As the Pink Panther theme tune stretches the limits of the loudspeakers, four prison inmates wearing bulletproof vests and baseball catchers’ masks make their way into the muddy rodeo arena. Carrying a red wooden table and plastic folded chairs, they’re setting up for a game of “Convict Poker”, described in last weekend’s Angola Prison Rodeo programme as “definitely not for the faint of heart”. An angry, 1,500-pound bull is about to be released into the arena, and three professional rodeo clowns are on hand to cajole him towards the poker table. “In this wild card game, a full ton of muscled madness calls all bluffs!” the programme cheerily states. The winner of Convict Poker and its $100 cash prize is the contestant who keeps his hands on the table for the longest.
Around me, an audience of 10,000 eager fans is going wild. It’s uncertain whether they’re behind the inmates or the bull. “This is suicide right here,” says a man seated behind me as the gate swings open and the beast begins his charge. “These boys are soldiers,” his friend replies. In one swift move of the head, the bull both overturns the table — which comes apart spectacularly — and sends a chair with contestant 11 up into the air. Upon his return to earth, he’s trampled by the animal, and badly hurt. Inmates, who have 59 years’ worth of prison rodeo folklore to draw on, know how to protect themselves: they bury their faces into the mud and put their arms round the back of their heads, while the clowns distract the raging bull.
But number 11 can’t muster any resistance; he is limp, arms splayed. Concerned clowns form a small human shield around him. The trouble is, the red rags hanging out of their back pockets are there to attract the bull their way. The beast begins charging towards the stricken prisoner and his comical guard. The arena goes quiet.
Louisiana State Penitentiary, better known as Angola Prison, lies some 130 miles northwest of New Orleans; the country road leading there is littered with roadkill and Baptist churches. Either side are the relics of antebellum Angola Plantations — worked by slaves born in the African nation — to which the prison’s name nods. Sometimes referred to the “Alcatraz of the South”, locals simply call it “The Farm”.
Those locals include 3,900 inmates, but also 1,800 staff members — many of whom live with their families in what is effectively a gated community on the prison grounds, called the B-Line. Jobs at the prison, which start at $14.55 per hour, come with around $100 a month in “location pay”. (They are usually passed down the generations.) This small, company town in the middle of the sprawling 7,000-hectare penitentiary site, has its own parks, swimming pool, tennis court and fishing lake. It also boasts a nine-hole Prison View Golf Course: any member of the law-abiding public can, for a fee, play a round in the largest maximum-security facility in the United States.
But nothing draws in the crowds quite like the Rodeo. Six are held each year, in April and October; between them, they attract more than 70,000 spectators. Around 1,000 prisoners participate, though only a few dozen are actually competing in the arena. The rest mingle freely with the crowds in the fairground, selling impressive artisan goods, from leather handbags to handmade wooden porch swings. Angola is known to be a fun family day out, with children’s rides and petting zoos. The Dale Carnegie organisation sells slushies. You almost forget you’re surrounded by people serving life sentences. But when I asked why a small number of prisoners were selling their handicrafts from behind a wire fence, one old hand explained: “They’re the ones not allowed anywhere near women and children.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeWhat exactly does she want “the authorities” to do to prevent a new generation of prisoners from ending up in Angola? Should they stop prosecuting violent crimes? Why does every Unherd contributor who has written for The Guardian come off sounding soft-headed?
This article struck me as having a strong agenda and bias. For example, the author wrote, “a steady stream of disadvantaged young men, caught up in senseless gang violence, will ensure that Angola’s declining stock is replenished.” Is the author suggesting that the Angola inmates had no agency in their crimes? What about their peers who grew up in similarly disadvantaged surroundings but didn’t join gangs or commit crime?
The holier than thou brigade who believe their judgements on society simultaneously make them morally superior to hoi polloi and exonerate them.
No need for THE, Aphrodite, surely you recall that hoi means the?
thank you for the correction Charles. I have corrected it though I think hoi polloi is used as a compound noun in English.
Perhaps John Solomon (of this Parish) might adjudicate?
There is also كحول al-Kuhl, which is also problematical.
Parish in the middle of a sentence should be lower case, Charles
Thank you.
Thank you.
Parish in the middle of a sentence should be lower case, Charles
Perhaps John Solomon (of this Parish) might adjudicate?
There is also كحول al-Kuhl, which is also problematical.
thank you for the correction Charles. I have corrected it though I think hoi polloi is used as a compound noun in English.
No need for THE, Aphrodite, surely you recall that hoi means the?
