The three-piece band was doing its best to lift spirits with relentlessly upbeat pop songs and bursts of oompah music as rain plummeted down on a bleak autumnal day. A handful of people sat scattered at tables set up under an awning beside some food stalls and a small ferris wheel. Four middle-aged women swayed together in unison to the music, doing their best to bring the Oktoberfest vibe to their town, while a few other brave souls swigged pints of lager or munched on their sausages.
But it will take more than a few blasts of brass, bratwurst and pilsner to lift the storm clouds over Wolfsburg. For this prosperous place, about two hours’ drive west of Berlin, is a company town like few others, built from Nazi roots off the back of Volkswagen — “The People’s Car Company” which overcame its fascist birth to become the world’s highest-earning motor manufacturer. Now, however, it is in serious trouble as persistently sluggish management considers closing plants in their homeland for the first time in their history.
Such is the scale of this crisis — labelled an “earthquake” by the local paper — there are even mutterings this mighty car giant might emulate the high-speed crash of Nokia, the Finnish behemoth dismantled and sold within a few years of being the largest maker of mobile phones. Tensions are rising as the powerful IG Metall union, which just began another round of negotiations with managers, insists all German sites must remain open, even as there have been furious clashes with bosses at internal meetings. ’The situation is not good,” said one worker. “I am 54 so my working life is nearly over and I hope to get my pension in three years time but this is very, very worrying for Wolfsburg. I hope this plant will not shut.”
That kind of statement seems unimaginable in this city made by Volkswagen. Step out of the station and you see the world’s biggest car plant, three times the size of Monaco and where 70,000 employees churned out almost half a million vehicles last year. In front of you squats a futuristic science centre designed by Zaha Hadid, which serves as a sculptural reminder that this otherwise rather dour place has some of the highest average incomes in Europe thanks to cars. Even that bustling main shopping street is named after Ferdinand Porsche, creator of the iconic Beetle car and founder of a globally famous marque.
Almost half the workforce in Wolfsburg helps make cars, the highest proportion of any city in a country with 47 other places heavily dependent on this core industrial sector. “Volkswagen not only stands for economic prosperity, but also has a strong emotional component,” said the city’s mayor Dennis Weilmann. “Many families have relatives or acquaintances at VW and the majority of Wolfsburg residents have been driving a Volkswagen since their first car. Volkswagen also invests in many different areas of society, from art and culture to voluntary work and leisure events. It is therefore completely understandable that the current news is causing uncertainty among citizens.”
The city and car company have grown up together. Wolfsburg — twinned with Luton — was created in 1938 for one of Adolf Hitler’s pet projects: the mass production of cars for the people. It was originally named after the Kraft durch Freude Wagen (Strength Through Joy Car), and seen as a model Nazi town, only to be devastated by Allied bombs during the Second World War, after slave labourers were forced to manufacture rockets and military vehicles. Then, a British army major kickstarted production of the quirky and eventual global best-selling Beetle. Three generations later, the city is home to about 125,000 people with a university and football team — sponsored by VW, of course — that once won the Bundesliga.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI’m not sure VW “bungled the shift to electric cars”. The EU is killing off their ability to sell petrol and diesel models – and there is no way they can compete with the Chinese EVs. Nut Zero targets are the issue.
Precisely right! Banning production of petrol and diesel cars doesn’t make people want to buy electric cars, it just forces up the second hand price of diesel and petrol cars.
This isn’t a failure of Volkswagen management, it’s a murder of an industry by the politicians.
The author is a moron. He has everything backwards. The failure of VW is the result of govt trying to manage the economy and impose corporate change through regulation. German energy costs are five times that of China because of govt imposed switch to wind and solar energy. The problem with EVs is that no one wants them. The govt has intervened in the market, which forces producers to build products without natural demand from consumers.
Germany and the EU have abandoned any semblance of free market capitalism. It’s the most over-regulated jurisdiction in the world.
As I’ve mentioned before, my coauthor and I are halfway into writing a book on how to increase innovation in carmaking. This article plays from the same basic themes we do in our book.
