Some gatekeepers come with more than two legs (Mario Tama/Getty)

The Mississippi GOP has near supermajorities in the statehouse and senate, controlling all eight statewide offices, both US Senate seats, and three of the state’s four Congressional seats. The last Democrat to carry the Magnolia State in a presidential race was Jimmy Carter. That was 1976.
But Ty Pinkins, a slim and energetic African-American lawyer, decided to challenge the GOP incumbent for a US Senate seat anyway. As the 50-year-old told me of his decision to take on Roger Wicker, “Don’t be afraid to walk in the tall grass. That’s how I started.”
Born to an unwed 15-year-old mother, Pinkins chopped cotton as a boy to help feed his family, a fate David Rushing, chair of the Sunflower County Democratic Party, says is typical of poor boys from the Mississippi Delta. “We don’t have many gutters in Mississippi,” explains Rushing, “but we have a lot of ditches.” For Pinkins, then, the tall grass was the only route out of that Delta ditch.
The first in his family to graduate high school, he struggled to pay for college. So, Pinkins left Mississippi for the tall grass of the US Army.
A 21-year military career gave him a passport full of stamps, three combat tours, a Bronze Star, and a job in the White House. After retirement, Pinkins earned not one but two law degrees from Georgetown University. He turned down the big money of a Washington law firm for the Delta.

Back in his hometown, Rolling Fork, Mississippi, Pinkins published a memoir, 23 Miles and Running, and litigated hundreds of civil cases for the underprivileged. In 2021, he made national news by filing a federal lawsuit on behalf of fired black farm labourers, who had been replaced by white South Africans. Filing suit and testifying before Congress on the issue, he forced a settlement.
Taking note was Mississippi’s lone Democratic Congressman, Bennie Thompson. The chair of the January 6 Select Committee tapped Pinkins to run for the local school board. By the time Pinkins learned of Thompson’s desire, he had already publicly declared his candidacy for the senate seat. “The biggest problems are federal issues,” he tells me. “That’s what I’m interested in. Our state is last in everything that is good and first in everything that is bad.”
In theory, Thompson and state Democratic chair Cheikh Taylor promised Pinkins, the only Democrat to announce for the race, their party’s full support. But though he knew the contest would be an uphill struggle, Pinkins never expected a major hurdle would be Bennie Thompson — his own Congressman and the very politician to first have noticed his talents.
At first, his phone calls asking for endorsements went unanswered. Then, when his phone did ring, respondents attacked, apparently upset that Pinkins’ hadn’t followed Thompson’s advice and run for his local school board. As Will Colom, a prominent black Mississippi attorney and party donor allegedly told him: “You will lose. You are a loser. And you will always be a loser.” A young Mississippi state representative also phoned. “Who the hell do you think you are, getting your name on the ballot?” they yelled. “You need to go through us gatekeepers.”
Gatekeeper. The term shocked Pinkins. Party insiders refused to support him simply because, as he tells me, “I didn’t ask anyone, ‘can I please run?’” The candidate’s astonishment went beyond personal ambition. With its pungent whiff of machine politics, what Pinkins calls Mississippi’s “Gatekeeper Syndrome” is the very problem “preventing our democracy at the state level from blossoming.”
Not that everyone is surprised. When I asked Ralph Eubanks about gatekeeping he laughed. As the academic and writer puts it: “Welcome to poor ole beat down Mississippi.” To Eubanks, Gatekeeper Syndrome reflects the “way the Democrats think about their own state. It is learned helplessness. There are so many things that are broken that can’t be fixed that many just give up.”

“Giving up” would oblige Democratic elites to abandon their prerogatives in favour of building a competitive party. So to safeguard their position, Bennie Thompson and his colleagues have adapted the strategy of that classic wheeler-dealer: Richard Daley. Just like Chicago, Eubanks tells me, Mississippi is a place where you “have to work your way up through the system or you are jumping the line.” He adds: “It’s not healthy at all because it stops someone who has talent and drive with an inspiring backstory. You’d think ‘let’s get behind the brother and help him out’ but that’s not happening.”
