'Deep England is not a place. It is a shock.' (Tolga Akmen/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)

When I was a boy, my family went for winter walks on the South Downs. The path up was always an adventure, a runnel of wet leaves and chalk slurry that cut between the trees. Crows made their flat, disapproving calls, but it was otherwise silent once you had climbed away from the road. Up top we trudged along the South Downs Way. Our sign to turn back was a series of lumpy grass mounds.
I always called the largest mound a hill fort, though I have no idea if it qualified for the title. This was no Maiden Castle. The ring’s centre can’t have held more than a family and a few pigs. Yet here it still was, thousands of years on. That modest earthwork was my first experience of Deep England — or Deep Britain, since the fort was constructed centuries before England was born.
Deep England is not a place. It is a shock. A sudden awareness of time freed from measurement and scale. Such a shock can be triggered by a hill fort, a shaped stone, a worn staircase. But you don’t need to tramp the Sussex countryside to find Deep England. It can be felt in the paintings of David Inshaw and Simon Palmer, the poetry of Geoffrey Hill, the work of Alan Garner. And at this time of year, it can easily be found in John Masefield’s 1935 Christmas tale The Box of Delights, one of those children’s books best enjoyed by adults.
A brush with Deep England might produce feelings of recognition and homecoming; equally, time’s long drop can inspire eeriness and threat. The best art devoted to England’s deep past is always a shuffling of the familiar and the strange. This makes Christmas the perfect time to reflect on the passage of centuries. There is a strained cosiness to modern Christmas, but beneath the lights and mulled wine lurks the black pause of the year’s end. It is a time for barred doors and ghost stories. John Masefield understood these things.
Masefield was Poet Laureate from 1930 until his death in 1967. In 1953, Muriel Spark declared that “John Masefield is known to all of us… I do not think there is any need of a book to make him wider known.” My father can still recite Masefield’s poem “Cargoes”, drummed into him as a schoolboy in Sixties Belfast. And yet, a few short decades later, Masefield has joined the ranks of the unread. This is not an unusual fate for a Poet Laureate, but it is sad in Masefield’s case. He wrote good verse, and although some of his work has withered on the page, much still sings.
If anyone under the age of 60 knows of Masefield today it is because of The Box of Delights. The story is simple enough. Kay Harker is going home for the Christmas holidays. He meets an old eccentric on the station platform, a Punch and Judy showman with a fondness for gnomic utterances: Cole Hawlings. But he is in trouble. He is being hunted across England by dark forces, and although he has powers of his own, they are waning. He asks for Kay’s help: “Now that the Wolves are Running, perhaps you would do something to stop their Bite?” Kay agrees to safeguard the Box of Delights, a magical object that serves as a doorway to the distant past.
Masefield was a great proponent of the old-fashioned yarn. In his autobiography So Long to Learn, he emphasised the importance of straightforward storytelling. The rarefied devices of celebrated writers did not interest him. He wanted the spare, salty narratives of earlier epochs: “The sagas with their simple power made the story-telling of most of our masters almost absurd. What was Flaubert, with his labour and richness of language; what was Pater, with his learning and instinct for felicity, to the tellers of the Laxdale or Njala sagas?” For Masefield, “literature” was an obstruction, an elaborate rood screen that hid a story from its audience.
The Box of Delights is a great story simply told. But it is not just the story of Kay Harker. It is the story of Britain. “A nation’s past is the poet’s pasture,” said Masefield, and Kay’s adventures bear this out. The winter landscape surrounding his village is a map of the past: the ruined Abbey, the Roman road, the hill fort known as Arthur’s Camp, even the trees that advance and retreat as Kay moves through time. He marches with legionaries, fights alongside ancient Britons, and gallops through the forest with Herne the Hunter. Always the Wolves are there, a sinister army that harries mankind. Cole Hawlings is himself a figure from the deep past, though fading now. Once the forces of good and evil were evenly matched, but his enemies have learnt new tricks. They employ the latest technology and prosper in plain sight amid respectable society, while Hawlings and his allies must live on the run.