The author quotes a German writer who blames oligopolistic groupthink and arrogance in German carmaking along with a lack of entrepreneurial dynamics. And another who says Germany needs to transform its governance and corporate structures to embrace flexibility, failure and innovation.
Those are very like the conclusions I have come to. Carmakers are more and more being forced to innovate to compete, but the structure of the carmaking industry stifles innovation instead of nurturing it. You are right that governments have made the problem worse. But they didn’t cause the problem.
So if this author is a moron, I’m moronic too.
I have little doubt that your conclusions are sensible – and unlike the author of this article – you seem to accept the significance of government mistakes. It’s worth remembering that it is easy for people to suspect that an author is unintelligent, if they write an article that omits major factors e.g. writing an article about housing shortages without mentioning record-high levels of immigration.
You make a good point — the author should have at least mentioned the government’s ham-handed industrial policy that requires a shift to electric cars on an accelerated timescale. That policy costs huge amounts of money yet does more harm than good.
But the problem in carmaking is bigger than that, and this author is one of the few who seems to have grasped that. The problem is decades in the making and is not just a car industry problem. The problem is structural, with the carmakers relying on economies of scale rather than innovation as their driving force.
It’s rather like a socialist economy compared to a market economy. German companies rely on planning instead of agility. They refine and optimize instead of invent and innovate. They are ponderous instead of nimble.
Two examples from our book illustrate what is needed. Over the last 60 years the computer industry has evolved at a remarkable pace. Innovation after innovation over decades has turned room-sized computers weighing tons into devices a million times more powerful that fit in a shirt pocket.
Another example was the SpaceX Super Heavy booster that fell from the sky last week and then fired its engines to hover and delicately dock itself at its gantry, a 23-story spacecraft suspended 200 feet in the air. A stunning achievement for the booster to return itself for rapid reuse after hurling a spacecraft 60 miles into space and 20 miles downrange. And SpaceX got it right the first try.
These triumphs were made possible by doing more bottom-up trial and error and less top-down dictating. It’s not simple to make a change, but it is really just a change in mindset, a paradigm shift, that is needed. This article captures that well. Our book goes into more detail, but the theme is the same.
Having had a great deal of exposure to software development, I am wholly in line with your perspective of the essential requirement to adopt iterative “fail fast” approaches. The US thrives on this thinking. The EU countries don’t seem to “get it”, and the U.K. MSM actively pour scorn on every “failure” (sic) of their enemies (e.g Musk).
“It’s rather like a socialist economy”…what, China becoming the world’s leading EV producer?
Its always possible (for a while) to replace innovation with massive state subsidy or mercantilist foreign exchange policies. Add in a little theft of intellectual property and you’re good to go(for a while).
My point is, why refer to ‘socialist’ and ‘market’ economies when neither exist. The bastion of the market economy, the US, has massive state subsidies of industry, while China has liberalised parts of its economy. The market economy in the US is dominated by an ever reducing number of giant corporates that rig the system in their favour. We live in a world where fewer and fewer people own more and more of the capital, whether it be in a ‘socialist’ or ‘market’ economy. As such, using such terms to further an argument seems unhelpful and pointless.
I am contrasting a socialist economy (also known as a planned, controlled or command economy) with a market economy (also known as a free market or open economy). One is top down, and the other bottom up.
My argument is that innovation is stifled in a socialist economy and nurtured in a market economy. Of course, most economies are mixed, with elements of both government control and the forces of supply and demand playing a part.
German companies tend to be too top-down to innovate, discouraging experimentation and punishing failure. They will do much if they become more bottom-up and, realizing that innovation is stochastic and encouraging trial and error (and error and error).
It is an interesting article but I’m not sure it adequately evidences that the German automotive industry is much different from that in the rest of Europe or the US, and your mention of ’socialist’ or ‘market’ (top down/bottom up) economies is a distraction that adds little value or evidence to the debate on the fate of the ICE producers. At the moment, a ‘socialist’ economy is the leading producer of EVs and a big innovator of battery technology; while Tesla is the big EV disrupter in the US ‘market’ economy. Other US car manufacturers are not fairing so well. General Motors only exists today because of a $50bn US Government bailout in 2009, but, that aside, the US ICE producers are all struggling, just like VW, and are temporarily ceasing production of EVs due to massive losses per unit and falling demand. This may not be disastrous because EV and battery technology are still changing rapidly and there is no consensus on where it will settle so, having started late, it makes sense not to risk putting all the eggs in the wrong basket. Motor manufacturing is all about volume and the ICE producers across the world, not just Germany, are on a tightrope.
