X Close

The Mexican side of the border crisis Migrants fear the cartels — not citizen convoys

A migrant at Eagle Pass. (Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

A migrant at Eagle Pass. (Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)


February 12, 2024   9 mins

The Rio Grande is shallow, but wields a powerful current where it slices sharply between the small windy Texan city of Eagle Pass on its northern bank and the larger Mexican city of Piedras Negras — Black Stones, after its coal deposits — on its southern. On the two banks, there are contrasting scenes. On the Mexican side, soldiers are dotted every few hundred yards along a track where locals walk dogs and jog by the bank. On the American, you see layers of razor wire, green Humvees and old cargo train carriages piled into barricades.

Over the past month, this small stretch of river has turned into the symbolic ground zero of the US battle over the border and immigration, the central issue of a contentious election year. But its fault lines extend well beyond these waters. This is also the epicentre of the problems that have dogged both America and Mexico for years: drug cartel money, the exodus from crumbling regimes and an existential struggle over the identity of the United States itself.

In December, Border Patrol agents processed more than 71,000 migrants and asylum seekers who crossed the river into the Del Rio sector, which includes Eagle Pass. They formed part of a record number of more than 300,000 migrants processed along the entire border in that month. In response, on January 10, Texas Governor Greg Abbott ordered his state National Guard (a section of the army under the governor’s control) to fortify Shelby Park, a 47-acre patch of scrubby land by the river.

 

In a historical irony, the park is named after a Confederate general who fled to Mexico rather than surrender to the Union in the Civil War. When the Biden White House ordered that Border Patrol agents be let into Shelby, Abbott refused, setting up a stand-off between the state and federal powers over who polices the border. The Texas governor has also clashed with Washington over the use of razor wire, which the federal government argues is unnecessary and harmful. Activists of the Right have sided with Abbott: hundreds declared they would lead a convoy to support Texas and “take our border back”.

Travelling in from Mexico City, I arrive in Piedras Negras on a Friday night to find a rainy and windy Rio Grande, and meet Benicio Herrera, a hardware store owner walking his Labrador along the bank. When I ask about the fortifications on the US shore, he shrugs his shoulders. “There are two sides to this,” he says. “On one hand, the migrants have human rights. But on the other, we have never seen numbers like this before so there is going to be a reaction.”

The American side of the Rio Grande (Juan Alberto Cedillo)

Opinions on the migrant surge in Mexico are mixed. Over in a park by the bridge into the US, I talk to Cipriano Arguello, who’s selling potato chips and chicharrón (pork rinds), who is sympathetic to those crossing. “People forget where they have come from,” he says. “We are all migrants.” Watching over his juice stand in a nearby market, however, Francisco Vázquez says he supports the hardened measures. “They have to implement tactics for security,” he says. “They should have done this a long time before.” The Piedras Negras residents also have varied opinions on the convoy of activists making their way to Texas. Some refer to them as “patriotas” or “patriots”, while others label them the “anti-migrants”.

These mixed feelings reflect how migration over the US border has transformed in the last decade. The vast majority going over used to be Mexicans, sneaking in between the official bridges to find work. But now Mexicans make up less than a quarter, with the rest coming from around the globe, particularly Venezuela and Honduras, but also South Africa, China and Russia. Most of them enter Mexico through its southern border, before trekking through the cities and countryside to the north.

On the Saturday morning, I visit the Casa de Migrante, a Catholic shelter where migrants can get a bed. Sitting on the sidewalk, Francisco Lugo tells me how he fled Venezuela with his wife and four children, after he was threatened by a government-linked militia demanding money. He wants to apply for asylum, but like many plans to cross the river and make his application in the United States. Lugo knows nothing about the convoy but has heard about a military build-up. “God will help me find a good time when the water is low and we can go over the river,” he says.

Later, a Cuban man arrives at the hostel and reveals he had been kidnapped. A mechanic by trade in his late 20s, Minardo Escalona describes how he was abducted in the city of Monterrey, taking a taxi which handed him to the gangsters. He was kept for three days until his family in Cuba sent $2,000 by Western Union. “They give you scraps to eat, just to keep you alive to pay,” he says. “I’m glad I made it but I feel terrible that my family had to lose all that money.”

