Donald Trump has long sought to portray himself as some sort of aristocrat, and now, a deeply divided American electorate has given him the chance for the greatest grift of all. King Trump’s Camelot is within his grasp, and the Lord in Waiting will be Robert F. Kennedy Jr, nephew of the great Jack, son of the great Robert, who has recently gained his own notoriety as the Harvard-educated anti-vaxxer with spray-tanned abs and a dead worm lodged in his brain. The 70-year-old reformed cocaine dealer and heroin addict is not so much dangling the prospect of Kennedy glitz returning to the White House, as he is on his knees, begging to be the Drug Czar, and make America safe for polio.
Within 24 hours of Trump’s landslide victory, while the Dow soared on the so-called Trump Trade, anticipation of a Kennedy health coup sent pharmaceutical markets into a doom loop. Covid MRNA vaccine providers Pfizer and Moderna were both down around 2% while BioNTech was 2.5% lower.
RFK Jr has promised to bring MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) to MAGA. Putting all venal political ambition to one side, the ex-environmental lawyer is an odd appurtenance to Trump, who gorges upon McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish and has phenylalanine on tap (aka, Diet Coke). RFK Jr blithely ignores such failings, along with the bothersome fact that during his previous tenure in the Oval Office, the Trump EPA ascended the heights of toxic chemical de-regulation by halting bans on a triumvirate of virulent chemicals. Not to mention Trump’s brilliant McDonald’s drive-thru stunt, in which he secured his victory in America’s electoral college by pretending to be CEO of the fryolator — chief villain of the MAHA universe.
Yet despite their dietary differences, Trump has promised to let Kennedy “go wild on food”. “The key that President Trump has promised me is control of the public health agencies which are HHS and its subagencies: CDC, FDA, NIH and a few others, and also USDA,” Kennedy rasped in a post-election video posted by Newsmax reporter Alex Salvi. That’s a lot of initials, a lot of agencies, and a lot of money, as Congress allotted more than one-and-a-half billion dollars for Health and Human Services in 2022.
Fears abound that Kennedy will send America’s regulation of food and drugs swirling into a chaos of contradictions. RFK and transition team co-chair Howard Lutnick are infamous for their aversion to vaccines, and are apparently already drafting 30-, 60-, and 90-day plans to end chronic diseases. Of course, the alt-Right Twittersphere is agog with the prospect that fluoride in the drinking water, the longstanding hobbyhorse of the conspiracy theorists, may at last have met its match.
In many ways, RFK Jr presents a paradox, as no one in their right mind can ignore America’s addiction to fast-food and cheap calories promoted by genetically modified insecticides and ever-abundant harvests of food porn. Amid a supersized obesity crisis, RFK Jr has tapped into our collective obsession with what shall or shall not pass the most holy threshold of our mouths. He embodies our national addiction to diets, from vegan to paleo. MAHA’s gospel of personal purity channels the spirit of long-lost digestive heroes such as the mid-19th-century Samuel Larned, who left society behind to live in a perfectionist community called Fruitlands. There, he spent one year of his life eating nothing but crackers. Another year he subsisted entirely on apples.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeNot hard to tell that the writer has almost no clue about RFK Jr’s views. I would suggest reading his books and listening to some of the many longform interviews he has given in recent years.
Whether or not he receives a cabinet post, he has already won, because the MSM can no longer ignore and marginalise him. He has a platform now to explain what has gone so badly wrong for people’s health due to Big Pharma, Big Ag and Big Food (or perhaps the writer thinks the US is the home of people of worldbeating health and longevity?).
I’m no fan of people like Tony Fauci, but at least he has spent his career as a doctor in the medical field, and has written many scientific papers and read hundreds more. To top that off he has spent a career in government and proven to be a talented bureaucrat.
Bobby Kennedy is verry bright and persuasive. But he is a trial lawyer by training and career and he doesn’t know the first thing about science or medicine. He has no training and no knowledge base in science and he has no experience running an organization. He continually misrepresents scientific studies in court filings, in his books and writings, and in interviews.
Bobby Kennedy understands the problems — we all do. But he has no good ideas as to solutions and no talent to lead others to solve them. He’s an attack dog, one who often unfairly goes after people who are at least making an effort to solve problems. He’s like a Greta Thunberg, a negative force instead of a positive one, doing more harm than good.
Tony Fauci is a joke. Through the NIH he funded dangerous gain of function developments outside the US with very few safeguards.
He flip flopped on masks for covid (don’t work, do work, double mask now!), covid vaccines (stop transmission, don’t stop transmission, stop you dying, don’t stop you dying but you must have a shot every 6 months anyway).