The tale’s Christmas setting serves as more than a cosy backdrop. The Box of Delights is a book about time, and the Winter Solstice is the appropriate moment to consider the passage of countless years. More specifically, the book is about deep time unfolding in one particular place. And so it is appropriate that in the final chapter, Kay attends the Christmas service at Tatchester cathedral, the thousandth such service to have been held there — the rhythms of worship are the only clock that can measure deep time. While Masefield’s reach extended back far beyond the arrival of Christianity in Britain, the novel is unambiguous in its religious message. Greed and aggression are punished, and the weak triumph at the close. Even Cole Hawlings, who has been knocking about “since Pagan times”, adheres to the new faith:
“In one place, the river ran through a wide cavern, the wall of which had been painted with a procession of men leading bulls and horses. ‘That was our old religion, Master Harker,’ Cole said, nodding towards it. ‘It was nothing like so good as the new, of course…’”
The Box of Delights remains in print. It was brilliantly adapted for the BBC in 1984, with a grizzled and twinkling Patrick Troughton starring as Hawlings, and a play based on the book is currently on at the Royal Shakespeare Company. There is no doubt that the novel has an enduring appeal.
While much of the dialogue is couched in Blytonisms (“splendiferous!”), and although its commitment to place and history could not be less fashionable, the story still delivers. It is perhaps more powerful now than when it was first published. Masefield’s world has joined the far-off epochs visited by Kay, just as ours soon will. Layers and layers of time and history will deepen Deep England further. As Cole Hawlings says, “Hearts, diamonds, spades, clubs it goes. And then all the way back again.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThis is the kind of article for which I subscribe to Unherd. Thoughtful, deep, well-written, unrushed in its manner and form – a work of art all its own. My thanks to the author and to Unherd. More of such would be most welcome!
True, but so painful to read.
My suggestion is don’t go to university, don’t rely on an art gallery to legitimise your art, don’t bother with the arts community, stop believing in the idea of being an artist. They are not savants, they’re merely entertainers. If you think you’re something special and you want to live off it then you’re going to have to play the game. You don’t need them to create, but you do to make money. Art is the ultimate elite game. This story just confirms it. The arts community talk about AIs destroying art because it’s not human. There’s nothing human about the arts today. It’s a closed, suffocating shop ticking off the boxes and bending everything into some shape that satisfies their warped egos, including antisemitism, the latest “trend”.
Having spent a professional life encouraging students to develop their thinking skills and knowledge by attending university, previously known as institutes of higher learning (but no longer deserving of that title), I would counsel any youngster possessed of an independent spirit and a modicum of intelligence to avoid these conformist echo chambers like the plague.
I entirely agree. And the world of contemporary literature is fast behind it: despite having an even bigger claim to being a medium meant to make us think, see other perspectives and empathise.
We have a number of tax-funded literary presses in the UK pumping out anti-western propaganda on a daily basis. 87 press is one of the most pernicious. Its editor is also studying for a tax-funded PhD in [whatever], while denying anyone was raped and any ‘innocents’ were harmed on October 7th.
It’s funny that art schools preach transgression but oddly seem to produce conformism.
I guess this is what happens when the traditional battle grounds of sexuality and politics have effectively been conquered.
I’m trying to remember my own art school days and what agitated us back then. As I remember it was ban the bomb, anti Thatcher and the after shock of the AIDS epidemic. I genuinely think we still had boundaries that needed to be crossed.
What we have now, some 35 years later, is a borderless, valueless society where everything is relative and nothing is sacred.
Maybe we are doomed to repeat cycles of hate and conflict. All that remains is for the people to decide which group of others to go to war against.
Yes, herdish transgression is the new “plat du jour” and relativism the latest absolute
The reoccurring theme here with the artists mentioned isn’t that they’re Jewish, it’s that they’re Israeli, which isn’t the same thing. Of course no one should blame each and every Israeli citizen for the actions of their government, that’s absurd, but assuming all criticism of the Israeli state is motivated by hostility to Jewish people is also absurd, especially when many of Israel’s staunchest critics are themselves Jewish.
Sorry but as a British Jew I can tell you that while you think this to be the case, it isn’t. If you are Jewish there are parts of this country that will shun you unless you are on ‘their’ side. We are guilty by association unless we denounce – sounds eerily familiar.
You missed his point.
He was speaking of the references in the article, not of your (alleged) personal experience.
With respect I didn’t miss his point and although most of the artists quoted were Israeli there is one that isn’t, and undoubtedly more that didn’t want to be named as suggested in the article. My point is that we as British Jews cannot disassociate or indeed are not allowed to disassociate ourselves from the conflict. People consistently try to separate the two, but it is impossible without us denoucing what is going on. When doors were kicked in on my brother’s road a few years ago it wasn’t because those houses all had Israeli flags, it’s because they displayed symbols of Judaism and were automatically associated with Israel. This is what people do not understand when they make comments like the above. It applies to any religion/religious conflict but is most pronounced with respect to Jews and Israel.
