Well, quite. ‘Loonies’ was a perfectly good word, but use it at work and you’ll get cancelled. Now it’s ‘outliers’. So, ‘outliers’ will become the new pejorative.
You obviously don’t realize that saying nasty things about other people just reveals your own nasty mentality that you feel the need to project onto others.
You obviously don’t realize that saying nasty things about other people just reveals your own nasty mentality that you feel the need to project onto others.
Because you knows and I know that we’re seeing the beginnings of the next craze. Before you know it, there will be tweetmobs of wolf people howling down authors who limit their stories to human characters, demanding their own bathrooms and their own Furry Studies degree programs in the three or four liberal arts colleges that still dare to stay open.
I’m guessing a lot of therians think they’re bats, because therianthropy sounds like a bat byproduct to me – the kind that accumulates underneath a bat colony.
Well, quite. ‘Loonies’ was a perfectly good word, but use it at work and you’ll get cancelled. Now it’s ‘outliers’. So, ‘outliers’ will become the new pejorative.
Because you knows and I know that we’re seeing the beginnings of the next craze. Before you know it, there will be tweetmobs of wolf people howling down authors who limit their stories to human characters, demanding their own bathrooms and their own Furry Studies degree programs in the three or four liberal arts colleges that still dare to stay open.
I’m guessing a lot of therians think they’re bats, because therianthropy sounds like a bat byproduct to me – the kind that accumulates underneath a bat colony.
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Why are we taking these immature narcissists seriously?
J Mo
1 year ago
“The comparison is often made by therians themselves, a minority of whom are transgender as well as “trans-species”, as they sometimes put it. (Not all transgender people are comfortable with this analogy, fearing that it complicates the public discourse and undermines their movement’s drive for recognition.) The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.”
Trans people don’t like the analogy because it’s on the nose and don’t want their preferred narrative being ‘complicated’ by dissenters. Because you cannot change ‘gender’ (weasel word) or s*x.
And how would Caeser the coyote know how a human thinks?
Also, it is not possible to change sex any more than it is possible to change species.
J Mo
1 year ago
“The comparison is often made by therians themselves, a minority of whom are transgender as well as “trans-species”, as they sometimes put it. (Not all transgender people are comfortable with this analogy, fearing that it complicates the public discourse and undermines their movement’s drive for recognition.) The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.”
Trans people don’t like the analogy because it’s on the nose and don’t want their preferred narrative being ‘complicated’ by dissenters. Because you cannot change ‘gender’ (weasel word) or s*x.
And how would Caeser the coyote know how a human thinks?
Drew Gibson
1 year ago
‘Neurological outliers’? How can this condition be anything other than a psychological disorder? As such, it deserves our sympathy but certainly not our affirmation. They are not ‘animals trapped in human bodies’. They are human beings with real problems
‘Therians are not delusional.’ Really? Unless ‘delusional’ has a technical meaning that I’m not aware of, how can they be anything else?
Yup. It sounds like a lot of undiagnosed autism. That’s why they felt from an early age as though they were fundamentally different from everyone else around them, and the meaning they made of this sense of difference and alienation was so off. And no, you cannot change your sex just like you can’t change your species.
Yup. It sounds like a lot of undiagnosed autism. That’s why they felt from an early age as though they were fundamentally different from everyone else around them, and the meaning they made of this sense of difference and alienation was so off. And no, you cannot change your sex just like you can’t change your species.
Drew Gibson
1 year ago
‘Neurological outliers’? How can this condition be anything other than a psychological disorder? As such, it deserves our sympathy but certainly not our affirmation. They are not ‘animals trapped in human bodies’. They are human beings with real problems
‘Therians are not delusional.’ Really? Unless ‘delusional’ has a technical meaning that I’m not aware of, how can they be anything else?
Last edited 1 year ago by Drew Gibson
Tom Lewis
1 year ago
It seems, therians, like people who believe that they have lived past lives are never something humdrum. You’ll, I bet, never find a therian fruit fly, dung beetle, slug or crab ( NOT of the sea going variety). I, myself, believe that I am a bull elephant, which, trust me, has caused no end of surprises, or issues, as I attempt to mount my chosen mate. Attempts, likewise, to procreate with my ‘actual’ species (elephants) has left them distinctly unimpressed, as if I was hardly there at all. Not all sexual encounters are quite so disappointing though, my friend Catherine (she’s really Great), is also a fellow (is that a misgendering ?) therian, only she believes herself to be a horse, and being a powerful, wealthy, sort of individual has gone to some lengths, as it were, to ensure that she is ‘fully’ fulfilled.
Indeed. Just like all those people with ‘former lives’ in which they were all princesses or mighty warriors, but never downtrodden peasants.
Tom Lewis
1 year ago
It seems, therians, like people who believe that they have lived past lives are never something humdrum. You’ll, I bet, never find a therian fruit fly, dung beetle, slug or crab ( NOT of the sea going variety). I, myself, believe that I am a bull elephant, which, trust me, has caused no end of surprises, or issues, as I attempt to mount my chosen mate. Attempts, likewise, to procreate with my ‘actual’ species (elephants) has left them distinctly unimpressed, as if I was hardly there at all. Not all sexual encounters are quite so disappointing though, my friend Catherine (she’s really Great), is also a fellow (is that a misgendering ?) therian, only she believes herself to be a horse, and being a powerful, wealthy, sort of individual has gone to some lengths, as it were, to ensure that she is ‘fully’ fulfilled.
Tina Lennon
1 year ago
Utter madness. We even have a name for them!! Next we will be affirming them and adding their missing tails!! I despair of this world that we are encouraging mental illness. Social media and the therapists and scientists have a lot to answer for.
The very designation “Therian” is older than social media. Humans who believed themselves to be animals or attempted to turn themselves into animals are as old as written history.
The very designation “Therian” is older than social media. Humans who believed themselves to be animals or attempted to turn themselves into animals are as old as written history.
Tina Lennon
1 year ago
Utter madness. We even have a name for them!! Next we will be affirming them and adding their missing tails!! I despair of this world that we are encouraging mental illness. Social media and the therapists and scientists have a lot to answer for.
Richard Pearse
1 year ago
I’m reminded of the Monty Python sketch about men who thought themselves Mice – dressed like Giant Mice, felt irresistible cravings for cheese and met in secret.
How did this nonsense become a “thing”? that social scientists study? that someone has to take seriously and write about?
I agree with comment questioning whether this is April 1.
Yes.
Monty Python looks more and more prescient every passing week – eg King Arthur in the Holy Grail, Dennis the Peasant: Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Arthur: Be quiet! Dennis the Peasant: You can’t expect to wield supreme power just ’cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!”
Oh that is just so perfect, my goodness Monty Python went to utterly absurd ‘it could never happen’ lengths, yet here we are fulfilling more and more of their ridiculous plot lines. I wonder if that is how Nostradamus started out.
Oh that is just so perfect, my goodness Monty Python went to utterly absurd ‘it could never happen’ lengths, yet here we are fulfilling more and more of their ridiculous plot lines. I wonder if that is how Nostradamus started out.
Yes.
Monty Python looks more and more prescient every passing week – eg King Arthur in the Holy Grail, Dennis the Peasant: Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Arthur: Be quiet! Dennis the Peasant: You can’t expect to wield supreme power just ’cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!”
Imagine the money to be made in the future with animal affirming surgeries? The aardvark affirming surgery would be very expensive, however.
Richard Pearse
1 year ago
I’m reminded of the Monty Python sketch about men who thought themselves Mice – dressed like Giant Mice, felt irresistible cravings for cheese and met in secret.
How did this nonsense become a “thing”? that social scientists study? that someone has to take seriously and write about?
I agree with comment questioning whether this is April 1.
Stephen Philip
1 year ago
” a disproportionate number of them had been diagnosed with autism… though it is not clear how the two conditions could be linked.”
The link is clear, in light of your next sentence –
“They also found that, compared with a control group, many therians struggle with relationships and social skills.”
Struggling with relationships and having poor social skills is practically the definition of autism. I suspect that people who struggle the most have a combination of narcissism (the desire to be the centre of attention) combined the inability to achieve such an outcome, except through extremely unconventional behaviour of some kind.
I agree. People on the autism spectrum have a tendency to get fixed ideas, fixations, monomanias.
Also, even if it isn’t full-on, as in clinical, narcissism, there’s definitely self-aggrandisement at play. Their fantasy selves are all animals that could be considered magnificent in some way – strong, large, powerful, majestic. Even the non-existent ones are always dragons and gryphons etc.
I agree. People on the autism spectrum have a tendency to get fixed ideas, fixations, monomanias.
Also, even if it isn’t full-on, as in clinical, narcissism, there’s definitely self-aggrandisement at play. Their fantasy selves are all animals that could be considered magnificent in some way – strong, large, powerful, majestic. Even the non-existent ones are always dragons and gryphons etc.
Nobody seems to have an inner gerbil!
Stephen Philip
1 year ago
” a disproportionate number of them had been diagnosed with autism… though it is not clear how the two conditions could be linked.”
The link is clear, in light of your next sentence –
“They also found that, compared with a control group, many therians struggle with relationships and social skills.”
Struggling with relationships and having poor social skills is practically the definition of autism. I suspect that people who struggle the most have a combination of narcissism (the desire to be the centre of attention) combined the inability to achieve such an outcome, except through extremely unconventional behaviour of some kind.
Caroline Watson
1 year ago
For both the people who believe that they are bears, and the people who believe that they are the other ‘gender’, the most simple and pragmatic response would be, ‘No you’re not’. Neither are possible, so should not be indulged. ‘Cruel to be kind’ might be unfashionable but sometimes it is necessary.
