A little over 10 years ago, as a young anthropology student, I arrived in the dusty, shrub-infested outback town of Alice Springs in a champagne-coloured Toyota Camry. It’s an extraordinary place: vast and dry and scorched. I planned to spend my summer break managing three local liquor stores there — given the town’s reputation for Aboriginal alcohol abuse, I thought it would make an interesting case study — and ended up living in Alice Springs for much of my early adulthood.
Driving through the town’s little streets at night, it wasn’t unusual to see people staggering across the roads in a drunken stupor. One night I saw a woman, completely naked, crawling along the side of the road. Day in and day out, binge drinkers stumbled through the doors of the liquor store, some smelling as if they hadn’t washed for weeks. A few even relieved themselves in the store. Theft was almost an hourly event, and fights over alcohol were common; stores were prone to being ransacked by mobs of up to 15 people, forcing staff and security against walls or bailed up by flying bottles of bourbon, while their comrades made away with cartons of wine.
In 2022 the problem reached its zenith, when the small Outback town of 25,000 accumulated 2,653 reported assaults. There was a 53% rise in alcohol-related assaults: shopkeepers installed metal barricades to prevent burglaries and concrete bollards were put up on roads to stop stolen cars. “We’ve already filled the jails,” warned the state’s police commissioner.
In January last year, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese arrived for an emergency meeting, keen to resolve the local disorder ahead of his divisive “Voice” referendum on indigenous representation to the Australian Parliament. The meeting ended on a controversial note, with the re-imposition of a ban on the sale of alcohol to indigenous Australians in some communities, who make up a fifth of the population. Since its reintroduction, there has been a substantial drop in domestic violence and other antisocial behaviour. However, recent months has seen a rise in crime by indigenous youths in Alice Springs and the imposition of a temporary 6pm curfew.
Many white Australians believe that Aboriginal people cannot be trusted with alcohol, a view echoed by some authorities on drug addiction. Psychiatrist and former White House drug czar, Robert DuPont, captures this sentiment in his 1997 book, The Selfish Brain: Learning from Addiction. He bemoans that: “To see Native Americans suffer from the use of alcohol and other drugs, and even cigarettes, or to see similar suffering among Australian Aborigines, is to face the painful reality that traditional cultures are not prepared to withstand exposure to modern drugs and to tolerant values governing drug-taking behaviour.” His book suggests that non-indigenous culture is superior in regulating social standards surrounding dangerous drugs such as alcohol, while tough pressure is required from an external source — white governments — to prevent their use in indigenous cultures.
What DuPont doesn’t seem to grasp is that Aboriginal culture does not exist in an a-historical vacuum. Stripping a culture of its regulatory mechanisms for discordant social behaviour and then declaring that culture to be inherently inferior in regulating substances intertwined with that behaviour leaves much to be desired in DuPont’s diagnosis of the problem. And in any case, if proximity to traditional Aboriginal culture could explain addiction, then the indigenous children of the “Stolen Generations” — taken from their parents and raised as white people as part of Australia’s Assimilation Policy — should have fared relatively well. Instead, they descended into a spiral of substance abuse. Christina Green, who as a child was taken by the government and raised in Parramatta Girls Home, recalled: “Most girls became depressed, suicidal and addicted to drugs and alcohol later in life.”
These children suffered horrific psychological scars — and some were abused and raped in the institutions that tried to assimilate them. In his book, In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters with Addiction,Canadian physician Gabor Maté explains how trauma in Australian indigenous communities has been passed from one generation to another through violence, sexual abuse, and child neglect that originally emanated from the trauma of colonialism. “If you look at why addicts are soothing themselves through chemicals… you will see that they have all experienced childhood adversity — the pain and distress that they needed to escape.” This explanation is not without its critics, such as those who would point to extreme levels of violence in indigenous communities prior to white contact. Moreover, confining the explanation to psychopathology derived from the childhood period seems to miss far broader determinants of addiction.
This is a problem where you could fling blame in any direction and hit a responsible party. But this is a pointless exercise that just makes things worse. Having decades worth of varied experiences with Aboriginals from binge drinking rage through to one of the nicest people you will ever meet to highly intelligent and competent manager. Aboriginals are just like everyone else.
Australia’s problem is that we continue to push the “noble savage” narrative and elevate Aboriginals to a highly advanced hunter gatherer culture which is total and utter BS! So many of us young and old just tune out every time anything gets the Aboriginal treatment. Be it sport, school, TV or whatever. Most people are sick of it because it is a pointless form of bullying of non-native (and especially white) people. It is very divisive just like the referendum.
The reality is that every culture at some point in their development has to go through the phase of hunter-gather to a more modern culture. Our hero worship of indigenous cultures only delays the process that every culture has work their way through. They do, just like we did, have to let go of so much that no longer serves them in the modern world (and stop calling it a white mans world because white people were not the first ones to go through this process) They have to modernise. They can keep the best and most useful parts of their culture to create their way. Which brings me to another very important point. There is no one Aboriginal culture. There are so many different Aboriginal languages and cultures here in Australia, that picking one is beyond stupid.