From the outside, Mississippi is ruby red. Outsiders assume that Democrats like Pinkins have zero chance. But with an African-American population of 40%, it’s the blackest state in the union. A reliable Democratic bloc, the African-American vote means Democrats can win with high black turnout and a quarter of white ballots. In 2023, Brandon Presley used that formula to come within 26,619 votes of the governor’s mansion.
White and black Mississippi Democrats can, and have, run competitive statewide races. But the problem isn’t at the top of the ballot. The issue, as Pinkins and others point out, are those gatekeepers, those machine politicians who think Mississippi’s Democratic Party belongs to them and them alone. No less important, gatekeeping means the bottom of the ballot stays empty.
In the same cycle as Presley’s 2023 near-miss, there were contests for all 122 of Mississippi’s statehouse seats. Yet in nearly half of contests, Democrats failed to field a candidate, a phenomenon that affects up-ticket races too. As Michele Hornish, the executive director of the Every State Blue campaign group explains, simply fielding a state representative candidate gives the top of the ticket a 1.5% vote boost. Running candidates across the ballot is also a barometer of a party’s grassroots health. As Scott Kleeb, a lead organiser with Rural Americans for Harris-Walz, admits: “For the last several decades Democrats have not been building at the local, county, and state level,” especially in rural states like Mississippi. Of the nation’s 3,143 counties, Kleeb says that Democrats have a chair in just 300.
To be fair, an increasing number of Democrats are prodding the system to change.
One example is Rickey Cole, a two-time Mississippi Democratic state chair and Pinkins’ campaign manager. Cole always intended to run a senate race while also re-building the state party’s grassroots.
Cole’s strategy was to organise Mississippi’s 82 counties and appoint a campaign leader in all 1,762 precincts. From there, Cole says, it’s “just math.” In 2020, after all, some 400,000 registered Mississippi Democrats failed to vote. This year, Cole needs to mobilise around 178,000. Once the party got organised, the path to higher Democratic turnout was easy. “In rural Mississippi,” Cole explains, “if you provide the matriarch of the family a list of folks who are sporadic voters, they can get to them.”

As Kleeb warns, moreover, this comprehensive approach is the only viable path to a Democratic revival in conservative redoubts like Mississippi. “Institutions matter,” he says. “We can’t go from candidate to candidate. Every campaign can’t build an airplane from scratch every four years.”
But instead of endorsements and campaign cash, all Pinkins got was a cold shoulder. Mississippi’s African-American leaders — notably Mike Espy — refused even to meet, much less endorse. Appeals to the Congressional Black Caucus, Black Economic Alliance, BlackPAC, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, and Dirt Road Democrats all went unanswered too.
Behind it all was Pinkins’ former admirer: Bennie Thompson.
Mississippi’s lone Democratic Congressman is the political kingpin of the Delta, and the state’s black political establishment. Thompson earned national attention as chair of the January 6 Select Committee, but at home he squelches democracy as Mississippi’s lead gatekeeper. Pinkins tells me that “fear of Bennie Thompson” has resulted in only three of Mississippi’s African-American state senators and representatives endorsing him. Others supposedly tell him: “I can’t host a fundraiser for you because of Bennie Thompson.”
All the same, Pinkins persevered, and nearly two years on from his initial snub finally bagged a meeting with Thompson in May 2024. Much like their earlier interaction, Thompson was kind, heaping praise on Pinkins and promising his full support. “I commit to you,” he apparently said. “I will make a sizeable contribution to your campaign.”
Yet once again, Pinkins would soon find this apparent warmth vanish, like dew in the Delta sun.
Just days after their apparent reconciliation, the duo attended the Democratic State Convention. In an auditorium full of the state’s leading liberals, Pinkins awaited his promised endorsement. Instead, Thompson praised the white Brandon Presley as his “brother” and then promptly sat down. Audience members turned to Pinkins in astonishment. In July this year, at another Democratic gala, Thompson pulled the same stunt. Pinkins understood “that my own Congressman was clearly refusing to publicly support my candidacy.”