Answered as a new comment
Just to be clear, it is eerily familiar of the authoritarian left (Stalin,etc). A Jewish artist who is explicitly and resolutely anti-Zionists and denounces Israel will be lauded by the art world which is overwhelmingly dominated by the left.
This is exemplified by the open letter published in July 24 by Artists for Palestine UK, the signatories, including more than 100 Jewish creatives, decrying as “shameful” the Royal Academy’s removal of a photograph of a protestor holding a placard that reads, “Jews Say Stop Genocide on Palestinians. Not In Our Name.
More than ever, the West’s art world is a leftist propagandas machine. Jews and non-Jews alike will be exhibited if they keep to the left.
assuming all criticism of the Israeli state is motivated by hostility to Jewish people is also absurd,
did you read the article? Did you get to the part where the author speaks to a particular piece and is told “how could any country promote an artist like her?”
Hi Chris, it’s the same. Israel is not just a Jewish state, but the land of the Jews (the Jewish people), and its name is Israel. It’s easier to say “Israeli” than “Jew” to cover up hate, and people use “social justice” arguments to denounce one country. Go check the number of deaths and refugees in Ukraine/Russia. Where is the venom there? You start calling the Jews “Semite,” then kill them all and start saying “antisemitism.” And the Jews start using this to explain the hate. So what do you do? Start saying “Zionist” – a movement that ended 75 years ago. I’m waiting for the next name.
how could any country promote an artist like her?
Ah, the ever-present desire to silence, stigmatize, and scapegoat people of a certain identity. What are the odds of the woman quoted saying the same of a black artist, a Latino, a gay, or anyone else from the congregation within the church of the aggrieved and offended?
Art has become another word for another institution paralyzed by mind-numbing groupthink that mistakes itself for wisdom. Voltaire was right in saying that the people who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit (or accept) atrocities.
It’s appalling this antisemitism is allowed to continue. There’s a post on another forum from a concerned Jewish mother whose child is being subjected to anti-semitic bullying at her school which has 30% Muslim pupils. Quite a few posters have either disbelieved her or asked ‘why are you surprised?’
Zionists like talking about ‘light’ while obscuring it as much as possible. When they talk about art, it is invariably about the artifice of conflating Judaism with zionism and Jews with zionists. Such subversion of language is not artistic.
As ever, _what_ are you talking about. Zionism= believing the Jewish people should return to their historic homeland. What do you know about art anyway? Your religion only permits shapes.
When left to their own devices, Jews create Israel, whilst Muslims create Daesh. By their works ye shall know them.
The zionist state was created by the Brits, not the zionists, like Northern Ireland. And much like NI, it created a trail of misery stretching to, but not ending in, the present day.
Historically illiterate. It was _recommended_ by the Brits as only fair that the Jews should have a state and the Muslims too: Transjordan, which they got. The UN voted in favour of Israel’s creation & the trail of misery has been the abject refusal of all the surrounding Islamic countries refusing to live alongside a single Jewish one ever since.
Some day historians will write about this time the same way they described Europe in the 1930s and 40s: the Jew-haters who wanted to kill us Jews because we’re Jewish, and those who fought that medieval barbarity. We live in such a time again.
100% solidarity with the innocent victims of the hypocritical anti-jewish, leftist arts world.
“Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?
And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.”
More Levites and priests around nowadays than Good Samaritans. Pious hypocrisy is much in vogue. Not much mercy.
The Sokal Affair last century showed what the art world has become. A propaganda machine for leftist nonsense.
This article points out the real threat from the far left, socialist anti west ideology which threatens our way of life. Cancel culture which attacks free speech, free expression and liberty writ large, is a baked into the cake principle of Marxism. It would be a good idea for everyone to brush up on Lenin, Stalin and Mao tactics of implementing Marxist Communism and Socialism with regards to those who did not get in line with their doctrines. Over 75 million people were murdered or died from starvation in those regimes, and freedom of the people did not exist. It is not alarmist to say we need to be very alarmed and fight back against this scourge to Western Civilization values. Antisemitism as described in this article is just the beginning. We are all at risk.