We have done so much for Aboriginals to the point where it is now too much. We need to role a lot of it back and give them the space to be accountable, and bring something to the table. We have to stop trying to make up for the past. We all live in a glasshouse, and so we need to drop the stone!
Great observations, thanks. We need to get over blame in favor of solutions.
If there are solutions.
As long as politicians like Albo and ScoMo have the reigns, no decent solutions will ever see the light of day. We know a few long-term Air Force people and one who basically despises every defence minister since she joined, except one. Peter Dutton is the only one with backbone. He is well respected outside of media circles. Not much charisma, but he makes up for it with substance.
Well said. No one gains agency without accountability. Social welfare should only exist to help people get out of poverty. Those who find work boring can enjoy the excitement of digging for grubs and eating small game while living under a crude shelter.
I’ve been reading Orwell’s ‘Down and out in Paris and London’. In the worlds he describes there are many who will never get out of poverty. I was interested in the English treatment of homeless men. They were not allowed to stay in any one shelter establishment for more than one night a month. So, they tramped the countryside and towns, always moving on. Not sure how accountability enters into that story.
Bizarre that the obvious explanation – genetics – is not mentioned here. American Indians and Aboriginies did not develop the genetic resistance to alcoholism that the Euro/Asians, big drinkers all, did over thousands of generations. Alcoholics tended to drink themselves to death and not procreate.
A recent study has found a gene for alcohol moderation that causes most people to become sick from over-intoxication, a gene which alcoholics lack. So we know there is a genetic issue, no matter how much that might make progressives blanch. Note that the author admits that indigenous children stolen and raised in “white” families had the same problems with substance abuse, obviously (though not conclusively) due to genetic proclivity.
I don’t know the answer, but blaming this on colonization or “boredom” is not going to get us anywhere.
Yes, I too was surprised that genetics weren’t mentioned and or that Europeans have been exposed to alcohol for centuries and so have a greater tolerance. It’s too much of a coincidence that Australian Aboriginals have suffered the same fate as American native peoples. On top of that are socioeconomic factors that have oppressed both races.. Europeans have had centuries to evolve from being hunter/gatherers and aboriginals have not. The writer definitely has a judgemental attitude towards Aboriginals that I suspect may be quite prevalent among whites. My sister, who lives there, has voiced a similar bias and she’s someone who goes along with the herd.
I detect from this author sorrow, anger, and frustration about a tragic level of human suffering. I think he makes a genuine effort to avoid spreading broadbrush or reductive blame in any direction.
Can you specify why you think Blackwell–a man engaged in decades of trying to help Australian Aboriginals (however imperfectly, in the face of huge obstacles)–is “definitely judgmental” toward them?
It’s not genetics that causes high rates of alcoholism. It is culture. Yes part is due to the struggle indigenous people have in adapting to modern cultures. This intransigence is not our fault nor is it our problem. I used to be quite sympathetic to the struggle of indigenous people until The Great Mass Graves Hoax in Canada. The hoax is well researched and debunked in the book Grave Error. I then realized that much of the narratives arising from indigenous leadership function to exploit resources from gullible modern economies. In Canada, when faced with basic scrutiny, like “where are the bodies?” ” Who exactly went missing?” Or “Why hasn’t this been reported to the police?” All sorts if nonsense is spewed out and demands for laws to be made to shut down questions. Seem too cynical. Well if we have a culture which, as the author stated, is willing to maim its own people resist exploitation, lying to gullible colonizers is nothing.
I don’t think that an imperious statement that it is all culture and nothing to do with genetics is helpful or admirable. It is much more likely (like most things in life) to be a complex mix of the two.
There is literature that addresses the very long history of the role played by agricultural practices and their relationship to the purity of nearby water sources (due to the run off of manure/fertiliser bacteria) and then in turn the development of alcohol to help make the water potable and the long term genetic adaptation of populations to those processes …
Genetics has been debunked; it is called The Firewater Myth.
Alcoholism is likely to be inherited by a gene whatever one’s ethnicity.
Research shows a 50% risk of alcoholism from family genetics. Risk. Even for people with this risk, how people are taught to view alcohol will have a factor.
What’s interesting in Canada is how the most blatant “native” activists and scammers are either not native or have maybe 10% native heritage.
Australia was a penal colony, built by the forced hard labour of the English poor, Irish political prisoners and prostituted women. It was unbearable trauma inflicted upon the already traumatised. If they survived the sea voyage. There was no currency except rum and drinking provided the only solace to lives of bleak misery. Only difference between outcomes of this heavy drinking culture are work and genes. Same with refined carb based diets. Aboriginal people have the highest rates of obesity and diabetes, even in outback towns with no fast food or convenience stores. Not genetically adapted to a western diet. And I hate to bring everything back to housing but precarious living conditions, even renting, is associated with higher levels of drinking, even when controlled for income. I’ve noticed it myself. Instead of painting the kitchen or gardening on weekends, now that we live in a rented flat, we eat and drink.
