Main Edition
US
FR
March 29, 2022 - 7:15am
The blue-and-gold flag of Ukraine evokes the country’s landscape. The blue stands for the sky and the gold represents a field of ripening wheat. It’s a reminder of Ukraine’s reputation as the bread basket of Europe.
And that prompts a pressing question for the rest of the world: what is this invasion doing to global food supplies? Nothing good, that’s for sure, but some of the figures quoted in the media are downright terrifying.
According to a report in the New York Times, “Russia and Ukraine together supply more than a quarter of the world’s wheat.” A piece in Politico states that “Russia and Ukraine together provide about 30 percent of the world’s wheat.”
So if the fighting in Ukraine — and the sanctions on Russia — interrupts such an important source of supply won’t this result in catastrophic shortages?
No, because percentages quoted don’t apply to global wheat production, but to global wheat exports. As the crop scientist, Sarah Taber, points out in a much-needed tweet thread, this means that the shortfall in supply is much smaller than some headlines might suggest.
For a start, wheat exports haven’t been halted completely — especially not from Russia, which continues to trade with most of the world. Taber puts the combined shortfall from both Ukraine and Russia at 7 million tons. Given that global wheat production last year was 778 million tons, this means that something like 1% of the worldwide supply needs to be replaced, not a quarter or a third.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeIt’s nice to have the sober professional view of the world but that won’t stop the gloom-and-doom sayers (AKA the MSM) from spooking people (and markets) into action.
PS What do I do with all these bags of bread flour that I’ve just taken a second mortgage on?
You could always ferment them into ethanol. Given the way fuel prices are going, you’ll probably make a profit. And it turns out to be a bad idea, you could always just drink it.
Send it to that magnificently named Yorkshire power station, DRAX, to be burnt as a bio fuel.
Last year DRAX received an £ 890 million subsidy for burning bio fuel pellets grown and harvested in British Columbia and California.
You should get a good price.
It is Drax. It is a village nearby
I wanted to emphasise it by putting it in bold, but my rinky-dink equipment didn’t run to that, hence capital letters. QED?
Well, if it amuses you….
No, it’s just an unusual name that dates back to Doomsday.
My local MP in Dorset is Richard Drax
Competition for Rishi as richest MP?
Send it in little envelopes to the Kremlin?
Unfortunately it’s the proper stuff not the ‘Graded Grains’ variety. It’s OK I do occaisionally bake my own and I supose I can invite the family around.
The “we’re all going to starve” headlines were never about informing people. They were about generating revenue by scaring people into buying newspapers or clicking on news stories. Same as always — news-ertainment
Thanks for this. It’s just what I suspected, that the MSM is fearmongering on this topic of food supply.
We really need to rein in our MSM – it’s whipping up its echo chamber (not the people) to take ridiculous actions – not pursuing herd immunity as callous because the ‘bodies might pile up’; stopping a national referendum on Brexit being enacted; trying to kick a PM out during a war because he went to some work parties.
Agreed. The problem is that most of us are not going to read an article with a headline: “Things going to be much as they are now next year”. Whereas “Catastrophic shortage, many will die” is likely to draw the eye. There is little incentive for superficial MSM to report soberly instead everything is framed in terms of some purported catastrophe. It is up to us to support sober reporting rather than alarmist but too many prefer a bit of drama in their news rather than dull sobriety.
Well I guess it depends on where you live and how much disposable income you have.
I would be pretty concerned if I was at subsistence level and living in say Egypt, Libya, Chad, Ethiopia, Yemen … this could be a long list.
It would be a bit ironic if the world ran out of wheat due to the war in Ukraine. Back in the day, the Soviet Union was often having to import food, despite Ukraine being a part of them. Of course it was being run according to socialist principles, so not surprising it wasn’t producing what it was capable of, but just sayin’, the rest of the world somehow got by and even had a bit left over.
Although this does make me think of an article in the Economist some years ago. They suggested the US and even certain western European countries should cut back drastically on agriculture since it wasn’t as profitable an activity as what the workers in that industry could otherwise be doing. They suggested we should just focus on imports from cheaper countries. It seemed crazy enough at the time, but stuff like the Ukraine war just points out the further risks of such a policy. And should peace break out permanently across humanity, not sure how that would stop droughts, floods, hurricanes, plagues of locusts (still a thing), plant diseases, and a host of other things that could strike at the food supply. Redundancy is not only a good idea, but downright essential for something you can’t get by without.
Yes, but the problem is that they consider food to be a commodity with lots of financial ties which has resulted in food of much lesser quality which causes many health issues. It is about time that agriculture should only be approached as a way of keeping us all healthy….. I can always dream…
Sarah Taber is a crop and food safety scientist who founded a caviar company and has studied small acreage farming. She’s not a grain farmer, an expert on grain production, an agricultural economist, a fertilizer producer, a wheat importer or exporter…so, I’m not sure why her interpretation of wheat statistics should anchor this article. What if protracted fighting in Ukraine disrupts the seasonal window to plant their wheat and corn crops? What if the chain reaction of high global natural gas prices reduces the economic viability of producing nitrogen-based fertilizers? What if unaffordable fertilizer means that farmers will opt for a diminished crop yield? Ukraine exported $377 million dollars worth of fertilizer in 2020…what if that product can’t get to market? The U.S. imports approximately 96% of the nation’s potassium fertilizer from Russia…what does that mean if sanctions are put in place?
