Klaus Schwab’s departure from the helm of the World Economic Forum has been met with excitement by sections of the Right. As the figurehead for globalism and the elite adoption of a laundry list of progressive causes, the German became something of a bogeyman for conservatives around the world.
But the WEF’s reputation as a progressive champion — which it owes to highly publicised interventions such as the promotion of eating insects and the promise that future generations will “own nothing and be happy” — misses the bigger picture.
The executive board, led by WEF President and Norwegian conservative Børge Brende, has taken “full executive responsibility” over the past year, according to Schwab. And Schwab himself, a millionaire with strong ties to the world’s financial elites, is more conservative than his reputation might suggest, particularly on economic issues.
“Klaus has always been close to the Christian Democrats in Germany. So, politically, that’s where it has always been: centre-right. The President [Brende] is a conservative Norwegian politician, most definitely not a socialist,” a Davos insider told UnHerd.
Schwab’s exit is unlikely to prompt any meaningful changes in the near future, according to the insider. The WEF founder may be stepping down from his executive role, but he’ll continue to serve as non-executive chairman and there’s an expectation that he’ll still have considerable sway for years to come. “I very much doubt [his stepping down] means much until he gives up sitting in the office as you walk in the door,” the source claimed. “Kissinger kept going that long.”
Peter Goodman, global economics correspondent at the New York Times and author of Davos Man: How the Billionaires Devoured the World, seems to agree. Speaking to UnHerd, he questioned the authenticity of Davos’s progressive image: “It’s always been ridiculous that you’ve got this institution that operates under the mantra ‘committed to improving the state of the world’ while gathering the ultimate beneficiaries of the status quo in his village in Switzerland.”
Goodman added: “I think this forum will become less and less relevant. It’s been clear for years that there’s a huge gap between this very idealistic rhetoric that comes out of the forum, and the reality that it’s an institution that is engineered to maintain the status quo.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeIn reply to the headline…NO!
“It’s always been ridiculous that you’ve got this institution that operates under the mantra ‘committed to improving the state of the world’ while gathering the ultimate beneficiaries of the status quo in his village in Switzerland.”
Wait, no. That’s not ridiculous. That’s absolutely the plan.
Exactly, making the rich even richer
Never heard of the WEF and I don’t care.
You’ll breathe better with your head removed from your fundament,
And that’s your credibility shot to sh*t…
Why advertise your ignorance?
We should know by now that it’s rarely the upper, senior levels of these organizations that actually sets policy; much more often it’s the belligerent and activist young radical apparats who relentlessly bully their elders with a combination of emotional blackmail and sub rosa complicity with a compliant media. These kids are still there.
It is a pity in a way that Klaus Schwab is going to lower his profile. The man’s appearance and thick, brutal accent has only been approached in sheer villainy by the James Bond character Ernst Stavro Blofeld. No one will miss Schwab more than conservatives.
Gonzalo Berrón of Transnational Institute:
https://www.tni.org/en/article/hundreds-of-civil-society-organizations-worldwide-denounce-world-economic-forums-takeover
“This agreement between the UN and WEF formalises a disturbing corporate capture of the UN. It moves the world dangerously towards a privatised and undemocratic global governance’, says Gonzalo Berrón of Transnational Institute, one of the key organisers of the open letter.”