X Close

The Left is coming for Starmer Labour's woes are just beginning

The two most recent Labour leaders campaigning on the road during the 2019 election. (Photo by Peter Summers/Getty Images)

The two most recent Labour leaders campaigning on the road during the 2019 election. (Photo by Peter Summers/Getty Images)


September 23, 2024   6 mins

As Labour gather in Liverpool, in an attempt to regain some moral credibility after a dire first few months in power, a storm is gathering on Starmer’s Left. For now it lacks the media spotlight of donor-funded birthday parties and New York city breaks, but its political implications could ultimately prove greater.  At its helm is the man Starmer sought to discard like a piece of rubbish: Jeremy Corbyn.

Rishi Sunak surprised almost everyone by calling a snap election in May, including the former Labour leader — who remained a party member but had lost the party whip in 2020. It was clear he would never be permitted to stand for Labour again, but as Sunak stood outside No. 10 — resembling a bedraggled school prefect — Corbyn moved quickly. Two days later he announced he would run as an independent. The party he first joined in 1965 was firmly in his sights.

For many, the move against Corbyn several years earlier was primarily driven by the desire to break with his socialist politics. Indeed, it was the first in a series of moves that the leadership undertook to defang the party’s Left. Later came top-down deselections of Faiza Shaheen and Lloyd Russell-Moyle, while Sam Tarry lost a close vote with the controversial “Anonyvoter” system being deployed. And yet, in the election itself, confounding historical precedent, Corbyn  – as an independent – retained his seat. The battle for Labour, and the future of the British Left, had begun.

Expelled from the party, and outside the tent, Corbyn is arguably more trouble for Starmer. He now sits under his own flag, alongside four other outsiders propelled to Parliament by their opposition to austerity and trenchant criticism of Israel’s war in Gaza. And while their election campaigns weren’t coordinated, these five independents are now getting organised, announcing a formal Independent Alliance earlier this month. That makes them the fifth largest grouping in Westminster. Alongside four Green members, moreover, theirs is the largest gathering of “Left of Labour” MPs in history. What was initially an inchoate rejection of Starmer across a grab-bag of seats is becoming a national movement.

“The biggest problem for Starmer is undoubtedly Corbyn and company.”

Worse still for Labour, this all began during what was supposed to be the pinnacle of Starmer’s appeal. Yet within three months of forming a government, one recent poll has Labour as low as 29%. Six-in-ten voters now say the Prime Minister can’t be trusted and, most remarkably of all, Starmer is less popular than Rishi Sunak.

Not that the Conservatives will benefit from Labour’s deepening woes. Despite his penchant for freebie designer glasses, the public still views Starmer more favourably than leader wannabes Kemi Badenoch, Robert Jenrick and James Cleverly. More broadly, the electorate remains more critical of the Tories than Labour. All those years of ineptitude haven’t been forgotten overnight.

And it is that presumption — that winning consists of being the “least worst” option — which perhaps explains the decision to cut the Winter Fuel Allowance for 10 million pensioners. In a two-party system, all that matters is being slightly less despised than the other guys. But Britain is no longer a two-party system, something Labour ignores at its peril. With the Lib Dems, the country now has its largest third party for a century — business has even started paying attention to them — and the SNP are looking to hit back under stable leadership. Elsewhere, the Greens and Reform are now truly national players. It wasn’t just Carla Denyer saying Labour should scrap the two-child benefit cap, but Nigel Farage too. Despite having more than 400 seats, the optics are that Labour is not only at odds with the country, but that electoral alternatives are increasingly conspicuous.

Yet the biggest problem for Starmer arguably remains his former comrade in Islington North, with Corbyn and his fellow independents a lightning rod for what was the Labour Left. The potential repercussions of his zero-tolerance approach on dissent can already be seen. Last month, Labour suspended seven MPs after they voted in favour of an SNP amendment to scrap the two-child benefit cap. A day later, Corbyn and his band of merry men signed a joint letter in support of those rebels, saying they looked forward to working together — and that they represented an alternative to the two establishment parties. The subtext was obvious: leave Labour and sit with us.