I think Danger’s ‘socialist economy’ is a convenient polemical notion familiar from Economics 101, not anything actually existing.
Or the games long played with housing finance.
I have no reason to believe you are wrong about lack of innovation from automakers. That’s a completely different question. The problem is govt forcing automakers to create innovations in predetermined ways. Innovation cannot be achieved from govt diktat.
That’s true. The government can’t force innovations on the car market. That’s the socialist, planned economy approach that has never worked, and never will.
The problem is that even if you eliminate the government dictates, you still wouldn’t have innovation. The structural problems in carmaking would remain.
The government action is an absurdly expensive annoyance, but it didn’t cause the disease killing off the German carmakers.
Eliminate the government diktats and you’d end up with new marques and increased competition, forcing innovation, so yes, the overreach of government did cause the disease that’s killing German carmakers.
According to the textbooks anyway.
I disagree. The recent government dictates didn’t cause the oligopoly in carmaking, it’s been a feature of the global car market for decades. And new entrants who do come in have a tough time competing. To top it off, competition doesn’t force innovation, it kills it.
At least those are my findings, after studying and working with and in the carmaking industry for the past 20 years. I’ve talked to hundreds of people about this in the US and Japan and read hundreds of books and articles. I may be wrong, but at least I’m informed.
“To top it off, competition doesn’t force innovation, it kills it.”
Doh!
The oligopoly has been around for decades. And so has government dictates to the auto industry. Of course new entrants have trouble competing. They dont have the scale to manage all the government requirements. With one response you’ve lost all credibility. SMH
Innovating in the digital sphere is arguably also a lot easier than in the physical sphere. People from Peter Thiel to David Graeber have made good points that we, in general, just don’t innovate as much anymore and therefore go for low hanging fruit. Of course things like social media have changed our world a lot but in the end they’re just websites any intelligent teen could have made. Is that really worth billions because ‘data’ is supposedly worth that much? Big tech is notorious for its vague models for producing revenue. In fact, many of the big names go forever without making profits in the first place. That raises the question how much of it is essentially a speculative Ponzi driven by years of loose monetary policy and a lack of other investment opportunities. The next step in hyper-financialization because the ways to generate real growth in the world of consumers and producers have been depleted. Similar to what Varoufakis argues: techno feudalism. The underlying semiconductor improvements are perhaps a bit different. On the other hand, much of that could essentiallly be seen as the commercialization of DARPA-funded cold war tech.
That finally brings me to the planning vs. market argument. I recommend that you take a closer look to how economies actually function when it really matters. For example, with the arms- and space race during the cold war.
Government Action is more than an annoyance, it also kills other highly innovative German “Mittelstand”firms, and companies, which need lots of reliable energy supply. The green political class is killing Germany’s industry.
That’s fair.
Difficult to substantiate that historically given the preponderance of government fostered innovation in so many spheres.
Yes, but motivated by entirely different kinds of goals. War has been a greater motivator for government-sponsored innovation. So has national pride and competition with adversaries. This time, the goals are ill-defined and ill-substantiated, with a sense of urgency that is abstract and controversial. The goal is to inhibit, more than to stimulate, industry. Based on a hope and a theory.
Germany has been slow and stodgy in software, no doubt. But it would be ironic if the fantastic EV mandate were to sink the global giants including China, as it threatens to do, only to (partially) vindicate VW.
I worked for a French company for many years. Whenever a competitive threat arose the instantaneous reaction of my colleagues was to pressure the government or the EU Commission to regulate against it or to raise barriers to to its import. You must not underestimate the impact of state corporatism on European business.
A very important point which fits well with the huge corporate investment in lobbying EU directorates to feather their nests and most especially raise barriers for others.
