, with no public responsibility.

Until he misstepped. By compelling Biden to withdraw in favour of Harris, who turned out to be an even worse candidate than a senile old man who had begun to resemble a badly taxidermied deer, Obama broke the unspoken agreement that had put him beyond scrutiny. Disappearing the sitting President from the Democratic Party ticket against his will, for reasons that were obviously contrary to what the press had been telling Americans about Biden’s incredibly acute mental functioning up, and replacing him with a candidate that no one in the party had actually voted for, required some sort of comment, however brief. It made it impossible, if only for a week or two, to maintain the fiction that Obama was simply living in Washington DC while staying out of politics. If Biden was senile, then who was actually running the country? Who had enough clout to order the President’s removal from the ticket?

The answer in both cases was Obama. And now he was on the hook not only for Kamala Harris, but retroactively for the more general mess that he and his operatives had helped to make of the country. Everywhere from Harvard University, his alma mater, where he helped install a repeat plagiarist as the University’s President, to the Middle East, which went up in flames the moment he was able to re-animate his Iran Deal, which appeared to be even stupider — if not as expensive — as George W. Bush’s determination to transform Afghanistan and Iraq into Western-style democratic societies at the point of a gun, the Party Leader’s Midas Touch-in-reverse was evident, even if no one ever breathed a single word of criticism.

Yet Americans, of all races and creeds, felt themselves to be living in a dystopian version of Alice in Wonderland, controlled by an unseen hand — and they didn’t like it. If the elite pollsters and expert predictors who had failed to foresee a Trump win had familiarised themselves with American history, instead of parroting the talking points of Obama and his operatives, they would have seen a country eager for a renewal of the freedoms that the vast majority of Americans embrace as their birthright.

Seeing Americans as one people, with a common culture and character, shaped by a common history, is not something that America’s new elites know how to do, though. From kindergarten on, they are taught otherwise. Ivy League universities, the crucible in which the new class has been forged, base admissions and hiring decisions not on measures of objective performance, but on their ranking in the ever-shifting hierarchies of Party-sanctioned identity groups. The ability to sort Americans into bureaucratic categories like BIPOC, MENA, LGBTQ+ and other alphabet soup constructions is in fact the defining skill of Obama-era elites. It signifies mastery of in-group codes that help the Democratic Party manage its own top-down constituencies, which are regimented by political operatives and NGO organisers, paid for by billionaire foundations, and embodied in bureaucratic regulations, executive orders, census categories and other legally-binding schemes meant to overcome historical American notions of equality. That’s how the party machine operates.

Now, in one night, the Obama machine, which he built on the model of the Chicago Democratic Party machine, and which he used to run the country, including the prestige institutions and the media, through a combination of bureaucratic capture and social pressure, accentuated by control of large tech platforms, was finally melting down. No wonder the press was in shock. None of the lines that they had been given could be reconciled with the numbers onscreen.

A reckoning will surely come. At the very least, the time has now arrived for Barack Obama to leave Washington and exit American politics, now that his Shadow Presidency — which proved to be even more counter-productive and chaotic than Trump’s first term in office — has gone down in flames.

Meanwhile, the gap between what America’s elites believe, and what the rest of the country believes, has never been wider, probably not since the late 19th century. Back then, Gilded Age America was ruled by a tight group of tycoons and their retainers who positioned themselves as the heirs to the Republican Party of Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant, the President and the General who together led the Civil War. The further the Republican Party traveled from the Civil War, the more the busts of Lincoln and Grant resembled window-dressing for the extraordinary fortunes of a new oligarchy that traveled in private trains, summered in Newport, and bought every available Old Master painting in Europe to decorate their lavish houses. Economically and morally, the so-called Robber Barons — Morgans, Rockefellers, Goulds, Fricks, Carnegies, Whitneys, Harrimans — had an easy time of it, enjoying the benefits of cheap immigrant labour while flattering themselves as the rightful heirs of the Party that ended slavery. With the exception of Carnegie, a self-made Scotsman and innovative industrialist who gave away his fortune to establish America’s system of public libraries, history doesn’t remember them kindly.

The Democratic Party that Bill and Hillary Clinton built in the Nineties, and Barack Obama then took in a decidedly more radical direction after 2012, won’t be remembered kindly by Americans either. The father of the modern Democratic Party, Franklin D. Roosevelt, was the country’s greatest political leader during what became known as the American Century. Roosevelt kept the country going during the Great Depression, and set it on the path to victory in the Second World War while creating a social safety net for the poor. Remarkably, every American President up until Bill Clinton in 1992 was either a protegee of Roosevelt or at least a private in his army.

The political alliance between urban ethnic machine politicians, including black urban political leaders, and Southern whites that FDR led also undercut the power of the Wasp class, successors to the New England Puritans, who dominated America’s class system and the country’s economy following the Civil War. By curbing their cultural, political, and economic influence, Roosevelt made possible the rise of the American middle class, which made America great, and also more equal.

The Clintons’ embrace of Wall Street and of international trade treaties was the window through which America’s old elites — rooted both in the Northeast as well as in San Francisco — climbed back into history. The China trade flourished, as did Democratic Party’s new Wall Street clients — at the expense of the Party’s traditional working-and-middle class constituencies. Obama brought Silicon Valley’s formerly libertarian-oriented founders on board the gravy train by promising them protection from populists like Bernie Sanders and from his own crew of high-end Chicago shakedown artists. In return, they would pay taxes to the party through campaign and NGO contributions and DEI hiring. Through this new political wiring, Obama completed the transformation of FDR’s Democrats into Gilded Age Republicans.

It will be hard for Donald Trump to top that. But maybe he will. Maybe Elon Musk will entirely revamp the Federal government. Maybe he will actually colonise Mars. Meanwhile, if Trump understands one thing, it’s that America is not Europe, or Asia, or Iraq, or Brazil. American elites come and go, while the capacity for sudden, radical, wide-eyed self-invention and leaps of innovation remain the country’s defining trait.

What outsiders tend to miss is that America was never meant to be stable. It is and has always been an inferno, the epitome of the Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter’s idea of creative destruction. The wonder and freedom and heartbreak of American life is that, sooner or later, everything is consumed in the furnace. For all his wealth and success, Elon Musk’s children may worship other gods. His grandchildren may end up in a trailer park, smoking meth. McKinsey consultants with Harvard degrees may wind up unemployed or selling bottled war. Robert F. Kennedy Jr, the country’s most eminent environmental lawyer and the closest thing the Democratic Party has to royalty, may become an antivaccine heretic, be broadly mocked and humiliated by the elite and by the less imaginative members of his own family, run for President, endorse Donald Trump, take on the Big Pharma and Big Ag, and Make America Healthy Again. Or not. All anyone can say for sure is that attempts to game the American system are doomed to failure.