Caroline Watson
1 year ago
For both the people who believe that they are bears, and the people who believe that they are the other ‘gender’, the most simple and pragmatic response would be, ‘No you’re not’. Neither are possible, so should not be indulged. ‘Cruel to be kind’ might be unfashionable but sometimes it is necessary.
Jacqueline Walker
1 year ago
I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry. What a load of codswallop.
Try both. Laugh like a hyena, cry wolf, and crocodile tears. The experience might give you a clue about your real self. In extremis, if none of these works, give yourself a good wallop, and you might find out you’re really a cod.
Try both. Laugh like a hyena, cry wolf, and crocodile tears. The experience might give you a clue about your real self. In extremis, if none of these works, give yourself a good wallop, and you might find out you’re really a cod.
Jacqueline Walker
1 year ago
I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry. What a load of codswallop.
Steve Murray
1 year ago
I’m going to disagree with the majority of comments. I welcome this article by Unherd, which provides an insight into a neurological condition with historical precedent, and therefore worthy of study and discussion.
The links with transgenderism are interesting, since there’s nothing inherently wrong with someone feeling they’re a different gender to the body they were born with, providing they’re not trying to impose their wish to lead a different life on other people, thus trampling on their rights. Similarly, why not just live and let live with therians, providing they’re not going around attacking anyone; indeed, most of them seem to be leading otherwise exemplary lives.
Many of the comments are just childish, and rather than asking Unherd to do better, i’d suggest those who comment unintelligently should do better.
Why did you say “neurological condition” instead of “psychological condition” (or better yet “spiritual condition”)? I think this choice of words is highly significant – and tells us much about the civilizational path that has gotten us to this point.
And of course there’s something “inherently wrong” with feeling like you’re in the wrong body (sex- or species-wise). It generates negative outcomes for the individual and those in relationship with him.
To feel body parts where none exist is not as biologically improbable as it sounds. Studies of people born with missing arms and legs have shown that limbs that have always been absent can still be represented in the sensory and motor regions of the brain. The psychologist Ronald Melzack, an expert on phantom pain, proposed that the brain continuously generates a pattern of impulses that indicate that the body is intact and “unequivocally one’s own”, even if it isn’t. This pattern, which Melzack called a “neurosignature”, is genetically determined and characteristic of each individual. It is not inconceivable that someone born with an atypical neurosignature might experience a body that is out of kilter with the one they possess. So far, no one has systematically examined the brains of therians to see if their neural patterns reflect what they feel.
Humans have evolved from much more ancient creatures, as you well know. Rather than seeking to dismiss the inherent neurology which evolved alongside physical characteristics, i prefer to maintain a “spirit” of enquiry. We have a coccyx, for example, which is the remnants of when we had tails. Those who feel as if they have tails may be experiencing a leftover neurological effect from the part of the brain where the sensation of having a tail developed.
I found the knee-jerk dismissiveness of something far from fully understood within many of the responses unintelligent, it’s as simple as that.
Or is the coccyx the precursor to our future tails?
There was a time when otherwise well-functioning members of society reported seeing wood nymphs and sprites as they wandered the dark forests of England. It wasn’t advances in neurology that ended that phenomenon, and it won’t be advances in neurology that end this one.
Or is the coccyx the precursor to our future tails?
There was a time when otherwise well-functioning members of society reported seeing wood nymphs and sprites as they wandered the dark forests of England. It wasn’t advances in neurology that ended that phenomenon, and it won’t be advances in neurology that end this one.
To feel body parts where none exist is not as biologically improbable as it sounds. Studies of people born with missing arms and legs have shown that limbs that have always been absent can still be represented in the sensory and motor regions of the brain. The psychologist Ronald Melzack, an expert on phantom pain, proposed that the brain continuously generates a pattern of impulses that indicate that the body is intact and “unequivocally one’s own”, even if it isn’t. This pattern, which Melzack called a “neurosignature”, is genetically determined and characteristic of each individual. It is not inconceivable that someone born with an atypical neurosignature might experience a body that is out of kilter with the one they possess. So far, no one has systematically examined the brains of therians to see if their neural patterns reflect what they feel.
Humans have evolved from much more ancient creatures, as you well know. Rather than seeking to dismiss the inherent neurology which evolved alongside physical characteristics, i prefer to maintain a “spirit” of enquiry. We have a coccyx, for example, which is the remnants of when we had tails. Those who feel as if they have tails may be experiencing a leftover neurological effect from the part of the brain where the sensation of having a tail developed.
I found the knee-jerk dismissiveness of something far from fully understood within many of the responses unintelligent, it’s as simple as that.
Let me ask you this- Why is the language used by transitioners virtually identical to the language of Post-Modern Gender Philosophers like Judith Butler?
Could it be that exposure to Gnostic-Hermetic Ideologies plants the seed in someone’s mind or do we have to automatically dismiss the notion of learned performativity and simply affirm?
The Gnostic Doctrine outlines that as the result of a cosmic accident, humans are trapped in an evil material world in a body they didn’t want and only those with Gnosis (absolute knowledge) understand this mystery. But the Gnostics are nihilistic with no plan. The Hermetics on the other hand use Alchemy to transform the Is into the Ought. The Marxists and “Applied” Postmodernists all use the Hegelian principles as a form of Praxis to transcend the hopeless material world to bring it toward universal Oneness.
Could this play any role or should we just assume all those “trapped in bodies” have never run into a therapist that studied these doctrines?
Well said – I am disappointed with many of the comments on here, I expect better of Unherd readers. This is clearly a genuine dysphoric condition and, as I understand it, is far far older than the transgender issue. I found the article fascinating – about a group of people I had no knowledge of, outside the kink groups of “furries” and “otherkin”. These people seem remarkably well adjusted, given their dysphoria, especially compared to many trans people who never seem to be happy whether they have transitioned or not. At least therians seem to understand it is impossible to actually become the animal they feel an affinity to, and there was nothing to suggest any of them would want surgery.
Why did you say “neurological condition” instead of “psychological condition” (or better yet “spiritual condition”)? I think this choice of words is highly significant – and tells us much about the civilizational path that has gotten us to this point.
And of course there’s something “inherently wrong” with feeling like you’re in the wrong body (sex- or species-wise). It generates negative outcomes for the individual and those in relationship with him.
Let me ask you this- Why is the language used by transitioners virtually identical to the language of Post-Modern Gender Philosophers like Judith Butler?
Could it be that exposure to Gnostic-Hermetic Ideologies plants the seed in someone’s mind or do we have to automatically dismiss the notion of learned performativity and simply affirm?
The Gnostic Doctrine outlines that as the result of a cosmic accident, humans are trapped in an evil material world in a body they didn’t want and only those with Gnosis (absolute knowledge) understand this mystery. But the Gnostics are nihilistic with no plan. The Hermetics on the other hand use Alchemy to transform the Is into the Ought. The Marxists and “Applied” Postmodernists all use the Hegelian principles as a form of Praxis to transcend the hopeless material world to bring it toward universal Oneness.
Could this play any role or should we just assume all those “trapped in bodies” have never run into a therapist that studied these doctrines?
Well said – I am disappointed with many of the comments on here, I expect better of Unherd readers. This is clearly a genuine dysphoric condition and, as I understand it, is far far older than the transgender issue. I found the article fascinating – about a group of people I had no knowledge of, outside the kink groups of “furries” and “otherkin”. These people seem remarkably well adjusted, given their dysphoria, especially compared to many trans people who never seem to be happy whether they have transitioned or not. At least therians seem to understand it is impossible to actually become the animal they feel an affinity to, and there was nothing to suggest any of them would want surgery.
I’m going to disagree with the majority of comments. I welcome this article by Unherd, which provides an insight into a neurological condition with historical precedent, and therefore worthy of study and discussion.
The links with transgenderism are interesting, since there’s nothing inherently wrong with someone feeling they’re a different gender to the body they were born with, providing they’re not trying to impose their wish to lead a different life on other people, thus trampling on their rights. Similarly, why not just live and let live with therians, providing they’re not going around attacking anyone; indeed, most of them seem to be leading otherwise exemplary lives.
Many of the comments are just childish, and rather than asking Unherd to do better, i’d suggest those who comment unintelligently should do better.
What else? The piece has to be a sendup. Maybe the editors missed the deadline and decided to drop it in anyway. Kudos to the Herd for some brilliant riffs!
What else? The piece has to be a sendup. Maybe the editors missed the deadline and decided to drop it in anyway. Kudos to the Herd for some brilliant riffs!
Last edited 1 year ago by AL Tinkcombe
Andrew D
1 year ago
Is it April 1st?
Coralie Palmer
1 year ago
This piece is frankly desperate. Also: ‘The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.’ Not a true opposition. The trans extremists do not claim to be changing gender, but changing sex. Which is no more possible than changing species.
More fundamentally, why is this piece of tenth-rate pseudo-psychology (‘therians are not delusional’) on UnHerd? I expect quality thinking on here, not jargon, fad and shallowness.
But here we are having read the article and commented on it. These stories are certainly seductive and compelling like a train wreck. A must read, and Unherd knows what sells.
But here we are having read the article and commented on it. These stories are certainly seductive and compelling like a train wreck. A must read, and Unherd knows what sells.
Coralie Palmer
1 year ago
This piece is frankly desperate. Also: ‘The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.’ Not a true opposition. The trans extremists do not claim to be changing gender, but changing sex. Which is no more possible than changing species.
More fundamentally, why is this piece of tenth-rate pseudo-psychology (‘therians are not delusional’) on UnHerd? I expect quality thinking on here, not jargon, fad and shallowness.