But as Starmer’s difficult inheritance becomes clearer, there will be increasing dissent within the party as to how he approaches various challenges. Those who disagree with the party line are already considering other options — including the Independent Alliance. In August, Labour announced its membership had fallen below 400,000 for the first time in a decade. For the party’s Right — anti-democratic fixers by disposition — that is considered a good thing. But many of those leaving will go elsewhere and campaign against the red rose. In Chingford, Faiza Shaheen, whose independent campaign denied Labour the seat in July — it was held by the Tory incumbent, Iain Duncan Smith — has several hundred supporters who have left the party with her. If Shaheen chooses to stand at the next general election that could matter.

For socialist MPs in parliament, subject to intimidation from the party machine, joining the Independent Alliance is less risky than it might sound. For those seven suspended MP’s, for example, the choice is not between standing with either Corbyn or Starmer at the next election — but being an MP at all. In all likelihood, if they continue to rebel, the Prime Minister and his retinue will use the same tactics they deployed against Shaheen earlier this year, and failed using against Diane Abbott: as soon as an election is called, their candidacy will be revoked by the party’s NEC. The sensible solution — from a purely self-interested perspective — is for those such as John McDonnell and Zarah Sultana to assume they’ll never be allowed to stand under the Labour banner again. As that becomes clearer expect them to sit alongside Corbyn.

A wider recognition of Starmer’s authoritarian style among Labour MPs will test his disciplinary approach. Rosie Duffield, hardly on the party’s Left, has already said she owes more to her constituents than the PM. This is dangerous ground for Starmer, who needs his big majority if he wants to address difficult challenges like the housing crisis. Some will stand up to Starmer — playing a game of political chicken in the knowledge there is an alternative with Corbyn. Meanwhile other, less courageous MPs, will pretend that abstention is somehow an act of defiance (more than 50 Labour MPs abstained on the Winter Fuel Allowance Bill). But that will prove bad politics — with a poor voting record manna for independent challengers at the next general election. Had Jess Philips not defied the party whip on calling for a ceasefire, for instance, she would most probably have lost her seat.

My bet is that a new party won’t happen, even with Corbyn open to the possibility. The strength of the five independents is that they are masters of what they don’t say: their platform of opposition to war, support for public services and criticism of Israel is overwhelmingly popular with the median Labour voter. Having a more detailed programme, where they’re liable to disagree among themselves over things such as LTNs or biodiversity, comes with too many downsides. An expanded alliance of independents at the next General Election — which does politics in the broadest of strokes — makes the most sense for now.

While covering the Batley and Spen by-election in 2021, I had the chance to meet some of Batley’s business families (the Yorkshire town is the cornerstone of the nation’s bed-making industry). Even then, it was clear that a generational shift was happening, especially in Muslim communities. “Our grandfathers voted Labour, but now we are saying it doesn’t have to be like that,” one told me. ”We want to shape things.” These are precisely the kinds of thick associational networks that powered independent candidates like Shockat Adam and Adnan Hussain to victory in Leicester South and Blackburn respectively. Because they are outside the M25, and don’t make sense through the prism of two-party politics, Westminster presumes they don’t matter. But soon they may have to sit up and notice.

Next year’s May elections will primarily focus on Tory-held county councils, so expect the Lib Dems, Greens and Reform to flourish. But elections in 2026, especially in Birmingham and London, could be a flashpoint for Starmer. As the Greens demonstrated before their success earlier this year, building power in councils is an effective first step to winning at Westminster. Wes Streeting and Jess Philips will be paying close attention.

This year, Labour’s victory wasn’t as definitive as it should have been. Their mandate was achieved with only 33.5% of the vote. Five years from now, they could still win a decent majority, albeit on an even smaller share of the vote. But to their Left there could be dozens of coordinated independents and Green Party MPs. As the contours of national politics shift, such figures could yet prove as influential as Reform, whether that is peeling off angry voters on issues such as corporate pay, inequality and cuts to the welfare state, or more potentially Tory-coded issues such as failing to clean up Britain’s rivers and coastlines.

For the first time in its history, the Labour Party is exposed on its Left, as well as its Right. This resets the parameters for what “centrism” actually means — a significant shift given the absence of a compelling orthodoxy at present. The Tory majority of 2019 proved to be volatile, and fleeting. And with Corbyn and his awkward squad snapping at its heels, come the next election, Labour may find itself in a similar position.


Aaron Bastani is the co-founder of Novara Media, and the author of Fully Automated Luxury Communism. 