And in late August, at the Democratic National Convention, Bennie Thompson took his gatekeeping public. At a Mississippi state delegation breakfast, Thompson supposedly told 100-or-so party leaders that “we need to support our candidates but some of them need to earn it. He needs to work for the support. He doesn’t get to walk up to the head of the table and think he’s going to get our support.” The Congressman never mentioned Pinkins by name — but then again he didn’t need to.
Pinkins, for his part, has endured Thompson’s slights with grace, describing them as “the Congressman’s prerogative.” Not that he’s sat on his hands either, instead throwing himself into grassroots campaigning. Gradually, perhaps, Mississippians have understood he’s a different sort of candidate from the gatekeeper stereotype, not least in terms of race.
In the Deep South, most African-Americans run in majority-minority districts, developing little experience wooing white voters. Pinkins, by contrast, had spent two decades in the military, meeting civilians and leading soldiers from every walk of life. And like Georgia or North Carolina, Mississippi’s demography is changing. Mark Robinson, North Carolina’s scandal-plagued GOP nominee for governor, won his race for lieutenant governor on the backs of white votes. He may bring pizza to a porn shop, but he also reveals that white voters in 2024 are not what they were in 1965. He also shows that Southern whites are more open to voting for black candidates. For their part, Cole and Pinkins have eyed white Yankee transplants to Mississippi’s Memphis suburbs, as well as snowbirds, soldiers, and shipbuilders in towns like Pascagoula. In soliciting white votes, alongside the African-American base, Pinkins says he’s learnt that most voters crave the same thing. “They want someone they can trust,” he says. “They are so tired of politicians doing the same old things. We end that by meeting voters face-to-face.” Pinkins adds that Mississippians of all races are interested in a Delta boy like him “doing something unorthodox.”

More than that, meanwhile, Pinkins feels a moral obligation to take on people like Bennie Thompson. “Walking in the tall grass,” he says, “is doing what the average Mississippian can’t afford to do,People want politicians to have moral courage. They wonder: ‘Do you have the courage to the hard right or the easy wrong?’”
By going public about Thompson’s behaviour, Pinkins believes he is doing that hard right. Perhaps. But there’s still a way to go until the gatekeepers are vanquished. As Pinkins explains, one issue are those black Mississippian Democrats still unwilling to cause civil rights legend John Lewis called “good trouble”.
“There are a select few black men who, because of Gatekeeper Syndrome, are stopping progress in Mississippi at the federal and state level,” he says, after a heavy sigh. “Their reluctance to go against Bennie Thompson is holding back black Mississippians. We have a lot of officeholders who prioritise their personal power over the people’s interest.
At this point, Pinkins stops and exhales, before starting again. “We need to have the conversation. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.”
All the while, Cole and Pinkins believe their efforts will boost Democratic changes in a 2026 senate race against a weak GOP incumbent. They’re also looking ahead to Brandon Presley’s widely anticipated 2027 race for governor. But those efforts will be undone if Mississippi’s gatekeepers shoo talented candidates like Ty Pinkins from the ballot.
As for the former cotton chopper, David Rushing is clear. “He has my unequivocal support. He’s the real deal. He is not blowing smoke. I just admire him. He’s a bright star, and the future of the party if he doesn’t get frustrated by all this mess.”
But the tall grass is where Pinkins feels most comfortable. Like his own life, he sees it as the only way for Mississippi to move forward.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThese are lefties prtending to be Republicans at these ersatz town halls.
I am a registered Democrat, and I support Doge 98%. I have been screwed by the unaccountable bureaucracy for my entire life – just like the Trump voters have. You knew the haters were gonna hate, right? A third of you knew it and were twitching to echo the poorly informed “backlash” BS.
It’s been a MONTH, b*tches! Wait until something real happens before you crap your guts out.
