X Close

Tribalism has come to the West Hostile and polarised, today's America reminds me of my Somalian clan

Credit: Brent Stirton/Getty


December 27, 2021   5 mins

About a decade ago, when I worked for the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), I had to force myself to go to lunch with a friend. I dreaded the meeting because I knew that she was going to try to convince me to leave my job. AEI is a pro-business, conservative-leaning think tank in Washington, DC. My friend was an enthusiastic liberal.

After I had run out of excuses, the day arrived and, predictably, after a few minutes of the usual small talk, my friend launched into a tirade about the Iraq War, which several of my colleagues strongly supported.

“You don’t belong there, Ayaan,” she said.

I remember trying to steer the conversation on to actual policies. I had voted for supporting the American coalition in Iraq when I was a Member of Parliament in The Netherlands — and I started to explain why.

But she wasn’t interested in a rational discussion. She interrupted me mid-sentence, launching into a monologue about John Bolton, the former Ambassador to the United Nations and a fellow at AEI (and subsequently National Security Advisor to President Trump). Bolton, my friend insisted, was a loathsome, hateful, racist, neo-conservative warmonger. The list went on and on until eventually she said that he looked like a walrus with a moustache. You could tell by his physiognomy, she explained, that he was a psychopath.

“But what about the policies?” I responded, trying to redirect the conversation away from personalities. The more she spoke, the more I recognised her broad disposition as something I had experienced earlier in my life. Her attitude was almost entirely tribal. Two things, in particular, stood out: an almost blind hatred of a particular group (Republicans); and secondly, the use of deeply personal attacks on individual researchers to justify that hatred.

Today, ten years later, this attitude seems to be the prevailing norm. Numerous studies support the hypothesis that American life — not just politics, but life in general — has become deeply polarised. The deeply divided society we now live in increasingly reminds me of clan or tribal behaviour in Africa.

In Somalia, where I was born, my mother was blindly loyal to our clan. So much so that, apparently, she claimed she could detect the malicious intentions of an individual from a different clan just by the structure of his forehead. She would, for example, often warn my father that someone was trying to take advantage of him, purely by the way he frowned.

In Culture and Conflict in the Middle East, anthropologist Philip Carl Salzman recounts meeting tribesmen in Baluchistan. What, they had asked Salzman, would he do if he faced a real danger in his home country? Well, Salzman replied, he would call the police. The tribesmen roared with laughter, then looked at him pityingly: “Oh no, no, no, they said: only your ‘lineage mates’ will help you.”

In tribal communities, neutral institutions of civil society that Westerners take for granted — such as the police, impartial courts, and the rule of law — simply do not, and cannot, exist. In such societies, everything is tribalised, and the task of building civic institutions is laden with difficulties.

In Somalia, I was taught to be suspicious of anyone from a different clan, to always think harm was coming my way and to be guarded against anyone that was “other.” I come from the Darod clan, and was taught to constantly listen to accents, examine face shapes and overanalyse all non-verbal cues, searching for any indications of a different tribe. I can still identify a Somali (and usually their clan) from across a room.

We were captives of an echo chamber, hearing constantly of the evils of the neighbouring Hawiye clan. We were taught from a young age that the Hawiye were coming to rape, rob, and destroy us. In response, we amassed weapons, hoarded food and exhorted young men (as young as 12) to join the military. The looming threat of the Hawiye was so great that my mother eventually sent my sister and me abroad.

In the end, because of such protracted tribal tensions, Somalia collapsed into civil war. Every attempt at mediation proved incapable of handling the deep-seated mistrust and hatred that accumulated by each clan over the years; tribal elders, reluctant to compromise, could not de-escalate the situation. With such high levels of distrust, the conflict spiralled into bloodshed.

While such violence is yet to seize America, all the tribalist ingredients are present. There is a blind commitment to one party or the other; emotions are running high; there is a lack of trust in civic institutions. If such tribalism isn’t overcome, it’s only a matter of time before the situation escalates.

Some of this has its absurd side: for instance, the strange ways that public-health measures such as mask-wearing and vaccination have become politicised, to the point that I know of fully vaccinated people in California who say they will continue to wear masks for fear of being mistaken for Republicans. Bizarre? Of course. But it is also symptomatic of a dangerous trend towards tribalism.

We are, I fear, close to the precipice of serious destabilisation. Many American cities are either militarised (Washington, DC), near a social boiling point (Minneapolis), or have capitulated to anarchist protests and pressures (Portland, Seattle).