AaronBastani

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

56 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Christopher Barclay
Christopher Barclay
2 months ago

Corbyn’s victory is not without precedent. Livingstone won the Mayoralty of London as an independent against the official Labour candidate. Blair was forced to accept Livingstone back into the Labour Party and Livingstone won again as the Labour candidate.
Corbyn’s position is different in that he has allied himself with the Islamists. In many northern cities it will be seen as him standing with the rapists and against their victims. There is no chance of him repeating his near victory in 2017. The Islamists will also be marginalised if they stay outside Labour. They will soon see this and attempt to make their peace with the ‘Zionists’.

Andrew S
Andrew S
2 months ago

Are you sure?

It was my recollection the official Labour campaign won but Livingstone took over soon after the election. I wonder if the same might happen to Starmer.

Christopher Barclay
Christopher Barclay
2 months ago
Reply to  Andrew S

You’re thinking of the 1981 GLC election which Labour won under Andrew McKintosh and then Livingstone mounted his coup. The role of Mayor of London was not created until after Blair came to power and Livingstone won the first election in 2000 as an independent.

Chris Whybrow
Chris Whybrow
2 months ago

Then he will crush them as he crushed the rioters. Don’t particularly like the man, but he sure is good at crushing.

Lancashire Lad
Lancashire Lad
2 months ago
Reply to  Chris Whybrow

Not so sure they were crushed as temporarily subdued. The issues and the festering resentment hasn’t gone away.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
2 months ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

wait till the trial of the man who killed the three girls, where they were quick to describe him so far as coming from a christian family. Is it possible that he is a recent convert?

Stuart Bennett
Stuart Bennett
2 months ago

The far left side with Islamists because they share the same preferred methods of population control. Oppression and violence, thought control, the ostracism and murder of apostates and non-believers.

Michael Askew
Michael Askew
2 months ago
Reply to  Stuart Bennett

A bit harsh

Stuart Bennett
Stuart Bennett
2 months ago
Reply to  Michael Askew

I’m afraid not. Any even cursory knowledge of the history of Marxism and causal observation of the modern left will confirm what I’ve written.

Karl Greenall
Karl Greenall
2 months ago
Reply to  Stuart Bennett

This has absolutely no whiff of Marxism about it.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
2 months ago
Reply to  Michael Askew

Ask a Russian, Chinese, North Korean, Pole, Czech, Slovak, Bulgarian, Romanian, East German, Hungarian, Cambodian, Ethiopian, Peruvian, Moldovan, Estonian, Lithuanian, Latvian, or Cuban.

Karl Greenall
Karl Greenall
2 months ago
Reply to  Michael Askew

More than a bit harsh. I would say typical of a certain strain of far right thinking.
A major problem for many who see themselves as on the right is that they have no idea how far to the extreme right they are heading.

Mike Michaels
Mike Michaels
2 months ago
Reply to  Karl Greenall

Thanks for that Rik.

Mint Julip
Mint Julip
2 months ago
Reply to  Stuart Bennett

You only have to look at what happened to Rosie Duffield, one of Labour’s own, to see how cruel the party can be to dissenters.

Stuart Bennett
Stuart Bennett
2 months ago
Reply to  Mint Julip

Yes, and it’s heartening to see her standing her ground. One of the interesting things I note is that the majority ‘Right’ will have nothing at all to do with the far right and will openly denounce them without a second thought. The majority left however appear to be like sheep desperate not to stand out from the flock and won’t speak up against the fanatics in their ranks. It’s pathetic.

Karl Greenall
Karl Greenall
2 months ago
Reply to  Stuart Bennett

I would respectfully suggest that you are rather off beam there.
I cannot imagine which “left2 you are referring to.

Stuart Bennett
Stuart Bennett
2 months ago
Reply to  Karl Greenall

Perhaps you can point me to the grounded in reality, non identitarian, non postmodern, non virtue signalling, non spineless cry-bully leftist faction I’m not seeing? The one until a decade ago I casually believed had peoples best interests at heart and believed in free speech.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
2 months ago
Reply to  Stuart Bennett