“They give you scraps to eat, just to keep you alive to pay”

Gangsters, usually affiliated to the cartels, have been kidnapping migrants in Mexico for over a decade, but there has been an uptick in cases. It’s an especially cruel crime: wrenching money from the poorest and most desperate. But human smuggling in Mexico is a bloody and ever-evolving racket. In the Eighties, the smugglers, known as polleros or chicken herders, were local players who would take migrants over the border for a couple of hundred dollars. As the fences got higher and demand got bigger, networks have formed that stretch from American cities and down into Latin America. A Central American can now expect to pay about $15,000 to go from their home all the way to their destination in Chicago or San Francisco. The human smugglers work with the cartels, and that price buys immunity from kidnapping (or so they hope). Those who can’t afford or don’t want to pay, risk getting nabbed.

While cartels control most of the Mexican border, Piedras Negras is in the state of Coahuila, which has a heavily armed police force that has chased out the remnants of the Zetas cartel. However, Isabel Turcios, a nun who runs the hostel, says the police have simply taken over the business of shaking down migrants themselves. “They hunt them down and they get every peso they can from them,” she said. “It’s terrible.” I ask Turcios about the convoy and the barbed wire. “There are women and children crossing,” she says. “Why do they keep giving these people the incentive to go north and then punish them for it?”

As Saturday heats up, I go to the river and see the Texas National Guard speeding up and down on boats, each manned by two soldiers. I talk to a group of their Mexican opposite-numbers watching from the south side. An officer tells me their instructions can vary on whether to arrest migrants or let them through, but in recent weeks they have been working hard to round them up. “We do the work of containment of the migrants,” he says. “I feel bad detaining these people looking for a better life but that is what our orders are.”

These Mexican efforts are a large part of the reason that there are not many migrants actually crossing this weekend, as activists, cameras and politicians descend on the area. In January, US border authorities processed 176,000 migrants, a big drop from December although still a high number. But the pressure has not disappeared: there are already reports that, since the start of February, the migrant flows have shifted to the parts of the border in Arizona and California.

The Texas National Guard speed up and down the river (Juan Alberto Cedillo)

A decisive solution remains elusive. The successive governments of Obama, Trump and now Biden have all worked to get Mexico to slow down the migrant flow using a range of incentives and threats, but the crisis has only grown. And last week, this cooperation was threatened by a tangential matter. Three media outlets, including the investigative organisation ProPublica, released stories relating to an old Drug Enforcement Administration probe into a cartel that allegedly financed the 2006 election campaign of Mexican President Andrés Obrador. The President reacted angrily, accusing the US State Department of plotting against him, and said this could threaten how Mexico was containing the migrants. Biden was forced to personally call Obrador and made clear the two were “committed to continuing their productive partnership”.

Thus the situation on the ground remains critical but stable. Travelling with Mexican investigative journalist Juan Alberto Cedillo, I head north of Piedras Negras. As we trek along a dirt path, a police car speeds over to check who we are. We show our press IDs and move on. While Juan holds back, I head further into the hills and see a movement in the trees. Walking into the woodland, I spot the khaki of uniforms and see two soldiers crouched with a dog and their guns.

Unlike the troops in town, they aren’t friendly. They demand I hand over my phone and, when I refuse, they threaten to set the dog on me. They are tense, looking through my phone and accusing me of making a call to give their location away. When Juan rings, they put him on speaker and I say I am being detained. He quickly alerts a group of journalists who keep an eye on security. Eventually, the soldiers check by radio and confirm I’d been checked out by the police. I am allowed to walk away.

Early the following day, I make the journey everyone is here for, crossing the bridge into Eagle Pass and the United States. The convoy to “take our border back” had been staying at a ranch north of the city. There were reportedly a few hundred attendees, far fewer than some had hoped, or feared, and no violence. There had been similar, smaller convoys to Yuma, Arizona and San Ysidro, California. Governor Abbott, along with 13 other Republican governors, is holding a press conference inside Shelby Park but the convoy members aren’t allowed in. Most have headed home but there are still a few in downtown Eagle Pass.