These tribal quirks run deep on both sides of the aisle. Many Republicans continue to dispute the legitimacy of the result of the last presidential election; while on the Left, the woke are eroding the Democratic Party from the inside, as identity politics displace universalist aspirations. Some citizens are viewed as part of oppressive groups, some as part of oppressed groups. A person’s individual actions can generally do little to change the immutable characteristics of the tribe to which they belong.

Just as I noticed with my friend over lunch, there is frequently a visceral hostility towards anyone who leans even slightly toward the Right. Today, especially in academia, those who don’t conform with the “progressive” narrative, no matter how ethical they might be as individuals, are vilified as racists, white supremacists, homophobes or transphobes. Individuals can be attacked, cancelled, disinvited or even fired for the tiniest of verbal transgressions.

This kind of intolerance has for some time been apparent in high schools, too. Another friend of mine has a daughter who attends a private school outside of San Francisco. Last year, when it was revealed that she had expressed mild support for President Trump, she was pushed down the stairs by a fellow pupil.

It was a horrifying and, one hopes, rare incident. And yet there is something very striking about tribalism: it is a basic human trait, like skin colour or gender. However, despite being the natural state of being for many humans, it is not a positive or helpful trait, particularly in modern times. Tribalism developed as an imperfect social survival mechanism in the early stages of human civilisation. But in modern times, it can lead to social disintegration and severe violence between groups.

The beautiful story of America, the reason so many people around the world still yearn to come here, is to a large extent founded on our rejection of tribalism and our establishment of civic, neutral institutions, based on the fundamental principle of equality before the law. These institutions are imperfect, of course, but they are far superior to the tribalism that rules other parts of the world. Our overcoming of such a natural urge is an accomplishment.

As “woke” politics strengthens its grasp on our institutions — extending beyond the educational system into the media and now many corporations — that accomplishment is being eroded. The presumption of innocence, the commitment to blind justice and the whole notion of due process are all falling victim to spurious notions of “equity” and “anti-racism” — both of which carry within them an implicit intention to discriminate on racial lines.

If we continue to slip down this path, the thirst for tribalism will be unquenchable. That’s why moderate liberals need to stand up to the destructive forces that are taking over the Democratic party, just as moderate conservatives need to resist the tribal impulse that often grows in reaction to the other side’s excesses.

In Somalia, we failed to do this. In America it is imperative that we succeed.

This piece was originally published in May.


Ayaan Hirsi Ali is an UnHerd columnist. She is also a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, Founder of the AHA Foundation, and host of The Ayaan Hirsi Ali Podcast. Her new book is Prey: Immigration, Islam, and the Erosion of Women’s Rights.

Ayaan

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

13 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jeremy Bray
Jeremy Bray
2 years ago

Ayaan is quite right in identifying these divisions as quasi-tribal and the consequences can be brutally lethal in even the most apparently civilised countries. In the UK we have looked on in horror and astonishment for years at the quasi-tribal conflict between Protestants and Catholics supposedly worshiping the same God who promotes charity and love for your neighbour in Northern Ireland and the fissures have not yet healed.
Germany under successively Kaiser Wilhelm and then Adolf Hitler descended into an aggressive tribalism despite its deep cultural traditions. Some of my ancestors were killed or escaped from the quasi-tribal conflict between republicans and clerical royalists in the Vendee rebellions in France in the early 1800s, described by one French historian as a genocide. This is to select but a few of the instances of such collective madness in supposedly civilised Europe.
Adding quasi-religious conflicts based on strong beliefs that are not susceptible to rational resolution is a lethal combination. Woke beliefs are often held with religious tenacity and are not susceptible to rational discussion.
Many of the problems in Africa involve tribalism and religion. In the recent Unherd article talking about the migrants trying to cross to the UK from the author talked in passing of the fights between the various migrant groups. We must preserve ourselves from imported tribalisms, whether religious or purely tribal and against the US import of racial tribalism.
Extinction Rebellion and Insulate Britain are further fanatical tribes who believe their causes transcend the Rule of Law. It is essential that the law is applied impartially if we are to avoid descending into tribal suspicions and mutual loathing.
It was further disturbing to read over Christmas of the angry fanatics disturbing the Christmas gatherings described in comments on Giles Fraser’s recent article. Heaven help us from tribal fanatics of all stripes.

George Stone
George Stone
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeremy Bray

Ayaan did not refer to ‘quasi’ tribalism at all in the article, but to the ‘almost entirely tribal’ attitude of her friend.