You ignore resentment of what they lack and spite towards those who have it. Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, Hitler, Himmler, Pol Pot, Mao, Khomeini , Sayyid Qutb and Abul Mawdudi were all lower middle class people with above average intelligence and education but felt they were entitled to more than they had. They all despised the genuine hard working and skilled working class, considered manual labour beneath them.
The expansion of commerce and industry since the Industrial Revolution has created a large group of lower middle class clerks/ journalists of above average intelligence and education but below average physical robustness and resilience because they do not undertake hard manual labour and physical sports. This group provides most of the revolutionaries from the French Revolution onwards
They were able to convince criminals from the proletariat, especially slum proletariat that they could indulge in their liking of killing, torturing and raping to serve a higher moral purpose. Namely overthrow of existing order and revolutionaries as new leaders. Orwell’s Animal Farm with pigs as new leaders and sheepdogs as guard dogs- SS, Gestapo, KGB, Red Guards, Iranian Revolutionary Guards, ISIS , etc,
Cain killed Abel because he resented Abel who was favoured by God because he gave generously. Those who lack the generosity of spirit often have a life where expectation exceeds reality which causes unhappiness( Hitler failed to enter Art School, Mao to become a teacher , etc). When one listens to those who endured years of combat, such as Cheshire VC , Odette Hallows GC and saw most of their comrades die, what is noticeable is they are grateful for life which gives them a serenity. They were tested to the utmost and never failed. They are at peace with themselves.
Birds of a feather flock together. Resentment and spite causes left wing intellectuals and Muslim extremists to be naturally attracted to each other.  

Mark epperson
Mark epperson
2 months ago
Reply to  Charles Hedges

Well stated! Thank you.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
2 months ago
Reply to  Mark epperson

Thank you. I should also they lack the skills to construct and produce the useful, durable and beautiful. What looks good works well be it a cathedral of the Middle Ages, The Severn Suspension Bridge, Spitfire , E Typ Jaguar, The Pietta by Michelangelo or a bespoke Saville Row suite. The beautiful well made object also endures; it stands the test of time. The Spitfire could take a vast amount of punishment and the pilot could fly or glide the plane back safely.
The creation of the useful and beautiful is an act of love. Resentment and spite can only destroy, such as Cain killing Abel. To cut one’s nose off to spite one’s face.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
2 months ago
Reply to  Charles Hedges

Spot on, Mate

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
2 months ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

Thank you.

David L
David L
2 months ago
Reply to  Stuart Bennett

I wonder if the recent reports of Labour taking huge bungs from rich Muslims has anything to do with thier leniency when it comes to Muslim thugs and grooming gangs.

Bit of a coincidence isn’t it.

Simon Blanchard
Simon Blanchard
2 months ago
Reply to  Stuart Bennett

No the far left side with Islam because they’re cowardly dweebs.

Kathleen Burnett
Kathleen Burnett
2 months ago

Briefly, the result of a disunited country. Find a replacement for patriotism, or resurrect it.

Martin Bollis
Martin Bollis
2 months ago

“propelled to Parliament by their opposition to austerity and trenchant criticism of Israel’s war in Gaza.”

If you rephrase this as ‘propelled to power by religious and ethnic tribalism’ you get a much more accurate take on the problems to come.

Stuart Bennett
Stuart Bennett
2 months ago
Reply to  Martin Bollis

Martin forgot to mention delusional utopian fantasies. Fantasies about economics. And a rank sense of juvenile entitlement that believes other people should be giving you the things you need and want without you making any effort or contribution. With a side order of Antisemitism.

Martin Bollis
Martin Bollis
2 months ago
Reply to  Martin Bollis

Classic left wing response – set up a false straw man then resort to insults.

Bar Corbyn, the other seats were won in Muslim majority areas on a single foreign war issue.

Caradog Wiliams
Caradog Wiliams
2 months ago

Also important as a pointer in 2026 will be the elections for Scottish and Welsh assemblies.

Ben Jones
Ben Jones
2 months ago

A ‘national movement’? Thanks Aaron I needed a laugh this morning.

Alphonse Pfarti
Alphonse Pfarti
2 months ago

‘Corbyn and his band of merry men’
Merry, indeed? Interesting way to describe a practical teetotaller and his religiously observant fellow travellers.

Gary Taylor
Gary Taylor
2 months ago

“thick associational networks”. A new euphemism for ‘tribes’ just dropped. Please update your software.