Mr. Bauer, do you really believe what you just wrote? In every poll, and I don’t care for polls, there is over 60 % support for auditing and restructuring the Feds. I can only assume that you are aware of this support so I have determined that you are nothing but a hack shill. No real discussion, just the “talking points” of the folks who have been eating at the trough for far too long.
Discussions of economic politics still make the assumption that the voters are like isolated self-interest robots, only concerned with their own finances.
But other issues pertain. Just in the first month so many people have been fired or threatened with firing, in NGO jobs as well as Federal jobs, that many voters see their friends and neighbors suffering. And now the talk in the news has turned to programs that hundreds of thousands of people depend on.
If the richest man in the world told me I didn’t need food stamps or public schools for my kids I would certainly be angry. Mr. Trump would do well to brush back DOGE before he makes too many new enemies. He still needs those voters to get him through the all-important mid-term elections.
The indiscriminate firings touch everyone in the US. It’s particularly annoying that the firings have concentrated on probationary workers, who are young persons mostly. Many parents are very concerned about their fledglings and independence. So, now that they have a decent job, that f*****g asshole Musk comes along and fires them WITHOUT CAUSE. Many of them already have had good or excellent reviews. It’s just a bitter pill, and is destroying Trump’s support.
Most of this jobs in NGOs are bullshit jobs for useless woke parasites.
Now they can go and find jobs in real economy.
But no one want wasters with degrees in gender studies.
Idea that this people would ever vote for Trump in for the birds.
It is the same in uk. Previous “Conservative”, ha, ha, government should had fired hundreds of thousands of uncivil service and NHS parasites but it never did.
The town halls are more than political theater- they’re pure astroturf.
See recent polls- from a left-leaning pollster.
It was quite a feat to write this article but not mention the Harvard Harris poll from Monday that showed a 76% approval for DOGE among the public. In fact almost all of Trump’s flagship policies (deportations and wall, men in wome’s sport, ending race-based hiring practices, ending drilling bans, cutting foreign aid, tariffs) had majority support.
Indeed.
Modern Washington DC has almost never been forced to weather an economic downturn (such as a recession) and in the rare cases that it has, it bounces back faster than other areas. Because the government always finds a way to not only fund itself but also to grow – even if this means accruing $36 trillion in debt and an additional $2 trillion in accumulating yearly loans that our children’s children will have to pay back.
Individual stories of government layoffs may be sad, but this doesn’t mean that the layoffs aren’t necessary. The alternative is so much worse.
The American people understand this, and they overwhelmingly support this once-in-many-lifetimes chance to start getting America’s financial books in order.
In many regards it is far too early to conclude Trump already in serious trouble, but the chainsaw was always going to hit some of his constituency. And he won no landslide. Doesn’t take much to peel away sufficient to lose the House entirely in 20mths. Having a Billionaire in the White House and the World’s richest man cutting programmes whilst his companies acquire further Federal contracts (see Starlink and the FAA) an increasing gift to opponents. Yes absolutely an elite controls power – a real Estate & Tech Bro Billionaire elite. A great Betrayal. You can it in lights already.
And this is before the real fight in the House for his Reconciliation Bill. Here his prioritisation of tax cuts for the v rich will receive further spotlight juxtaposed with an increase in national debt and cuts to programmes that just may support many in need.
The WWF smack-down distraction twaddle will only get you so far.
I actually got a tax cut in 2017 too. Helped a ton. You may want to modify your “tax cuts for the rich theory” when many working class people significantly benefit.
He promised alot of tax cuts in his 2024 campaign. Remember the one on tips? Now watch carefully which one’s he prioritises in his Reconciliation Bill. You can be sure that relating to the top 0.1% will be prioritised. As the US treasury published itself a continuation of that gives the top percent £360k a year benefit. The ‘little guy’ gonna get screwed and you know it.
I care about my family. Is my disposable income going to increase or decrease?
Depends where you are on the strata TB, how secure your employment, type of industry you work in, your age, your asset owning situ, and your health status. Things could already be loaded in your favour. But for many things are not loaded in their favour.