The bigger lesson being that America is just too big — and too wild, and too destructive, and rooted in the idea of individual freedom — for any self-styled “elite” to ride the horse for very long, without being thrown off.


David Samuels is a writer who lives in upstate New York.


Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

152 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lancashire Lad
Lancashire Lad
4 days ago

What a brilliant essay. There’s not many times i race through an article then re-read it, but this one deserves praise for it’s sheer exuberance, like a literary example of what the author is seeking to define in the American spirit.
It starts with a scene in a late bar that many will instinctively recognise, and then draws us into a breakdown of not just the current zeitgeist and its potential for renewal but a history of US zeitgeists. He does this with a stream of phrases that are too numerous to repeat but each of which would be standout in any article. Better still, there’s an intellectual coherence which – whether you agree with him or not – makes the whole stand up.
In particular, his characterisations of each of the political protagonists and the media hit every single nail on the head. I’m rarely given to hyperbole, and apologies if this comment comes across as hyperbolic; i’ll be more than interested to read what others think.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
4 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

This might be the best essay I’ve read in a decade. My head is still shaking.

Seb Dakin
Seb Dakin
4 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

I couldn’t agree more. Bravo!

Lesley van Reenen
Lesley van Reenen
4 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

I too read this twice. This is the kind of journalism we are paying for.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
4 days ago

Agree totally. This article alone is worth my subscription.

Malcolm Webb
Malcolm Webb
4 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

Not at all hyperbolic. A very accurate assessment of a truly great article – which, together with Kathleen Stock’s also brilliant piece today, reconfirms me in the view that Unherd is a very important magazine.

Michael Askew
Michael Askew
4 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

You put it better than I could.

Nathan Arsenault
Nathan Arsenault
4 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

Agreed was really a good article.

Andrew Wise
Andrew Wise
4 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

Flourishes of Hunter S. Thompson in places, brilliant

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
1 day ago
Reply to  Andrew Wise

Here, here! “When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.”

Cantab Man
Cantab Man
4 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

Indeed.
Unherd is currently publishing scholarly-level reflections on the ascendance of Trump and his vision for America. Which, as the author points out, was accomplished against all odds.
Trump was in open defiance of America’s progressive elite power brokers and kingmakers. Those who chose to brake with longstanding political traditions and norms…those who used both legal and illegal means in an effort to destroy both Trump and his vision for America.
And yet Trump and his vision for America has been elected/chosen by the voice of the American people as their representation of the new center.
This being said, one should consider bookmarking these Unherd articles that most accurately capture the realized truths of the 2024 election before the political spinmeisters start their inane spinning.
In 2020, the Wall Street Journal pointed out that Democrats have only accepted the results of two presidential election over the past 50 years. And only because those two elections were blow-outs.
Recall that it only took Hillary’s expensive political team and her allies one month or so before the meaningful truths to be learned from her loss were purposely obfuscated by mass-produced political conspiracy fakery. We heard the incessant “Trump Russia Collusion!” chants from on high:

“Within 24 hours of her concession speech, [campaign chair John Podesta and manager Robby Mook] assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.”

-Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign, published in April 2017 by Democrat heavyweights Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes

Political soothsayers (aka “consultants”) are very good at their jobs and they collect hefty fees to proclaim exactly what the losers want to hear: The loss wasn’t their fault. It wasn’t their vision for America that lost the American people. It was really the fault of secret Russians hiding under everyone’s beds. Or the popularity of the color Orange in the fall. Or it was the fault of the tens-of-millions of Nazis in America that hide camouflaged in grocery stores, at malls, attending baseball games, and while eating cherry pie at the park and watching their grandchildren light small fireworks on July 4th, etc. In short, the losers and their radicalized compatriots will always remain the TRUE ‘centrists’ whilst the majority of Americans at the real center are assuredly the ‘extremists’ that must be snuffed out for the good of society.
At this moment, Democrat power brokers are meeting “with Shake Shack containers littering the room” to determine whether they keep the base fired up with another conspiracy theory (“…how about Trump Russia Collusion part deux, everyone!!!”), or whether this loss constitutes a blow-out in which case they don’t change their vision for America but briefly say they’ll listen better to the American people in a minuscule show of contrite penance … until Trump does something in January that he promised to the American people, at which time he is once again, “Hitler!” And “The Great Satan!”
As an aside, everyone (especially the paid progressive prognosticators) should have paid better attention to the Tech Titans. They didn’t let their news outlets publish endorsements of Kamala. They quietly toned down their personal rhetoric against half of the nation. They started acting in a conciliatory manner toward Trump. And this was all happening many weeks before the election.
Similarly, many Wall Streeters knew what was about to happen in advance of the 2008 financial crisis. One such I-Banker told me before the crash that it’d be at least three years before a recovery – and he was right. These traders were opening ‘buy’ and ‘sell’ positions well in advance of the full crash to make money on the pain that they, in cooperation with the government, had created and knew was coming for most Americans.
Similarly, the Tech Titans knew full well that Trump was going to receive a massive mandate by the will of the American people. Such Titans can afford to pay real statistical geniuses who tell them (and only them) the truth.
And this is one of the last and most important lessons from the 2024 election:
Post Modernism is dead.
Before the election, post-modernist prophets proclaimed that truth is ‘relative.’ If one has billions in the bank to spend, one may create his or her own desired ‘truth’ in direct opposition to actual truth, and with a mix of repetition and societal enforcement, all Americans will come to accept the billionaires’ desired ‘truth’ as their own. The post-modernist prophets proclaimed that it all comes down to ‘nurture’, no ‘nature’ whatsoever … just make these prophets obscenely wealthy and they’ll deliver the billionaires’ utopia.
Kamala’s incomprehensible word salads will be seen by historical accounts as the ultimate outcome of an expensive post-modernist education. Without a recognition of, and alignment with, absolute truths, one’s words inevitably descend into a singularity of absolute meaningless. A singularity that, behind its event horizon, obscures any sign of rational intelligence. In short, a post-modernist’s paradise, where facts and the Scientific Method have been disappeared from existence.
The majority of Americans smelled this post-modernist bullshit for years and especially during the 2024 election cycle, and they made their displeasure known on election day.