Many of the convoy members are retirees in their 70s, and don’t at all fit the profile of ferocious MAGA insurrectionists. I talk for a long while with a 73-year-old Vietnam veteran from Texas and Frank Lite, a 60-year-old businessman from Tennessee. They are both strong conservatives, and say that while they are fine with legal immigration, the border needs to be secured. And they enthusiastically support the Texas governor’s taking the park, “1,000%,” as Lite puts it. “He should have done this three years ago.”

Walking down the street, I talk to another group of retirees from the convoy, including a former airplane mechanic and his school teacher wife who drove a thousand miles from Florida, picking up others on the way. They all seem in a festive mood and talk about meeting good Christians while protesting to close the border. Outside Shelby Park itself, there is a counter-demonstration of activists protesting the National Guard’s seizure of the park. “Our river, our land,” says one banner. “Trump for prison,” says another. An elderly member of the convoy in a wheelchair lightly heckles them from across the road.

Jesse G. Herrera, 70, a retired poet in the counter-protest, says the park should be used by the residents. “It’s a city park. It’s not a state park. It’s not a federal park. It belongs to the people.” When I ask about the razor wires, he is dismissive. “It’s a waste of money. It’s not doing anything, it’s a joke. It’s political theatre.” Inside the park itself, TV crews are getting ready to film the governors. I find Jacob Tackett, an army veteran of Afghanistan from Virginia, and Nolan Meeks, who works for a body armour company in California. They flew down to document the event, thinking it would be far bigger.

Tackett said he was especially keen to verify the claims of whether there was a genuine stand-off between federal and state forces. And, after speaking to the troops, he said the reality was far more peaceful than reports made out. “The most poignant quote I got was from a company commander. His phrase was: ‘If you look at our Humvees, none of them have guns mounted on the trucks. What does that tell you?’” The supposed militarisation of the border is clearly an exaggeration, Tackett says. “If there were a stand-off, there would be guns mounted on trucks. And clearly that isn’t the situation. Clearly, the federal authorities were happy to have the assistance.”

A stage for political theatre (Juan Alberto Cedillo)

Before the politicians arrive, the troops set up a backdrop in front of the river with Humvees and soldiers and barbed wire. The 14 governors arrive in a convoy of armoured vehicles, and then give short speeches that are live-streamed on Facebook. “Now that we have taken control of this area, for the past three days, there is an average of only three people crossing illegally in this area,” Abbott says. I walk back into Mexico along with Tackett and Meeks and watch the rest of the governor press conference from the Mexican side.

Looking down on Shelby Park, you can see what a small section of border it represents. Whatever Abbott has achieved here is no gamechanger. Tackett says that seeing the border for himself shows how much both sides distort the issue for their bases. “It’s very clearly a dog and pony show to drive donations,” he says. “There is a corrupted incentive structure from the conservative side of the house not to fix the problem either… The migrants themselves are the currency.”

Having spent two decades covering America’s southern border with Mexico, it’s hard to disagree with him. Forces deep within their political and economic systems lack the will or ability to solve an overwhelming problem, yet know fully well how it can be deployed to make hay on the airwaves. The result isn’t just a setting for hope and tragedy — but a stage for political theatre.


Ioan Grillo is a journalist based in Mexico and the author, most recently, of Blood Gun Money.

ioangrillo

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

61 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
T Bone
T Bone
9 months ago

The Republican House passed HR 2, The Secure Border Act bill. The fact that Democrats hate it does not negate its existence. Regardless of what anyone thinks of Republicans, its a fact that they’re disproportionately more concerned with limiting illegal migration than Democrats. There’s no way around that conclusion.