Last edited 1 year ago by Coralie Palmer
Allison Barrows
1 year ago
This extremely idiotic trend for using “they” to refer to a single person – person, deluded or not – makes my teeth itch. He, she, or the person’s name. That’s it.
As for the substance of the article, people are free to believe anything they wish about themselves. The rest of us need not be involved.
But you are involved because you read all about it and commented.
Allison Barrows
1 year ago
This extremely idiotic trend for using “they” to refer to a single person – person, deluded or not – makes my teeth itch. He, she, or the person’s name. That’s it.
As for the substance of the article, people are free to believe anything they wish about themselves. The rest of us need not be involved.
Bob Downing
1 year ago
I am not surprised that one study classed therians as having some form of autism. People with some degree of autism also exhibit feelings of being “different”, social awkwardness and so on. Neurological sciences are busy trying to keep up with each other, and haven’t yet agreed on what to call autism. Recognition is still a long way off, and general understanding even further away. Throw both into the melting pot along with gender and “identity” (etc) and we’re talking about a whole different type of medical science, as significant as the difference between ‘normal’ physics and quantum physics.
One day it will be routine to diagnose an autistic, transgender therian (using quite different wording!), but only when “post-modern science” has stopped fighting for little bits of fame and glory, and resumed the calmer behaviour of the Enlightenment.
Bob Downing
1 year ago
I am not surprised that one study classed therians as having some form of autism. People with some degree of autism also exhibit feelings of being “different”, social awkwardness and so on. Neurological sciences are busy trying to keep up with each other, and haven’t yet agreed on what to call autism. Recognition is still a long way off, and general understanding even further away. Throw both into the melting pot along with gender and “identity” (etc) and we’re talking about a whole different type of medical science, as significant as the difference between ‘normal’ physics and quantum physics.
One day it will be routine to diagnose an autistic, transgender therian (using quite different wording!), but only when “post-modern science” has stopped fighting for little bits of fame and glory, and resumed the calmer behaviour of the Enlightenment.
Grace Note
1 year ago
I found this really interesting and a little moving in places. Yes, I’ll be mocked by some commentators but … They are not demanding we affirm their beliefs and some aspects, the phantom tail/wing/whatever are not dissimilar to recognised neurological issues that amputees, for example, deal with. Mostly, these are people who are aware of their oddness and just looking for others like them. Yes, I’m amazed that this is a thing but when compared to transgenderism at least they all understand that whatever they feel/believe they are, as one “coyote” put it, really weird.
I’m not surprised that the trans community don’t want to be aligned with them, not least because they, therians, are accepting of their beliefs, not demanding we accept them and not hating on others for getting their species wrong.
Well said – I think I have found maybe three comments on here, excluding my own, that are not either nasty, childish or just plain silly.
Grace Note
1 year ago
I found this really interesting and a little moving in places. Yes, I’ll be mocked by some commentators but … They are not demanding we affirm their beliefs and some aspects, the phantom tail/wing/whatever are not dissimilar to recognised neurological issues that amputees, for example, deal with. Mostly, these are people who are aware of their oddness and just looking for others like them. Yes, I’m amazed that this is a thing but when compared to transgenderism at least they all understand that whatever they feel/believe they are, as one “coyote” put it, really weird.
I’m not surprised that the trans community don’t want to be aligned with them, not least because they, therians, are accepting of their beliefs, not demanding we accept them and not hating on others for getting their species wrong.
Last edited 1 year ago by Grace Note
Lucy Browne
1 year ago
“The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.”
Well you can change your gender, yes, because gender is a made-up thing. You can’t change your sex, though, any more than you can change your species.
I’m really starting to be embarrassed by my diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder… this sort of nonsense has taken a fast hold in the ‘autism community’ (which is a nonsense in itself, actually, that a pack of terminally online ‘activists’ can claim to speak for a diverse section of the population).
Last edited 1 year ago by Lucy Browne
Lucy Browne
1 year ago
“The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.”
Well you can change your gender, yes, because gender is a made-up thing. You can’t change your sex, though, any more than you can change your species.
I’m really starting to be embarrassed by my diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder… this sort of nonsense has taken a fast hold in the ‘autism community’ (which is a nonsense in itself, actually, that a pack of terminally online ‘activists’ can claim to speak for a diverse section of the population).
Last edited 1 year ago by Lucy Browne
Dominic A
1 year ago
It’s crazy, but no more so than legions of grown men crying with joy because a group of 11 millionaires managed to push a pig-skin ball into a net. etc etc etc
Quite true. Or dressing up as an animal on Sunday, paying $500 to get in and spending $12 on a pint of lite beer to watch 11 over sized men chase after an oval pig skin in freezing weather.
Quite true. Or dressing up as an animal on Sunday, paying $500 to get in and spending $12 on a pint of lite beer to watch 11 over sized men chase after an oval pig skin in freezing weather.
It’s crazy, but no more so than legions of grown men crying with joy because a group of 11 millionaires managed to push a pig-skin ball into a net. etc etc etc
Keith Payne
1 year ago
Interesting comments, a lot very quick to sharply and somewhat unkindly judge. If therians want to go quietly about their business feeling not quite human, that’s fine by me. We are a diverse species and long may it remain so. Until some AI nutters change us into robots or we die out, we remain Homo sapiens, an animal – one that is very good at absorbing the feelings of other beings.
Keith Payne
1 year ago
Interesting comments, a lot very quick to sharply and somewhat unkindly judge. If therians want to go quietly about their business feeling not quite human, that’s fine by me. We are a diverse species and long may it remain so. Until some AI nutters change us into robots or we die out, we remain Homo sapiens, an animal – one that is very good at absorbing the feelings of other beings.
Vincent R
1 year ago
This is meant as parody, right?
Nowadays it can sometimes be hard to be sure
Vincent R
1 year ago
This is meant as parody, right?
Nowadays it can sometimes be hard to be sure
Jane Watson
1 year ago
“a disproportionate number of them had been diagnosed with autism (7.69%, compared with 1.5% in the general US population)”.
I would suggest that this is a massive underestimate. As with trans identifying individuals, the underlying sentiment is often a sense of ‘otherness’. The feeling of being ‘different’ can be interpreted according to whatever (ironically) is socially/culturally sanctioned at the time.
Hopefully the medical establishment will show less enthusiasm for transforming people into animals than they did for transitioning children with ASDs from one sex to the other.
Jane Watson
1 year ago
“a disproportionate number of them had been diagnosed with autism (7.69%, compared with 1.5% in the general US population)”.
I would suggest that this is a massive underestimate. As with trans identifying individuals, the underlying sentiment is often a sense of ‘otherness’. The feeling of being ‘different’ can be interpreted according to whatever (ironically) is socially/culturally sanctioned at the time.
Hopefully the medical establishment will show less enthusiasm for transforming people into animals than they did for transitioning children with ASDs from one sex to the other.
Susan Grabston
1 year ago
Sounds like the conflation of disassociation and delusion.
Susan Grabston
1 year ago
Sounds like the conflation of disassociation and delusion.
Kevin Hansen
1 year ago
The guy who thinks he is a bear – anyone want to guess where he goes to do a number 2?
The guy who thinks he is a bear – anyone want to guess where he goes to do a number 2?
Nikki Hayes
11 months ago
This was a really interesting article – I had never heard of therians, although I have heard of otherkin and furries, both of which I believe to be some kind of kink rather than actual dysphoria. I am not sure why some of you are so doubtful about these people – they clearly differentiate from many trans people in that they acknowledge that they are not really animals and can never become an animal, regardless of the fact that they display more animal traits than the average human. We are, after all, descended from animals so why should this kind of dysphoria be so hard to believe? I am glad they have a supportive community around them – it must be incredibly difficult to feel that you are in the wrong body, my main issue with a lot of trans people is my lack of belief that they really do think they are in the wrong body, as opposed to it being autogynephilia or some similar sexual kink. All humans still display at least some animal traits leading back to our more primitive ancestors – we would never have survived as a species if we did not have these traits.
Last edited 11 months ago by Nikki Hayes
Nikki Hayes
11 months ago
This was a really interesting article – I had never heard of therians, although I have heard of otherkin and furries, both of which I believe to be some kind of kink rather than actual dysphoria. I am not sure why some of you are so doubtful about these people – they clearly differentiate from many trans people in that they acknowledge that they are not really animals and can never become an animal, regardless of the fact that they display more animal traits than the average human. We are, after all, descended from animals so why should this kind of dysphoria be so hard to believe? I am glad they have a supportive community around them – it must be incredibly difficult to feel that you are in the wrong body, my main issue with a lot of trans people is my lack of belief that they really do think they are in the wrong body, as opposed to it being autogynephilia or some similar sexual kink. All humans still display at least some animal traits leading back to our more primitive ancestors – we would never have survived as a species if we did not have these traits.
Last edited 11 months ago by Nikki Hayes
Paul T
1 year ago
“…except furries daddy, they are just weird”.
“Yeah they give everyone the creeps, all my friends think they are scary and unsettling”.
Have you come across many “furry daddies”? I’ve never even seen one.
Paul T
1 year ago
“…except furries daddy, they are just weird”.
“Yeah they give everyone the creeps, all my friends think they are scary and unsettling”.
From the mouths of my children.
Alphonse Pfarti
1 year ago
Why several comments disappeared? Particularly ones questioning that this really is a thing.
Last edited 1 year ago by Alphonse Pfarti
Alphonse Pfarti
1 year ago
Why several comments disappeared? Particularly ones questioning that this really is a thing.