Lancashire Lad
Lancashire Lad
2 months ago
Reply to  Gary Taylor

Yes, i found that amusing, especially with the potential for misinterpretation of the initial adjective.

edward coyle
edward coyle
2 months ago

The left has been very loyal to the Labour Party despite the contempt it is held by the leadership and its HQ admin.im not so sure there is no appetite amongst Momentum and others for a French style split from the politics of just getting power.i agree that with such a low proportion of the popular vote and more pluralist political representation Starmer should be worried.

Nick Faulks
Nick Faulks
2 months ago

33.5% of the vote is a mediocre mandate. What should be mentioned more often is that this amounted to only 20% of registered voters, so for every one who voted for Starmer, four didn’t.
Sunak plumbed unprecented depths, but previously this would have been considered disappointing by a losing candidate.

Mike Michaels
Mike Michaels
2 months ago
Reply to  Nick Faulks

When’s the People’s Vote?

S Lntr
S Lntr
2 months ago
Reply to  Mike Michaels

Yes I think we have to vote again asap. After all, democracy didn’t end with the general election. Also it’s clear that everyone who voted Labour now regrets their vote. Back in July, they didn’t know what they were voting for, so that vote is null and void and a new election needed immediately – SL

David Clater
David Clater
2 months ago

A mishmash of rehashed grievance and wishful thinking from unreconstructed Corbyn apologist Aaron Bastani.

William Cameron
William Cameron
2 months ago

Labour membership 366,000 (dropping)
Tories 172,000 (dropping)
Liberals 90,000 (holding)
Reform 80,000 (rising fast)

Remember both Tories and Labour polled much lower than in the previous election. And today their polls are worse even than the last election

Andrew Martin
Andrew Martin
2 months ago

Oh come off it Aaron, you’ve been watching too many Citizen Smith videos… power to the people! As I see it Corbyn is a few steps away from those places that look after tired old Socialists that start to dribble along with his mate McDonnell.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
2 months ago
Reply to  Andrew Martin

Its called The Socialist Workers Party

R S Foster
R S Foster
2 months ago

I’m personally rather dismayed to see an emerging alliance on the left of British politics, mostly united by barely concealed antisemitism, some of it expressed by cheerleaders for the Genocidaires of Hamas…

Tim Powell
Tim Powell
2 months ago

Momentum fan fiction, meanwhile on planet earth…

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
2 months ago

Nothing (and no one) in today’s as ever erudite comments has surprised me – congratulations to UnHerd for continuing to publish unwanted (for the majority of subscribers) pieces by the likes of Mr. Bastani. Proof conclusive that Corbyn could never have won in 2017 in spite of having Starmer’s “subtly nuanced” Brexit strategy (funny how no one seems to mention that…)

Jeff Carr
Jeff Carr
2 months ago

One point I think Aaron is right on is that there will be an increase in ‘Independent’ MPs in seats with a large number of ‘ethnic minority’ voters. This will threaten the likes of Phillips, Streeting, McMahon, Waugh and many others. This reflects community voting rather than the development of a far-left insurgency. I would argue that the morals and values of many of these communities are more (little c) conservative than socialist.
Unfortunately this increase in voting along racial lines by minority communities may well result in a backlash from the ethnic majority who have, to date, shown that the UK is one of the most accomodating countries in the world. Reference the Sewell Report and other fact based evaluations.

Rather Not
Rather Not
2 months ago

“For the first time in its history, the Labour Party is exposed on its Left, as well as its Right” – What a strange thing to say. Being exposed on its left has been pretty much the default state for Labour.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
2 months ago

This is what happens when an election is based on not being the incumbent. No one voted FOR Labour; those who voted were mostly AGAINST the Tories. How’s that working out? I realize a change was inevitable but change without vision is not worth much.

Tony Kilmister
Tony Kilmister
2 months ago

Delusional stuff. There is simply no appetite across the country for a more resolutely left alternative to Labour. If anything, affairs are trending in the opposite direction. Starmer’s government for the bond markets, together with the Tories and the rising Reform party, are much more symptomatic of where popular opinion is, and is heading. Other European electorates are showing the direction of travel.

Corbyn’s alliance isn’t even left; more an opportunist coming together of anti-Semites who got lucky electorally by playing to the bigotry of constituencies that reject Israelis’ right to defend their nation against invaders. Jess Phillips, no left-winger, meanwhile is simply saying things out of concern for her personal safety.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
2 months ago

 “politics in the broadest of strokes” – in other words, politics as performative gesture, unencumbered by the gritty, day-to-day reality of actually governing and dealing with the sorts of compromises and trade-offs that are inherent to being in power.