And as you know if inflation ahead of wage growth…
Inflation always hits the poorest more. Who’s paying the cost of tariffs?
I sense though you may put much stock in your personal position in coming to judgment. Of course many will do that. But society relies on us also appreciating better what it like for many others less fortunate.
The problem with what DOGE is doing is that increasing efficiency seems to be a benefit but it usually is not. Taking out the slack in a complex system usually doesn’t make it work better, it makes it work worse.
Take the food distribution system. People can see that there’s a lot of wasted food and they think that’s a problem that’s easy to solve. But it’s not. It’s really, really hard not to waste food. Try too hard, and some people will starve.
My sense is that about 20% slack in a complex system is about right. So that’s about 80% efficiency. Beyond that, you probably make the system more brittle and fragile and that offsets any sayings from efficiency.
Take Elon Musk’s Twitter as an example. Elon Musk went in and cut 75% of his staff yet the company still operates about the same as it did. A success, right? Sure, unless you look at the value of the company now compared to when he bought it. On that metric it’s about as big a failure as it could be.
But company was never worth what Musk paid for it.
He knew it and tried to back out of a deal but sale deal was so tight that he could not.
So congrats to lawyers on the sale side.
His decision to fire woke parasites from Twitter was a right one.
Obviously you are in denial about censorship on Twitter under old management.
Just follow Twitter Files to find out.
Nope. You need to a better job of following the money Fred. The noise at the townhalls is from Soros backed, USAID funded (previously) progressive activists. Plenty of real journalist sources for that.
No doubt you can supply some of these real journalist sources for this insane claim?
(This is where he says he isn’t going to do my homework for me and then scuttles away with his tail between his legs – just watch!)
Let me help. Check out this and the references in it…
https://freebeacon.com/media/mainstream-media-outlets-cited-red-district-doge-protests-as-proof-of-broad-musk-backlash-soros-funded-liberal-groups-organized-them/
…well at least its my own tail down there and not some woke ideolog’s tongue as with your carcass Chamsoc. Check out the Washington Beacon for relevant video content,
And guess who were the major financial supports of the right-wing tea party protest during the Obama era: the billionaire Koch Brothers and their org “Americans for Prosperity” So it seems both sides have their billionaire supporters. And each side tries to use that fact to invalidate the actions / arguments of their opponents, claiming that the protesters were bought and paid for. Is it really hard that hard to believe that people have genuine anger that wasn’t paid for by a billionaire. One of my brothers hated Obama but he ever received any $ from Koch while my sister despises Trump and Musk. She hasn’t received a dime from Soros. But go ahead hate on people who are probably more like you than you imagine.
There’s no hate at this end Nick. But as others are pointing out, the only mode Progessives are actually capable of operating in is political Kabuki theatre. In their safe spaces within the bureaucracy/academy/media complex they have been incompetent self dealing, failures. And now Trump is stripping off their masks, and ripping up their fantasy scripts. Everybody will be better off as a result, including the newly maskless, who must now embrace the actual human condition that life is not a movie read-through.
Another headline question were the answer is no.
Sometimes its not even worth mocking you people…
I know how you feel
I was on about CS
Haha yes, they do that a lot, especially with the DOGE topic.
Dont believe the fear porn, Europe. Nice try, trying to convince the average citizen there’s a downside to cutting the bloat. That we should feel sympathetic and that there will be some horrible backlash to cutting the corruption and the thousands of empty desks and money going to NGOs. What a joke. It’s all the same playbook, attack Trump, attack Musk, leverage the lefties, as they cling to the lies and TDS. And don’t forget how much was exposed, which shows the global/leftist/democrat funded media and all the baddies, have a big stake and billions of dollars in manipulating you to believe you want this big, fat, corrupt leftist self destruction. I have been loving unherd, but interesting not one article with specifics about what’s actually exposed. They think you are so stupid.
Here’s the website, if you care to look and not put your faith in the media at all. Sadly, that seems to include unherd. I think we all know how the baddies behave when we are over the target. Fear, smears and gaslighting.
https://www.doge.gov/
Is this the website that claimed an $8BN savings when it was actually $8M?