Jeremy Bray
Jeremy Bray
2 years ago
Reply to  George Stone

Indeed, but a tribe is something you are born into, it is not really an attitude you adopt even if it is that of the group you decide to identify with. So being a progressive is, in my view, something more quasi-tribal rather than tribal in it’s true sense. I have however used tribal more loosely in my post as well.

Peter Mott
Peter Mott
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeremy Bray

You are right, “sectarian” is a much better term. In fact I am not convinced that there is a clear direction presently in the US and the present piece, though suggestive and beautifully written does not add anything much.

Christopher Chantrill
Christopher Chantrill
2 years ago

But first we have to understand tribalism, and Nazi Carl Schmitt has taught us how: politics is the friend-enemy distinction. Or, as Curtis Yarvin puts it: “there is no politics without an enemy.”
If you believe, as our lefty friends do, that politics is the royal road to justice, then anyone opposed to your Sacred Struggle for Justice is an enemy. And the thing about enemies is that it is OK to kill them.

Rob Hiney-Saunders
Rob Hiney-Saunders
2 years ago

Interestingly I’m left wing and I don’t believe that politics is a “sacred struggle” nor do I believe people that disagree with me are enemies. The fact that you think we do is an example of the tribalism being described in the article. Easier to see it other people rather than yourself isn’t it?
Good article.

Phil Rees
Phil Rees
2 years ago

But is it such a new phenomenon in USA?before any of the current extremes wasn’t there an Irish tribe, originally treated a vermin; an Italian tribe; a Sicilian mafia tribe? Then there was the white tribe/black tribe division. All of these distinctions can be found in UK too but to a far less marked degree (except in Ireland!). It is the importance given to these distinctions in USA that mark them as tribal.

Bill W
Bill W
2 years ago
Reply to  Phil Rees

We tend to import American attitudes.

Last edited 2 years ago by Bill W
James Joyce
James Joyce
2 years ago

Last year, when it was revealed that she had expressed mild support for President Trump, she was pushed down the stairs by a fellow pupil.
It was a horrifying and, one hopes, rare incident. 
Of course this is a rare incident, because people are afraid of expressing even “mild support” for President Trump.
I’m a fan of tribalism in these times, and for the record, I hate the Ds and I also hate the Rs–I just hate the Rs slightly less because they don’t hate straight white men and their policies are slightly better than than the Ds, though far from ideal. I also recognize the two things that stand out to Ayaan: blind hatred, and deeply personal attacks. I don’t have a blind hatred of the enemy–I hate them because I can see clearly who they are, what they represent, and how they want to take my freedom. That’s why I hate them–not blindly, but clearly. And surely it follows on the “clear hatred” that deeply personal attacks are welcome, even required. Yes, I attack the policies, but it is also fair play to attack the vile, evil, stupid, fasc#@t people attempting to, and, in many cases, succeeding in implementing these policies.
Ayaan doesn’t quite predict a civil war, but I see it coming, though I’ve been chastised for signing off on some posts “Lock and load!” A shame that she didn’t reference Lebanon and the former Yugoslavia, which are/were extremely tribal and are recent models of what is likely to happen in the US. But I actually think that this is a good outcome–of course I am in favor of a peaceful dissolution of the US–I don’t want to be a citizen of a country where half the country blindly hates me and shares none of my values–and I hate (though not blindly) the other half and share none of their values. Let’s call it a day, and peacefully divide the country in a way that makes sense, a sort of Brexit for the US.
But I don’t see that happening. The time for “talking and listening” is over–hasn’t worked, has it? Civil War much more likely–and cue the downvotes–Lock and load!

Nicky Samengo-Turner
Nicky Samengo-Turner
2 years ago

Superb… and so true

Brian Villanueva
Brian Villanueva
2 years ago

Diverse life experience gives one a unique perspective, which is liekly why Ayaan is one of the most insightful and penetrating commentary writers today.
“These tribal quirks run deep on both sides of the aisle. Many Republicans continue to dispute the legitimacy of the result of the last presidential election; while on the Left, the woke are eroding the Democratic Party from the inside, as identity politics displace universalist aspirations.”
This is completely true, yet the moment it is articulated, many on both sides reflexively defend their own tribe: Republicans launching into a litany of voter irregularities, Democrats screaming about Trump’s racism. This behavior makes it impossible for either to hear much needed call for calm. How do we fix that instinct?

Vyomesh Thanki
Vyomesh Thanki
2 years ago

Why did Ayaan support the American coalition invasion of Iraq?

Emre Emre
Emre Emre
2 years ago

Today, ten years later, those neocons are part of the Democrat party. I suspect, her friend ignores this inconvenient truth.