He appears to have been consequentially wrong on many things and I look forward to a full investigation and accountability of his time heading up government agencies like the NIH.
Like I said, I’m no fan of Tony Fauci. He did make a lot of mistakes. But at least he went to medical school, did an internship and a residency, became a licensed doctor who treated patients throughout his 39-year career as the highest-ranked (and highest-paid) medical professional in the country.
What does Bobby Kennedy know about medicine? What training has he had? What experience does he have? None and none. I know a lot of trial lawyers like him. He’s like John Edwards, the Democratic politician who ran for vice president with John Kerry in 2004. John Edwards sounded very persuasive when he stood in court in front of a jury and got them to award tens of millions of dollars in medical malpractice suits. But it was all smoke and mirrors.
I don’t know what Bobby Kennedy feels in his heart, but I do know that much of what he tells us is false. He identifies the problems well enough, but he doesn’t have the solutions he claims to. He’s selling snake oil, and we shouldn’t buy it.
I don’t know where to begin. Have you read his book on Fauci? Everything in it is evidenced, it will have been lawyered over for months, and I have heard that much was taken out because it might not stand up in court, but neither Fauci nor Gates have sued over the complete destruction of their reputations contained therein. Why is that?
Perhaps an anecdote will help. Fauci spent years pouring public scorn on RFK Jr’s claim that ‘None of the 72 shots on the US Childhood Vaccine Schedule has received a pre-licensing placebo-controlled trial’. It does sound like an outrageous claim, doesn’t it? RFK Jr asked Fauci to supply evidence of a single trial, but none was forthcoming, so ICAN sued the US Govt to obtain the information. The govt was forced to back down and admit that no such trials have been carried out.
I’m not defending Tony Fauci. But he’s gone. What he did in the past doesn’t matter. What matters is what we do now. And Bobby Kennedy offers no solution to the problems we face.
Bobby Kennedy doesn’t understand the science. He has no management skills or experience. Like all litigators he only knows how to go to war and attack people and destroy things. Well the war’s over now, and we need to rebuild. How can he help?
“Bobby Kennedy doesn’t understand the science.”.
Have you read his books?
I’ve read what he’s written and I’ve listened to what he says. He misinterprets scientific studies and even lies about what they say. Take his claim that WiFi breaks down the brain-blood barrier. That’s absurd.
I wasn’t aware of this claim, but this may be rooted in what appears to have been a valid topic of research from this extensive literature review on the topic I’ve just found: https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec10_2012_Effects_Electromagnetic_Fields_Wireless_Communication.pdf
Sure, the effect of electromagnetic radiation on the human body is a valid topic of research. That’s why people like my father devoted their careers to researching it. And they found no evidence that any electromagnetic radiation from wifi or cell phones had any effect on the blood-brain barrier.
Papers like the one you found cannot be taken seriously. Their methodology is flawed. We should be open to the possibility that people may find new evidence of a problem, but we should not do like Bobby Kennedy has done and lie about the state of the science.
I think Bobby Kennedy’s politics are fine. He’s passionate and persuasive, and politics are beliefs that cannot be proven or disproven. But science is all about proof. To lie about science disqualifies him from leading an organization devoted to science like the Department of Health.
The paper is a literature review of 120 published studies with multiple authors. All these authors were presumably “absurd” too? You have not characterised the respect in which you find its methodology flawed. (NB I have no drum to beat here, I have no idea whether there is any merit in the claim)
Can you comment on the medical credentials of the current HHS secretary? Or many of his predecessors?
No no. What Fauci did does matter. It’s not that simple just to forgive and forget. We have to hold people responsible for the Covid response to account. This is serious stuff. The adult way is not just to forget but to dig deep and find out what actually happened.
I think you’re conflating scientific training with good public health policy.Fauci was an utter disgrace irrespective of his CV-
I’m just saying that someone who knows nothing about the science underlying public health is in a poor position to make good policy.
Do you know what background the current Secretary for Health and Human services has? Look it up.
The second bitchy hit piece in Unherd in as many days. This reads like something from the Guardian comments section. More errors, generalisations and misrepresentations than I care to list.
Unherd: Could do better.
Everyone agrees chronic disease epidemic in the US is linked to an appalling diet high on processed foods and sugar. That is what Kennedy wants to change. As for big pharma and vaccines, they’ve been convicted of so many felonies it’s a joke. Profit before people should be their motto.
What a dishonest and biased article. A pure hit job on Kennedy !
indeed-and to be fair-he’s in great nick-70 or not!