No not a moron, just a different starting point to you, but identifying the same issues.
Don’t attack your allies
I’m not a huge fan of German management in general, but to accuse VW management of bungling the transition to electric seems to a) disregard the current, sharp buying trend away from EVs, and b) the roles played by fantasist politicians and climate activists. Considering the latter point, it seems to me there is not a single European country where the necessary political drive to modernise national infrastructure to be able to cope with the demand for adequately generated, distributed and delivered power to sustain the replacement of internal combustion engines. But there is almost certainly some form of commercial egotism as well that has encouraged car manufacturers’ boards of management to champion and adopt early transition to full EV “status” The same applies with politics, politicians and Net Zero.
The quote you mention does imply the author thinks it’s possible!
He’s probably like our Energy ministers: an Arts, Humanities, or possibly Social Science graduate. They are clueless, especially the History and PPE graduates. 🙂
I don’t think you are taking global warming seriously enough. Don’t you know the temperature reached 80F/26C in southern England on 9 separate days this year. That is only slightly below the annual average for the last hundred years. England is burning up! I might have to unbutton my overcoat next August. Ban all engines now!
Quite right. We simply can’t have all of the human beings running around, all well-fed and warm. Cold and hunger are much better for the environment.
And these antiquated notions that people should be able to own reliable, affordable private automobiles are simply wrong. They reflect the toxic masculinity and white supremacist outlook of the extreme right wing.
Quite right, comrade!
This article is way off the mark, as it implies that electric cars are the only was ahead for automobiles, and VW is in trouble solely for not embracing them as hard as they “should”. Electric cars (as well as “computer” cars with ludicrous laptop touch screens) are being rejected by the majority of consumers. The real reason for the drop in industrial output is expensive energy and labour. Closing down all nuclear power stations, and refusing to buy cheap Russian gas are two German own goals that will be taught in business classrooms for decades to come..
This rather smug article does not mention the waning interest in electric vehicles in the US as the country turns from the claims of the climate hysterics that the sky is falling. The EVs are unsafe compared to gas-powered cars and last only eight years. The last I looked, the forever bungling federal government had budgeted billions for charging stations but only seven had been built.
Difficult to have any sympathy; Germany is now getting the treatment they doled out to the UK about 30 years ago.
The Germans have done what most of the West have done, funnelled their incompetents into national politics.
The private sector didn’t want them so they had to go somewhere.
And the incompetents have managed to drive up the price of energy to sky-high levels. Whatever one says about the British service-oriented economy, at least its less vulnerable to surging costs of power. An economy based on manufacturing and exports, on the other hand… .
The Victorian’s had the right idea when they were funnelled into the clergy.
Agree. As I have said for several years now, the west is being “led” by a confederation of dunces.
Germany both seem to have forgotten Vorsprung durch Technik — that progress comes through technology.
And what comes before technology, which is only a tool?
German politicians have forgotten.
Vorsprung durch Technik was and still is an Audi slogan, and Audi has always been the most innovative company within Volkswagen. I think that kind of thinking is just what the carmaking industry needs now, using technology to give consumers what they want.
Is the manufacturer the problem? Or the outrageous rules effette bureaucracy is subjecting it to?
Where in this column is there any account of the fact, EV sales have stalled or are going into reverse.
German industry is collapsing in on itself because of the regulatory monster it created to control Europe, unless Germany destroys Brussels and its parasite bodies that stifle free original thinking, then it will die and revert to its pre 1870s origins.
No ifs, no buts
The cat is out of the bag. The batteries will need to be replaced; at a cost of 20 or 30K (US). The advocates “forgot” to mention that.
It’s “almost” like a bait-and-switch.
That’s an old wives’ tale, I’m afraid. There are now Teslas on the road with 250,000 miles, still going strong long after many ICE cars would have bitten the dust. Long term research shows Tesla batteries (which are comparable to others’) degrade by 12% – 15% after 200,000 miles. Bear in mind that an internal combustion engine becomes progressively less fuel efficient over time as well.
Bottom line: the car surrounding the battery is most likely to fall apart before the battery of an EV car needs replacing.