Egypt is one of the largest importers of wheat in the world, and 80% of its supply is from Russia and Ukraine. Does the author believe that Egypt isn’t panicking right now?
All of that has already happened. Seeds aren’t reaching the farmers in Ukraine. Nitrogen-based fertilizers are produced at a smaller scale, and are exported in smaller amounts, if at all. This plus high diesel prices means that farmes are not planting as much, or are switching to other crops. Which means there is too little animal feed on top. Which in turn will net less natural fertilizer.
It means banana peels will get their own market.
They’re sh**ing their pants, as they should.
Good to get some perspective Peter, some sane counter to the panic merchants.
Also Australia is a major wheat grower and exporter and has an all time record harvest this year.
Also worth noting that there is certainly no shortage of food in the western world (quite likely that there is at least 10% per capita overconsumption – so there’s an immediate saving). Add in massive food waste in the West. Hard to see how we don’t survive.
Of course, in poorer countries it’s not the same.
But there are also plenty of alternatives to wheat.
A period of reduced food consumption in the west with healthier diets and less waste would be no bad thing.
There’s overeating and overheating, most people live in overheated homes and could turn their thermostats down a few notches.
It’s possible that wheat exports and wheat production might be a bit more complicated than is suggested in this article,
I read a while ago someone interviewing a wheat farmer in Australia. He was asked about growing more to supply the possible shortfall for next year. He said something like well maybe, although it did depend on the weather. Failed crops and all that meaning it’s a bad idea to have all your wheat in one basket so to speak.
He then said there was a matter of transporting it to the ports, which could be overcome with some issues but he foresaw the biggest issue being the ports themselves. He doubted they could handle the increase in shipping required without a lot of extra capacity which meant serious amounts of investment.
And given we don’t know how long this wheat crisis would last (you know, lifting sanctions one day etc) he doubted any investors would be forthcoming. And even if by some miracle they were it would take more than a year to raise the money, get the planning sorted and build the necessary capacity.
So, as someone else pointed out, the person being interviewed knows a lot about crop and food safety but maybe her knowledge of the world wheat markets is less extensive.
Sorry about my moniker. I wrote it in exasperation some time ago when UnHerd kept badgering me about subscribing or some such. I can’t seem to change it!
Don’t worry about it, a capable government can easily handle such situations.
It’s almost like the majority of journos are pushed to sensationalism and tight deadlines – in addition to not being as bright as their forebears – preferring journalism degrees above real life experience.
So they’re incapable both intrinsically and by design of going through more than one or two layers of analysis.
TLDR: Nice article Peter
We live in a farming area in the UK and the farmers are saying that if there is going to be a shortage of wheat it will likely be next year not this. Not sure of the reason for that.
I think the reason for it being next year is partly to do with Ukraine exports but also due to the cost of fertiliser going from £200 to £1000/tonne. Therefore some can’t afford to put a crop in this year or some are actively not doing so based on the fact that the volatility in the wheat price means that they may end up making a loss on this years crop!! Not a good situation to be in when margins are as slim as they are!!
Yes, one farmer told me he will not use fertiliser this year with the result that he will only get half the normal yield.
See note on Australia below
Look around you! …we eat too much including wheat. It makes us fat and makes many people feel bloated and feeling fat. Comsuming wheat is not good for many people including me. We are not running out of food. The biggest risk to humans is not shortages but the incredible amount of over consuption of bad food including wheat.
Though you and I (and most UnHerd readers) may be somewhat fat and happy, with fully loaded freezers, refrigerators and pantries, the World Health Organization estimates that 2.3 billion humans (or 30% of the world’s population) are ” food insecure “, which is the popular, sanitized term for people who aren’t certain where their (or their family’s) next meal is coming from…if it’s coming at all. Even in wealthy Western nations, the lines at charitable food banks and the public’s demand for government food assistance are at record levels. The global pandemic caused a spike in world hunger, which isn’t hard to cogitate…so imagine what happens when you now layer on supply chain disruptions, a spike in transportation costs, a significant increase in food inflation (from farm, factory, and fishery production, all the way to in-store purchase), and unmitigated global competition for what will potentially be a dearth in supply of raw food products and grocery store edibles if the doom & gloom prognosticators are even partially correct.
I take the point that headlines, as usual, are as sensational as they can be made, and are therefore misleading or exagerrated when they imply 30% of world production may be lost, but I should have thought that even a 7% loss would have a disproportionate effect on world prices, as in all markets, until higher prices result in higher production.
.
I wonder if the possibility of food/ fertiliser shortages might affect the idea of rewilding? Isabella Tree says in ber book that Britain does not need to grow as much food as it does, and that the world produces more food than it needs. We can therefore put agricultural land back into wilderness without concern. Now the dialogue is about being more self sufficient, a concern of the EEC/EU since its inception. At least we can stop growing edible foods to use as bio fuels!
Will still raise prices. Cooking oil in Kenya has tripled in price.
I read today that energy /fertiliser inflation means many UK growers of cucumbers, peppers are shuttering their heated greenhouses..