And yet millions of people in so called advanced societies regularly medicate themselves with alcohol and other drugs to take the edge off of stifling, monotonous working lives. None of us are really very well designed for industrial civilisation.
And it was not so long ago that things like the enclosure acts forced people here in England who had lived on the land for centuries into hellish factories.
And Georgian/Victorian London had a terrible alcohol problem as desperate people sought solace in oblivion.
Excellent point
Oversimplification of a complex social and historical problem, oboriginal societies have similar problems everywhere, including here in Canada. Their inability to consume alcohol by many is just one element, personaly I know some aboriginals who can socially drink without overdoing it, maybe because they have jobs and steady income and are more integrated in the western culture. In Canada we have the northern Cree who negotiated a huge settlement for hydro projects, and they managed the funds quite well, they even have their own airline. Many of them have good jobs in the north and elsewhere, and have education. They still have social problems, but not nearly as bad as many other mostly poorer communities. But at least they have good housing and services, but boredom is a problem for many, limited economic opportunity is a problem, and they have a very difficult time competing within our culture, it was never part of their culture being communal people.
Excellent comment. Good leadership in an indigenous community makes a huge difference. The West Kelowna band owns malls and other businesses. We are seeing the rise of indigenous capitalism led by visionary leaders. Bernd Christmas, now a Canadian Senator was a pioneer. Indigenous communities are freeing themselves from bad leaders who stay in power through grievance politics and maintaining a hunter gatherer culture. The capitalization of indigenous culture is happening and it’s a good thing. Those who do withing a hundred years or two they will be running things. I’m good with that.
The ‘unexposed to alcohol’ is only a theory. Until very recently, high percentage alcoholic beverages could not be made, and for the majority of historical populations resources were too limited to produce large amounts of alcohol.
If you’ve ever seen the Saudis defend upon London cocktail bars gasping for a drink – and handling it pretty well – the not exposed to alcohol argument becomes pretty unconvincing
It can only be genetics: in the white man’s world I have witnessed very different reactions to alcohol consumption.
Celts, Slavs, Scandis, Teutons, Anglo-saxons, Gauls have significant average variations in drunken behaviour, some socially benign and others malignant. This also applies to their descendants in far-flung colonies.
May as well discuss the 800 pound gorilla in the room. There’s a taboo in the modern world against using genetics to explain racial discrepancies, especially in the media, due to the misuse of such arguments by some of history’s worst bad actors, namely the Nazis. Even mentioning genetics in the context of race is apt to invite accusations of neo-Nazism or some other form of racial superiority argument. This is despite the fact that there are demonstrable and scientifically valid genetic differences between the races.
They are minor and generally have fairly mundane explanations regarding the development of cultures and societies over very long periods of time. The one Americans are familiar with is lactose intolerance as African Americans have a much higher rate than white people. The white people are actually the outlier in this case. Most white Americans have a significant percentage of their background from the handful of areas where lactose tolerance evolved. Basically lactose tolerance is a European thing, particularly northern European such as English, Scotch, Irish, German, Scandinavian, Dutch, etc. In actuality one of the five food groups we learned as children doesn’t exist in most of the world. The reasons are debated but theories center around the survival advantage of having access to an additional source of nutrition, particularly in the northern latitudes where the growing season is shorter and there are fewer options. Lactose is a form of sugar that, in people who can digest it, is broken down into glucose, the basic fuel of cellular metabolism. The evolutionary advantage is pretty obvious.
Most genetic disorders are more common in certain races because they are heritable and generally arose in a particular place and spread throughout the gene pool from there, and it wasn’t until the past half century that much interbreeding between disparate geographic ranges occurred. Some disorders are exclusively associated with a single racial group or region of origin.
Since it’s established scientific fact that there are heritable traits that are scientifically verified to have arisen in a particular place and/or within a particular ethnic group, it makes little sense to just close off this avenue of research or discussion, but then that’s the thing about cultural taboos. They only make sense in the context of a particular culture. Given the cultural trauma of Nazism with it’s racial superiority doctrine and the visceral horror of the holocaust that doctrine produced, it’s somewhat understandable that we’re a bit queasy about discussing genetics, race, and personal characteristics like alcoholism and drug addiction. Taboos have an emotional component; fear, guilt, shame, or some other deeply held negative feeling. In this case it’s all of the above and then some.
At the end of the day, there certainly are some scientifically valid discussions of race and genetics that could be had, but there’s no getting around how similar it ends up sounding to Nazi discussions of racial superiority, and we can be forgiven for finding that unsettling. If we’re going to get over this particular taboo, it has to start with acknowledging that there is one and understanding why it exists, how it came to be, and how it affects our thought processes.
