This Country has been one of the outstanding success stories of British television in the past few years. The mockumentary follows two cousins, Kerry and Kurtan, who live in an isolated Cotswolds village. It gently satirises a rural environment that’s still very different from how most of us live, despite the slow spread of mainstream culture into every corner of the country.
The show’s third and quite possibly final season, which is about to draw to a close, has been as brilliant as the previous two. Its bread and butter is the skewering of a particular social class — the rural precariat. It recounts the stories of people who aren’t all that bright, aren’t always that nice, and who are held back in life by their hubris and their capacity to self-sabotage. Its trick, what has set it apart from other shows, has been to do this in such a way that it’s unmistakeably a deeply compassionate piece of television. It’s a celebration of the oddness of a corner of the world where people live limited lives, and, therefore, an insistence on the humanity and individuality of every person, whoever they are, wherever they come from. This Country exists to give a group of people the dignity of being heard.
It has not happened by chance. The show is the work of two artists whose lives were defined, in the years before their success, by the feeling that no one wanted to hear from them, and this has undoubtedly powered their writing. Daisy May and Charlie Cooper, the brother and sister who play Kerry and Kurtan as well as writing the show, made the series a long way from any TV industry influence, living in their parent’s house in Cirencester. It feels more deeply rooted in that environment than in the world of TV commissioning and celebrity casting.
Almost no one in the show was a professional actor when they started filming — the Coopers’ dad plays the dad in the show, and a group of their Cirencester friends make up most of the rest of the cast. Even one of the few professional actors involved in the core cast, Trevor Cooper, only really seems to be in it because he’s Daisy May and Charlie’s uncle (although he also happens to be a wonderful actor).
Once you know this, it’s hard to avoid the feeling that this casting gives the show a loving kind of authenticity — but it’s also a mark of difference, a proud way of displaying where the show began and where its heart still belongs. Because part of what’s great about This Country is a feeling that it happened in spite of the way the world works, the world of television production in particular. So the Coopers’ use of their family in the casting also seems like a way of signalling what a triumphant act of defiance it was for them to get this show made — and a means of showing their scars.
In an interview with the Independent published earlier this year, Daisy May Cooper spoke about the poverty she and her brother lived in while they came up with This Country. “We were sharing a broken mattress at our parents’; all the springs had gone in the middle and we didn’t have any internet because we couldn’t afford it. Every morning, we walked down to the library to check our emails and Facebooks. We had nothing. The stress of it. It was so humiliating, and you have no choices when you don’t have money. Your dignity is absolutely… you’ve got no self-respect.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI read something about this show elsewhere. I would love to check it out but I threw out the TV 20 years ago for all the obvious reasons. Perhaps there are some clips on YouTube.
Thank you, and I get what you are saying. Indeed it is a great TV show and you are spot on in many of your points. I would like to add to this: “…held back in life by their hubris and their capacity to self-sabotage.” Yes people are, but ironically you later mention the structural reasons as well that hold people back. I don’t think you mean to, but that sentence could be read to mean it is 100% their own fault and responsibility, which fits neatly into the “lack of aspiration” narrative. Personal agency is bounded by psychological mechanisms (for example lack of self efficacy, external locus of control), biological mechanisms including, increasingly important in many sectors, personal attractiveness and norms of ‘beauty’, and finally social mechanisms such as social class which affects things like access to private education, and material benefits that help children develop positively. You acknowledge this later in your piece, and I’m reminded of Orwell’s comment in Down and Out about how poverty ‘annihilates the future’, about the ‘crust wiping’ and the ‘boredom’. There is empirical evidence that poverty affects cognitive development and creates feelings of fatalism. This can then lead to other self sabotaging behaviours. Some people like to blame the individuals themselves and leave it at that. ‘This Country’ avoids that overly simplistic understanding.
Well I’ve had a look on YouTube and I don’t really consider it to be a ‘modern miracle’. Instead, I find it to be somewhat puerile and a rural Office knock-off.
And I don’t buy all this stuff about being isolated an unable to get to London etc. I grew up in a hamlet – not even a village – in the middle of nowhere and further away from London. I would get on the train and go to London when I was 16. I was working as a copywriter in one of London’s best advertising agencies when I was 20. Really, it’s not difficult.
As for the village and its environs, it all looks beautiful. I know that one doesn’t appreciate these things when you are the age of the two main characters, but most people would love to live there.