Subscribe
Notify of
guest

9 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ana Cebrian
Ana Cebrian
7 days ago

So what actually is “IP of national importance”? Secrets for weapons of some sort, or secrets to give commercial advantage of some sort?
The destruction of our civil infrastructure, food, and energy security is clearly not part of this, as these people and organisations seem to be enthusiastically supporting that part of our national suicide.

Michael Cazaly
Michael Cazaly
9 days ago

Yes we can’t have foreigners owning a British newspaper. They might want it to print the truth, and even have real investigative journalists.

Martin M
Martin M
9 days ago
Reply to  Michael Cazaly

That doesn’t seem likely. This isn’t a James Bond movie, you know.

Michael Cazaly
Michael Cazaly
9 days ago
Reply to  Martin M

Lol…

Kent Ausburn
Kent Ausburn
7 days ago
Reply to  Michael Cazaly

“The truth”, as in the CCP propaganda on TicToc?

Dougie Undersub
Dougie Undersub
7 days ago

Security is a mindset, not a bunch of Acts of Parliament.

Mike Doyle
Mike Doyle
9 days ago

Nice article, shame about the headline.

Nathan Ngumi
Nathan Ngumi
9 days ago

An eye-opening and timely piece.
Hostile states still exist and will continue to do so until the end of time.
However in the post Cold War I dispensation the rise of non-state actors like transnational terrorist groups and rogue corporations have changed the global security dynamic.
In a dystopian future it will be multinational corporations going to war with each other across continents, recruiting states and individuals to do their bidding and using dangerous tools like AI as weapons.

Michael Clarke
Michael Clarke
8 days ago

What I like about the Daniel Craig JB films is that the plots are hard to follow. That reflects the post-Cold War world. The greed, brutality, ruthlessness and amorality captured by the films, which are the best Bond films, reflect and arise from globalisation. The producers of the films have kept pace with the times.