Martin M
Martin M
9 months ago
Reply to  T Bone

The Republicans, on the other hand, are disproportionally more concerned with not giving more aid to Ukraine. I would have though the would be a deal to be done here. I mean, whatever the Democrats think about people crossing the Southern border, they must know that it is unpopular with the people generally.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
9 months ago
Reply to  Martin M

The Dems don’t care if it’s unpopular with the proles. One Dem city after another is screaming about the impact this is having on their budgets and the party’s leadership ignores them. Dems are about power. That’s it. They foresee a permanent voting majority in their favor and they’re willing to burn down the country to get it.

Cathy Carron
Cathy Carron
9 months ago
Reply to  Martin M

Republicans are smart. They know the Ukraine war like many before it, is a war of attrition so that there’s no way the Ukraine can win. The Ukraine has about 40 million people – they say about a million young men have fled – and Russia has about 140 million. Zelensky is begging for 500,000 more soldiers- will Europeans be willing to send their young? Further funding only delays the inevitable. Republicans are looking awfully smart at the moment.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
9 months ago
Reply to  Cathy Carron

I do not support the U.S. fighting a proxy war with Russia on the backs of Ukrainians, but to suddenly abandon them before a peace deal is negotiated is even more repugnant.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
9 months ago
Reply to  Cathy Carron

I think not.

Michael
Michael
8 months ago
Reply to  Cathy Carron

Zelensky said 30,000 Ukrainian soldiers dead, and about 80,000 Russian dead.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
9 months ago
Reply to  T Bone

That’s rubbish. There’s a bill addressing the migrant crisis waiting to pass if the Republicans sign it, but they won’t because Trump told them not to. They’re not seriously interested in stopping the flow of migrants as long as it can be used as a political tool.

Wesley Davis
Wesley Davis
9 months ago
Reply to  Clare Knight

There aleady legislation in place. We don’t need more. Also adding money for Ukraine is BS.

Andrew Vanbarner
Andrew Vanbarner
9 months ago
Reply to  Clare Knight

The Democrats “bill addressing the migrant crisis” addresses the migrant crisis by simply releasing slightly fewer of them into our cities. It “limited migration” – ie, illegal entry – to 5,000 migrants PER DAY.
The “additional money for border enforcement” is additional money for the Border Patrol to make the “migrants” sandwiches, and buy them bus tickets to Detroit.
Biden himself said, almost as soon as he was elected, that he’d offer “migrants” amnesty. He then reversed every Trump EO on immigration enforcement, and we now see the easily predictable results.

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago

WHY THE NEW FORMAT?
IT IS AWFUL!

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
9 months ago

It’s weird how no one notices the website design, until it’s so horrific that it punches you in the gut.

Matt Hindman
Matt Hindman
9 months ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

It was so clean and simple!

Stephanie Surface
Stephanie Surface
9 months ago
Reply to  Matt Hindman

No more editing, no more finding responses to old comments. It is a mess!

Martin M
Martin M
9 months ago

I second that!

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago
Reply to  Martin M

It’s no better than The London Times.
Also NO edit facility.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
9 months ago

There is editing and the voting has more clarity. So it’s better.

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago
Reply to  Clare Knight

I always regard the voting as irrelevant, particularly as it is/was anonymous.

However editing seems to have been restored.

Ian Barton
Ian Barton
9 months ago

I guess the Newsroom is the nearest equivalent of the old useful format.
Probably a good idea to get rid of the UnHerd/Post distinction.
Shame that the commenters colour tags are not visible (and the smaller font size of their names) as it helped you to find the thoughts of people you respect more quickly.

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago
Reply to  Ian Barton

Agreed the loss of the coloured tags iis particularly regrettable.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
9 months ago

I wasn’t aware of colored tags. I’m just happy with the new voting clarity.

Prashant Kotak
Prashant Kotak
9 months ago

It’s now got all the hallmarks of Indian UI aesthetics – appalling and confused layout, mish-mash of randomly selected font sizes, etc. The only thing missing is a bracingly jarring mix of primary bright and pastel colours in random coalition.

UnHerd must’ve handed over their IT to Tata Consulting or one of the other Indian service giants. It’s the only possible explanation.