Last edited 1 year ago by Alphonse Pfarti
Brian Villanueva
1 year ago
Slicing off private parts is so last week. “No Medicaid funding for tail grafts, no peace!”
Brian Villanueva
1 year ago
Slicing off private parts is so last week. “No Medicaid funding for tail grafts, no peace!”
Clare Knight
11 months ago
I’m curious to know if when the Therians identify as an animal if it’s the same sex animal as they are a human.
Clare Knight
11 months ago
I’m curious to know if when the Therians identify as an animal if it’s the same sex animal as they are a human.
Kirk Susong
1 year ago
Poor Gregor Samsa, he just *thought* he was a roach
Kirk Susong
1 year ago
Poor Gregor Samsa, he just *thought* he was a roach
Marie Krylova
1 year ago
Are bears aware that they are bears? Do coyotes think about being coyotes? I’ve encountered quite a few of both, and most of them are primarily concerned with rummaging through your trash and stealing your chickens.
They aren’t delusional and should be taken seriously? In that case, BearX has obviously been habituated to humans and therefore it’s the responsibility of the Department of Wildlife to relocate or euthanize him. And shame on his wife for letting a dangerous animal into the house with children present.
Shooting coyotes (the vicious little pests) is legal in most U.S. states year round. Azi the Mexican wolf should avoid the Northern Rockies, as they just opened up wolf hunting.
I kid, of course. These people have never encountered a wild animal in their lives. It doesn’t seem to occur to them that there are very specific behaviors attributed to each of these animals. Bears don’t get engineering degrees; they forage, reproduce, and die. Has this guy even tried to sustain himself on a diet of raw elk, moths, and berries? Or does he dig through the trash while his wife screams at him and tries to bear spray him?
It’s notable that they want to be accepted by the wider world, i.e. people, and not the animals they claim to be. Don’t try to convince me you are a bear. Go convince the mama grizzly with two cubs. Good luck with that.
Marie Krylova
1 year ago
Are bears aware that they are bears? Do coyotes think about being coyotes? I’ve encountered quite a few of both, and most of them are primarily concerned with rummaging through your trash and stealing your chickens.
They aren’t delusional and should be taken seriously? In that case, BearX has obviously been habituated to humans and therefore it’s the responsibility of the Department of Wildlife to relocate or euthanize him. And shame on his wife for letting a dangerous animal into the house with children present.
Shooting coyotes (the vicious little pests) is legal in most U.S. states year round. Azi the Mexican wolf should avoid the Northern Rockies, as they just opened up wolf hunting.
I kid, of course. These people have never encountered a wild animal in their lives. It doesn’t seem to occur to them that there are very specific behaviors attributed to each of these animals. Bears don’t get engineering degrees; they forage, reproduce, and die. Has this guy even tried to sustain himself on a diet of raw elk, moths, and berries? Or does he dig through the trash while his wife screams at him and tries to bear spray him?
It’s notable that they want to be accepted by the wider world, i.e. people, and not the animals they claim to be. Don’t try to convince me you are a bear. Go convince the mama grizzly with two cubs. Good luck with that.
Kenda Grant
11 months ago
“The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.”
Ah…no you can’t – on both counts. Both are complex mental health conditions, delusions if you will. Saying you are the opposite sex or a cat, doesn’t make it so. If you lop off your breasts or sew on a tail, neither will alter the underlying mental health conditions or make you happy. No thought, word or action will change your gender or make you an animal.
Kenda Grant
11 months ago
“The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.”
Ah…no you can’t – on both counts. Both are complex mental health conditions, delusions if you will. Saying you are the opposite sex or a cat, doesn’t make it so. If you lop off your breasts or sew on a tail, neither will alter the underlying mental health conditions or make you happy. No thought, word or action will change your gender or make you an animal.
ben arnulfssen
11 months ago
If these peopleclaimed to be Napoleon or Julius Caesar, we would simply dismiss them as deluded fantasist.
ben arnulfssen
11 months ago
How does he react to being in the woods? Is he a Catholic?
Carmel Shortall
11 months ago
What a crock of shite! But at least it made me laugh:
“In her book Unthinkable, Helen Thomson describes meeting a lycanthrope who periodically believes he has turned into a tiger; her interview with him was cut short when he suddenly started growling and threatening to attack her, a relapse his doctors blamed on his failure to take his anti-psychotic medication”
Daniel Lee
10 months ago
Has there been a change in the editorial cadre at Unherd?
lin sampson
10 months ago
so i live in south africa on a very small income. i had to choose between the Spectator and unherd for subscriptions, can only afford one. i chose, to my everlasting chagrin Unherd, too many silly stories, few really well known writers, f**k.
Stephen Quilley
1 year ago
It feels like a version of those medieval dancing crazes in which thousands bopped themselves to death
Stephen Quilley
1 year ago
It feels like a version of those medieval dancing crazes in which thousands bopped themselves to death
Iris Violet
1 year ago
Enough of this please. Mental illness need not be further glorified.
Iris Violet
1 year ago
Enough of this please. Mental illness need not be further glorified.
David Bullard
11 months ago
On the plus side for a therian is that the waiting time to see a vet is much shorter than for a GP. Woof woof. The downside is that you need a tree to give your urine sample.
David Bullard
11 months ago
On the plus side for a therian is that the waiting time to see a vet is much shorter than for a GP. Woof woof. The downside is that you need a tree to give your urine sample.
Richard Ross
11 months ago
“The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.” IS it obvious, though? How is it any different? Given enough mutilative surgery and drugs, isn’t the fiction of being “trans-species” no more difficult to maintain than “trans-sex”?
Richard Ross
11 months ago
“The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.” IS it obvious, though? How is it any different? Given enough mutilative surgery and drugs, isn’t the fiction of being “trans-species” no more difficult to maintain than “trans-sex”?
Stephen Kristan
1 year ago
This article has got to be a spoof… right?
Last edited 1 year ago by Stephen Kristan
Stephen Kristan
1 year ago
This article has got to be a spoof… right?
Last edited 1 year ago by Stephen Kristan
Nicholas Taylor
11 months ago
Puts ‘trans’ in perspective. If ‘wolf man’ had never seen or heard of a wolf, what would he be? Conversely, if the shrinks crack it, could they make me believe I’m Einstein, at least during working hours, so I could solve the quantum gravity problem? Another thought. Most of the vertebrate animals are now domesticated. All the ones where I live are dogs, though not all recognisable as such. Are there any therians who believe themselves to be a pig with no tail and sticking-up ears, or one of those white dusting wands with stubby legs?
Last edited 11 months ago by Nicholas Taylor
Nicholas Taylor
11 months ago
Puts ‘trans’ in perspective. If ‘wolf man’ had never seen or heard of a wolf, what would he be? Conversely, if the shrinks crack it, could they make me believe I’m Einstein, at least during working hours, so I could solve the quantum gravity problem? Another thought. Most of the vertebrate animals are now domesticated. All the ones where I live are dogs, though not all recognisable as such. Are there any therians who believe themselves to be a pig with no tail and sticking-up ears, or one of those white dusting wands with stubby legs?
Last edited 11 months ago by Nicholas Taylor
T Bone
1 year ago
This is quite obviously the Dialectic of Inclusion. It’s a set of Abstract Mind over Matter principles Reified into Objective Reality. A simulation of Reality is performed and the performance creates “reality” or Hyperreality when Society affirms it.
Social Scientists may feel this will create a more integrated, empathetic population. It will not. It will create a complete inability to accomplish objectives because people aren’t living in the same realities.
At some point in order to live in a “Sustainable Economy” there would have to be an Authoritarian clamp down to assure economies could function in an environment where nothing makes sense. A new set of Universal Values would be imposed from Above (Principle of Correspondence) by an Expert Class that would shepherd the masses. We’ve seen this before many times throughout history.
Ahahahaha, your first paragraph took me right back to grad school in the ‘80s! Wonderful satire of the post-structuralist bullsh*t that passed for high intellectualism back then (and apparently still does).
Correct me if I’m wrong but the original Postmodern/Post-structuralists were just analyzing society. They weren’t Marxist Change Agents trying to redirect the course of history. They were basically Nihilists, right?
Correct me if I’m wrong but the original Postmodern/Post-structuralists were just analyzing society. They weren’t Marxist Change Agents trying to redirect the course of history. They were basically Nihilists, right?
Ahahahaha, your first paragraph took me right back to grad school in the ‘80s! Wonderful satire of the post-structuralist bullsh*t that passed for high intellectualism back then (and apparently still does).
T Bone
1 year ago
This is quite obviously the Dialectic of Inclusion. It’s a set of Abstract Mind over Matter principles Reified into Objective Reality. A simulation of Reality is performed and the performance creates “reality” or Hyperreality when Society affirms it.
Social Scientists may feel this will create a more integrated, empathetic population. It will not. It will create a complete inability to accomplish objectives because people aren’t living in the same realities.
At some point in order to live in a “Sustainable Economy” there would have to be an Authoritarian clamp down to assure economies could function in an environment where nothing makes sense. A new set of Universal Values would be imposed from Above (Principle of Correspondence) by an Expert Class that would shepherd the masses. We’ve seen this before many times throughout history.
Last edited 1 year ago by T Bone
Nicky Samengo-Turner
1 year ago
I know this girl who shags everything that moves.. people think she is a dog….
Why are we taking these immature narcissists seriously?
Well, quite. ‘Loonies’ was a perfectly good word, but use it at work and you’ll get cancelled. Now it’s ‘outliers’. So, ‘outliers’ will become the new pejorative.
I also wonder how many mind altering substances some of the interviewees have imbibed.
I don’t mind sticking with ‘loonies’ as long as it offends the woke scum.