That seems like a sensible and balanced framing of the issue(s) and the current heightened volatility around broaching the subject.
The lactose thing is an apt comparison. Native Americans and East Asians certainly have a high incidence of intolerance for alcohol. (hmm, Native North Americans are thought to have come over on a ice bridge about 12,000 years ago from present-day Mongolia or thereabouts). But chronic drunkenness or pattern bingeing is less common–though far from unknown– among East Asians from China, Japan, Vietnam etc., than among those of European descent.
Perhaps the remaining differences are largely cultural and situational. There is certainly an argument, to me a plausible one, concerning the greater likelihood that intolerance for or low resistance to alcohol will be combined with excess consumption in squalid and dependent conditions like those prevalent on many reservations. Then again, a shocking number of “Indians” had a weakness for the sauce when it was first introduced to them in Colonial or Federal times, when they still had their original lands and were not under the thumb or boot of the “big bad” white man. And the intolerance of East Asians is not identical to the penchant for excess among Indigenous peoples, is it?
These things are complex, and I think the article above at least does a good job of acknowledging and confronting that complexity, from a knowledgeable perspective. As you say, we ought to be able to bring up these issues and discuss them in an honest way without being accused of clueless bias or worse. Yet we should resist leaning in to single-story genetic explanations, even when there is clearly some truth to many of them.
Of course there are statistical differences among white folks too–just ask the majority of my ancestors, who were Irish and Scottish (never mind, they’re gone from the Earth).
Just to elaborate on this, the differential reaction to alcohol in East Asian groups is a known, studied phenomena. It’s called the Alcohol Flush Reaction, and is caused by a specific SNP(mutation) called rs671, which influences how the body metabolises alcohol. The SNP is present in only 30-40% of East Asians, but it is specific to that geographic area. There are other SNPs more common in East Asians which also have a contributory effect.
Interestingly, the effect of the Alcohol Flush Reaction is to make drinking alcohol more unhealthy. It’s also makes hangovers lot more unpleasant, which discourages consumption to the extent that the individual may be better off overall. It’s an interesting case study of how selection effects can be very unintuitive.
Yes I knew the basics of that difference, though not the hard science. I was speculating about a regional crossover in different types of “low resistance” to alcohol–I think pointlessly so.
The lack of past gene-pool exposure in Native North American who came over on ice 12,000-plus years ago–just before evidence of intentional consumption of alcohol–probably has a lot more to do with. And alcohol’s inherent addictiveness, especially for a sizable minority of any large population. And no cultural rules around the newly introduced “firewater”.
I like your post and have made a reply of similar length to your comment;
it won’t post for about 16 hours now, which is frustrating because all I can think that I did was to mention what seem to be relevant ethnicities from multiple continents. Ah well.It began as a replacement for mother’s milk. The extremely high rates of maternal mortality in colder climates meant that the babies who couldn’t suckle from another source wouldn’t survive more than a few days (unless you could find and afford to pay a ‘wet nurse’ – a mother whose baby had recently died).
There is no us. It has been my experience that most of European origin do not fully appreciate the divide between our world and the indigenous one. Most indigenous are very segregationist when it comes to outsiders; not to just the European colonizers. Insular and ridge cultures do not consider outside people as part of their “us”.
Whereas all of Europe in 1600 was one big inclusive family?
Several tribes combined with one another over the pre-contact centuries, and afterward. I’m not saying the stark divide you conjure is completely unfounded, but it is oversimplified and exaggerated.
I’m currently doing some work looking at the economic impacts of programs aimed at engaging indigenous populations in construction projects.
A number of things struck me through conversations i’ve had. Firstly, the immense responsibility felt by workers to those who can’t or won’t work is real.
It’s no surprise that so many choose not to work when they’re compelled to pay a form of ‘community tax’ on top of their income tax.
Secondly, was the absolute hopelessness of their situation. In this case, a bunch have been trained, but in remote Australia, there’re no opportunities for these skills to be applied elsewhere.
Practically all work in remote Australia is government-led. There is no private sector to speak of. Whether this has cultural roots, or is a consequence of our grim obsession with stripping indigenous people of their agency, i’m not sure.
Regardless, there’s an obvious dilemma.
Without abandoning their homelands and ways of life, how can ‘gaps’ in economic and social outcomes be closed between they and the rest of us?
But the idea of compelling them to leave their land and ‘live like us’ feels like pure injustice.
I hate to say it, but there’s nothing even close to a solution here.
Thank you for this informed perspective. A solution to a problem like intergenerational addiction and unemployment among groups like Aboriginals, Native Americans, or Appalachian whites is far off indeed. That may remain elusive, as with many other longstanding human woes. But harm reduction is possible. And compassionate understanding of the hardships and complexities such as you express are not nothing. I hope more of that sort of attitude spreads, in all directions.