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago
Reply to  Prashant Kotak

Thank you!
If only somebody had remembered the old adage “if it ain’t broke, DON’T fix it!

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
9 months ago

But it was broke. People were constantly complaining.

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago
Reply to  Clare Knight

I wasn’t!

Sayantani Gupta
Sayantani Gupta
9 months ago
Reply to  Prashant Kotak

Really Prashant! Say ” crudely Punjabi”, please don’t tar the aesthetic of the gentler non garish parts of India with this charge of splash of colour!
I suspect this is some cheapskate Ludhiana IT makeover much like those horrid woollens originating from the same mills.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
9 months ago
Reply to  Prashant Kotak

I’m quite happy with it. Y’all don’t like change.

Stephanie Surface
Stephanie Surface
9 months ago

Totally agree. I already complained.

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago

Well done, I’ve done same, after all we are paying for this.
Some obviously don’t agree with us, but I suspect that they maybe UnHerd ‘employees’ trying to skew the vote!

Peter F. Lee
Peter F. Lee
9 months ago

CS I am in the main, interested in reading your comments and insights. However your “UnHerd ‘employees’ trying to skew the vote!” is a little beyond the pale. I wonder how many employees they have?

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago
Reply to  Peter F. Lee

Two apparently.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
9 months ago

I don’t agree with you.

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago
Reply to  Clare Knight

Is the ‘trigger word’ GAZA or is it GHETTO?

POSTED AT 10.49 GMT-5.
and immediately SIN BINNED.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
9 months ago

No, it’s not it’s better, there is clarity with the voting now.

Stephanie Surface
Stephanie Surface
9 months ago
Reply to  Clare Knight

Why is there more clarity now? Worst is that you can’t quickly get to your comments anymore.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
9 months ago

Really enjoyed this essay – reaching out to actual human beings at the border. It’s troublesome that both parties are using this as a political football. Having said that, the issue is critical and has to be dealt with. If Trump wins, there’s no excuses – he had to solve it one way or another.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
9 months ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

Republicans are holding up a bill to remedy the crisis because the border crossing crisis is all they’ve got.

R Wright
R Wright
9 months ago

This new UI is absolutely dreadful.

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago
Reply to  R Wright

As at GMT -5, the Ayes: 62 the No’s : 9.
QED.

Peter F. Lee
Peter F. Lee
9 months ago

At Least CS you got your separation of Ayes and No’s. I for one am unperturbed. We see different website designs all the time; I just detest any horizontal scrolling, it is amazing how quickly we adjust; I will agree however most people love the familiar, especially the older we get..

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
9 months ago
Reply to  Peter F. Lee

Exactly. I like it.

Howard S.
Howard S.
9 months ago

Two police officers savagely beaten in the streets of Midtown Manhattan by a gang of up to seven men, revealed to be “migrants”, living in a local hotel courtesy of New York’s taxpayers. Five were apprehended and arrested, four released without bail and have since skipped town. Last week a woman was walking in Times Square and she had her cell phone grabbed out of her hand and she was dragged for several yards by a “migrant” on a motor scooter. New York police are reporting that cell phone thefts are a new business being carried out by “migrant” gangs. When the free cell phone they were given when they crossed the border run out of minutes, they steal one and use the minutes or time left on that one. Last night a man was shot in the back in the Flatiron district of Manhattan, a trendy hotspot for the younger crowd. Police say it was the result of an altercation between two rival “migrant” gangs. We are becoming the dumping ground of the Third World.

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago
Reply to  Howard S.

Think yourself lucky you haven’t got them paddling through the Verrazano Narrows in their thousands.

Here in England we have four Norman Invasion’s worth crossing the English Channel each and every summer! And absolutely NOTHING is being done about it.

Citizen Diversity
Citizen Diversity
9 months ago

Plenty is being done – to facilitate it.
According to the Bishop of Dover, the migrants are ‘our brothers, sisters and mothers’. Just adding to our ‘family’. If only the Anglo-Saxon clergy had persuaded Harold to be so reasonable.