You obviously don’t realize that saying nasty things about other people just reveals your own nasty mentality that you feel the need to project onto others.
You obviously don’t realize that saying nasty things about other people just reveals your own nasty mentality that you feel the need to project onto others.
I also wonder how many mind altering substances some of the interviewees have imbibed.
I don’t mind sticking with ‘loonies’ as long as it offends the woke scum.
Perhaps for the same reason we take men, who now want a gynecologist exam, seriously. If anything goes, anything will go.
Because you knows and I know that we’re seeing the beginnings of the next craze. Before you know it, there will be tweetmobs of wolf people howling down authors who limit their stories to human characters, demanding their own bathrooms and their own Furry Studies degree programs in the three or four liberal arts colleges that still dare to stay open.
There is no “next craze”, this stuff is old, older than you and I.
And we already have a Furry study degree programme, we just call it “engineering” 😉
There is no “next craze”, this stuff is old, older than you and I.
And we already have a Furry study degree programme, we just call it “engineering” 😉
It’s ludicrous. Are we meant to take this seriously ?
Are we sure this isn’t another of those Pluckrose / Lindsay / Boghossian hoaxes?
If only!
If only!
I’m guessing a lot of therians think they’re bats, because therianthropy sounds like a bat byproduct to me – the kind that accumulates underneath a bat colony.
Well, quite. ‘Loonies’ was a perfectly good word, but use it at work and you’ll get cancelled. Now it’s ‘outliers’. So, ‘outliers’ will become the new pejorative.
Perhaps for the same reason we take men, who now want a gynecologist exam, seriously. If anything goes, anything will go.
Because you knows and I know that we’re seeing the beginnings of the next craze. Before you know it, there will be tweetmobs of wolf people howling down authors who limit their stories to human characters, demanding their own bathrooms and their own Furry Studies degree programs in the three or four liberal arts colleges that still dare to stay open.
It’s ludicrous. Are we meant to take this seriously ?
Are we sure this isn’t another of those Pluckrose / Lindsay / Boghossian hoaxes?
I’m guessing a lot of therians think they’re bats, because therianthropy sounds like a bat byproduct to me – the kind that accumulates underneath a bat colony.
Why are we taking these immature narcissists seriously?
“The comparison is often made by therians themselves, a minority of whom are transgender as well as “trans-species”, as they sometimes put it. (Not all transgender people are comfortable with this analogy, fearing that it complicates the public discourse and undermines their movement’s drive for recognition.) The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.”
Trans people don’t like the analogy because it’s on the nose and don’t want their preferred narrative being ‘complicated’ by dissenters. Because you cannot change ‘gender’ (weasel word) or s*x.
And how would Caeser the coyote know how a human thinks?
Also, it is not possible to change sex any more than it is possible to change species.
Also, it is not possible to change sex any more than it is possible to change species.
“The comparison is often made by therians themselves, a minority of whom are transgender as well as “trans-species”, as they sometimes put it. (Not all transgender people are comfortable with this analogy, fearing that it complicates the public discourse and undermines their movement’s drive for recognition.) The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.”
Trans people don’t like the analogy because it’s on the nose and don’t want their preferred narrative being ‘complicated’ by dissenters. Because you cannot change ‘gender’ (weasel word) or s*x.
And how would Caeser the coyote know how a human thinks?
‘Neurological outliers’? How can this condition be anything other than a psychological disorder? As such, it deserves our sympathy but certainly not our affirmation. They are not ‘animals trapped in human bodies’. They are human beings with real problems
‘Therians are not delusional.’ Really? Unless ‘delusional’ has a technical meaning that I’m not aware of, how can they be anything else?
A trans chipmunk is a chipmunk! You had better get in line.
As with the trannies, the vast majority of them will just be attention-seekers.
Yup. It sounds like a lot of undiagnosed autism. That’s why they felt from an early age as though they were fundamentally different from everyone else around them, and the meaning they made of this sense of difference and alienation was so off. And no, you cannot change your sex just like you can’t change your species.
A trans chipmunk is a chipmunk! You had better get in line.
As with the trannies, the vast majority of them will just be attention-seekers.
Yup. It sounds like a lot of undiagnosed autism. That’s why they felt from an early age as though they were fundamentally different from everyone else around them, and the meaning they made of this sense of difference and alienation was so off. And no, you cannot change your sex just like you can’t change your species.
‘Neurological outliers’? How can this condition be anything other than a psychological disorder? As such, it deserves our sympathy but certainly not our affirmation. They are not ‘animals trapped in human bodies’. They are human beings with real problems
‘Therians are not delusional.’ Really? Unless ‘delusional’ has a technical meaning that I’m not aware of, how can they be anything else?
It seems, therians, like people who believe that they have lived past lives are never something humdrum. You’ll, I bet, never find a therian fruit fly, dung beetle, slug or crab ( NOT of the sea going variety). I, myself, believe that I am a bull elephant, which, trust me, has caused no end of surprises, or issues, as I attempt to mount my chosen mate. Attempts, likewise, to procreate with my ‘actual’ species (elephants) has left them distinctly unimpressed, as if I was hardly there at all. Not all sexual encounters are quite so disappointing though, my friend Catherine (she’s really Great), is also a fellow (is that a misgendering ?) therian, only she believes herself to be a horse, and being a powerful, wealthy, sort of individual has gone to some lengths, as it were, to ensure that she is ‘fully’ fulfilled.
Indeed. Just like all those people with ‘former lives’ in which they were all princesses or mighty warriors, but never downtrodden peasants.
If you were a descendant of slaves in a former life, would that get you a place in line at the reparations tent?
If you were a descendant of slaves in a former life, would that get you a place in line at the reparations tent?
Indeed. Just like all those people with ‘former lives’ in which they were all princesses or mighty warriors, but never downtrodden peasants.
It seems, therians, like people who believe that they have lived past lives are never something humdrum. You’ll, I bet, never find a therian fruit fly, dung beetle, slug or crab ( NOT of the sea going variety). I, myself, believe that I am a bull elephant, which, trust me, has caused no end of surprises, or issues, as I attempt to mount my chosen mate. Attempts, likewise, to procreate with my ‘actual’ species (elephants) has left them distinctly unimpressed, as if I was hardly there at all. Not all sexual encounters are quite so disappointing though, my friend Catherine (she’s really Great), is also a fellow (is that a misgendering ?) therian, only she believes herself to be a horse, and being a powerful, wealthy, sort of individual has gone to some lengths, as it were, to ensure that she is ‘fully’ fulfilled.
Utter madness. We even have a name for them!! Next we will be affirming them and adding their missing tails!! I despair of this world that we are encouraging mental illness. Social media and the therapists and scientists have a lot to answer for.
The very designation “Therian” is older than social media. Humans who believed themselves to be animals or attempted to turn themselves into animals are as old as written history.
True but now it will be come the next “right”, the next fad.
True but now it will be come the next “right”, the next fad.
The very designation “Therian” is older than social media. Humans who believed themselves to be animals or attempted to turn themselves into animals are as old as written history.
Utter madness. We even have a name for them!! Next we will be affirming them and adding their missing tails!! I despair of this world that we are encouraging mental illness. Social media and the therapists and scientists have a lot to answer for.
I’m reminded of the Monty Python sketch about men who thought themselves Mice – dressed like Giant Mice, felt irresistible cravings for cheese and met in secret.
How did this nonsense become a “thing”? that social scientists study? that someone has to take seriously and write about?
I agree with comment questioning whether this is April 1.
Who is funding it? How much did Unherd pay for the article? There is a glut of ‘academics’ desperate for novel research projects.
Unherd is increasingly herd.
Unherd is increasingly herd.
Yes.
Monty Python looks more and more prescient every passing week – eg King Arthur in the Holy Grail,
Dennis the Peasant: Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
Arthur: Be quiet!
Dennis the Peasant: You can’t expect to wield supreme power just ’cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!”
Oh that is just so perfect, my goodness Monty Python went to utterly absurd ‘it could never happen’ lengths, yet here we are fulfilling more and more of their ridiculous plot lines. I wonder if that is how Nostradamus started out.
One of my favourite MP scenes! Thanks for sharing.
Oh that is just so perfect, my goodness Monty Python went to utterly absurd ‘it could never happen’ lengths, yet here we are fulfilling more and more of their ridiculous plot lines. I wonder if that is how Nostradamus started out.
One of my favourite MP scenes! Thanks for sharing.
thanks for reminding me of that Monty P – God that was funny
Imagine the money to be made in the future with animal affirming surgeries? The aardvark affirming surgery would be very expensive, however.
Who is funding it? How much did Unherd pay for the article? There is a glut of ‘academics’ desperate for novel research projects.
Yes.
Monty Python looks more and more prescient every passing week – eg King Arthur in the Holy Grail,
Dennis the Peasant: Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
Arthur: Be quiet!
Dennis the Peasant: You can’t expect to wield supreme power just ’cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!”
thanks for reminding me of that Monty P – God that was funny
Imagine the money to be made in the future with animal affirming surgeries? The aardvark affirming surgery would be very expensive, however.
I’m reminded of the Monty Python sketch about men who thought themselves Mice – dressed like Giant Mice, felt irresistible cravings for cheese and met in secret.
How did this nonsense become a “thing”? that social scientists study? that someone has to take seriously and write about?
I agree with comment questioning whether this is April 1.
” a disproportionate number of them had been diagnosed with autism… though it is not clear how the two conditions could be linked.”
The link is clear, in light of your next sentence –
“They also found that, compared with a control group, many therians struggle with relationships and social skills.”