There are plenty of good reasons to be critical of EVs, and also of the suicidal energy and transport policies of developed countries’ governments which are accelerating de-industrialisation.
Battery life is a red herring.
Most of my research was done by talking to uber, lyft and taxi drivers. They won’t go near EVs. Most drive hybrids.
Also, the used EV market must have collapsed for some reason. The battery problem certainly would explain why.
charging them up isn’t a red herring…that is what is putting customers off purchasing EVs.
This is a pretty simplistic article. The downward slide of Germany’s car industry is mostly based on crazy Green politics. The EU‘s impossible NetZero time table, banning the production of petrol cars by 2035, is an impossible task, especially, if the consumer is rejecting EVs unless the infrastructure is in place and prices are compatible.
Right now not only Germany’s car industry is in trouble, but also other well known high energy companies are moving away or shedding its workforce. The current German government doesn’t seem to help this dire situation by having a total incompetent Green politician at the helm of the Energy and Economics Department . But it all goes much further back to Merkel’s policy of “Energie Wende”, which planned to eventually shut down all nuclear plants and totally rely on renewables and Russian Gas. The Symbol of Germany’s political madness reached its peak this year after the destruction of the cooling towers of one of the last nuclear power plants and was in full view on all the front pages of its newspapers. Mission accomplished: “Make Germany Small Again”!
The “wonderful” cheap Chinese EVs, soon to be flooding the European market, are all built with 80% fossil fuels, supposedly rescuing the World of Climate Doom.
The so-called extreme right wing Party AfD, funnily together with the Marxist BSW, seems to be the only sane voice right now to stop this Green madness and think of Germany’s workers and prosperity by abandoning these mad deadlines by the EU bureaucrats and have proper energy sources back again.
Your analysis is far more intelligent than the author of the article. Unherd should commission you to write a piece expanding on this.
To top it all off, importing cars from the other side of the planet negates much of the benefit of “going green.” If we bought local, within certain mileage areas, we could reduce our carbon impact by a third. Perhaps more, given how dirty production is in much of Asia. But why think of simple solutions.
Yes the Elephant in the room. The destructive haste brought on by the nearly cultish human made climate change believer’s. Tripping over each other rushing to ensure the West’s destruction.
VW lobbied the EU for ‘green diesel’ so as to avoid having to make investments in EVs.
They got what they asked for, now they must pay the price.
Let’s be clear. VW didn’t bungle the transition to electric cars. The order to transition was a bungle by a Western “nowhere” elite now completely disconnected from nations and their economies.
Or was if a bungle? As the UK government’s FIRES study found, net zero demands living standards be dramatically reduced. In a future with no new glass and earth houses, cars will be a rare luxury for a privileged few. Destroying Germany’s automotive sector is the unspoken means to the end that is the net zero goal all our governments talk about.
Based on past performance, UK bureaucrats will solve the housing problem by building barracks-type structures that will make council housing look like Monte Carlo in comparison. Residents will have their choice on alternate days of eating or heating.
Ultimately, the German car industry grew complacent, resisting the trend towards electric cars for too long
could the resistance stem from this ‘trend’ being artificial, one that is manufactured by govt and mandates rather than consumer demand? People are NOT clamoring to trade in their gas-powered cars for EVs. They simply are not and there is ample evidence of that in the US where carmakers are at odds with car dealers, even though the latter is far more attuned to what buyers want.
Even if you forget the Green Delusion, how do Engineers and Businessmen et al forget to prototype and market research these new products?
The answer is government (taxpayers) money, and loads of it, no questions asked.
Many of the other reasons given for the problems Germany has are right, but one of the major reasons why the car companies are having problems is a prediction that was made years ago and came true, that the Chinese market that was so important for VW, Mercedes and BMW would demand ever more EV’s. And regardless of what Europeans think of EV’s.
For whatever reason German carmakers either do not seem to have taken this prediction seriously or could not take it seriously. They were protected by the German government and here Professor Knie is dead on: they just thought they were the best and could beat everybody else with one hand tied behind their back.