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago

Yes that would have saved us a whole lot of ‘bovver’!

Andrew Vanbarner
Andrew Vanbarner
9 months ago

I wonder if we’ll experience the uniquely British modern delights of “knife crime” and acid attacks, or simply have more still more gunfights.
We did “defund” our police forces in many of our big northern cities, leaving their remnants a beleaguered and thinly stretched blue line. I’d imagine the sales registers are getting a workout at the local guns and sporting goods stores.

Charles Stanhope
Charles Stanhope
9 months ago

It’s incredibly difficult to buy guns in the UK, hence the preference for knives and acid.

Pip G
Pip G
9 months ago

Forces deep within their political and economic systems lack the will or ability to solve an overwhelming problem”.
The same applies in the UK where HMG promotes the irrelevant Rwanda plan, yet we have largely an open border to those who can cross the Channel.
The solution seems to lie in recruitment of trained immigration officers with a quick turn around. Genuine refugees can be passed on to a place in England, and economic refugees sent back promptly. More difficult in practice, but this should be the starting point.

john zac
john zac
9 months ago

We clearly just need people to do menial tasks so that we can tax and keep servicing our debt. These poor people are being being used by everyone from polleros to Biden

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
9 months ago

I can be sympathetic to people and to “migrants’ rights,” while being equally sympathetic to the rights of American citizens who are being overrun and their cities bankrupted by this madness. Team Biden flung open the borders on day one and only now have some people bothered to notice, as if all was normal for the preceding three years.
At this point, nothing will happen. Pending legislation is a joke. A bad joke. There are millions upon millions who will never be rounded up and sent back to wherever, and everyone knows it. This is the fundamental transformation that an empty suit from Chicago promised back in 2008. But people were too busy projecting their fondest hopes onto him to question what those two words meant.

Cathy Carron
Cathy Carron
9 months ago

Your next stop should be New York City where you’ll be able to complete your report. Here you will find illegal migrants roaming the subways, many women with babies strapped to their back selling candy. Or you will see them sitting on the sidewalks with no place to go. You might try checking out Time Square, where Senegalese hangout together in groups. There are pick-pocketers galore now and lots of stealing from stores. Welcome to the New Third World.

mike otter
mike otter
9 months ago

Testing the edit facility – also i prefer so see the metric of plusses and minuses rather than the aggregate – it confirms what i long suspected about Unherd’s readership at large: – 60% dog whistle right wingers who simply do not understand the paradoxes of liberty or equality, 10% lefty trolls with similar limitations of thought and 30% “old school” rightwingers who have a reasonable evidence- led world view. As far as the article goes its interesting reportage but misses the bigger issue: Democrats think by bringing in armies of mainly Catholic economic migrants with a work ethic will bring them votes – don’t be so sure guys. Neocons think the same human imports will keep labour costs down and any negative social or resource impacts are a price worth paying. Identical to the UK/EU contradiction. Quite how the the importation of millions of ME&A Muslims is going to help the UK/EU Socialist politicians and civil servants is beyond me. These are overwhelmingly hard working, sober and family orientated economic migrants. When their kids attend Brit schools and are actively told to disrespect your parents, take drugs and become sexually deviant there will be push back.
Edit working fine – good thing with my poor eyesight and rapidly depleting spelling skills

Eileen Krol
Eileen Krol
9 months ago

We live part time in Baja Sur, and it seems like we are a world away from this (hopefully). My heart goes out to everyone involved, just trying to forge a better life for their families.