Struggling with relationships and having poor social skills is practically the definition of autism. I suspect that people who struggle the most have a combination of narcissism (the desire to be the centre of attention) combined the inability to achieve such an outcome, except through extremely unconventional behaviour of some kind.
I agree. People on the autism spectrum have a tendency to get fixed ideas, fixations, monomanias.
Also, even if it isn’t full-on, as in clinical, narcissism, there’s definitely self-aggrandisement at play. Their fantasy selves are all animals that could be considered magnificent in some way – strong, large, powerful, majestic. Even the non-existent ones are always dragons and gryphons etc.
Nobody seems to have an inner gerbil!
Funny.Or a laughing Hyena or a …………
Funny.Or a laughing Hyena or a …………
I agree. People on the autism spectrum have a tendency to get fixed ideas, fixations, monomanias.
Also, even if it isn’t full-on, as in clinical, narcissism, there’s definitely self-aggrandisement at play. Their fantasy selves are all animals that could be considered magnificent in some way – strong, large, powerful, majestic. Even the non-existent ones are always dragons and gryphons etc.
Nobody seems to have an inner gerbil!
” a disproportionate number of them had been diagnosed with autism… though it is not clear how the two conditions could be linked.”
The link is clear, in light of your next sentence –
“They also found that, compared with a control group, many therians struggle with relationships and social skills.”
Struggling with relationships and having poor social skills is practically the definition of autism. I suspect that people who struggle the most have a combination of narcissism (the desire to be the centre of attention) combined the inability to achieve such an outcome, except through extremely unconventional behaviour of some kind.
For both the people who believe that they are bears, and the people who believe that they are the other ‘gender’, the most simple and pragmatic response would be, ‘No you’re not’. Neither are possible, so should not be indulged. ‘Cruel to be kind’ might be unfashionable but sometimes it is necessary.
For both the people who believe that they are bears, and the people who believe that they are the other ‘gender’, the most simple and pragmatic response would be, ‘No you’re not’. Neither are possible, so should not be indulged. ‘Cruel to be kind’ might be unfashionable but sometimes it is necessary.
I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry. What a load of codswallop.
Try both. Laugh like a hyena, cry wolf, and crocodile tears. The experience might give you a clue about your real self. In extremis, if none of these works, give yourself a good wallop, and you might find out you’re really a cod.
Try both. Laugh like a hyena, cry wolf, and crocodile tears. The experience might give you a clue about your real self. In extremis, if none of these works, give yourself a good wallop, and you might find out you’re really a cod.
I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry. What a load of codswallop.
I’m going to disagree with the majority of comments. I welcome this article by Unherd, which provides an insight into a neurological condition with historical precedent, and therefore worthy of study and discussion.
The links with transgenderism are interesting, since there’s nothing inherently wrong with someone feeling they’re a different gender to the body they were born with, providing they’re not trying to impose their wish to lead a different life on other people, thus trampling on their rights. Similarly, why not just live and let live with therians, providing they’re not going around attacking anyone; indeed, most of them seem to be leading otherwise exemplary lives.
Many of the comments are just childish, and rather than asking Unherd to do better, i’d suggest those who comment unintelligently should do better.
Why did you say “neurological condition” instead of “psychological condition” (or better yet “spiritual condition”)? I think this choice of words is highly significant – and tells us much about the civilizational path that has gotten us to this point.
And of course there’s something “inherently wrong” with feeling like you’re in the wrong body (sex- or species-wise). It generates negative outcomes for the individual and those in relationship with him.
.
To feel body parts where none exist is not as biologically improbable as it sounds. Studies of people born with missing arms and legs have shown that limbs that have always been absent can still be represented in the sensory and motor regions of the brain. The psychologist Ronald Melzack, an expert on phantom pain, proposed that the brain continuously generates a pattern of impulses that indicate that the body is intact and “unequivocally one’s own”, even if it isn’t. This pattern, which Melzack called a “neurosignature”, is genetically determined and characteristic of each individual. It is not inconceivable that someone born with an atypical neurosignature might experience a body that is out of kilter with the one they possess. So far, no one has systematically examined the brains of therians to see if their neural patterns reflect what they feel.
Humans have evolved from much more ancient creatures, as you well know. Rather than seeking to dismiss the inherent neurology which evolved alongside physical characteristics, i prefer to maintain a “spirit” of enquiry. We have a coccyx, for example, which is the remnants of when we had tails. Those who feel as if they have tails may be experiencing a leftover neurological effect from the part of the brain where the sensation of having a tail developed.
I found the knee-jerk dismissiveness of something far from fully understood within many of the responses unintelligent, it’s as simple as that.
Or is the coccyx the precursor to our future tails?
There was a time when otherwise well-functioning members of society reported seeing wood nymphs and sprites as they wandered the dark forests of England. It wasn’t advances in neurology that ended that phenomenon, and it won’t be advances in neurology that end this one.
Do you know that for a fact?
Do you know that for a fact?
I agree, Steve.
Or is the coccyx the precursor to our future tails?
There was a time when otherwise well-functioning members of society reported seeing wood nymphs and sprites as they wandered the dark forests of England. It wasn’t advances in neurology that ended that phenomenon, and it won’t be advances in neurology that end this one.
I agree, Steve.
Or her.
.
To feel body parts where none exist is not as biologically improbable as it sounds. Studies of people born with missing arms and legs have shown that limbs that have always been absent can still be represented in the sensory and motor regions of the brain. The psychologist Ronald Melzack, an expert on phantom pain, proposed that the brain continuously generates a pattern of impulses that indicate that the body is intact and “unequivocally one’s own”, even if it isn’t. This pattern, which Melzack called a “neurosignature”, is genetically determined and characteristic of each individual. It is not inconceivable that someone born with an atypical neurosignature might experience a body that is out of kilter with the one they possess. So far, no one has systematically examined the brains of therians to see if their neural patterns reflect what they feel.
Humans have evolved from much more ancient creatures, as you well know. Rather than seeking to dismiss the inherent neurology which evolved alongside physical characteristics, i prefer to maintain a “spirit” of enquiry. We have a coccyx, for example, which is the remnants of when we had tails. Those who feel as if they have tails may be experiencing a leftover neurological effect from the part of the brain where the sensation of having a tail developed.
I found the knee-jerk dismissiveness of something far from fully understood within many of the responses unintelligent, it’s as simple as that.
Or her.
Let me ask you this- Why is the language used by transitioners virtually identical to the language of Post-Modern Gender Philosophers like Judith Butler?
Could it be that exposure to Gnostic-Hermetic Ideologies plants the seed in someone’s mind or do we have to automatically dismiss the notion of learned performativity and simply affirm?
The Gnostic Doctrine outlines that as the result of a cosmic accident, humans are trapped in an evil material world in a body they didn’t want and only those with Gnosis (absolute knowledge) understand this mystery. But the Gnostics are nihilistic with no plan. The Hermetics on the other hand use Alchemy to transform the Is into the Ought. The Marxists and “Applied” Postmodernists all use the Hegelian principles as a form of Praxis to transcend the hopeless material world to bring it toward universal Oneness.
Could this play any role or should we just assume all those “trapped in bodies” have never run into a therapist that studied these doctrines?
Well said – I am disappointed with many of the comments on here, I expect better of Unherd readers. This is clearly a genuine dysphoric condition and, as I understand it, is far far older than the transgender issue. I found the article fascinating – about a group of people I had no knowledge of, outside the kink groups of “furries” and “otherkin”. These people seem remarkably well adjusted, given their dysphoria, especially compared to many trans people who never seem to be happy whether they have transitioned or not. At least therians seem to understand it is impossible to actually become the animal they feel an affinity to, and there was nothing to suggest any of them would want surgery.
I agree, Steve.
Why did you say “neurological condition” instead of “psychological condition” (or better yet “spiritual condition”)? I think this choice of words is highly significant – and tells us much about the civilizational path that has gotten us to this point.
And of course there’s something “inherently wrong” with feeling like you’re in the wrong body (sex- or species-wise). It generates negative outcomes for the individual and those in relationship with him.
Let me ask you this- Why is the language used by transitioners virtually identical to the language of Post-Modern Gender Philosophers like Judith Butler?
Could it be that exposure to Gnostic-Hermetic Ideologies plants the seed in someone’s mind or do we have to automatically dismiss the notion of learned performativity and simply affirm?
The Gnostic Doctrine outlines that as the result of a cosmic accident, humans are trapped in an evil material world in a body they didn’t want and only those with Gnosis (absolute knowledge) understand this mystery. But the Gnostics are nihilistic with no plan. The Hermetics on the other hand use Alchemy to transform the Is into the Ought. The Marxists and “Applied” Postmodernists all use the Hegelian principles as a form of Praxis to transcend the hopeless material world to bring it toward universal Oneness.
Could this play any role or should we just assume all those “trapped in bodies” have never run into a therapist that studied these doctrines?
Well said – I am disappointed with many of the comments on here, I expect better of Unherd readers. This is clearly a genuine dysphoric condition and, as I understand it, is far far older than the transgender issue. I found the article fascinating – about a group of people I had no knowledge of, outside the kink groups of “furries” and “otherkin”. These people seem remarkably well adjusted, given their dysphoria, especially compared to many trans people who never seem to be happy whether they have transitioned or not. At least therians seem to understand it is impossible to actually become the animal they feel an affinity to, and there was nothing to suggest any of them would want surgery.
I agree, Steve.
I’m going to disagree with the majority of comments. I welcome this article by Unherd, which provides an insight into a neurological condition with historical precedent, and therefore worthy of study and discussion.