Anna Bramwell
Anna Bramwell
4 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

Oh, me too.

Steve Jolly
Steve Jolly
4 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

Agreed. This guy gets it. There are few common threads that can be traced throughout American history from the outset, and there is perhaps none so consistent or deeply woven as the deep instinctive, visceral, and utter hatred of elites and elitism. America is a nation of rebels, malcontents, revolutionaries, vigilantes, and self-made men. From the settlers who fled religious persecution to the founding fathers who dared to defy the stratified feudal society of Europe to the immigrants who fled corruption and tyranny all the way up to the present, Americans have refused at every turn to bend the knee to any elite class. It does not matter how elites justify their rule, by birth as the feudal nobility did, by wealth as the robber barons did, by race as the southern plantation owners did, or by education and “expertise” as today’s elites have attempted. This is America, where more often than not the heroes are vigilantes, outlaws, and gangsters while the rich, the powerful, the governments, the snooty aristocrats are usually the villains. The more the elites piled on Trump, the more they stirred that primal spirit of American freedom and made Trump into the avatar of that spirit. The more they persecuted, demonized, harassed, and harangued the man, the stronger he became. They could have turned aside at any point from 2016 onward and simply ignored Trump or treated him like every other political figure. Instead they built him up into some great monster of history. It never occurred to them that people would choose the monster over them. They failed to understand history or the country they were attempting to rule. They have failed as a ruling class, and they deserve to lose.

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
4 days ago
Reply to  Steve Jolly

[deleted for unnecessary rudeness]

Last edited 4 days ago by AJ Mac
Harrydog
Harrydog
3 days ago
Reply to  Steve Jolly

Excellent assessment by an UnHerd guest writer in waiting. What a great morning for me and for America (cueing theme song from Annie)

Kerry Davie
Kerry Davie
2 days ago
Reply to  Steve Jolly

…….and they deserve to lose.(their heads?)- Ah,that was an earlier age.
‘The more they persecuted, demonized, harassed, and harangued the man, the stronger he became.’
Yes, Donald Trump exemplifies the concept, celebrated by Nicolas Nassim Taleb in his book of the same name, of Antifragile.

Nathan Sapio
Nathan Sapio
3 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

One of the best pieces in memory on unherd inspired you to write a inspired characterization of it. Well done, agreed.

Apo State
Apo State
3 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

Your reaction was beautifully said. I read the article with a big grin, and I paused several times to exclaim — out loud — “This is a masterpiece!”, and “This guy doesn’t pull any punches”.
Wow. I had forgotten that people could write like this.
I only realized who he is after the fact…he writes for Tablet and co-founded a magazine with Walter Kirn. Now it makes sense.

Last edited 3 days ago by Apo State
Konstantinos Stavropoulos
Konstantinos Stavropoulos
3 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

A magnificent article indeed..!

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
1 day ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

Unbelievably great analysis of the current US political/social scene. Blows the cover off Obama and his minions running the US like a Chicago ward. I’ve been reading the news but didn’t figure this out. His description of how this country seemed to be transformed into a Euro-style Fanon nightmare, and reacted with this election, is the BEST thing I’ve read since the election by far. My faith in the gyroscope at the center of this country, first revved up by John Smith in Jamestown when he was elected head of the colony as they starved due to being a collective, is restored. Thank you David Samuels.

Last edited 1 day ago by UnHerd Reader
M James
M James
4 days ago

“Yet Americans, of all races and creeds, felt themselves to be living in a dystopian version of Alice in Wonderland, controlled by an unseen hand – and they didn’t like it.”

Of all the attempts to explain the outcome of the 2024 election, or “Why Trump Won”, this single sentence said it more incisively and succinctly than all the paragraphs written by other commentators. What an absolute dead-centre hit of the bullseye.

That alone would have made the article worth reading. The post-Civil War history of the US and its power structure shifts in one flowing summation was a bonus.

So no, Lancashire Lad, I don’t think that you’re being hyperbolic. We’re all recognizing top drawer analysis when we read it.

AC Harper
AC Harper
4 days ago
Reply to  M James

“Why Trump Won” – alternative summary “Why Obama Lost”,

Jo Wallis
Jo Wallis
3 days ago
Reply to  M James

Yes, I have been aghast and agog – and despondent – for four years at the gaslighting of the entire world by the insertion of a Manchurian Candidate into the WH. If I was American that contempt for the people would have been enough to see me running to Trump never mind the transparent lawfare against Trump personally. I despise Obama, not least for inflicting transgenderism upon the west. I hope there are enough Ronan Farrow-style journos left out there to expose what he has done. As for calling for ‘the brothers’ to vote for Harris because she was apparently just like them… I hope he’s signed the death knell for identity politics. This was a great piece.

Colorado UnHerd
Colorado UnHerd
4 days ago

Bravo! An historical and political tour de force, illuminating and enjoyable.
Eight years ago, I was a lifelong Democrat, certain about who were the good and bad guys. My seismic shift began with Biden administration overreach during the pandemic and achieved critical mass with Democratic Party embrace of gender ideology and its repugnant forced teaming with gay rights, for which I fought as a lesbian. Then I watched RFK, Jr. not only excluded and obstructed by Democratic powerbrokers but alternately ignored and smeared by legacy media that had become little more than mouthpieces for a “progressive” agenda. And thus outgrew, as well, a presumption of trust in my former profession, journalism. And, finally, complete disgust at an arrogant Democratic elite that hid Biden’s slipping capacity and then anointed Harris its nominee, neatly sidestepping voters — my former allies, most of whom seemed not to care, if they even noticed.
I’m a childless cat lady, but color me Independent and open-minded about Trump now and later Vance, who is smart, self-made and still maturing. I celebrate that in the near future we will see a return to sanity around the delusion of gender ideology. Vulnerable groups — including gay kids who are particularly susceptible to this cult, and females whose sports and spaces have been trespassed — will again have protection at the federal level. And I’m eager to see what RFK, Jr. — he got my vote — will do to address the corruption of regulatory agencies overseeing pharmaceuticals, health care and our food production system.
Thanks for this excellent essay.

Last edited 4 days ago by Colorado UnHerd
Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
4 days ago

I have to wonder how many others like you there are – people who see the gender madness as inherently anti-gay along with anti-woman, a double dose in your case.