The second reason is one I, as a software developer, gave to a women with two sons working for VW two years ago and is seemingly very difficult for non-programmers to understand. Once again Prof. Knie hits it on the nail. Germany is good at hardware but not at software, despite the success of SAP. In particular VW et. al. are an engineering company where every manager is an engineer to the core. From personal experience I can say that engineers and software developers are about as far apart culturally as Finland and Brazil (or any other pair you consider more appropriate). Explaining software problems to an engineer is like speaking Chinese to an Italian.
But EV’s are 50% software and VW is having great difficulties getting their software production under control. And, yes I do know that there is a great deal of software in cars and it doesn’t make me feel safer. But there seems to be something about software projects and software developers that makes it difficult to manage them. I am prepared to debate why, but not that it is the case.
But for the moment I think that VW, Mercedes and BMW are probably too far behind to turn things around.
The problem is that, for EVs to be successful for NEARY EVERYONE, they need to be at least as good as ICE vehicles, including the total system. This includes Electricity generation, storage and transfer. It can’t happen unless the Laws of Physics are changed. The total package of NET Zero policies is even more impossible, just showing how much they know.
Most decision makers in politics are Arts and Humanities graduates, and are clueless. They are also clueless about Business. It’s a requirement: having no relevant knowledge! 🙂
If I may remark, I was careful to include the sentence “And regardless of what Europeans think of EVs”. It isn’t about what we think about EV’s which may or may not be justified, but what the Chinese thought of them and that they would be demanding ever more EVs. And they declared their intentions in advance. Part of VWs failure was not responding to what was an entirely foreseeable development in a market that was extremely important to them.
All the comments here bar one, assume that consumer demand should direct industrial and environmental policy. Really? Fossil fuels are the easy/ lazy option. Transitioning away from them will be tough – Germany has just had bad luck on top of this (Russian gas) and an idiotic decision (nuclear).
If consumers could afford the “industrial and environmental policy” then there would be no problem. But they can’t. And the validity of the policy is questionable in any event.
The basic principle behind democratic government is that the people decide industrial and environmental policy, not the elites. So of course consumers should get what they want instead of the government forcing unpopular policies on them.
You can’t change the Laws of Physics.
“We still believe we are the best footballers, the best soldiers, the best car makers”
wrong on two possibly three.
Stuff EVs, I was nearly a convert, but reality bit. The future for transport and heating is renewable alternative fuels, HVO etc…..we might even be producing them from sewage sludge within a few years…..though political sewage could be quicker.
Very perceptive article. An oligopoly like carmaking doesn’t adapt well to change. We may see the big and powerful but ponderous dinosaurs die off and be replaced by the nimbler and smarter though smaller mammals that can adapt.
That’s a shame, since the best technological ecosystem includes both. That gives both competition to keep prices down and cooperation to keep innovation thriving.. The computer industry developed that way, and though it too has its faults, provides a model.
Germany exported their industry to China, trained up their competition, and shuttered their nuclear power plants (rather than build safer and smaller ones, research how to reutilize nuclear waste or safely dispose of it), and neglected research into electric options. Complacency is the path to economic irrelevance.
Neglected research example: Liquid Fluoride reactors allow newly made isotopes to be removed, so they don’t continue to even heavier elements, which usually/probably have longer half lives. This makes nuclear ‘waste’ easier to handle.
Also, when separated, the elements are valuable and can be sold.
So much can be done, but it needs long term commitment.
“slick engines and smooth gear boxes” still sound good enough to me.
After 100 years of development, we abandon it because of political fantasy!
The German economy props up the EU;
I thought it was the other way round!
Remind me, how much was VW fined by the UD DOJ for Dieselgate, again? How much was Seimens fined under the FCPA in Argentina, versus IBM for its far worse bribery offences? How much did VW suffer from Nordstream? Add margin upon margin upon margin, do the maths, and realise China may not be VW’s most threatening enemy.
Start by looking at the German and the EU attitudes to data privacy I.e the calamitous GDPR legislation.
Then the German and EU attitudes to Google, to AI, to Musks X.
Volkeswagens attitude to cheating it’s own customers by defective and criminal software.