The links with transgenderism are interesting, since there’s nothing inherently wrong with someone feeling they’re a different gender to the body they were born with, providing they’re not trying to impose their wish to lead a different life on other people, thus trampling on their rights. Similarly, why not just live and let live with therians, providing they’re not going around attacking anyone; indeed, most of them seem to be leading otherwise exemplary lives.
Many of the comments are just childish, and rather than asking Unherd to do better, i’d suggest those who comment unintelligently should do better.
Is it April 1st?
What else? The piece has to be a sendup. Maybe the editors missed the deadline and decided to drop it in anyway. Kudos to the Herd for some brilliant riffs!
What else? The piece has to be a sendup. Maybe the editors missed the deadline and decided to drop it in anyway. Kudos to the Herd for some brilliant riffs!
Is it April 1st?
This piece is frankly desperate. Also: ‘The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.’ Not a true opposition. The trans extremists do not claim to be changing gender, but changing sex. Which is no more possible than changing species.
More fundamentally, why is this piece of tenth-rate pseudo-psychology (‘therians are not delusional’) on UnHerd? I expect quality thinking on here, not jargon, fad and shallowness.
But here we are having read the article and commented on it. These stories are certainly seductive and compelling like a train wreck. A must read, and Unherd knows what sells.
But here we are having read the article and commented on it. These stories are certainly seductive and compelling like a train wreck. A must read, and Unherd knows what sells.
This piece is frankly desperate. Also: ‘The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.’ Not a true opposition. The trans extremists do not claim to be changing gender, but changing sex. Which is no more possible than changing species.
More fundamentally, why is this piece of tenth-rate pseudo-psychology (‘therians are not delusional’) on UnHerd? I expect quality thinking on here, not jargon, fad and shallowness.
This extremely idiotic trend for using “they” to refer to a single person – person, deluded or not – makes my teeth itch. He, she, or the person’s name. That’s it.
As for the substance of the article, people are free to believe anything they wish about themselves. The rest of us need not be involved.
To my mind, it smacks of the Royal ‘we’. I am more than one. We are not amused.
We’re involved if we lose our job over getting a pronoun wrong.
… which actually means getting a pronoun right.
… which actually means getting a pronoun right.
But you are involved because you read all about it and commented.
To my mind, it smacks of the Royal ‘we’. I am more than one. We are not amused.
We’re involved if we lose our job over getting a pronoun wrong.
But you are involved because you read all about it and commented.
This extremely idiotic trend for using “they” to refer to a single person – person, deluded or not – makes my teeth itch. He, she, or the person’s name. That’s it.
As for the substance of the article, people are free to believe anything they wish about themselves. The rest of us need not be involved.
I am not surprised that one study classed therians as having some form of autism. People with some degree of autism also exhibit feelings of being “different”, social awkwardness and so on. Neurological sciences are busy trying to keep up with each other, and haven’t yet agreed on what to call autism. Recognition is still a long way off, and general understanding even further away. Throw both into the melting pot along with gender and “identity” (etc) and we’re talking about a whole different type of medical science, as significant as the difference between ‘normal’ physics and quantum physics.
One day it will be routine to diagnose an autistic, transgender therian (using quite different wording!), but only when “post-modern science” has stopped fighting for little bits of fame and glory, and resumed the calmer behaviour of the Enlightenment.
I am not surprised that one study classed therians as having some form of autism. People with some degree of autism also exhibit feelings of being “different”, social awkwardness and so on. Neurological sciences are busy trying to keep up with each other, and haven’t yet agreed on what to call autism. Recognition is still a long way off, and general understanding even further away. Throw both into the melting pot along with gender and “identity” (etc) and we’re talking about a whole different type of medical science, as significant as the difference between ‘normal’ physics and quantum physics.
One day it will be routine to diagnose an autistic, transgender therian (using quite different wording!), but only when “post-modern science” has stopped fighting for little bits of fame and glory, and resumed the calmer behaviour of the Enlightenment.
I found this really interesting and a little moving in places. Yes, I’ll be mocked by some commentators but … They are not demanding we affirm their beliefs and some aspects, the phantom tail/wing/whatever are not dissimilar to recognised neurological issues that amputees, for example, deal with. Mostly, these are people who are aware of their oddness and just looking for others like them. Yes, I’m amazed that this is a thing but when compared to transgenderism at least they all understand that whatever they feel/believe they are, as one “coyote” put it, really weird.
I’m not surprised that the trans community don’t want to be aligned with them, not least because they, therians, are accepting of their beliefs, not demanding we accept them and not hating on others for getting their species wrong.
Well said – I think I have found maybe three comments on here, excluding my own, that are not either nasty, childish or just plain silly.
Exactly.
Exactly.
Well said – I think I have found maybe three comments on here, excluding my own, that are not either nasty, childish or just plain silly.
I found this really interesting and a little moving in places. Yes, I’ll be mocked by some commentators but … They are not demanding we affirm their beliefs and some aspects, the phantom tail/wing/whatever are not dissimilar to recognised neurological issues that amputees, for example, deal with. Mostly, these are people who are aware of their oddness and just looking for others like them. Yes, I’m amazed that this is a thing but when compared to transgenderism at least they all understand that whatever they feel/believe they are, as one “coyote” put it, really weird.
I’m not surprised that the trans community don’t want to be aligned with them, not least because they, therians, are accepting of their beliefs, not demanding we accept them and not hating on others for getting their species wrong.
“The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.”
Well you can change your gender, yes, because gender is a made-up thing. You can’t change your sex, though, any more than you can change your species.
I’m really starting to be embarrassed by my diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder… this sort of nonsense has taken a fast hold in the ‘autism community’ (which is a nonsense in itself, actually, that a pack of terminally online ‘activists’ can claim to speak for a diverse section of the population).
“The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.”
Well you can change your gender, yes, because gender is a made-up thing. You can’t change your sex, though, any more than you can change your species.
I’m really starting to be embarrassed by my diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder… this sort of nonsense has taken a fast hold in the ‘autism community’ (which is a nonsense in itself, actually, that a pack of terminally online ‘activists’ can claim to speak for a diverse section of the population).
It’s crazy, but no more so than legions of grown men crying with joy because a group of 11 millionaires managed to push a pig-skin ball into a net. etc etc etc
Quite true. Or dressing up as an animal on Sunday, paying $500 to get in and spending $12 on a pint of lite beer to watch 11 over sized men chase after an oval pig skin in freezing weather.
Yes it is. Considerably more crazy.
Quite true. Or dressing up as an animal on Sunday, paying $500 to get in and spending $12 on a pint of lite beer to watch 11 over sized men chase after an oval pig skin in freezing weather.
Yes it is. Considerably more crazy.
It’s crazy, but no more so than legions of grown men crying with joy because a group of 11 millionaires managed to push a pig-skin ball into a net. etc etc etc
Interesting comments, a lot very quick to sharply and somewhat unkindly judge. If therians want to go quietly about their business feeling not quite human, that’s fine by me. We are a diverse species and long may it remain so. Until some AI nutters change us into robots or we die out, we remain Homo sapiens, an animal – one that is very good at absorbing the feelings of other beings.
Interesting comments, a lot very quick to sharply and somewhat unkindly judge. If therians want to go quietly about their business feeling not quite human, that’s fine by me. We are a diverse species and long may it remain so. Until some AI nutters change us into robots or we die out, we remain Homo sapiens, an animal – one that is very good at absorbing the feelings of other beings.
This is meant as parody, right?
Nowadays it can sometimes be hard to be sure
This is meant as parody, right?
Nowadays it can sometimes be hard to be sure
“a disproportionate number of them had been diagnosed with autism (7.69%, compared with 1.5% in the general US population)”.
I would suggest that this is a massive underestimate. As with trans identifying individuals, the underlying sentiment is often a sense of ‘otherness’. The feeling of being ‘different’ can be interpreted according to whatever (ironically) is socially/culturally sanctioned at the time.
Hopefully the medical establishment will show less enthusiasm for transforming people into animals than they did for transitioning children with ASDs from one sex to the other.
“a disproportionate number of them had been diagnosed with autism (7.69%, compared with 1.5% in the general US population)”.
I would suggest that this is a massive underestimate. As with trans identifying individuals, the underlying sentiment is often a sense of ‘otherness’. The feeling of being ‘different’ can be interpreted according to whatever (ironically) is socially/culturally sanctioned at the time.
Hopefully the medical establishment will show less enthusiasm for transforming people into animals than they did for transitioning children with ASDs from one sex to the other.
Sounds like the conflation of disassociation and delusion.
Sounds like the conflation of disassociation and delusion.
The guy who thinks he is a bear – anyone want to guess where he goes to do a number 2?
The Vatican.
The Vatican.
The guy who thinks he is a bear – anyone want to guess where he goes to do a number 2?
This was a really interesting article – I had never heard of therians, although I have heard of otherkin and furries, both of which I believe to be some kind of kink rather than actual dysphoria. I am not sure why some of you are so doubtful about these people – they clearly differentiate from many trans people in that they acknowledge that they are not really animals and can never become an animal, regardless of the fact that they display more animal traits than the average human. We are, after all, descended from animals so why should this kind of dysphoria be so hard to believe? I am glad they have a supportive community around them – it must be incredibly difficult to feel that you are in the wrong body, my main issue with a lot of trans people is my lack of belief that they really do think they are in the wrong body, as opposed to it being autogynephilia or some similar sexual kink. All humans still display at least some animal traits leading back to our more primitive ancestors – we would never have survived as a species if we did not have these traits.