Colorado UnHerd
Colorado UnHerd
4 days ago
Reply to  Alex Lekas

Many, though few among my friends. In the United States, more Dems are aligning with the recently formed Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender (DIAG). Gays Against Groomers (my favorite acronym) is also fighting the good fight. Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF) is similarly clear-eyed about the misogyny and homophobia that undergird gender ideology; it’s been on the front lines legally to keep males out of female sports and spaces and to protect minors from medical and surgical mutilation.
Such groups and the kind of independent, smart journalism exemplified by this essay have kept me sane and hopeful.

Stu N
Stu N
3 days ago
Reply to  Alex Lekas

There are huge numbers of gays who know what women are and think the world of them. We also know that heterosexual perverts who like cross dressing are no friends of ours. Hopefully the idiotic political class will wake up to this eventually.

Becky Truesdell
Becky Truesdell
4 days ago

I’m with you, sister. Covid forever removed what remained of my tiny faith in government. MAHA

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
4 days ago

Great comment.

Colorado UnHerd
Colorado UnHerd
4 days ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

Thanks, Jim.

Nathan Sapio
Nathan Sapio
3 days ago

Based on our identities, those on the left who discourage thought and seek to divide would have painted you and I as being in an irreconcilable hateful position and set us against each other. But your comment was touching, and inspiring, and a thing of beauty. Proof that all human beings who desire truth and aim up share something vital that’s way more important than any of our immutable characteristics.

Colorado UnHerd
Colorado UnHerd
3 days ago
Reply to  Nathan Sapio

Well said.

J Bryant
J Bryant
4 days ago

Fantastic essay.
“But neither Barnum nor Musk could ever become President twice, and defeat the entire American power structure.
I’ve never heard Trump’s victory expressed quite that way before, but, yes, that’s what Trump did.

Katharine Eyre
Katharine Eyre
4 days ago

Brilliant essay, I loved it.
And the thing which strikes me is that to understand just how far this liberal elite has wandered away from the nature and thinking of the average American and how the nation still holds together despite these endless and brutal cycles of re-invention, all you need to do is read the first lines of the Declaration of Independence, worth posting even though I’m sure everyone knows them:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Jefferson was an amazing individual of great foresight, but I wonder if he would be surprised at just how effective a glue on the nation those words would become. And how, if the governors of the new nation he was proclaiming failed to live up to them, stopped listening to the People, got too high and mighty, they’d end up being kicked to the kerb in just as brutal a fashion as Britain was.
So, to the the author’s portrayal of America as a more wild and violent country, you might consider these lurching democratic changes and cycles of schöpferische Zerstörung as mini-revolutions; as a country periodically returning to the crucible in which it was forged.

Last edited 4 days ago by Katharine Eyre
Unwoke S
Unwoke S
4 days ago
Reply to  Katharine Eyre

How extraordinarily serendipitous! I wrote earlier today to a friend, as follows…. 

“You’re an American. You have more right than I to pontificate about the country. So correct me if you think I am pontificating unwisely with the following observation. The first lines of the Declaration of Independence opine:

‘We hold these truths to be self-evident:- that all men are created equal, – that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, – that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, – that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, – that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organising its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.’

Does not this week’s election suggest that the majority of people in your country believe that during the last four years:

not all men are equal: white heteronormative cis-gender men are patriarchal misogynist oppressors and/or colonialists and should be treated as garbagethe rights that some people have are indeed alienable: anointed “fact-checkers” and “disinformation” experts will decide whether what they say or believe is acceptable or offensive or punishable in lawyour right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness will be dependent upon whether or not you support the narrative that the Establishment prefersgovernment has derived its powers not from the consent of the governed but from the consent of the shadowy people who appoint the governors

and that as a consequence of these things, and because the current government has become corrupt and destructive, the People have now decided to throw out the garbage and institute a new government that they hope will be more likely to provide for their safety and happiness?

Just sayin’.”

Niall Roche
Niall Roche
4 days ago

Wow! That is excellent writing. Brilliant article

Santiago Excilio
Santiago Excilio
4 days ago

Excellent.
Articulate, innovative, insightful, amusing and, to the extent that any analysis can ever be, carries the hallmarks of veracity.
More like this, please, Unherd.

mike flynn
mike flynn
4 days ago

Finally, after all these years, a commentator willing to outright out Obama. The worst kept secret since FDRs infirmity.

Terry M
Terry M
4 days ago

We must protect our democracy from those evil anti-democratic forces, American voters, who vote for Donald Trump against the expert guidance of their betters, meaning us.
Echoes of the famous “It became necessary to destroy the town to save it.” quote from Vietnam.
The Democrats eschewed democratic principles to install a minority woman according to their DEI playbook. If they had conducted a mini-primary in July they would have gotten a better candidate, salvaged some legitimacy, and possibly have beaten Trump. Their adherance to their religion of identity uber alles brought them down.
We are all better off as a result.

nigel roberts
nigel roberts
3 days ago
Reply to  Terry M

And just to clarify, that quotation was Peter Arnett, the radical journalist, not the American military.

Stephen Follows
Stephen Follows
3 days ago
Reply to  nigel roberts

It sounds like Swift.

nigel roberts
nigel roberts
2 days ago

Peter Arnett not in Swift’s league.

Lesley van Reenen
Lesley van Reenen
4 days ago

Has anyone else seen the video of Obama taunting and roasting Trump at the WH Correspondents Dinner – “President Obama mocks Donald Trump over birth certificate conspiracy, Celebrity Apprentice & his presidential ambitions!”. This was the day that Trump decided to run for president.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
4 days ago

I haven’t, but I’ve heard Musk talk about it, who was there. He said it was so aggressive that people in the room were visibly uncomfortable, considering Trump wasn’t the one being roasted.

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
4 days ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

It’s worth watching and (of course) available at a click.

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
4 days ago

Yes. Given Trump’s permanent grudge holding, that has to rank as the most consequential roast of all time.

Peter Lee
Peter Lee
3 days ago
Reply to  AJ Mac

The last thing that can be said about Pres. Trump is that he holds ‘permament grudges’. Which is pretty fortuitous for Hillary Clinton etc.!

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
4 days ago

I bow to Samuels and marvel at his mastery of the written word. I’m almost ashamed to write a comment because it will look like gibberish in comparison. I don’t give an eff about the content. The writing is all that matters.

ChilblainEdwardOlmos
ChilblainEdwardOlmos
4 days ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

Pick up a copy of County Highway, the physical paper and ink newspaper of which I believe he is the editor. You will not be disappointed.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
4 days ago

Is this the guy from some small town publishing a hard copy newspaper out of the sticks? I heard him on a podcast, but I have never read him.