But it doesn’t have to be paid work. There are shows on TV like Alone and Grand Designs, The streets, where people with few skills or experience build their own houses because they need a place to live. Why don’t people living ‘on country’ do this? They have native title to the land so if they feel so responsible for others, why not build houses, grow food, etc outside the economy and government led projects – which come from the revenue provided by taxpayers. Fine, don’t work in the economy or pay tax, but don’t ask for a free house to be provided and to be paid social security from others who do contribute. It’s the same principle, just on a larger scale.
The devil makes work for idle hands.
This was first said by white people about white people. It appears to apply to other cultures too. Perhaps under our skins we’re all the same after all.
Pretty sure I’d be drinking and whatever else was available if I was sat around some isolated settlement in the middle of nowhere. And I’ve never been colonized, and my childhood was fine.
No, not everyone deals with isolation that way. Just look at the various anabaptist groups in Western Canada who are solid thriving aricultural communities. Same land, same isolation, different cultures, different outcomes.
But is it a hot, dusty desert? Sounds like it’s possible to work the land.
Such a hot topic and thank you for offering your insight. I live in Australia also. Regarding all of this, after originally choosing to vote Yes in the referendum to The Voice, I ended up voting No. I will tell you why. After much thinking on this subject and listening to emotive shouting from the Left, and then listening to some adjuncts to the Right, I came to my own decision. Like any other major social issue we have, regardless of ethnicity, colour, creed or identity, I believe it must be addressed first under the umbrella of a collective social issue before it is addressed further down field. I came from a house-hold of fathers and grandfathers who were alcoholics. Some were abusive by todays standards. I believe it was endemic in society but not spoken of or addressed. We have, in some quarters, domestic violence issues, child sexual abuse, child neglect, drug addiction, homelessness….etc. this is unfortunately a part of our wider fabric of shared humanity. All will have tales of trauma before them. You could go for millennia over time. What was the silence – shame. In our increasingly multi-cultural society, you do not ‘fix’ or address any issue by singling out one group. The ‘shame’ will only increase emotional resistance. Also it does nothing to unify ‘humanity’ in a collective problem which needs addressing. By singling out 1, you create the ‘less than’ in another. What if there are issues in the rest of society, what if your Indian, Chinese, Arab, Muslim, Asian, or heaven forbid European – let alone that ugly word ‘white’. I am not saying cultural issues don’t come into play but until we look at collectively the distinct human traits of being also prone to violence, addiction, cheating, lying, stealing, gambling, manipulation, I could go on….etc. and every other vulnerability known to our race, then you just create sacred cows with no way to move to accountability, rehabilitation, and responsibility. Like any other addict.
Our government has spent vast amounts of money – volumes of the stuff – to seemingly no avail. It doesn’t work. Like the potential and actuality of other institutions in ‘white land’ so to speak, we hear of corruption, in corporations set up for Aboriginal people exclusively. We heard via The Australian just the other week, how a ‘Aboriginal” man got to head a department for human relations whilst being convicted of domestic violence. How is this possible???? Because he is ‘Human’…..every human group has the potential also for every negative proclivity known to man – and unfortunately at the moment at least, can seem to create a special ‘soft spot’ of no-accountability or consequence for bad actions. One rule for one, another for the rest. You only need to look at the Rochdale child sexual abuse gangs in the UK to see what happens when you go too far and create sacred cows – I think it was around 476 young vulnerable ‘White” girls were targeted, groomed, and routinely sexually abused, even gang raped and sold off for sexual acts. For years and years this was swept under the rug and ignored – because the Pakistani men who were responsible – were just that, Pakistani. You cannot speak of ‘race’. Bad for politics….anyway, they were just ‘white girls’……when you hold one ‘on high’ you create the same problem for the other. Just not Ok. You must be held to account – equally – same consequences – same everything, whilst recognizing and addressing cultural differences. This huge horrendous crime should have been addressed straight away and given its due and cultural abhorrence as any act of this type, to any person should have been. It is a disgrace and a timely mirror to reflect on current consequences if……
Our government has also given away, even recently in Victoria vast swathes of land exclusively to Aboriginal Rights. They wish to live as they were to their own devices, their own way. I can understand this however, at the same token they are also asking for government hand-outs, more, health care, education, housing, jobs, welfare etc. this is all tax payer money by the way. And it come from the rest of ‘society’ – the very society they no longer want to have anything to do with. But I think they do. How else are they going to stop being ‘bored’ and be part of, inclusive and valuable to, the rest of society? The regions is one thing and the city is another. You cannot have it both ways. The old way has gone. Like so many of us even now, how do you find your place in society whilst also being a valued and valuable person who’s roots stem from a culture with its own identity. We are one and many.
Great contribution, Thank You Bird.
Seconded.
Well said.
‘Some have implied to me that their substance abuse is a product of the boredom and monotony of white man’s work. ‘
What is ‘white man’s work’?
