Ouassila Kessaci, 57, will never forget the agonising wait to confirm the death of her eldest son. On 29 December 2020, 22-year-old Brahim left the apartment saying he would be back — but the next day, Kessaci received a panicked call from Brahim’s wife, who believed Brahim was dead. “It really shocked me,” recalls Kessaci. “She shook me up.”
Over the next four days, Kessaci frantically called the police until they finally identified her son. He’d been murdered, and his body had been burned inside a car just off the main highway north of Marseille. He, along with two of his friends, had been victims of what the French police coldly call a règlement de comptes — literally a “settling of scores” — in the drug trade. Kessaci acknowledges her son was “in with a bad crowd”, but insists he wasn’t the primary target.
Kessaci is not the only mother to lose a son to Marseille’s underworld. Last year, Marseille hit an annual record with at least 49 murders linked to the drug trade, more than double the 2020 figure. The age of both the murderers and their victims is falling; teenagers are killing teenagers.
The local police and chief prosecutor vow to keep arresting and prosecuting dealers. And this month, a new police prefect is taking over the département, charged with tackling what the interior ministry calls “narco-banditry”. But the numbers don’t lie: existing laws and police practices are failing to deliver lasting peace and security. What’s happening in Marseille is a tragedy — but it is also ground zero for France’s failed war on drugs.
For many, Marseille still evokes the “French Connection”, the decades-long arrangement by which Corsican mobsters smuggled heroin from Southeast Asia and Turkey to North America, immortalised in the 1971 film. In those days, France’s port city played a leading role in the international drug trade. But those trafficking networks were dismantled 50 years ago. While the city is seeing rising shares of cocaine, Marseille’s drug market today is dominated by a far more benign substance: cannabis — typically smoked as hashish and referred to in French as “shit”. And despite all the bloodshed, the stock bought and sold here is largely meant for local consumption. “Marseille isn’t a ‘hub’ for cannabis in France or Europe,” Claire Duport, a sociologist and researcher covering the region for the French Observatory of Drugs and Addictive Trends (OFDT), told me. “The cannabis sold in Lille, Paris, Bordeaux, Berlin, or London isn’t coming from Marseille.”
Yet drug distribution in Marseille is highly unusual. Much of the trade here takes place out in the open, swallowing up precious common space in scores of housing projects. According to the most recent police count, there are roughly 127 “points of sale”, many scattered about the quartiers nords, or “northern neighbourhoods”. In pockets of the city long plagued by unemployment and a lack of basic public services, drug dealing has filled a void.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI’m fairly certain that decriminalisation is a net positive – it has to be better than the War on Drugs. But I’m a little uneasy about the ever-expanding choice of ways in which to cook your brain. A freely available kaleidoscope of drugs seems to be a common theme in dystopian sci-fi, with (I believe) good reason.
Actually a diminishing of choice. Amphetamine mixed with bath salts is all that’s available, and it has a strong attrition rate. People don’t want to cook their brains at such high speed.
The people on my estate who smoke Cannabis look at 25 like gaunt, grey, semi-functioning blobs.
The older people who have spent their lives doing allsorts look like the walking dead.
So why do people still claim that there are any plusses to that famous oxymoron ‘drug culture’?
If this is the future, God help us.
Probably because they read books by writers who lived that life for a bit, and wrote about it in a way that seemed edgy or glamorous. And maybe it was.
I think most of them are older, or have inherited older views.
But we’re in a world now, where glamour is in short supply. Even ‘Breaking Bad’ seems impossibly sunny and optimistic from this remove.
People don’t want flowery, imagination-enhancing, fluffy drugs. They don’t even want to party.
They want a sledgehammer to take them out of an ever-present awfulness.
Were drugs to be decriminalised, would anyone be able to walk into a shop – maybe similar to an off-licence – and buy what they want?
Have a look at Portland, Oregon if you want to see the results of decriminalization.
So, The Wire season 1.
Think what’s happening here is a cascade of users and dealers from things which are no longer attractive or possible.
And the zeroing in on a bleaker hard core of users who take stuff for different reasons
One would be the amphetamines market which has changed a lot because of substitution and mixing of much of the product with bath salts. I assume this is down to police & international crime agencies making the precursors harder to obtain.
These aren’t party drugs or glamour drugs anymore. That market has gone and so has its product.
The bath salts send people mad. Those still in that market, who can afford it, have retreated to coke.
Those who can’t afford coke, have retreated to the traditional staple of very strong cannabis strains.
At this lower end of the market, it’s people who want to take something that just bashes them on the head, anaesthetising them in order that they can deal with a life they hate.
Prohibition of soft and hard drugs in lieu of kegalisation, taxation and regulation makes far better economic sense. The only opponents of this who remain are increasingly weird old cranks who die in large numbers every day.
There isn’t much of a drug problem in Singapore & Japan but I don’t think their drug laws would be very popular in the West.
Exactly. Introduce the death penalty for drug dealers and the problem will go away. We are too weak.
The more fundamental theory – ie tackling the problem at its source – involves the death penalty for users.
The proof of this is possession (which obviously would catch sellers too – no point in proving that you only intended to supply, not to use.)
Tho targeting users sounds more cruel, the reasoning is that you don’t have to do it very much.
When people are given a good excuse not to use drugs, they don’t buy them.
And once the market vanishes – no buyers, so no market – the sellers and suppliers stop, since there’s no money to be made.
This was the Chairman Mao strategy – announce that you are going to shoot the opium smokers, execute a few and all the others will soon find a reason to stop.
❝When I ask Sid❞ Who is Sid?
“Eddy Sid, a local spokesperson for France’s top police union, Unité SGP Police-Force Ouvrière.”
Decriminalization has been a disaster in the USA, as a visit to any big city will show. Crime, filth, death, despair, with no recourse now except social worker platitudes. Pick this over the “drug war?” I don’t know.
I think the Dutch have had second thoughts about the wisdom.of decriminalisation, too.