R S Foster
R S Foster
9 months ago

…the West was pretty much committed to decolonisation by 1950…my money is on our being committed to recolonisation by 2050, as being the only practical way to protect our borders and the way of life they defend…against the chaos, disorder and unbridled hatred that lies beyond.
What people tend to do is confuse two quite distinctive versions of colonisation, that of settlers…and that of traders…
…the first was what resulted in our creating new states like the USA, Canada, Australia and to some extent New Zealand…because the from the point of view of any old-world culture which arrived in those lands (European, Arab, Chinese all might have done)…
…those places seemed to all intents and purposes to be “empty” because they could not support large populations of the (essentially) neolithic hunter/gatherers…or transient agriculturalists…which inhabited them…and eventually more efficient agrarian/industrial societies were pretty much certain to expand into them…
…the second, to which I believe we will be forced to return…in self-defence…was born out of a desire to trade on fair and orderly terms…and the need to defend ourselves against the chaotic and capricious societies and rulers that we encountered whilst doing so…essentially we wanted to do business, but needed to impose law and order (as we defined it) in order to do so…and thus ended up doing both…
…this time round, the objective will not necessarily be trade…although that will be an additional benefit…but rather the need to establish a forward defence for our own way of life, and our peaceful enjoyment of our own homelands…against those outwith our borders whose conduct makes their lands unendurable…but whose exiles often seem to be unable to leave their destructive impulses behind…

Linda Arnold
Linda Arnold
9 months ago

Three presidents have worked to stem the flow but it has only gotten worse???? This is an example of left-wing type lies. It got much better under Trump. But you hid that fact because of your politics. Or perhaps you did not find that fact because you, even though you are a reporter, only check left wing sources. They omit that fact. You made a false statement about it.

laurence scaduto
laurence scaduto
9 months ago

Good article. Very informative. The interveiw with Freddy S. is even better.

Debra Maddrell
Debra Maddrell
9 months ago

Whatever. Here’s a thought: stay home and sort out your own messes.

William Brand
William Brand
9 months ago

The Democrats will be surprised at the ingratitude that these migrants will display in their voting once they become citizens. Venezuela and Cuban immigrants have been burned and exiled by socialism. They are now joining the Republican Red working class. Many will vote Republican.

William Brand
William Brand
9 months ago

The best way to discourage immigration into America is to show the immigrants the passage in Revelations 18 regarding America’s imminent fate. After this I saw another angel coming down from heaven. He spoke: ‘Fallen! Fallen is Babylon the Great!’ ‘Come out of her, my people,’[b]so that you will not share in her sins,  so that you will not receive any of her plagues;5 for her sins are piled up to heaven, and God has remembered her crimes.6 Give back to her as she has given; pay her back double for what she has Done! Woe to you, great city, where all who had ships on the sea    became rich through her wealth! In one hour she has been brought to ruin!’ It goes on to indicate that Babylon the great must refer to the United States since no other country fits the description. We are in the end times and Christa return is soon. All the signs are out there. A standard life in the bible is 90 years and a 12-year-old Bar Mitza Jew on Israels Independence Day in 1948 will be 90 years old in 2226. Jesus said that generation will not pass away until all these things come to pass. This Rapture of the Church date (Pentecost 2066) also agrees with a return of Christ on the 2000 anniversary of the assentation into Heaven. In addition, Jesus said “As it was in the time of Noah so shall it be in the time of Christs return.” With all these prophesies, fulfilled no wise one should move to America. The ground zero of many rockets and H bombs.

Kate Martin
Kate Martin
9 months ago

The cartels as the basis for the instability is clear, yet the article sort of evades that. Somewhere between 2/3 and 3/4 of the geography of Mexico is controlled by the cartels. They control not only the politicians, the drug trade, the weapons traficking, and more, but also the agriculture. So is there really a Mexican government that governs or is it all just a puppet show for the reality that the cartels are the government. It’s easy to call it a border problem, but with this shadow government in place and their ruthless tactics, it’s a Mexico problem. Beyond that border, it’s a problem of all the countries that are also controlled by cartels. Again, do those countries have a government or is it just an illusion. This cannot be fought at the border alone. Probably why Nikki Haley talks about that.

Daniel Lee
Daniel Lee
9 months ago

“In December, Border Patrol agents processed more than 71,000 migrants and asylum seekers who crossed the river into the Del Rio sector, which includes Eagle Pass.”
The Border Patrol is not supposed to be “processing” migrants IN. It’s supposed to be processing them OUT.