Geo TP
Geo TP
3 days ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

This author is the Editor and Walter Kirn is Editor-at-Large.

Mrs R
Mrs R
4 days ago

Looks amazing and inspiring. Wish there was something similar in the UK.

B. Timothy S.
B. Timothy S.
4 days ago

Makes me want to shout Hallelujah! Trump is the tribune of the untamed American spirit that will never die!

Graham Cunningham
Graham Cunningham
4 days ago

A superb read Yes but it has the self-comforting flaw common to almost all post-election journalism….. forgetting that there is no such thing as ‘the will of the people’ only the will of the 50+%. Reading this eloquent paean to American exceptionalism it is all too easy to forget that it was in fact almost half of the electorate who voted for the wokeified nonsense of that Obamaesque ‘elite’. If it was only just an ‘elite’ that has bought into Wokeness, how good would it be that they have finally got their come-uppance. But the more unpallatable truth is that it is in fact tens of millions of Americans who are – and remain – full of its nonsense.

Last edited 4 days ago by Graham Cunningham
Brett H
Brett H
4 days ago

Do you mean less than half?

Lesley van Reenen
Lesley van Reenen
4 days ago

But the republicans won the election, the popular vote, the senate and hopefully soon, the house. A clean sweep. Too big to rig.

Bret Larson
Bret Larson
4 days ago

History balances on a knifes edge.

I think it might be one of the best examples of chaos math available.

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
4 days ago

Obama ain’t a wokester and he never was. He tried to unify the country a bit too quickly and cheaply, with a few key misspteps (Trayvon or “clingers” anyone?) but he was and is a moderate. I think only very charismatic people like Barack and Donald will have a real chance of winning the presidency in the forecastable future. But if we all survive we’ll see how an exhausted/thrilled American electorate “feels” in 4 years.

Bret Larson
Bret Larson
4 days ago
Reply to  AJ Mac

Maybe trump will win the Nobel peace prize?

nigel roberts
nigel roberts
3 days ago
Reply to  AJ Mac

I don’t think moderates set out to “fundamentally transform the United States of America” or learn at the kneee of Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky or Jeremiah “God damn America” Wright.

Stephen Follows
Stephen Follows
3 days ago

In other words, more than 50% didn’t. That’s called losing.

William Amos
William Amos
4 days ago

What a tremendous essay. Fluent, erudite, Humane, learned, perspicacious, measured, uncozened and engrossing. The style, all its own, reminds me in some parts of the late C. Hitchens or Thomas Mann, in others of Orwell, yet with flashes of that ‘Slumbering Volcano’ Wyndham Lewis.
I cannot praise the author highly enough. What a delight.

0 0
0 0
4 days ago
Reply to  William Amos

Heartening to see the Enemy (as Lewis styled himself in the 1920s) receive a timely and well-merited namecheck. As numerous others have said, this essay is truly exceptional. Thanks!

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
4 days ago

Brilliantly written. Powerful and entertaining. But I would genuinely like to hear the evidence, if much, behind the matter-of-fact claims about Obama’s influence that are made in the late-middle paragraphs. Do a better job of convincing me. Anyone.

Hugh Jarse
Hugh Jarse
4 days ago
Reply to  AJ Mac

Amen to all of the above. I too would be fascinated to have more insight into what exactly Obama was up to during the last 4 years, and how, and the extent to which he was able to exercise the levers of the presidency.
I suspect though, we’ll never find out.

Stephen Barnard
Stephen Barnard
4 days ago
Reply to  Hugh Jarse

Until he writes The Book…

Michael Cavanaugh
Michael Cavanaugh
4 days ago
Reply to  Hugh Jarse
Colorado UnHerd
Colorado UnHerd
3 days ago

Thanks for this. Fascinating.

Stephen Follows
Stephen Follows
3 days ago
Reply to  Hugh Jarse

I’m sure Trump is chasing that down even now. He’s got a lot of revenge to take.

Lesley van Reenen
Lesley van Reenen
4 days ago
Reply to  AJ Mac

Assumptions have to be made because it sure as hell wasn’t Biden or Harris running the show. Anyway, Obama’s influence over deep state is hardly a secret.

Neil Turrell
Neil Turrell
4 days ago

There is a lot of speculation about what he did in the two months before Trump took office in 2016; usually around the themes of arming a number of state departments to deliberately stymie Trump’s progress in government. I suspect we’ll never know the full story.

J Bryant
J Bryant
4 days ago
Reply to  AJ Mac

You make a good point. I’ve heard the same rumors over the years but I don’t recall an investigative article presenting the evidence. Maybe Mr. Samuels could tackle that project.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
2 days ago
Reply to  J Bryant

David Samuels is not an investigative reporter. He writes well, but relies more on speculation than fact. This essay, for example, did not do well in my fact checking. Not that it matters much, as he doesn’t make any pretense of doing rigorous analysis and reporting. He’s more a writer than a reporter, having published in places like the New Republic, the New Yorker, the Atlantic, the New York Times Magazine, and two books. He’s the literary editor of Tablet. He went to Harvard and Princeton.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
2 days ago
Reply to  AJ Mac

You asked to be convinced about Barack Obama’s influence during Joe Biden’s presidency. You are right to be skeptical — there is limited evidence of a Barack Obama “shadow presidency” and it’s based on a lot more frothy speculation than solid fact.
I think David Samuels is engaging in “truthful hyperbole” on that topic, exaggerating what is true to a more modest degree to make it sound truer. Not exaggeration to Trumpian levels, but hyperbolic nonetheless.
I think Joe and Jill Biden made the White House their own, even though Barack Obama had some influence. David Samuels exaggerates that influence to an imaginary level, just like he does with Barack Obama’s net worth. The Obamas did cash in, that’s clear, but to the tune of half a billion to a billion dollars? I don’t think so. Not even close.

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
2 days ago
Reply to  Carlos Danger

That all sounds about right to me. I’m already persuaded that Obama remains influential and powerful.

We tend to downplay or even overlook the self-interest and character flaws of those we’d rather have in charge, and take a harsh view of those we’d rather not. I try to correct for this in my own outlook, but can’t claim great success.

Last edited 2 days ago by AJ Mac
UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
4 days ago

When the U.S. votes for change they get Donald Trump. When the U.K. votes for change we get Keir Starmer.