Dull repetitive tasks not linked clearly and directly to survival. Plenty of us struggle with it 🙂
The stuff that (for better or worse) invented much or most of the modern world.
milk man
For one thing it’s an expression that Native people used to dismiss or distance themselves from the larger society. I guess we white folks do a version of the same thing, on a different trajectory, to Native and Aboriginal people too.
But here’s a few prime candidates for the list: filling out forms while staring at screens; covering most of the earth with pavement; moving numbers around to acquire paper or “crypto” wealth.
Ulster Scot cultures hate work as well. This is why they are among the poorest Americans. The parallels between Appalachian whites and indigenous social problems is quite strong.
True enough statistically though absolute enough of a statement to constitute a slur, in the face of such numerous “exceptions” as to utterly explode your rule as stated. Are coal miners lazy?
Convict labour, I guess.
A version of “Universal Basic Income” did this to the indigenous population of Australia.
Perhaps in part. But whether we agree with Blackwell’s experienced point of view or not I hope we can all try harder to avoid oversimplifying things “in order to tie a complicated psycho-social problem into a neat little package”.
How were Aboriginals doing prior to the onset of the benefits you blame?
Well said. My admittedly wild guess is that they weren’t doing all that great before UBI. It’s basic logic. If they were doing fine before UBI, why was there a perceived need for UBI? Paul is just conflating the problem with a solution that didn’t work because his only real point is to disparage the concept of UBI in any context.
Read David Collins “An Account of the English Colony in New South Wales” to see a detailed description of the lives of Aboriginal people in the Sydney region before 1810, a way of life well-sustained before the scourge of small-pox in the early days of the colony. Theories on where the small-pox came from vary, but one consideration is that Surgeon John White brought variolas matter in a bottle on the first fleet in 1788.
That was the beginning of years of undermining of Aboriginal ways of living, including massacres which, between 1788 and 1930 killed 10,000 Aboriginal people. It is estimated that 168 non-Aboriginal people died in this extended war. https://c21ch.newcastle.edu.au/colonialmassacres/map.php
Then there is the history of removing people from their land, forcing them onto reserves and removing children to be raised by white people. The story of the Stolen Generation is not over, as children are still being removed.
Yes, it is a complicated psycho-social-political problem
There are actually some Aboriginal communities that declare themselves dry. They sometimes have to fight to keep that status intact. In 2020 Woolworths planned to open a large liquor store within walking distance of three such communities in the Northern Territory. Local leaders and others campaigned against it. The plan was scrapped after an independent review found that Woolworths had failed to adequately address the concerns of local stakeholders.
While I am far more familiar with massacres of Indigenous peoples in a North American context–wherein the traditional ways were forcibly stamped out, or nearly so, for most tribes–I understand much about your general points.
But you refer to a time period in the pre-colonial or early colonization period, well before any UBI was introduced. So while your comments have validity and relevance to the larger conversation, they seem off to the side of the initial comment thread. Upvoted even so.
We don’t have UBI in Australia, we have the dole. Federal governments have introduced community development projects( in which people worked for the money they received), scrapped them, and now are reintroducing them. Those involved welcome the change. It is unfortunate that government chops and changes so much.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-27/cdp-trial-nt-indigenous-remote-communities-back-new-conditions/102523276
I get it. I’ll look into your link when I can but I was just playing along with the terminology of Paul T, whom I suspect of living in the States as I do. Is it fair to say the dole is increased or more available for certain Aboriginal populations at least? (That’s a genuine question: How augmented or “special” are their benefits vs. non-minority or protected-group Australians?)
In Canada, where I was born, many tribes have special treaty awards or attempts at reparation, such as $20,000 for all enrolled members on their 18th birthdays. The results of this quick money–not a fortune, not trivial–is often disastrous.
I’m not saying I oppose all such measures, let alone with confidence or certainty, especially in a country I’ve never visited. But from an American standpoint, there’s a lack of will to engage face to face, rather than to cut a check or allow another tribal casino. And a bone-deep squeamishness (if you will) about calling out or trying to revise programs that are a clear failure.
There are special programs for indigenous people, e.g. to help them engage in study but to my knowledge the rates of payment for the dole, aged pension etc are the same and are means tested.
It sounds very similar to what happened to Native Americans including the small Pox.
No. The unwillingness of aboriginal cultures to adapt is the cause.
To their deliberate exploitation and displacement you mean; to Indian Schools where their customs and very language were beaten out of them.
I don’t claim to have captured the whole picture in that one sentence, but a lot more of it than your Blame the Conquered bumper sticker does.
Great piece thanks Matthew
Firstly, ‘Hats Off’ to the writer who is clearly a highly dedicated, empathetic and decent human being.
What a tragic and poignant description of aboriginal life, society and substance abuse problems.
However – for all of his commentary and his insights and his real life experience… I could not find a single suggestion from him that would make even a small difference to those people and their existence.
