Sabrina’s got that boy wrapped round her finger. Olivia knows she might sound crazy but she doesn’t care. Chappell is having a sexually explicit kinda love affair with a closeted woman. Billie is going to eat that girl for lunch, because it tastes like she might be the one. Charli wants you to guess the colour of her underwear. Renée is feuding with the worst bitch on earth. Summer 2024 is a bad girlie summer.
Anodyne injunctions to have a good time or vague sentiments about love are out. This year’s music invites you to party hard, feel your feels in all their glorious mess, and succumb to being frankly, fiercely horny. Musically, they cover everything from woozy dream-pop (Billie Eilish) to peppy guitar-led tracks (Olivia Rodrigo) to aggressively hooky dance music (Charli XCX); aesthetically, they run from Bardot-esque cutie (Sabrina Carpenter) to drag-act confrontational (Chappel Roan, with her mime makeup and wildly teased hair).
Some of its practitioners are barely in their twenties, having been famous since they were children — Eilish started releasing music at 13 and had her first hit at 15, while Carpenter and Rodrigo both came up through the Disney machine as teenagers. Some of them are old enough to be weighing nervous thoughts about having children of their own — “I Think About it All the Time”, on Charli XCX’s new album Brat, is a stark confrontation with her own biological clock, in which she wonders whether having a baby would “give my life a new purpose” or “make me miss my freedom”.
They don’t exactly comprise a scene. But together, they make up a constellation committed to the exploration of what you could broadly — and at least partly ironically — call “feminine chaos”. These are girls singing about girls, for girls.
I use the word “girl” advisedly, because even though all of them are adults, each has a pull towards the adolescent. You could call this infantilising, but I don’t think it is. After all, a lot of what they sing about is thoroughly adult — not just the desire and the heartbreak, but the lucid dissections of their professional life. (Charli XCX bemoans how much she cares about trade magazine Billboard on “Rewind” and Eilish worries quietly “am I on the way out?” on the opening track to her new album, Hit Me Hard and Soft.)
Girlhood instead denotes a certain unfinished state of femaleness. In some cases, that’s because they’re literally navigating the advent of adulthood in public (“When am I gonna stop being great for my age and just start being good?” wonders Rodrigo on “Teenage Dream” from the album Guts). For others, it’s because they know the fever of the teen years makes a good muse: leaning in, Charli XCX has called her album Brat.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeIt’s 2024. Surely everyone knows the bad pop girls aren’t “making” the music. Wiki exists and sleeves tell the truth. Nearly all of the artists mentioned above have only part writing credits and don’t produce. So the words are only partly theirs and the sound and style is almost entirely someone elses.
Eilish: half the writing credits and all the production credit goes to Finneas O’Connell (male).
Rodrigo: co-writer and all production credit of last album and all tracks goes to Dan Nigro (male).
Charli XCX: ditto except shared between Alexander Guy (AG) Cook, Finn Keane and Henry Russell Walter (Cirkut) (all male).
Chappell Roan: co-writer and all production credit of last album and all tracks goes to Dan Nigro (him again).
On and on, the same pattern. Female packaging of a product planned and created by many, often male writers and producers. Lose the naivity and you will see the bad pop girls in this article are in fact handpicked female marionettes working in an industry of puppeteers. And the awful reason why is that Lou Pearlman was right.
I’m not saying Eilish et all are being exploited. Far from it. The industry knows better these days. No, they all are cynically exploiting the feelings and purses of young and impressionable girls with their entirely synthetic feminism and sexuality.
Play back these lyrics in the voice of the 30-something man that wrote them for teenage girls to listen and you’ve just seen the big label music industry for what it is.
Excellent observation.
Finneas O’Connell is Billie Eilish’s brother, so at least it’s kept in the family.
Finneas is particularly talented and recognised as such having won far more awards. He is the perfect example of a creative writer, instrumentalist, and engineer needing a female form to sell his music.
The other thing about this music is that it’s mostly synthetic. Not even the singers’ voices are real. Most of the live performances are entirely mimed. The songs are written by committee – giving the singers authorial credit, as this article does, is highly misleading. The commercial music industry is as corrupt as it was in the early sixties and just as ripe for disruption by a new, more authentic aesthetic.
So likewise being a “Bast*rd” is good and empowering, right ?
All pop is pap. Has been for many decades…
“Regina: People say I’m a b***h, but you know what they would call me if I was a boy?
Cady: Strong?”
No, they’d call you an a**hole.
Haven’t we seen this movie before?
I’ll take notice when they begin to conquer POOP
Who gives a primate’s copulation?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pdwzko9DZ0s
A dissenting view!