It is all centres on suspicion, of technology fear, the desire to contain innovation and the innovators. It goes right to the very top of the EU.
Google ‘street map’ is regarded as a big invasion of privacy in Germany .
Dear Mr. Birrell,
my story is unbelievable, but true, also tried to get help from Prof. Knie, Fratzscher et.al., so quite mad about their statements:
I -economic engineer, born in Bayreuth/Bavaria, studied in Dresden- worked out a concept for THE last car, technologically advanced and optimized for efficiency, not only technically, but in a traffic systems view, when that? In 2011 !!!Aware of it being THE solution (unfortunately at the same time with big business case) for quite some most problematic developments in Germany AND in the EU (and in the UK also… ;.) started it when you were still in…) since 2014, i tried to make sure that it’s not gonna be robbed.In vain, in 2018, my concept was hijacked by VW, BMW, political agents in Bavaria, Saxony and at federal level and at the same time my strategic roadmap and proposals (europe-wide broad and timely coordinated entry-into-market to set a european market standard; intermodalilty included) I proposed before a so-called Business Angel (recommended by Bayern innovativ) in 2018 will be realized 1:1 but without me.My EV is aimed to be the most efficient car, weight like Aptera plus a trunk under the passenger cell that enables at the time crowd delivery digitized and automated, perfect sharing capability through possiblitiy of introducing use-case-specific inserts (Tetris-like) plus MORE not unveiled yet.All well-documented (patent of 2/2018, first unveiled before patent attorney in 2014, personal contact with Herbert Diess, Stefan Piech, dozens of contacts with German institutions which should have helped me in such an case but … failed) you can ask me every question about it, I’ll have an answer.My motivation: My father advised me an article about CO2/climate in 1989, that’s why i chose economic engineering, be able to judge and help find solutions on it. Claim to be one of the best spot-on in what concerns real speed of problems with that matter. Born in Bayreuth, I know A LOT about German history and got some most welcome feedback by classic Britons, that I am amongst the very few Germans that are fully aware of their past and well-balanced in quite some views (e.g. defense!!!) – plus: lived for 30 years in Dresden and got the same feedback from quite the majority of east germans..Didn’t know UnHerd until today, I’d be very grateful if somebody could take a look at my story, German Journalism just ‘hesitates’ a bit, German Greens gotten pragmatic, they know about it, but … it’s more convenient to oversee it…
Profile and lots of posts at linkedin.com!
Perhaps write in German with more specifics so that language does not impede your message? We can translate. Good luck.
VW could move ICE production to Africa where EVs are as rare as hens teeth. Doesn’t help with their forthcoming redundancies in Germany but it would mean they don’t go bust.
Many good points here but strange not to mention there’s little future for manufacturing anything in Germany until they get their cheap Russian energy back. Even though reliance on that may have contributed to the relative neglect of software rather than hardware investment.
There’s a larger historical context missing as well. Innovative links between German Universities and industry opened global pathways in biochemical and metallurgical engineering 150 years ago, catapulting German firms and the nascent German state into dominance. But more recently ruling political perspective in Germany has been to milk mature cows rather than nurturing the next generation , never mind improving the breed. Kleinburgertum.
Maybe if the Germans would start developing their own shale gas potential via fracking and resurrect their nuclear industry they wouldn’t have to relie on cheap Russian nat gas.
I doubt the Germans are going to get “cheap Russian energy” back, because they now know that doing so would involve them signing up to be permanent hostages to the whims of whoever is the dictator of Russia at any given time.
“The People’s Car Company” which overcame its fascist birth to become…”
It was a National Socialist birth rather than fascist (there’s significant differences), but I understand why socialist try to distance themselves from mustache man: Bad optics and awkward questions etc.
Just wondering. What proportion of VWs are built outside of Germany?
I have doubts about this article’s basic premise that the reason VW is falling is because they didn’t embrace electric vehicles and “smart” vehicles. Electric vehicles are only gaining prominence because of flawed government mandates. Such central planning is always the enemy of good decision making and VW is kowtowing to this flawed govermnet.