Yeah, these guys are right on top of things! Honestly, even I am sometimes surprised at how gullible you hicks are!
You’d be one of the lefties they leverage. Well played.
“town halls are political theatre, and progressive activists have recognised in them an opportunity to hold Republicans’ feet to the fire.”
This one sentence sums up the entire story. Nobody knows how to work the public meeting space like progressive activists.
The DOGE fanatics remind me of the climate fanatics. Both have reasonable goals — to eliminate the federal deficit in one case and to eliminate carbon emissions in the other.
In both cases those goals are aspirational but unachievable, at least in the near term. There’s no way to cut trillions of dollars from the federal budget. There’s no way to get to net zero.
When people pursue fanatical and fantastical goals they tend to do their cause more harm than good. They often generate a backlash that stops all progress when if they had been less doctrinaire and ideological they could have achieved much of what they sought. So they get 20% of what they want instead of 80%.
What’s the answer? Give up a little to the other side. Recognize they are not evil and let them save face instead of forcing them to eat dirt. Be reasonable instead of forceful. Push but don’t shove.
Replied to your deleted post first…
Have you ever looked at political contributions from different agencies, say USAID?
Does a 97% donation rate imply neutrality to you? I’m not sure how any organization could get that partisan let alone a supposedly neutral agency.
Should I as a Republican voter just assume Correlation is not Causation. Would Democrat voters assume there was no partisan bias if donations were 97% Republican?
Every honest person knows the answer. Standard operating procedure for the Left is to push as far as they can when in power then urge the Right to be cautious when we’ve got the reins.
Right on, Mr. Bone.
97% donation rate? What are you babbling about now?!?!?
Its hard to make any sense of your “thoughts” here but are you suggesting that 97% of USAID donations went to democrats? Because that is stupid even for you!
According to Open Secrets it was 96.74% to Democrats and 3.26% to Republicans. Go ahead and check yourself. I’ll be eagerly awaiting your apology.
Do you know what USDAID is? Had you ever heard of it before Trump decided that he didn’t like it? Have you done even the most basic research about it since then?
Obviously the answer to all of these questions is a resounding NO!
Your comments make me thankful ..that at least the U.S. taxpayer dollars used to deceive the useful idiots, hasn’t gone to waste. Money well spent.
I sure do CS. Let me know if you want to have a substantive discussion.
OK. Point me to a reliable source that says that 96.74% of USAID donations went to Democrats. A link to the actual story because I looked at Open Secrets and it said nothing of the kind.
If you go to the USAID page on Open Secrets and click on Totals it has a chart of the Democrat to Republican contributions and percentages by election year dating back to 1990.
In 2006 contributions were 52% Republican. In 2008 it went to 69% Democrat. 2010 was 89% Democrat and from 2012-2024 its all over 90% Democrat.
You can’t handle the truth: They ARE evil.
That is the recipe more for the same old same old.
.
Have you ever looked at political contributions from different agencies, say USAID?
Does a 97% donation rate imply neutrality to you? I’m not sure how any organization could get that partisan let alone a supposedly neutral agency.
Should I as a Republican voter just assume Correlation is not Causation. Would Democrat voters assume there was no partisan bias if donations were 97% Republican?
It would be interesting to know where you’re coming from, Carlos. It’s not that nothing you say has any value. It’s just that you don’t seem to have come to terms with the mood of our side of the spectrum.
Nobody voted for Trump expecting nuance. Our exasperation over decades of the political class not stewarding the country well reached a head. We tried the diplomatic approach to no avail, so we sent a bouncer.
In other words, read the room. There’s no strategy other than full sunlight.
You’re conflating a lot, Fred. Do some more research.
Red-District DOGE Protests, Cited As Proof of Broad Musk ‘Backlash,’ Were Organized By Left-Wing Groups
Yes, exactly. It’s all orchestrated and Doge is showing the receipts
Free Beacon? LOL!