Mark epperson
Mark epperson
2 months ago

Wow, I thought we Americans had the most inept, greedy, slimy, and uber moral cowards as politicians and bureaucrats. It appears the UK has its clowns too, along with probably the most corrupt political organization in history, the EU. Somehow, that does not make me feel better.

carl taylor
carl taylor
2 months ago

“My bet is that a new party won’t happen, even with Corbyn  div > p > a”> div > p > a”> div > p > a”>open to the possibility. The strength of the five independents is that they are masters of what they don’t say: their platform of opposition to war, support for public services and criticism of Israel is overwhelmingly popular with the median Labour voter. Having a more detailed programme, where they’re liable to disagree among themselves over things such as LTNs or biodiversity, comes with too many downsides.”
I understand that Corbyn and his merry anti-Semites do intend to form their new alliance into a party, to be called Collective. I’m looking forward to the first membership conference. Bastani’s counsel – that it should avoid a more detailed programme over which they will disagree – is bound to be ignored. The far left just can’t help themselves. There’ll be angry sixth-form strops and walk-outs over more than just ‘LTNs or biodiversity’. The inquisition will be established early on. LGBTQ+ and/or women’s rights motions, for example, of the kind that threatened to derail the Respect Party at its 2005 conference (a similar bun-fight which saw the Left split over appeasement to Muslim ‘values’), will certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons, as will a whole wish-list of other impractical positions forwarded by both the far left and the Islamists on the party’s right. If it can survive more than a few years, given those internal contradictions, it may have a chance; but ironically, that will only likely be possible if Corbyn & Co are as ruthlessly authoritarian over party discipline and MP selection as Starmer.

B Emery
B Emery
2 months ago

‘Corbyn and his band of merry men signed a joint letter in support of those rebels, saying they looked forward to working together — and that they represented an alternative to the two establishment parties. The subtext was obvious: leave Labour and sit with us.’

‘ These are precisely the kinds of thick associational networks that powered independent candidates like Shockat Adam and Adnan Hussain to victory in Leicester South and Blackburn respectively. Because they are outside the M25, and don’t make sense through the prism of two-party politics, Westminster presumes they don’t matter. But soon they may have to sit up and notice.’

I hope Corbyns lot, the independents elected for Leicester and Blackburn, Reform Mps, the Green party, all of them, give the two party system a massive kick up the arse, on the left and the right.

Kevan Hudson
Kevan Hudson
2 months ago
Reply to  B Emery

As with Germany, the AfD and BSW, I agree that it nice to see independents and populist parties shifting the Overton Window and shaking up the stale political system.

B Emery
B Emery
2 months ago
Reply to  Kevan Hudson

In my opinion, it doesn’t matter who shakes it up, just that it is shaken.
Westminster is incredibly detached from it’s own population and from global issues.
They will take us over a cliff edge if they do not start taking freedom of speech, freedom of association and the concerns of normal working people seriously.
They don’t care about small businesses or the economy, they brand people concerned with immigration and all this DEI cr*p imported from America as far right racists, dissent against certain issues especially when discussing Geopolitics is very difficult if you have to navigate their ‘permitted speech’ bullsh*t Internet police guidance.
Frankly I don’t care if my cat is elected if it gives them a kick up the arse.

Martin M
Martin M
2 months ago

Perhaps Corbyn and his fellow travellers should be honest with the electorate, and simply rebrand themselves as the Anti-Semite Party.

Ted Ditchburn
Ted Ditchburn
2 months ago

I think Sectarian voting along ethnic and religious lines is on the rise.
The ‘left and right’ model for analysing politics just doesn’t work any more, Goodhart’s ‘Anywhere’s (or Nowhere’s) and Somewhere’s’ idea is far more useful.
What is going on in Leicester is a degree thesis waiting to be written, the only Tory win on the recent General Election night a Hindu up against Muslims, and Jonathan Ashworth beaten by a Muslim.
It isn’t only Leicester, there are many Northern Towns and seats around Manchester and Leeds especially, and many London constituencies going the same way, but Leicester is where the fault lines were most vividly illustrated in July.
It’s a real shame, a terrible chapter in our island story may only just be starting.