This was a really interesting article – I had never heard of therians, although I have heard of otherkin and furries, both of which I believe to be some kind of kink rather than actual dysphoria. I am not sure why some of you are so doubtful about these people – they clearly differentiate from many trans people in that they acknowledge that they are not really animals and can never become an animal, regardless of the fact that they display more animal traits than the average human. We are, after all, descended from animals so why should this kind of dysphoria be so hard to believe? I am glad they have a supportive community around them – it must be incredibly difficult to feel that you are in the wrong body, my main issue with a lot of trans people is my lack of belief that they really do think they are in the wrong body, as opposed to it being autogynephilia or some similar sexual kink. All humans still display at least some animal traits leading back to our more primitive ancestors – we would never have survived as a species if we did not have these traits.
“…except furries daddy, they are just weird”.
“Yeah they give everyone the creeps, all my friends think they are scary and unsettling”.
From the mouths of my children.
Have you come across many “furry daddies”? I’ve never even seen one.
Have you come across many “furry daddies”? I’ve never even seen one.
“…except furries daddy, they are just weird”.
“Yeah they give everyone the creeps, all my friends think they are scary and unsettling”.
From the mouths of my children.
Why several comments disappeared? Particularly ones questioning that this really is a thing.
Why several comments disappeared? Particularly ones questioning that this really is a thing.
Slicing off private parts is so last week. “No Medicaid funding for tail grafts, no peace!”
Slicing off private parts is so last week. “No Medicaid funding for tail grafts, no peace!”
I’m curious to know if when the Therians identify as an animal if it’s the same sex animal as they are a human.
I’m curious to know if when the Therians identify as an animal if it’s the same sex animal as they are a human.
Poor Gregor Samsa, he just *thought* he was a roach
Poor Gregor Samsa, he just *thought* he was a roach
Are bears aware that they are bears? Do coyotes think about being coyotes? I’ve encountered quite a few of both, and most of them are primarily concerned with rummaging through your trash and stealing your chickens.
They aren’t delusional and should be taken seriously? In that case, BearX has obviously been habituated to humans and therefore it’s the responsibility of the Department of Wildlife to relocate or euthanize him. And shame on his wife for letting a dangerous animal into the house with children present.
Shooting coyotes (the vicious little pests) is legal in most U.S. states year round. Azi the Mexican wolf should avoid the Northern Rockies, as they just opened up wolf hunting.
I kid, of course. These people have never encountered a wild animal in their lives. It doesn’t seem to occur to them that there are very specific behaviors attributed to each of these animals. Bears don’t get engineering degrees; they forage, reproduce, and die. Has this guy even tried to sustain himself on a diet of raw elk, moths, and berries? Or does he dig through the trash while his wife screams at him and tries to bear spray him?
It’s notable that they want to be accepted by the wider world, i.e. people, and not the animals they claim to be. Don’t try to convince me you are a bear. Go convince the mama grizzly with two cubs. Good luck with that.
Are bears aware that they are bears? Do coyotes think about being coyotes? I’ve encountered quite a few of both, and most of them are primarily concerned with rummaging through your trash and stealing your chickens.
They aren’t delusional and should be taken seriously? In that case, BearX has obviously been habituated to humans and therefore it’s the responsibility of the Department of Wildlife to relocate or euthanize him. And shame on his wife for letting a dangerous animal into the house with children present.
Shooting coyotes (the vicious little pests) is legal in most U.S. states year round. Azi the Mexican wolf should avoid the Northern Rockies, as they just opened up wolf hunting.
I kid, of course. These people have never encountered a wild animal in their lives. It doesn’t seem to occur to them that there are very specific behaviors attributed to each of these animals. Bears don’t get engineering degrees; they forage, reproduce, and die. Has this guy even tried to sustain himself on a diet of raw elk, moths, and berries? Or does he dig through the trash while his wife screams at him and tries to bear spray him?
It’s notable that they want to be accepted by the wider world, i.e. people, and not the animals they claim to be. Don’t try to convince me you are a bear. Go convince the mama grizzly with two cubs. Good luck with that.
“The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.”
Ah…no you can’t – on both counts. Both are complex mental health conditions, delusions if you will. Saying you are the opposite sex or a cat, doesn’t make it so. If you lop off your breasts or sew on a tail, neither will alter the underlying mental health conditions or make you happy. No thought, word or action will change your gender or make you an animal.
“The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.”
Ah…no you can’t – on both counts. Both are complex mental health conditions, delusions if you will. Saying you are the opposite sex or a cat, doesn’t make it so. If you lop off your breasts or sew on a tail, neither will alter the underlying mental health conditions or make you happy. No thought, word or action will change your gender or make you an animal.
If these peopleclaimed to be Napoleon or Julius Caesar, we would simply dismiss them as deluded fantasist.
How does he react to being in the woods? Is he a Catholic?
What a crock of shite! But at least it made me laugh:
“In her book Unthinkable, Helen Thomson describes meeting a lycanthrope who periodically believes he has turned into a tiger; her interview with him was cut short when he suddenly started growling and threatening to attack her, a relapse his doctors blamed on his failure to take his anti-psychotic medication”
Has there been a change in the editorial cadre at Unherd?
so i live in south africa on a very small income. i had to choose between the Spectator and unherd for subscriptions, can only afford one. i chose, to my everlasting chagrin Unherd, too many silly stories, few really well known writers, f**k.
It feels like a version of those medieval dancing crazes in which thousands bopped themselves to death
It feels like a version of those medieval dancing crazes in which thousands bopped themselves to death
Enough of this please. Mental illness need not be further glorified.
Enough of this please. Mental illness need not be further glorified.
On the plus side for a therian is that the waiting time to see a vet is much shorter than for a GP. Woof woof. The downside is that you need a tree to give your urine sample.
On the plus side for a therian is that the waiting time to see a vet is much shorter than for a GP. Woof woof. The downside is that you need a tree to give your urine sample.
“The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.” IS it obvious, though? How is it any different? Given enough mutilative surgery and drugs, isn’t the fiction of being “trans-species” no more difficult to maintain than “trans-sex”?
“The obvious difference is that while you can change your gender, you cannot do anything about your species.” IS it obvious, though? How is it any different? Given enough mutilative surgery and drugs, isn’t the fiction of being “trans-species” no more difficult to maintain than “trans-sex”?
This article has got to be a spoof… right?
This article has got to be a spoof… right?
Puts ‘trans’ in perspective. If ‘wolf man’ had never seen or heard of a wolf, what would he be? Conversely, if the shrinks crack it, could they make me believe I’m Einstein, at least during working hours, so I could solve the quantum gravity problem? Another thought. Most of the vertebrate animals are now domesticated. All the ones where I live are dogs, though not all recognisable as such. Are there any therians who believe themselves to be a pig with no tail and sticking-up ears, or one of those white dusting wands with stubby legs?
Puts ‘trans’ in perspective. If ‘wolf man’ had never seen or heard of a wolf, what would he be? Conversely, if the shrinks crack it, could they make me believe I’m Einstein, at least during working hours, so I could solve the quantum gravity problem? Another thought. Most of the vertebrate animals are now domesticated. All the ones where I live are dogs, though not all recognisable as such. Are there any therians who believe themselves to be a pig with no tail and sticking-up ears, or one of those white dusting wands with stubby legs?
This is quite obviously the Dialectic of Inclusion. It’s a set of Abstract Mind over Matter principles Reified into Objective Reality. A simulation of Reality is performed and the performance creates “reality” or Hyperreality when Society affirms it.
Social Scientists may feel this will create a more integrated, empathetic population. It will not. It will create a complete inability to accomplish objectives because people aren’t living in the same realities.
At some point in order to live in a “Sustainable Economy” there would have to be an Authoritarian clamp down to assure economies could function in an environment where nothing makes sense. A new set of Universal Values would be imposed from Above (Principle of Correspondence) by an Expert Class that would shepherd the masses. We’ve seen this before many times throughout history.
Ahahahaha, your first paragraph took me right back to grad school in the ‘80s! Wonderful satire of the post-structuralist bullsh*t that passed for high intellectualism back then (and apparently still does).
Correct me if I’m wrong but the original Postmodern/Post-structuralists were just analyzing society. They weren’t Marxist Change Agents trying to redirect the course of history. They were basically Nihilists, right?
Correct me if I’m wrong but the original Postmodern/Post-structuralists were just analyzing society. They weren’t Marxist Change Agents trying to redirect the course of history. They were basically Nihilists, right?
Ahahahaha, your first paragraph took me right back to grad school in the ‘80s! Wonderful satire of the post-structuralist bullsh*t that passed for high intellectualism back then (and apparently still does).
This is quite obviously the Dialectic of Inclusion. It’s a set of Abstract Mind over Matter principles Reified into Objective Reality. A simulation of Reality is performed and the performance creates “reality” or Hyperreality when Society affirms it.
Social Scientists may feel this will create a more integrated, empathetic population. It will not. It will create a complete inability to accomplish objectives because people aren’t living in the same realities.
At some point in order to live in a “Sustainable Economy” there would have to be an Authoritarian clamp down to assure economies could function in an environment where nothing makes sense. A new set of Universal Values would be imposed from Above (Principle of Correspondence) by an Expert Class that would shepherd the masses. We’ve seen this before many times throughout history.
I know this girl who shags everything that moves.. people think she is a dog….
and another who likes younger men… she thinks she is a Cougar…
I know quite a few right cows…
deleted
deleted
I know quite a few right cows…
She probably identifies as a bicycle.
That’s better. I think Nicky’s gags weren’t quite nailing it.
That’s better. I think Nicky’s gags weren’t quite nailing it.
and another who likes younger men… she thinks she is a Cougar…
She probably identifies as a bicycle.
I know this girl who shags everything that moves.. people think she is a dog….