He is helping their disfunction and tends their needs, while not offering up a single idea that would make a difference.
He makes some attempts at explaining and almost excusing their cultural norms but ultimately they don’t appear willing to work, to integrate, to aspire to or to evolve their thinking or capabilities to operate successfully in the country of Australia in 2024. Worse they abuse themselves, each other and seemingly anyone among their own who tries to better themselves.
It is very popular in the ‘liberal progressive’ community to blame all faults on former colonialism and sure that brings forth a rush of funding for the natives.
There appears Zero evidence that free government helicoptered money is the cure.
I contend that there is much evidence thar government money is the problem. Why develop a work ethic in your culture if you can just make up new accusations which instead of being scrutinized quickly bring millions of dollars. Canadians still are waiting for one body to be exhumed in Kamloops Canada after claims of mass graves. Eight million was given to this community with no accountability for the spending.
It is psychic trauma. Simple as that.
The aboriginals who first encountered the Europeans and Asians who colonized the country gradually realized they were encountering a civilizational model exponentially superior to theirs, in terms of economic success and scientific advancement.
Later generations of aboriginals simply struggle to compete on that playing field – and the incessant interventions of the modern Left (which *still* views them as helpless babies and unthinking savages) is total cancer for them. Socialist policies essentially keep them trapped as a permanent underclass in perpetuity.
The big difference between Aboriginal people and those who came from England was that the latter had guns, arsenic (with which flour and waterways were poisoned) and, as noted above, possibly small-pox variolas in bottles. One early way in which Aboriginal people proved themselves superior was in langague skill: they all spoke several languages and picked up English quite quickly.
I appreciate your principled pushback to the attitudes that prevail on this comment board. Yet I think you overcorrect in claiming they “all” spoke several languages (often more like dialects, correct?) or were “superior” rather than the fundamentally about the same in their human essence; merely equal, with different average strengths and weaknesses according to individual makeup and tribe.
Most Australians of anglo background speak no other language than English. Many of migrant background or of indigenous background speak more than one language, often several. For indigenous children living on country English is often the third or fourth language they learn to speak.
Ok fair enough. And I genuinely appreciate the context you provide. The multilingual thing is good and could strengthen cognitive ability and later learning, in addition to its intrinsic value. But learning English as a tertiary language is a huge beginning disadvantage in the Anglosphere (especially if some of those other languages are only or mostly oral). I’m a monolingual Anglophone except for minor Spanish and an even more pathetic smattering of German. Tengo verguenza. Ach du lieber! Yet I’m very lucky to speak what is in effect the world language, at least of the West. (China, with its “superior” number of native Mandarin speakers may change that, but not right away).
I believe in equal human dignity and prodigious potential across cultures, with some meaningful and much superficial difference. I don’t think we should essentialize, let alone denigrate whole peoples. But we should avoid broadbrush valorization too.
Languages are functional. At a large scale, people generally learn languages because they practical value in doing so, not because of any intrinsic cultural ‘language skill’ or particular drive to be culturally pluralistic. Languages take a lot of time, effort and repeated exposure to properly master – people need a reason to do that.
If you grew up in the US, UK or Australia there is isn’t much practical value in learning another language (relative to the amount of effort it takes), and certainly no overwhelming advantage in any specific language (although Spanish comes close in parts of the US). This is especially true if you come from a family of native English speakers and so don’t have to worry about speaking to grandma. This isn’t a particular failing of Anglo culture, just people valuing their time.
There is something in the DNA of aboriginal peoples that makes alcohol and other substances so dangerous.
Agreed on the booze part (generally speaking). But which other substances?
Meth and fentanyl, for example, are highly dangerous across the socioeconomic and color spectrum.
Blaming dna is patronizing.
Yes, and sometimes worse. But essentializing the cultures of individual sub-populations out of context and assigning them scores for Virtue and Industry is reductive and self-serving, at best.
I’m not sure that it is DNA as such, but the fact is that as a person of Western European origin, I can confidently say that my ancestors have been drinking alcohol for many thousands of years. An Aboriginal person could not say the same. That might account for some of the issues.
The industrial revolution resulted in most of our ancestors abandoning their homelands and ways of life. It was painful but most of us adapted.
The paternalism of the endless deluge of government assistance in Central Australia designed to help people stay in their homeland has instead trapped them there.
And regardless of whether it does, the generosity will be condemned as harmful and reparations demanded. In some cultures problems are always caused by outside problems.
What is stopping the Aboriginal people in Alice Springs from living a hunter-gatherer lifestyle?
It’s easier to gather from gullible modern societies than to the harder work of a traditional hunter gatherer society.
It’s what they do, per the author’s bottle shop experience.
In all seriousness, probably population numbers. While coastal areas of Australia could have supported relatively high hunter-gatherer populations, population densities in an environment like central Australia were almost certainly extremally low.
