One lonely road cuts through the Azerbaijani town of Fuzuli. On one side, a cluster of decaying, vacant houses sit in a dip in the landscape, the remains of the original settlement. Three decades ago, it was home to around 17,000 people. But in August 1993, the entire population, made up of ethnic Azeris, fled. The First Nagorno-Karabakh War was into its final year, and Azerbaijan’s ethnic Armenian separatists, supported by the Republic of Armenia, were approaching. When they arrived in Fuzuli, they completely demolished the town. For the next 27 years, it was devoid of any human life.
But now, on the other side of that lonely road, lies a construction site. “There will be 38 buildings here, with over a thousand apartments,” Araz Imanov, a senior advisor to the Azerbaijani president, tells me. They will provide homes for people internally displaced in the Nineties. The project is part of a huge, government-led reconstruction effort — one that could serve as a blueprint, when the time comes, for the rebuilding of Ukraine.
Even after peace is declared, the scars of war zones make them hard to rebuild. A dozen or so metres from the edge of the road, there are signs warning of the presence of landmines — a legacy of the illegal military occupation of the town, which only ended after the Second Karabakh War in 2020. “That’s why it took us a long time, almost a month, to get in,” Imanov says.
When the authorities finally found safe passage into the town, they discovered houses that no longer had roofs, window frames or doors. They had been torn apart by hand rather than artillery. Everything, down to the copper wiring, was stripped away by occupiers and shipped over the border to Armenia, to be sold as building materials. The most well-preserved building is a former publishing house with an ornate doorway, flanked by two stone columns: a reminder of how culture, and commerce, used to flourish here.
“For 30 years, the Armenians claimed that these territories belonged to them,” says Imanov with a hint of sarcasm. The areas were given new Armenian names, and “their prime minister made statements claiming that they’re not even a separate territory but a part of Armenia itself. Yet this is the way that they treated the lands that they claimed to be their own.”
Azerbaijan’s intentions, however, couldn’t be more different. Cities that were destroyed in the first war will be rebuilt from scratch. Domestic refugees — of which there are 650,000 — will be given fully-furnished homes financed by the state, free of charge. Private sector businesses will be incentivised to invest in what the Azerbaijanis call “the liberated territories” — an area roughly equivalent in size to the state of Qatar — with tax breaks and customs duty exemptions. Dubbed “The Big Return”, this is a huge nation-building mission comparable to Roosevelt’s New Deal.
Already, the progress made since the end of the war is remarkable. In April, when I visited Karabakh, only the skeletal outlines of the new apartment blocks had begun, but on the edge of town, the glistening Fuzuli International Airport is already in operation. Construction began just two months after the end of the Second Karabakh War, in January 2021; by September that year, it had already accommodated its first test flight. Meanwhile, hundreds of miles of newly-asphalted roads have been built in the formerly occupied territories. A railway linking Karabakh to the capital, Baku, which sits on the shores of the Caspian Sea, is already under construction.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThis is Azeri state propaganda, nothing more. It’s obviously the result of a state sponsored ‘fact finding’ mission. Well done, Unherd
This is Azeri state propaganda, nothing more. It’s obviously the result of a state sponsored ‘fact finding’ mission. Well done, Unherd
An interesting model. In particular, Azerbaijan’s decision to build “smart villages” and “smart towns” and use the destruction to leapfrog their infrastructure is something that might work well for Ukraine too. Orlando W.: Ukraine is definitely not “over as a country” – the opposite is true. Putin has managed to forge them into a resolute country and to put them on the map for an international community that barely registered them before. Governments and companies are already scrambling to get in on the rebuild…
An interesting model. In particular, Azerbaijan’s decision to build “smart villages” and “smart towns” and use the destruction to leapfrog their infrastructure is something that might work well for Ukraine too. Orlando W.: Ukraine is definitely not “over as a country” – the opposite is true. Putin has managed to forge them into a resolute country and to put them on the map for an international community that barely registered them before. Governments and companies are already scrambling to get in on the rebuild…
This is a deranged perspective that fully omits (willfully?) the difference in scale. Fuzuli (cfr. wikipedia) covers ~1400 square km. Let’s say half of that is the city proper, which would need to be wholly rebuilt.
And you really want to sit here and tell me this operation could in any way be comparable to Ukraine, which has seen frontlines shift back and forth multiple times over a front that at some point equaled the Low Countries? What about all the critical infrastructure that has been destroyed beyond the frontline? A few carpenters are not going to cut it for that.