Stephanie Surface
Stephanie Surface
4 days ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

Hahaha…

Peter Lee
Peter Lee
3 days ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

Perhaps you will get Farage!

Stephen Follows
Stephen Follows
3 days ago
Reply to  Peter Lee

Not under FPTP, unfortunately.

M Ruri
M Ruri
4 days ago

When are people going to realize, Kamala was Biden’s revenge, and he took it seriously and immediately. I knew as Biden endorsed her in his resignation speech it was an act of sabotage. Yes, I’m sure he did play around with the idea in front of others, but the vengeful look in his eye as he said the words belied his intention as did the fact that he has always been a vengeful p***k when he felt like it. She had been the most unpopular VP around since what, maybe Spiro Agnew? This was Biden’s way of flipping two birds to Pelosi, Schumer and Obama. Jill’s bright red pantsuit on election day, Biden putting on the MAGA hat to pose for a pic, all of it. Biden finally got the best of the great oracle from Chicago.

Su Mac
Su Mac
4 days ago

A great combination of the personal and the panoramic in this essay filled with wonder, interesting facts and sheer enjoyment of an incedible moment in American history!
Some of the most pithy and resonant bits for me are…
“Trump had been subjected to a whole-of-society assault by the American elite that would have killed most men 20 years younger, including those who don’t eat cheeseburgers most days for lunch”
And…
“Seeing Americans as one people, with a common culture and character, shaped by a common history, is not something that America’s new elites know how to do, though.”
And…
“Back then, Gilded Age America was ruled by a tight group of tycoons and their retainers who positioned themselves as the heirs to the Republican Party of Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant…the so-called Robber Barons — Morgans, Rockefellers, Goulds, Fricks, Carnegies, Whitneys, Harrimans — had an easy time of it, enjoying the benefits of cheap immigrant labour while flattering themselves as the rightful heirs of the Party that ended slavery…history doesn’t remember them kindly.”
Need to reread this potted history again soon.

Daniel Lee
Daniel Lee
4 days ago

Brilliant. But the new Elite hasn’t been unhorsed just yet. They’ll double down on everything and continue using their megaphone press to counterattack.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
4 days ago

Ultimately, it came down to this: the lurching of an increasingly overbearing and at the same time increasingly anarchic and incompetent American state had managed to alarm many Americans who were previously more alarmed by Trump.”
That is the sum of it and that will have more to do with the legacy of Trump than the man himself. DC has become a dysfunctional mess and that is what made Trump possible. He would have no place in a healthy, well-functioning republic, nor would he have an interest in running an operation that was already working smoothly.

Geo TP
Geo TP
3 days ago
Reply to  Alex Lekas

Agree. Ben Shapiro says (paraphrasing) Trump didn’t kill American politics during his first term, but rather when he first arrived on the scene he was the coroner declaring it dead.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
4 days ago

“McKinsey consultants with Harvard degrees may wind up unemployed or selling bottled war.”
Probably a typo, but maybe not.

Chuck Burns
Chuck Burns
4 days ago

Yes, it is a good article. It shows that the Democrat’s so-called democracy is a take off of Alice in Wonderland noting the man behind the curtain has been Obama all along. However, it doesn’t go far enough to show the end justifies the means depths the Democrats have gone to subvert the concept of democracy. The Democrats have moved the country into the realm of a 1984 Police State with its weaponization of the DOJ, FBI, CIA, et al.

Brett H
Brett H
4 days ago

Great piece of writing.

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
4 days ago
Reply to  Brett H

I knew we could agree on at leas one thing.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
4 days ago

Amazing.
Thank you.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
4 days ago

Totally brilliant articulate – did I say brilliant? – article by David Samuels. I shall make sure that everyone I know who can hold a thought for longer than 2 minutes sees it.

Thank you for such an amazing gallop through US socio-economic cultural background/history.

Ex Nihilo
Ex Nihilo
4 days ago

In the flood of post-election commentary David Samuel’s essay stands out as an original piece of genius. After reading it I felt like someone who had been groping through a dark room and finally found the light switch.

Bernard Brothman
Bernard Brothman
4 days ago

I wish I could have a musical comment, so you will have to sing this yourself: Irving Berlin’s, “G-d Bless America.”

David Lindsay
David Lindsay
4 days ago

Herewith, my contribution to The Guardian‘s counselling of its staff in their sorrow at the victory of Donald Trump. Like your idols in the United States, you can now go back to pretending to be opposed to war, to genocide, to the caging of child migrants, and to all the rest of it.

But will you? Those heroes of yours have let their masks slip, and you can let yours. They stop taking the knee when the people for whom they purport to do it stop voting for them, and that is as true of class as it is of race. Now they can scream what they have always thought, that black men were misogynists, that Latinos were misogynists and racists, that Hispanics and Arabs should be deported, that the working class was garbage, and that all of the above were just so ungrateful. Substitute brown people of sorts more common in Britain. On my knees I beg you to substitute “rubbish” for “garbage”. And away you go. We have always known that those were your real views, anyway.

Having lost the popular vote on the day that it probably failed to take control of the House of Representatives, the rump Democratic Party can no longer claim to be the natural majority obscured by the Electoral College and by the Senate. 90 per cent of discretionary household spending is by women, and even those who were in favour of abortion turn out to want a loaf of bread or a carton of milk rather more often than such a procedure. In politics or any other field, there is nothing on which the liberal elite will stamp harder than a movement with a young male following. The Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn movements felt the heel of that boot, so the young men of the first have largely migrated to Trump, whom Sanders would have beaten in 2016, while those of the second show signs of arriving in even worse places on our own shores unless action were taken with the utmost urgency.

As Jean-Luc Mélenchon has been pointing out, where there is no Left, then there is no restriction on the Right, and the Democratic Party is simply not the Left. If it were, then Keir Starmer would not have sent 100 staff to campaign for it. On the contrary, the Labour Party would have expelled any member who had done so. The impending settlement of the war in Ukraine has already brought down the German Government, but just as France has Mélenchon, so Germany has the even better Sahra Wagenknecht. They need something like that in the United States. And we need something like that here. Watch this space.

Stephanie Surface
Stephanie Surface
4 days ago
Reply to  David Lindsay

Melenchon, Sanders and Wagenknecht aren’t the way to a future of free prospering countries. I think you are delusional to think Marxists would be the answer to our current problems in the West. Whenever Marxists were in power they failed, even, if they tell you, that this time it’ll be different. It always ended in tears…

Last edited 4 days ago by Stephanie Surface
Ex Nihilo
Ex Nihilo
1 day ago

Not so much of an immigration problem to places like Venezuela, North Korea, or Cuba presently; or the USSR and Warsaw Pact historically. Help me remember: the Berlin Wall, was that to keep the East Germans in or the West Germans out?

