X Close

The return of Muscular Christianity Gym bros are repping for Jesus


December 16, 2024   6 mins

Rhea Graham is not your average content creator. With a powerful physique and a penchant for heavy lifting, she looks every inch the fitness influencer. Yet her page isn’t quite what you’d expect from someone who bench presses 55 kilos “for bants”. Amid the gym vlogs and the modelling shoots, Graham uses her platform primarily to talk about her Christian faith. “Both my faith in the Lord and my health and wellness are formed by discipline,” she writes, accompanying a video montage of endless perfect pull-ups. “They require both discipline and grace.”

Graham, a 25-year-old Londoner, is far from alone. TikTok and Instagram are now bulging with Christian “fitfluencers”, not least Graham’s friend @veryvalerie, who mixes “thicker thigh supersets” with reels about the “grace of the Lord”. We’re also seeing a “Gym Bro Revival” on Christian blogs and forums, something even non-believers are noticing. “Why does fitness culture skew so HEAVILY Christian?” laments one Reddit thread.

No less striking, specifically Christian fitness spaces are on the rise. CrossFit, for instance, has a subsidiary called Faith RXD, which boasts chapters across the world and integrates workouts with Bible study. The Station Gym in Sheffield features a community room where Christians can hold prayer meetings. Then there’s Fountains Church in Bradford: famous for its regular wrestling events, in which the takedowns function as a metaphor for a believer’s inner fight.

For Graham, the links between faith and fitness are watertight, with the minister and personal trainer describing herself as a “sister in Christ who navigates fitness from a Christ-centred perspective”. Yet the relationship between the two is complex. For most of Christian history, the faithful were taught to de-prioritise the flesh, favouring spiritual might over physical prowess. And while more recent Protestants have placed sportiness near Godliness, the rise of Christian gymgoers remains a peculiarly 21st-century story — one speaking to the distinctive rhythms of a life lived between reps.

Christianity and fitness might seem like an awkward pairing. While gym culture is notoriously image-focused, bleeding all too easily into a fixation on the body beautiful, Christians try to steer clear of vanity and bodily obsession.

Graham concedes that many older believers shy away from fitness, dismissing the spiritual importance of physical discipline. That said, there is a striking shift among younger generations. Many Gen Z Christians of her acquaintance are cultivating a passion for movement, and talking openly about God between sets.

And while this may be predominantly an evangelical phenomenon — well-matched to the fervent, emotion-driven nature of their churches — other denominations do have their gym fans too. You don’t get too many High Anglicans pumping iron and praising the Lord on TikTok: their average age, and typical temperament, likely put paid to that. Yet there is a burgeoning scene of Catholic bodybuilders, including the Australian teenager Hugo Byrnes, who produces lift-wear emblazoned with Christian slogan; and Miami-based priest Fr Rafael Capo, who uses bodybuilding to attract young people into church.

Graham herself captions photo reels with Bible verses, and intersperses clothing launches with clips of herself delivering sermons. Workout videos, soundtracked to Christian rap music, talk about “drawing on Him for strength”. It’s a far cry from the supplements-and-six-pack promotions you’d associate with this corner of the internet.

So why are so many Christians rushing to dovetail “gainz” with God? Evangelism is surely part of it: now that Gen Zs encompass some 29% of gym joiners, it makes sense to meet them where they are. But converting others isn’t the whole story. Something has shifted in the Christian ethos. Early worshippers, after all, weren’t exactly falling over themselves to smash their marathon PB or cultivate a jacked physique. Influenced by Platonism, they instead subscribed to a framework in which the body is lesser than the soul, our animal urges in conflict with our more virtuous aspirations. Denying the animalistic, fleshy part of ourselves was seen as spiritually cleansing.

Later ascetics took this thinking to its logical extreme. These ardent believers starved themselves, fought sleep, and subjected themselves to a gory array of self-punishments. Among their ranks were Teresa of Ávila, a 16th-century Spaniard who liked to apply nettles to her infected sores. Or else there was Catherine of Siena, who self-flagellated with an iron chain three times a day, and Simeon the Stylite who lived on top of a pillar for 36 years, standing until his legs gave out.

