Subscribe
Notify of
guest

11 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Right-Wing Hippie
Right-Wing Hippie
5 months ago

I thought the patron saint of nuclear weapons was Saint Leibowitz.

Andrew Boughton
Andrew Boughton
5 months ago

“His message was clear … his patronage sanctioned her ability to destroy humanity.” I don’t draw that conclusion from his words in the least. Quite the opposite. Did not the Americans or Israelis have this same ability? Was their aim the destruction of humanity, or their own security?

But what am I saying! If they destroy humanity, it will be in a good cause. Humanity will not have adequately worshipped the Jefferson Memorial or Old Testament.

See? Cheap shots are dishonest and weak.

Last edited 5 months ago by Andrew Boughton
T Bone
T Bone
5 months ago

I have no doubt that actual Christians exist in State churches but State churches don’t serve the interest of Christianity. They serve the interest of the State. The US is infinitely more Christian than any major western country specifically because it has no National Church.

Just look at the French Revolution. The first Communist movement was inspired by a State Church apparatus. I highly doubt Communism would have developed as militant as it did had the State and Church not fused as an organ of Power. I get that England has a Church but England has long made it’s Church mostly symbolic not unlike it’s Monarchy. At the end of the day, when a powerful Church and State fuses it’s clearly the interest of the State that’s primary not vice versa.

Amelia Melkinthorpe
Amelia Melkinthorpe
5 months ago

Good.

Kellen
Kellen
5 months ago

Mr. Flew, you’re an ass for disparaging the religious in the language of “cult.”

Zac Chave-Cox
Zac Chave-Cox
5 months ago
Reply to  Kellen

This might be a misunderstanding on different usages of the word. the “cult of Saint X” is the common term within Catholicism and Orthodoxy to describe the veneration of a saint. The word didn’t originally have any pejorative overtones, and in this context, still doesn’t.
I’m an Orthodox Christian myself and did not feel that this article belied any hostility towards my religion. I do not know the author’s work, but certainly as far as this article is concerned, I share the author’s sentiments and I find the association made by Patriarch Kirill of a man as holy as St Seraphim of Sarov with weapons of mass destruction deeply disgusting.

Liakoura
Liakoura
4 months ago

“Indeed, it is perhaps the mark of a desperate man”.
Indeed it is as Timothy Snyder writes in his book – “On Tyranny and on Ukraine. Lessons from Russia’s War on Ukraine”:
‘Teaching a lecture class on Ukrainian history last fall, I felt a touch of the surreal. The war in Ukraine had been going on for half a year when I began. A nuclear power had attacked a state that had given up its nuclear weapons. An empire was trying to halt European integration. A tyranny was attempting to crush a neighboring democracy. On occupied territories, Russia perpetrated genocidal atrocities with clear expressions of genocidal intent.
And yet, Ukraine was fighting back. Ukrainians resisted the nuclear blackmail, scorned the vaunted empire and took risks for their democracy. At Kyiv, Kharkiv and, later, Kherson, they beat back the Russians, halting the torture, the murder and the deportation…
…Russian President Vladimir Putin told a story about the past that had nothing to do with history. Russia and Ukraine, according to him, were conceived together in a ruler’s baptism a thousand years ago. They shared the same culture, and therefore should be ruled by the same person. If anything else seemed to happen, it was not really history. Should Ukrainians not believe that they were Russians, this was the nefarious work of outsiders. Putin not only said such things; he had memory laws passed to prevent Russians from being challenged by history, and even had the word “Ukraine” stricken from textbooks.
As logic, this is circular; and as politics, it is tyrannical. If I can claim that Canadians are Americans because they speak the same language, or because we share a common history, that would strike us as an idiotic reason to order an invasion. When a dictator claims the power to define other people’s identity, then the question of their own freedom never arises. If identity is frozen forever at the whim of a ruler, citizens soon find themselves without choices.’

Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden
5 months ago

Be in Peter or Catherine the Great as his model, Mr Putin dreams of being today’s Eurasian Charlemagne, a C21st Holy Roman Emperor presiding over Europe in some fashion or other.
And with Runsfeld gone and d**k Cheney waning, there really is no-one of equivalent standing to thwart his ambitions. Perhaps Mr Orban should be invited to join the opposing team and reach a long-term settlement before Moscow fulfils Ukrainian nationalist predictions and marches on Warsaw via Kiev?

0 0
0 0
5 months ago
Reply to  Tyler Durden

Neither Pyotr nor Catherine could shine Charlemagne’s boots. Nor can Vlad who, in his mind, serves as their latest incarnation.

Jim C
Jim C
5 months ago
Reply to  Tyler Durden

What makes you privy to Putin’s dreams?

David Yetter
David Yetter
5 months ago
Reply to  Tyler Durden

As an Orthodox Christians, I regard Putin as already a “Eurasian Charlemagne”. Why? Not because he’s a great ruler, no for a very different reason.
When the Orthodox Christian bioetheicist H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. was asked when everything started to go wrong, by someone referring to the cultural decline embodied back then by “political correctness”, which has since metastizied into “wokeness”, he replied, “Let me see… if I remember correctly, it was just after the Third Mass of Christmas in the Year 800.”
Putin is corrupting the Russian Church even as Charlemagne corrupted the Church in the Patriarchate of Rome.