Again, you people are beyond mockery! But that won’t stop me doing it anyway!
You may be the person held in lowest esteem here, but you seem too obtuse to realize it.
Given all the time evidently on your hands, no one will be surprised.
What did they expect? Trump inherited a booming economy from Obama, drove it into the ground through his lavish tax cuts for the richest Americans and his grotesque incompetence during the first year of Covid.
Biden may have received little credit for it but his administration did the hard work of turning the economy around and the pain that involved.
I suspect that many US voters are starting to realize that they may have elected an imbecile and the person actually running the government is a racist megalomaniac.
Kamala Harris must be looking pretty good to them right about now – shame that its too late for that…
Polls show the Trumpster is off to a phenomenal start. Still, he hasn’t moved to reduce income taxes yet.
Once he slashes income taxes and replaces it with the hearty 90% trust fund tax, we will be swimming in revenue.
I’m not sure that you know what the word phenomenal means.
Anyway, the true MAGA lunatics like you don’t care about facts and will blindly follow your dumbo cult leader regardless of what nonsense he spouts. Its the few in the middle that matter and when they see inflation going up, chaos in the government, services being cut willy nilly and maniacs like Dan Bongino being appointed to senior roles we’ll soon see Trump’s already squishy approval numbers tank.
Reality will eventually strike the Trump fantasy world, the shitshow is only starting, a huge market crash is coming with a slowing economy and fiscal crisis. Income tax cuts with a 2 trillion annual deficit? Good luck with that. And don’t tell me they will slash government spending and social security and Medicare amd defense spending to give more to the rich, which will cause a depression. Trump will sink like a rock. The great swindle will be exposed soon.
In the next 4 years we will have learned what NPD abuse and the shared fantasy is on a global scale.
Let’s remove the schoolground politic of Dem/Rep
This is about psychopathology and the shared fantasy – In this instance we have two unchecked, phenomenally rich/powerful guys who fit the bill of malignant NPD running the country with the safety off.
Unlike other leaders falling into the NPD bracket (Blair, Clintons, Obama, Reagan) but these two are genuinely sadistic. They don’t care about anyone, or anything, they dont even care about MAGA. The whole world is an object to play with and reality is something to be played with.
Right now they are trying to find a way to solve the crisis in the debt system where the US stopped QE and collapsed the bond market. Which is why we are seeing the state being torn up, which is why we are seeing deals in Ukraine, which is why we are seeing a pullback in global military committment.
Basel regs meant all banks had to hold a certain amount of long duration debt and They have been running false pricing on overnight swaps for 2 years now, and that only leads for every other broke bank to increase risk because like SVB, they know the gov (or Jamie Dimon as a proxy for the gov) will bail them out. (Wait? Who’s freeloading on gov time now?)
All of this is another fantasy. The US cannot keep expanding if it tariffs the rest of the world without forcing new alliances amongst nations which redeuce their dependency on the US. It cannot cut all wealfare support without creating a revolutionary reaction internally. The USA cannot project power if it pulls troops away – which then takes away the ability for the US to use it’s most powerful weapon – The Dollar. GDP Q/Q comes out tomorrow and I have bet that it spells stagflation.
Meanwhile, it cannot rebuild the gap in the demographics required to restructure taxation (especially at the lower rates they aim for) without immigration. You can’t have kids in the past.. We missed that boat 15 years ago.
Oh and back to psychopathology – not only do narcs self destruct blaming the country/family/relationship for not living up to their impossible fantasy. But they turn on each other. Elon and Trump wont be able to be in the same room at the same time after a while… MAGA will tear itself apart.
None of this feels good. Apart from feeling gobally unsafe, it actually ends up with the end of the USA as we know it. Some of you may be indifferent, but we are going to see a lot of people dying. On a global scale. Trump just opened up a multipolar world when all his voters were voting for a Unipolar one.
Some of this is true. The mistake is not recognizing that the world already broke away from Unipolarity with BRICS. Thats 55% of the world’s population.