While today’s super-fit believers may embrace physical punishment, their motivations stem from somewhere else.  Rather than treating the pleasures of the body as suspect — as per the 17th-century Puritans, who banned dancing, vaulting and football — they’re inclined to see their physical welfare as directly linked to their spiritual state.

“The body-mind-spirit interconnection is real, and training any one of them has a benefit for the others,” suggests Simon Lennox, CEO of The Word One to One, a UK-based ministry. “So you train the body and the mind is clear, and therefore you have more energy to cooperate with the Holy Spirit. Having the resolve to go to the gym builds a muscle that has transferability to other areas.”

These kinds of ideas have a more recent provenance. During the 19th century, a movement called Muscular Christianity emerged, in reaction to a prevailing ethic of bodily denial. Quite aside from the edicts of the church, physical jobs were declining and men were moving en masse to white-collar work. Amid concerns around masculine “enfeeblement”, thinkers on both sides of the Atlantic began promoting physical fitness as a corrective. Theodore Roosevelt’s “strenuous life” came to be seen as an expression of Christian values, patriotism and masculine vigour.

“Amid concerns around masculine “enfeeblement”, thinkers on both sides of the Atlantic began promoting physical fitness as a corrective.”

Around 1900, a new crop of Young Men’s Christian Associations (YMCAs) started teaching athletics. Churches formed their own sports leagues, and colleges and universities began fielding sports teams as a way to improve students’ moral fibre. One proponent of Muscular Christianity was Pierre de Coubertin, who founded the modern Olympics.

Over a century on, the links between sporting success and spiritual glory still resonate with many believers. “If you think of [American] football players or Olympians, a lot of them will have Bible verses on their arms,” says Jordyn Dean, a California-based entrepreneur, author and committed Christian. “And why do you think that is? Because it takes something larger than you to become an Olympic gold medallist; it takes something larger than you to get to that Super Bowl. That strength just can’t come from you — it’s something deeper.”

It’s tempting here to make the armchair sociologist’s argument that history repeats itself: just like our Victorian forebears, we live in a time when the concept of masculinity has been plunged into crisis. Through this lens, perhaps, lifting weights is a way for Christian men to reassert a sense of personal power and agency. Especially in the US, evangelical Christianity dovetails with conservatism — and conservatism, studies have shown, dovetails with getting ripped.

That said, the present iteration of muscular Christianity transcends both gender and political boundaries. Nobody I spoke to explicitly identified as conservative. And it’d be fair to surmise that, as women, Graham and Dean don’t harbour much anxiety about their manliness.

A more satisfying answer, I think, can be offered by returning to gyms themselves: and how the rhythms of contemporary fitness echo more longstanding habits of faith. Graham, Dean and Lennox all described adopting a posture of thanksgiving during tough workouts. They also discussed the obligation to take care of themselves in body and soul; and emphasised the importance of remaining disciplined under pressure. These points were all framed in Biblical terms, but they’re ideas any secular gymgoer would recognise.

Lennox also believes that, in some cases, gyms may fulfil needs that churches don’t. While you can just show your face at a Sunday service, a gruelling shared workout demands your full participation, and along with it a higher level of intimacy and honesty. In his view, gyms are places where people can be unusually open about spiritual matters. Through suffering side-by-side, you break down barriers and clear the way for deeper conversations.

He isn’t the first person to make this point. In 2015, two academics wrote a report called “How We Gather”, which explored the ways that secular people were meeting their social and spiritual needs. They noted that gyms had “become the locations of shared, transformative experience” — with the likes of SoulCycle and CrossFit functioning a bit like churches for the non-religious.

In part, that’s because of the communal nature of these workouts: they offer a forum for mass intensity, or even mass transcendence, that is otherwise hard to find in secular spaces. Many of these classes also have a ritualistic element that in some ways resemble the liturgies performed in churches.

But what does seem clear is that fitness culture itself is steeped in an ethic of self-improvement, something that neatly maps onto the Christian conception of spiritual growth. Just think of the slogans on any lifter’s T-shirt: “A champion is someone who gets up when they can’t”; “The real workout starts when you want to stop”. A Christian might identify the source of their strength as lying beyond them. But in both cases, it’s about tapping into a deeper, more resilient, part of oneself that may not be so accessible day-to-day. And while certain corners of the fitness industry remain heavily fixated on aesthetics, it seems there’s a growing cohort for whom my body is a temple means exactly that.