This was journalism at the level of The View
The author makes a comment about fluoridation of drinking water and labels those concerned as conspiracy theorists. Has the author read Dr. Marty Makary’s latest book where he shows that fluoridation is associated with a whole host of medical issues. Makary is no conspiracy theorist. Her is an internationally renowned surgeon at Johns Hopkins as well as an elected member of the US National Academy of Medicine. Perhaps the author needs to do some more homework before writing drivel.
The 70-year-old reformed cocaine dealer and heroin addict is not so much dangling the prospect of Kennedy glitz returning to the White House, as he is on his knees, begging to be the Drug Czar, and make America safe for polio.
Seriously? We’re aware of his past substance issues. And? When your piece starts with this sort of narrative, what follows is not going to be journalism; it’s going to be advocacy based on demonizing any position not in line with your own. “Safe for polio.” Okay, Karen.
This author’s bile and biases swarm through his every word ….
I remember how we ate sparrows roasted over a fire as children. It was delicious! And the article is stupid because it is senselessly evil.
Why does Unherd continue to publish articles by this fool? He has no idea what he is saying, no clue as to what RFK stands for. He’s just a Trump-basher whooping it up to impress other Trump-bashers with his clumsy, awful writing. Please stop inflicting this man on your readers. He’s not worthy of this site.
If I wanted to read this sort of poorly researched tripe I’d have continue my subscription to the Times or Telegraph. Whenever I read ad hominem attacks I find it hard to give any credence at all to the article. This is tedious mainstream type stuff.
Well said. Mud-slingin’ ain’t arguin’, after all ….
This is just a hit piece not worthy to be published. I would not have any problem with it if the article had been well researched and thought through but it isn’t.
“Liberals were stunned at the rumour that Kennedy had devoured a dog“. Why would anybody be even remotely surprised about a suggestion like that?
What’s wrong with eating dogs?
It’s going to be a lot of fun chaos as Americans will never give up their addiction to fast and processed foods, though there are rightfully a number of anti-vaxxers.
Message to Mr. Kaufman on behalf of MSM: I think you’ll find he’s already won that argument…
Sos we’re about to find out whether being unvaxed vegans will make MAGA people healthier than the rest of us. Good luck with that.
Vegans? I thought right wingers were supposed to be meat eaters?
Is it not a good goal to encourage good health, regardless of how?
Garbage.
Unherd’s journalism standards are slipping.
More disappointing out of touch liberal garbage. Unherd unfortunately is serving up the same old slop as the Atlantic etc. Unherd more like IveHerd this already.
This article is fit for NYT.
.
The howls of rage from anti-vaxxers in the comments are what I expected from Unherd readers. I have a question for them. It is, surely, generally acknowledged that the future prosperity of the UK will be strongly dependent on science and technology. Science shows that vaccines work. The fact that the hard right insists on denying scientific reality makes them look like luddites.
Yes they do work and Kennedy has said as much. Yes we need to get back to science and not The Science. Decades of corporate interest lobbying and fealty to progressive politics has meant a lot of the science we have been relying on to inform our policy and the lives of hundreds of millions of people needs some careful reconsideration.
We also need to get rid of, “l am the science” types.
We do need skeptics who are not like Tony Fauci. But it would help if they are not like Bobby Kennedy too, a man who is anti-science. He has no science background and has no idea how it works. On Joe Rogan he said that there are hundreds of studies that show that WiFi breaks down the blood-brain barrier and causes diseases. Hundreds of studies, he said. He’s wrong. There’s not hundreds of studies. There’s not even one.
I have a hard time defending science. Most people have no idea what it can actually say. And it has nothing to do with what party they vote for. The understanding of basic technology and the science behind it is minimal to vanishing.
Do you mean climate change is real? And the earth is not flat? And vaccines actually work? What a shock that would be to most unherd readers, even if presented with evidence of the “science ” , it’s still not real because the “science ” is not real. Good luck dealing with that, luddites sounds complementary with this crowd
Who is saying that vaccines don’t work?
Are you sure that you have a basic understanding of science yourself?
Who needs experts?
Great article and funny as well. RFK will fit right in there with the coming Trump show. I guess someone ‘sophisticated ‘like RFK is needed to tell Americans that eating less fat, sugar and salt, managing weight and getting some exercise will be good for you. Wow , what a revelation that will be, no one listens to doctors but RFK will be OK. The great health revolution is coming, in 4 years everyone will be fit and healthy, just in time for the great war with China
Frederick is that you?