Geo TP
Geo TP
3 days ago

I wasn’t familiar with the author, but I certainly am now. I happened to click on this one from the RCP page. After reading it, I felt compelled to immediately subscribe, as the home of such brilliant writing deserves support.
I am a Gen X professional, conservative, a never Trumper in 2015, ashamed of being taken hostage intellectually by the Bush era neocons, and person who voted for Trump thrice, as much for him representing the biggest middle finger to the elites I could find as for my policy hopes. I despise with the heat of one thousand suns our corrupt lying media and the western Marxism that has run roughshod through our once trusted institutions. I am feeling really good about the future of America now, and I deeply respect and am thankful for the many honest, intelligent, liberal, and current/former democrat voices who have had the courage to resist our decline and speak honestly about it. DJT has built himself a very interesting pirate ship this time, and it will be fascinating to watch.

denz
denz
4 days ago

Loved this. Bravo.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
3 days ago

My only point of contention is naming Trump the greatest living bullshit artist. That honor is reserved for the one and only William Jefferson Clinton And I quote “…That depends upon what your definition of is is..”

Peter B
Peter B
4 days ago

This is excellent. Puts it all into a historical context that makes some sense.
Last week I was looking at some old US election maps showing red and blue states. And there really was a period when the electoral college states map was almost the exact inverse of what it is today. For example, in 1900, the West Coast and North East were Republican and the entire South (plus Idaho and Montana) Democrat. It’s almost as if the parties had completely swapped over.
It also leaves me wondering – if Obama really was the power behind the throne all this time, how did I miss that ? And why did the media never report it ? Why didn’t Trump ever call it out ?

Peter Lee
Peter Lee
3 days ago
Reply to  Peter B

Even before the 2016, Obama opined in an interview, that this was what he wanted to do. Install a puppet and then govern anonomously.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
2 days ago
Reply to  Peter B

Good questions. I’ve seen no evidence that Barack Obama has been the power behind Joe Biden’s throne. Indeed, I don’t think Barack Obama was all that powerful when he was on the throne. He and his wife Michelle are good orators and writers, but that’s about it. He’s better at politics than she is, but neither one is a good executive. Or at least, they’ve never shown executive ability. Had Barack Obama been a white man, he never would have won the presidency.

Ex Nihilo
Ex Nihilo
1 day ago
Reply to  Carlos Danger

I agree totally. Obama was just an avatar for the left’s power establishment. He merely rubber-stamped whatever the people to whom he owed his office wanted. For that he was magnificently rewarded, arriving at the White House merely middle-class in assets and now worth a cool half-billion. That transformation initiated him into the Davos power set, but he remains only iterative and has not the real influence or gravitas to determine single-handedly the priorities of the Left. If one compares Obama the Senator from Illinois with Harris the Senator from California there is scant difference between them except that Obama was lucky to arrive at the precise moment that his superficial qualities were highly marketable politically and his predecessor in the White House was a moron who brought foolish wars and economic chaos to Americans.

Ralph Weiland
Ralph Weiland
4 days ago

Extraordinarily well written whether one agrees with its content or not. Incisive and very much to the point. Please do write on…

Nathan Sapio
Nathan Sapio
3 days ago

This piece rose to the level of literature. A genuine pleasure to read. Subtle and punchy. Completely summed up what people with heads on their shoulders (and not elsewhere) think about the farce and triumphant comedy of the last decades. I need to watch for more of your pieces.

Last edited 3 days ago by Nathan Sapio
Penny Rose
Penny Rose
4 days ago

Brilliant writing. Thank you.

Chipoko
Chipoko
4 days ago

I agree. An excellent piece of writing.

Mike Gallagher
Mike Gallagher
4 days ago

What a beautifully constructed essay a real masterpiece of observation and story telling. Thank you.

A.N. Other
A.N. Other
4 days ago

So beautifully written. Not sure whether the central arguments are true or not. I don’t know enough about American history. But that was a joy to read .

Paul MacDonnell
Paul MacDonnell
4 days ago

Good stuff.

Laurence Eyton
Laurence Eyton
4 days ago

Insanely good.

ANNE Quinlan
ANNE Quinlan
4 days ago

Great read..

Chris Gordon
Chris Gordon
4 days ago

I enjoyed and appreciate the insights of this essay, David. Thank you.

Tom Condray
Tom Condray
4 days ago

I’ve been genuinely worried for the past few months, and haven’t slept well at all.
Until Wednesday night, that is.
I love my country.
I always will.
To explain why henceforth I will provide a copy of this essay.

Mike W
Mike W
3 days ago

This article compelled me to subscribe.

Rosemary Throssell
Rosemary Throssell
4 days ago

Wow, just wow.

Amelia Melkinthorpe
Amelia Melkinthorpe
4 days ago

Fabulous!

laurence scaduto
laurence scaduto
4 days ago

Anyone who hasn’t voted for Willie Nelson at lest once isn’t a real American!

Michael Cavanaugh
Michael Cavanaugh
4 days ago

Mama don’t let your babies grow up to be MSM . . .

Evan Heneghan
Evan Heneghan
4 days ago

Man this is bloody brilliant honestly, just a great read from start to finish, thank you.

Rick Lawrence
Rick Lawrence
4 days ago

Excellently written essay. Of course, it appeals strongly to my, and probably many others, unconscious bias, and as others have said, I do not know the veracity of all the Obama references. But it all rings true. We should not get too far ahead of ourselves in rejoicing at what many are comparing to the second coming (oh wait, it is the second coming). Trump won’t be starting his presidency for a few weeks yet. Let’s wait a while (4 years?) before getting too carried away about what the future holds.

Mark Engemann
Mark Engemann
4 days ago

Excellent Article
America is the Phoenix
It keeps us great, but it hurts if you are to close to the flames.

Jerry Carroll
Jerry Carroll
4 days ago

This is simply brilliant.

mike flynn
mike flynn
4 days ago

Were all those 19th century robber barons GOP? Recall mid 20th century Averill Harriman was DEM. Dont know about the rest.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
2 days ago
Reply to  mike flynn

The robber barons tended to be fluid in their politics. Andrew Carnegie, for instance, seemed to be a Democrat early on but ended up (probably) a Republican. Not robber baron Leland Stanford, though. He was a Republican, serving as the first Republican governor of California and then later as a Republican Senator from California.