 


Abi Millar is a journalist, and author of The Spirituality Gap: Searching for Meaning in a Secular Age, due to be published in January 2025.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest

19 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tony Nunn
Tony Nunn
2 days ago

Anyone wishing to combine fitness with Christianity should consider taking up bell ringing. You get a physical (and mental) workout in church.

0 0
0 0
2 days ago

1 Timothy 4:7-10

[7] Have nothing to do with irreverent, silly myths. Rather train yourself for godliness; [8] for while bodily training is of some value, godliness is of value in every way, as it holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come. [9] The saying is trustworthy and deserving of full acceptance. [10] For to this end we toil and strive, because we have our hope set on the living God, who is the Savior of all people, especially of those who believe.
St Paul, an observer of Olympic Games knew the value of physical workouts in order underline the greater value of spiritual fitness not just for eternity but for time. So keep on lifting!

Rob N
Rob N
2 days ago

Having followed the first 3 links I see that all were about black / coloured people. I am only a cultural Christian but it is good to see more active Christians out there and disappointing that the white Brits are currently too soft, lifeless and soulless to be heavily involved in the search for Truth.

Richard Ross
Richard Ross
2 days ago
Reply to  Rob N

Be the change you want to see, Rob!

Billy Bob
Billy Bob
2 days ago
Reply to  Rob N

Why is not wanting to waste your Sunday in a church (or gym) being soft?

Billy Bob
Billy Bob
2 days ago

Being stuck in a room full of narcissistic gym freaks and pushy God botherers sounds like my idea of hell! Give me a boozer and a fry up any day of the week

Last edited 2 days ago by Billy Bob
Jeremy Sansom
Jeremy Sansom
2 days ago
Reply to  Billy Bob

Well Billy, there are boozers and fry-up franchises galore, but remember, hell is just around the corner. The choice of the narrow gate and the narrow way speak to me of a certain degree of discipline. Or at least, that’s the view of this unapologetic God-botherer.

Billy Bob
Billy Bob
2 days ago
Reply to  Jeremy Sansom

Its a gamble we all take. You’re hoping that by living a less fun life now you’ll be rewarded for it after you die. I’m living life well now in the belief that this is it, there is nothing to follow.
Ultimately neither of us know either way

Jeremy Sansom
Jeremy Sansom
2 days ago
Reply to  Billy Bob

Boozers and fry-up franchises there are a-plenty Billy, but hell is always just around the corner. It strikes me that the choice of the narrow gate and the narrow way demand a degree of discipline. But that’s just the view of this unapologetic God-botherer.

Last edited 2 days ago by Jeremy Sansom
philip kern
philip kern
1 day ago
Reply to  Jeremy Sansom

My response to the article was, much like yours, that the real issue is being disciplined in an increasingly ill-disciplined world. But if self-control is restricted to (or primarily found in) the gym, that by itself isn’t a recipe for success. I hope this is a brand of Christianity that spills over into other areas of life.

Hugh Thornton
Hugh Thornton
1 day ago

I found this rather interesting as a Christian who goes to the gym but who is at the age of 80 rather at the opposite end of the age spectrum. I praise the Lord for giving me faith only 4 years ago, just a few months before the discovery of a brain tumour. That was good because it saved me from doom and gloom about it. Unfortunately, a series of medications made me nauseous and lacking in appetite such that I lost 16kg of mostly muscle (that’s about 2 1/2 stone). Now that I have an appetite, I am trying to regain lost muscle. As Christians, we have an obligation to look after God’s creation – and that includes ourselves, mentally and physically as well as spiritually.

John Duncan
John Duncan
2 days ago

Muscular Christianity first developed in the Victorian era in the public (I.e. fee-paying private) schools in Britain. Its main focus was the development of team sports, in order to give teenage boys an outlet so that they didn’t fall into “vices”. The main concern was masturbation, which was understood to be a source of “enfeeblement”.