You’re an anthropologist and therefore possibly against, but the view of my erstwhile African-American partner who encountered this world was interesting. Which is that maintaining strident separatism based on historical grievances in a broken culture within a world that is now all mixed, that mix genetically including most Australian Aboriginals, is a fatal disservice all round. Amounting to the boxing-in of Aboriginals generation after generation, until the air runs out. If the core of Aboriginal culture is to survive, the vast majority of people identifying as Aboriginal on the fringe of that culture need to thrive independently, by breathing the same air and living the same life as the rest of the races on earth, all of whom are in Australia. Despite anthropology.
Congratulations Matthew and UnHerd for not shying away from a historically intractable and complex subject that concerns all Australians more than ever. I was impressed to read your account of life in Alice Springs, simply telling it as you found it, with respect and intelligence but without gloss. Something, strangely, it seems hard to do in the Australian media from my observations when visiting for extended periods.
More, please.
“how to integrate communal hunter-gatherer cultures into an how to integrate communal hunter-gatherer cultures into an industrial economy”
The author asks the wrong question. We should be asking why we enable people to remain in a culture which no longer works once it encounters industrial and other advanced economies?
While indigenous leaders and their enablers push the old canard regarding generational trauma from European attemps to assist the transition. Little research other than blind acceptance of anecdotes has been done to sort out whether the trauma really stems from European action or is merely the dynamic of hunter gather societies being unable or unwilling to adapt. If it is the latter, there is little foundation for indigenous people to blame Europeans for merely being the first to bring them the modern world.
My position is that most of the problems indigenous people have are theirs to solve. And to solve with their own resources. It is time to cut off the exploitation of those us willing to do “white man’s work”.
The history of the white man’s exploitation at the cruel, powerful hands of Indigenous people–who are not one identical mass any more than all of Europe is–is indeed a tragic sob story that has yet to be fully told. Perhaps you can write it and put your WASPy name to it.
Well said.
This essay is inconsequential because it has no conclusion. Or maybe the last page of the copy somehow got left off.
What he didn’t mention is that this malaise has arisen with the welfarisation of township Aborigines. In mission times, there was work and moral leadership, with little drug or alcohol abuse. Now there only indolence and a certainty that the government will provide, no matter how irresponsible you are to your own life, and that of your children and community. That’s it. That’s what this guy should have concluded. But he neglected an historical perspective, so completely missed it.
This essay is inconsequential because it has no conclusion. Or maybe the last page of the copy somehow got left off.
What he didn’t mention is that this malaise has arisen with the welfarisation of township Ab*rig*nes. In mission times, there was work and moral leadership, with little dr*g or alc*h*l ab*se. Now there only indolence and a certainty that the government will provide, no matter how irresponsible you are to your own life, and that of your children and community. That’s it. That’s what this guy should have concluded. But he neglected an historical perspective, so completely missed it.
(Edit: asterisks because UnHerd wets the bed over these words).
I disagree. At a minimum it has occasioned a lively and sometimes fruitful discussion in the comments, though it was pre-emptively curtailed by sectioning them off.
And why should he be required to address every aspect of a complex problem in depth in a single article, or to come to your own very simple conclusion?
The Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) scheme gave people in Aboriginal communities work to do and payment for it. Then that scheme was scrapped and things went downhill. Now the federal government has introduced the Community Development Program that offers work and top up pay (that is on top of the dole). People working for that program are pleased to have meaningful work and enough money to support their families. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-27/cdp-trial-nt-indigenous-remote-communities-back-new-conditions/102523276
Adding to commentary:
I recently listened to another lecture by Aayan Hirsi Ali, speaking about the minority groups and the downstream problems this creates when they are not held to the same standard as everyone else. You inadvertently create a ‘second class citizen’ of them and perversely do the reverse of your original intention. You strip them of total agency. i had not properly considered the down-stream consequences of this. Sam Harris also gives an example where say in the US, if you give say ‘black Americans’ less standards or tests to get into a given course than everyone else, and lets say this is to be a surgeon, or GP, down stream, are you as a citizen of any ‘identity, want the best you can to consult with. Would you willingly go to a black American who had by virtue of his skin colour, able to get his credentials under a much less standard than everyone else? Eventually everyone would know that they are perhaps ‘not as good’ – was unable to reach the same standard as everyone else……
Its obvious what this creates. You are doing a disservice.
I am not saying that native peoples dont need assistance – everyone wants this – but you dont do this by stripping them of the very agency that they need to help.
I enjoyed the read but FFS can some sub-editor please change ‘Aboriginals’ to ‘Aborigines’ – or preferrably ‘Indigenous Australians’ – wherever it occurs. Especially in the heading. (Scotch/Scottish, etc, if the request needs amplifying.)
Thanks.
Interesting because to my knowledge Mexican people of indigenous heritage don’t have the same troubles with alcohol that Canadian and Australian Aboriginal peoples do
I’m not saying Mexico is perfect though I’ve spent time there and can only go by what I saw.