Do you really think that damage can be undone? Ukraine is over as a country. Sure, some rebuilding is bound to take place. But guess what another difference is? Azerbaijan is a prosperous country sitting on the goldmine that are fossil fuels, which the EU is very willing to buy at any price (the EU will also pretend not to see that Russian gas is flowing to Azerbaijan and being remarketed to the EU as if it were Azeri, but no matter, this Matryoshka spiel allows them to keep the facade that energy decoupling from Russia is possible – after all, hapless consumers are the ones who will pay for the Azeri triangulation).
I guess European taxpayers should also foot the bill of Ukraine’s reconstruction? I am afraid mr. Fazi, another columnist of Unherd, got a better perspective on this: every last penny of EU funds has already been redirected to fund Ukrainian folly and their ensuing idea of a total war on Russia – and it seems unlikely this should change anytime soon.
The article certainly isn’t as deranged as your ludicrous pro Russian comment, which appears to blame Ukraine for being invaded by Russia.
You seem to be rather unaware also that Ukraine also has huge natural gas reserves. Of course whether their peaceful neighbour would actually allow them to develop these might well be another matter.
There is exactly one sentence where Russia is even mentioned in my comment. You people really are in a McCarthyist trance
There is exactly one sentence where Russia is even mentioned in my comment. You people really are in a McCarthyist trance
The article certainly isn’t as deranged as your ludicrous pro Russian comment, which appears to blame Ukraine for being invaded by Russia.
You seem to be rather unaware also that Ukraine also has huge natural gas reserves. Of course whether their peaceful neighbour would actually allow them to develop these might well be another matter.
This is a deranged perspective that fully omits (willfully?) the difference in scale. Fuzuli (cfr. wikipedia) covers ~1400 square km. Let’s say half of that is the city proper, which would need to be wholly rebuilt.
And you really want to sit here and tell me this operation could in any way be comparable to Ukraine, which has seen frontlines shift back and forth multiple times over a front that at some point equaled the Low Countries? What about all the critical infrastructure that has been destroyed beyond the frontline? A few carpenters are not going to cut it for that.
Do you really think that damage can be undone? Ukraine is over as a country. Sure, some rebuilding is bound to take place. But guess what another difference is? Azerbaijan is a prosperous country sitting on the goldmine that are fossil fuels, which the EU is very willing to buy at any price (the EU will also pretend not to see that Russian gas is flowing to Azerbaijan and being remarketed to the EU as if it were Azeri, but no matter, this Matryoshka spiel allows them to keep the facade that energy decoupling from Russia is possible – after all, hapless consumers are the ones who will pay for the Azeri triangulation).
I guess European taxpayers should also foot the bill of Ukraine’s reconstruction? I am afraid mr. Fazi, another columnist of Unherd, got a better perspective on this: every last penny of EU funds has already been redirected to fund Ukrainian folly and their ensuing idea of a total war on Russia – and it seems unlikely this should change anytime soon.
I hope they rebuild nice houses and low rise flats in the vernacular style rather than the deeply depressing Soviet plattenbau which can be seen from Chicago to Berlin to Seoul to Nairobi.
I hope they rebuild nice houses and low rise flats in the vernacular style rather than the deeply depressing Soviet plattenbau which can be seen from Chicago to Berlin to Seoul to Nairobi.
There are a few problems.
Firstly, the Russian majority areas, don’t want to remain with Ukraine (no matter how much Ukraine and the West hate to admit it), are almost certainly lost, and those were the most productive. Agriculture, industry….
Secondly, the loss of a significant part of the most productive population, either migration to Europe during the last year or the huge numbers of young men thrown away at the likes of Bakhmut.
But the most important problem is, as we have seen in Libya, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iraq… the West are very lavish with instruments of war, not so much with post war reconstruction.
Winning or losing are options only did Russia or NATO. Ukraine is done for, no matter what happens from now on.
There are a few problems.
Firstly, the Russian majority areas, don’t want to remain with Ukraine (no matter how much Ukraine and the West hate to admit it), are almost certainly lost, and those were the most productive. Agriculture, industry….
Secondly, the loss of a significant part of the most productive population, either migration to Europe during the last year or the huge numbers of young men thrown away at the likes of Bakhmut.
But the most important problem is, as we have seen in Libya, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iraq… the West are very lavish with instruments of war, not so much with post war reconstruction.
Winning or losing are options only did Russia or NATO. Ukraine is done for, no matter what happens from now on.