Carol Staines
Carol Staines
2 days ago

Erm…in my opinion, muscular Christianity is not about body building.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
2 days ago

I have no quarrel with the faithful but the gym is NOT a church. It is a personal sanctuary where one goes to maintain health, accrue the psychological benefits that are part of a good workout, and to become one with the metal. For me, it is a decidedly selfish pursuit. It’s not a singles club, it’s not a social setting, and it’s not group therapy.
It is bad enough to be surrounded by people more interested in their smartphones – and clogging up the premises with their incessant scrolling and swiping – than in training. I don’t see how communal workouts with “deeper conversations” are better. There is nothing wrong with being in shape but I think this makes of something than is actually there.

Lancashire Lad
Lancashire Lad
2 days ago

Seems like the writer might be onto something here.
I can well remember attending religious services as a child, and although i didn’t necessarily think in those terms at the time, looking back the thing that strikes me is the performative element.
This applies principally to the “celebrants” of course, but amongst the congregation there was always a distinct element of “look at me, how holy i am”. Holier than thou, indeed.
In the absence of attending overt religious services then, attending a gym most likely fulfils the same needs and yes – desires – as churchgoing. Instead of dressing up in one’s “Sunday best”, one dresses primarily to show off a honed form. The desire is the same: attending church was one way of meeting a suitable mate back in the day, or at least connecting with like-minded people, aka socialising.
As for spirituality… it’s becoming a term that’s increasingly used in an equally performative way – a way of signalling that you’re a “whole” kind of person, in touch with your inner self. I’m more inclined to understand it as an absence of self; or rather, a merging of self with the world outside, in as full a sense as possible.
Neither those attending gyms or those attending church are doing that. By concentrating on their inner self, including how it’s reflected to others via a pseudo-beatific countenance or honed physique, they’re essentially squandering any chance of simply being in the world. A walk in the countryside, actually looking at the natural world, is more spiritual than either of those activities; looking both at the intricate forms of living things and also moving towards new horizons, rather than within the confines of a church/gym.
I wish the author well with her forthcoming publication. I hope within it, she has some cognisance of what spirituality actually means.

Richard Ross
Richard Ross
2 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

An obvious argument is that “A walk in the countryside, actually looking at the natural world, is more spiritual than either” gym-ing or church-ing.
But in practice – as has been often pointed out – those who have had their eyes on the spiritual world, i.e. beyond the natural one of trees and flesh, have made far more positive impact on the here-and-now; Pierre de Coubertain being an example noted in the article above. Both the Olympics and the YMCA have their roots in the “muscular Christianity” referrenced by Ms. Millar.

Lancashire Lad
Lancashire Lad
2 days ago
Reply to  Richard Ross

I’d politely suggest that what we experience as spirituality is very much concerned with how we’re part of the natural world.
It’s a conceit to imagine there’s something which exists external to it, or beyond it; indeed, i’d go so far as to argue that it’s a form of self-deception. That’s not to say our human senses are able to detect all there is to detect, in fact, we know we can’t. But equally, and by definition, what isn’t available to us is therefore just a product of our imaginations, combined with a heavy dose of wishful thinking.
I don’t dispute that the values which form the Christian heritage have impact and historical resonance, but i’d add that such values are absolutely not dependent on having been preached a couple of millennia ago; indeed, they existed before that and will continue to do so as long as humans need to live together. Therefore, quoting historical sources of value, and those who quote the bible, are simply repeating what human beings – not anything or anyone else – have considered worthwhile.

Janice Campbell
Janice Campbell
1 day ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

I’m disappointed by this glib and uncharitable reading of other people’s supposed motives. To look back at childhood church experiences and presume to know — and worse, to be qualified to judge — the thoughts, motives, and spirituality of otherwise unfamiliar adults seems to require a shocking amount of arrogance. When someone is immersed in an experience — a moment of transcendence at church, a breakthrough at the gym, an unexpected vista on a walk — they are beautiful and whole, even if only for a few minutes. Judging the hearts of others is a tricky business; best avoided.

Maverick Melonsmith
Maverick Melonsmith
2 days ago

Lennox also believes that, in some cases, gyms may fulfil needs that churches don’t. Yeah. Going to the gym might actually provide you with something desirable.