The only reason Chinese EVs are popular is because those government mandates are not trusted by people and they don’t want, and often can’t afford, this government’s centralization of decision making, so they buy the cheaper thing around.
If VW again made cars that people want and can afford, they will succeed. Look at Toyota–the world’s largest car manufacturer.
Recent reports in the press state the resale value of EVs in the U.S. has crashed.
Xi Jiping experienced himself the dire consequences of Lysenkoism. He is now using it against his contenders. This craving for displaying of the Western virtues symbolized by a Swedish moron is killing our economies and societies. China takes revenge via an inverted moral imperialism that we turn against ourselves. Good luck with eating your own children.
EVs will be a blind alley in car evolution
The big three auto companies in the US is dramatically retreating from the big push to electric automobiles. The market is simply not there. Politicians are retreating from pushing the issue because Americans say f**k you to anyone telling them what kind of car to buy.
“As cars turn into computers on wheels, analysts fear the German giants are being left in the dust of faster-moving rivals from China and the United States.”
It is precisely here that VW is losing out. I am the dubious owner of a 2020 hybrid Golf, which is hybrid in more than one way.
On the one hand, the mechanical part of the car is great. Fun to drive, reliable, well-built, comfortable and solid, like all the Volkswagens I have owned. I love it.
On the other hand, it is a $h1tty computer. The display interface, which I hate in every car, is particularly clumsy. It takes forever to load, has millions of useless buttons to get to the essentials. Worst of all, the car is loaded with crappy driver assist functions you have to manually switch off EACH time you start the engine. And then they malfunction – fine, I don’t want them anyway, except you cannot stop the system from beeping to tell you the system you never wanted anyway isn’t working anymore.
It reeks of overengineering, complacency and the sloppiness of a car company that has had its day.
Ignoring the market for supercars where the criteria are design, high performance and high price, the car market will boil down to those for whom cars are mere transportation and to those petrol heads who like what are fast becoming classic cars and who would not entertain an electric car. For the former, with the advent of self-driving cars, available at your door a few minutes after calling one up on your phone app, I can see people not bothering to own a car at all. Why invest in a depreciating asset which sits idle most of the day? On this basis, the smartest thing that auto manufacturers can do is be their own car provider, involving less manufacturing but more servicing of their fleets. With VW floundering, they need to plan for this future in order to thrive. There will still be a market for cars in less populated areas, but a fraction of the current market. They need to adjust.
Nearly everyone who’s bought an electric car keeps at least one real car as well. Electric cars are never going to fully replace ICE cars, for numerous reasons, but primarily for cost and reliability.
I suppose I’ll just make sure my Mercedes is regularly serviced, until this asinine trend plays out.
Toyota didn’t get fooled by the supposed death of the petrol car. How are they doing?
It’s astonishing that this article doesn’t mention the crucial issue that is killing off German industry as a whole, and not just automotive but chemicals and of course coal too: prohibitively high energy prices due to panic over nuclear and climate alarmism.
Interesting piece, but the author forgot to mention that the root cause of the persistently sluggish management, to which he rightly refers, was replacing the DM with a weak DM (the euro). An excessively weak currency is as damaging to the export market as an excessively strong one as exporters become … well sluggish.
I wouldn’t proclaim the death of combustion engine cars quite yet. Is there a country in Europe that can generate enough electricity to take up the domestic, industrial and vehicular demands that green energy insists upon? Keep your old VW in the back of the garage with a few cans of fuel for the day when we have electricity blackouts.
I’ve long thought that all this fuss over electrical cars has taken the West down a massive blind alley. Why not simply produce fuel such as ethanol or petrol using renewable energy? Then we could carry on using internal combustion engines, whose technology has been honed for over a century.
We all know the huge problems in sourcing giant batteries for electric cars, and keeping on sourcing them in years to come, and (as you point out) the energy and new infrastructure needed keep recharging them all, and the frequent and catastrophic fires often caused when they ignite.
The intermittant nature of solar and wind power is also a well-known problem when it is used in the grid. But this would hardly matter a fig if it was being used to produce fuel, assuming there is a sufficiently efficient way to do so using suitable catalysts.