Mark Kennedy
Mark Kennedy
3 days ago

An interesting, albeit caustic historical overview, David, perceptive (alas) in ways potentially inimical to your long-term well-being. As #Resistance2 gathers its forces, are you concerned at all that the assassins surely coming for Trump could take notice of you as well? Just because history is turning the page on them doesn’t mean they aren’t still capable of doing some damage on the way down.

Last edited 3 days ago by Mark Kennedy
Ray Andrews
Ray Andrews
4 days ago

Bravo!

nigel roberts
nigel roberts
3 days ago

Notwithstanding my peevish pedant alert below, this essay kicks ass.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
3 days ago

Such a great essay. All I can say is Amen!!

Harrydog
Harrydog
3 days ago

Outstanding. The best understanding of Trump I have read in a long time.
Brought to mind this scene from the “The Wind and the Lion”
Wind and he lion Teddy’s grizzly bear speech – Google Search

Last edited 3 days ago by Harrydog
UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
3 days ago

Not a great metaphor: “Ivy League universities, the crucible in which the new class has been forged, … ” A forge is where cast steel, aluminum, and other metals are made stronger under pressure. The crucible is where the base metals and alloying elements are melted. Better description of the Ivies might be the crucibles where the pot metal of our so called elites is produced; pot metal being made without a metallurgical standard, primarily from an assortment of metals with low melting points. And (according to Wikipedia), ‘Depending on the exact metals “thrown into the pot”, pot metal can become unstable over time, as it has a tendency to bend, distort, crack, shatter, and pit with age.’ Otherwise a good read.

Last edited 3 days ago by UnHerd Reader
Geo TP
Geo TP
3 days ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

Lol I am not sure if this is supposed to be low key snark/funny but I got a kick out of this!

charlie martell
charlie martell
3 days ago

What a great piece. I thoroughly enjoyed that. Bookmarked too!

Morgan Smith
Morgan Smith
3 days ago

This is the best essay I’ve read in years, an encyclopedic overview of how we got to where we are today, exposing the agent of “hope and change” as the germ that infected American politics. Fabulous! Thank you.

Last edited 3 days ago by Morgan Smith
Craig Woerpel
Craig Woerpel
3 days ago
Reply to  Morgan Smith

“waving their hands at the cameras like they were calling for smelling salts”
nice

Craig Woerpel
Craig Woerpel
3 days ago
Reply to  Craig Woerpel

But it’s so unfair. FDR had 4 terms and BHO only got 3.

Adolphus Longestaffe
Adolphus Longestaffe
2 days ago

Trump’s victory was clear-cut. It was not a landslide (though that’s almost beside the point, since Trump claimed a landslide after he lost in 2020).
For examples of landslide victories, please refer to the elections of 1972 and 1980.

Kerry Davie
Kerry Davie
2 days ago

A very perceptive take on the Obama Malignancy that I hope has finally been buried, together with the wooden stake driven through its heart (if such can be found).

Samuel Ross
Samuel Ross
2 days ago

Well said, Mr. Samuels. My compliments to you and your pen which writes with dry wit, as dry as the Sahara desert and as vast in scope. Thank you, sir.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
2 days ago

Well said!

Michael Clarke
Michael Clarke
2 days ago

Very good piece.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
2 days ago

I just joined Unherd because of this excellent and insightful article. Thank you Mr. Samuels!

Bryan Owens
Bryan Owens
2 days ago

The entire paragraph that begins with: “At 78, Trump’s relentless pitchman’s energy is at once diminished, and at the same more genial…”
Bravo, Mr. Samuels. That paragraph is, for me, writing at its absolute finest. You have my total respect. Oh, what an essay.

Last edited 2 days ago by Bryan Owens
Jane Doe
Jane Doe
1 day ago

This is one of the best essays I’ve read on American politics and our current state of affairs. I’m literally overwhelmed by it. Bravo!

Chris Whybrow
Chris Whybrow
4 days ago

Captions is the best way to follow a Trump speech. The man doesn’t exactly have a soothing, melodic voice.

nigel roberts
nigel roberts
3 days ago

Pedant alert. It was not “long past midnight in Livingston Montana” it was a few minutes after one.

Three o’clock in Florida.

Last edited 3 days ago by nigel roberts
S HW
S HW
4 days ago

I’m not a fan of the Democratic machine, to put it mildly, but I do think it’s a responsibility of journalists to hold people to the same standards. Your boys, Trump and Vance, are both products of the same Ivy institutions you seem to associate only with Democrats. And Trump is also a real estate billionaire like Obama. But my biggest concern is that you and people who think like you seem to be seduced only by the idea of destruction. What’s after that? What’s the plan for healthcare, living wages, inflation reduction? It’s fun when your team wins a football game, which is how you’re treating it, but not so much fun when people have to grind out the details of a functioning government. Much luck to us all.
Also, you could have just watched the speech literally anywhere else. Don’t be disingenuous.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
4 days ago
Reply to  S HW

And Trump is also a real estate billionaire like Obama.
What? Obama has never held a regular job in his life.

Sisyphus Jones
Sisyphus Jones
4 days ago
Reply to  Alex Lekas

Chauncey Gardener. Wait, no. Chauncey Gardener was gardener. That’s a real job.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
4 days ago
Reply to  S HW

You have to stop the bleeding first. Then you can look at treating other diseases. I figure the U.S. under the Dems is about 10 years behind Britain and the EU when it comes to self-destructive policies like net zero. Trump will stop the bleeding, as we watch Europe’s death rattle.

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
4 days ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

Hope so. Can you remind of how well Trump handled Covid?
*After re-reading your comment: I hope you’re not celebrating the potential ‘death’ of Europe, or hate-watching it with popcorn, Jim

Last edited 4 days ago by AJ Mac
Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
2 days ago
Reply to  AJ Mac

Even in hindsight, can you think of anything Donald Trump could have done better to handle the Covid-19 pandemic?

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
2 days ago
Reply to  Carlos Danger

Yes: Be less of an arrogant jerk. He nearly died from it himself but minimized it until he couldn’t any longer. And don’t promote idiot cures like bleach, even if what you said is not what you meant.

In retrospect, he did well by shutting down incoming air traffic pretty early.

Last edited 2 days ago by AJ Mac