This article struck me as having a strong agenda and bias. For example, the author wrote, “a steady stream of disadvantaged young men, caught up in senseless gang violence, will ensure that Angola’s declining stock is replenished.” Is the author suggesting that the Angola inmates had no agency in their crimes? What about their peers who grew up in similarly disadvantaged surroundings but didn’t join gangs or commit crime?
The holier than thou brigade who believe their judgements on society simultaneously make them morally superior to hoi polloi and exonerate them.
What exactly does she want “the authorities” to do to prevent a new generation of prisoners from ending up in Angola? Should they stop prosecuting violent crimes? Why does every Unherd contributor who has written for The Guardian come off sounding soft-headed?
Littered with churches? Quite the tell there, lady.
Follow the link in her bio blurb: “She is the author of ‘Beyond Belief: How Pentecostal Christianity Is Taking Over the World’.”
She’s an anti-religious bigot and a conspiracy theorist.
Follow the link in her bio blurb: “She is the author of ‘Beyond Belief: How Pentecostal Christianity Is Taking Over the World’.”
She’s an anti-religious bigot and a conspiracy theorist.
Littered with churches? Quite the tell there, lady.
Some “argue that the Rodeo is exploitative, a Roman spectacle in which inmates must perform for the enjoyment of the public.”
“Must”?
No. They are not forced.
“Gladiators for profit”?
A better journalist would note whether this prison is under public or private management.
Is prison rodeo immoral? It’s really hard to tell, with such poor reporting.
Some “argue that the Rodeo is exploitative, a Roman spectacle in which inmates must perform for the enjoyment of the public.”
“Must”?
No. They are not forced.
“Gladiators for profit”?
A better journalist would note whether this prison is under public or private management.
Is prison rodeo immoral? It’s really hard to tell, with such poor reporting.
Interesting story. Prison rodeo seems like a weird thing, but there’s lots of weird things out there.
Interesting story. Prison rodeo seems like a weird thing, but there’s lots of weird things out there.
The Spanish phrase “se quebro” literally means “it broke itself”. It’s the ultimate passive voice: the bad thing happened entirely on its own with no human cause at all.
American parents hear something similar from young children: “the vase just broke”. Good parents know that this is an attempt to mask blame. And the children of those parents soon learn that this technique of refusing to accept responsibility often results in a sore backside. The vase did not break itself; you broke it.
I can only conclude that progressives were never taught this (via sore backsides or any other way), since their writing often uses the same passive voice to deny the agency and responsibility of particular groups of their fellow human beings.
“a steady stream of disadvantaged young men, caught up in senseless gang violence”
More accurately: “a steady stream of young and violent gang members”
Gang violence didn’t “happen to them” — they were the perpetrators of it. That was likely after being the victims of it, but it doesn’t change that they committed violence, probably repeatedly to land a long sentence in a maximum security pen.
The gang shooting didn’t happen by itself; a person shot a gun and hurt other people. The drugs didn’t sell themselves; a person sold them. The people who did those things had the same agency that every person has, and bear responsibility for their actions.
Are there circumstances that limit people’s options? Yes! And I am completely on board with solutions to those problems. Considering that 80% of all urban, black children are born to single mothers, I might suggest altering divorce and child support laws to make it VERY hard for fathers to abandon their families. I’m also on board with alterations in sentencing and alternative paths particularly for younger offenders. If we can rehabilitate a 20 year old to make him even a moderately productive member of society, that’s a win, for everyone, most especially him.
But denying the responsibility and agency that all people have as human beings is not the answer. “Se quebro” is fine for vases, not for human lives.
The Spanish phrase “se quebro” literally means “it broke itself”. It’s the ultimate passive voice: the bad thing happened entirely on its own with no human cause at all.
American parents hear something similar from young children: “the vase just broke”. Good parents know that this is an attempt to mask blame. And the children of those parents soon learn that this technique of refusing to accept responsibility often results in a sore backside. The vase did not break itself; you broke it.
I can only conclude that progressives were never taught this (via sore backsides or any other way), since their writing often uses the same passive voice to deny the agency and responsibility of particular groups of their fellow human beings.
“a steady stream of disadvantaged young men, caught up in senseless gang violence”
More accurately: “a steady stream of young and violent gang members”
Gang violence didn’t “happen to them” — they were the perpetrators of it. That was likely after being the victims of it, but it doesn’t change that they committed violence, probably repeatedly to land a long sentence in a maximum security pen.
The gang shooting didn’t happen by itself; a person shot a gun and hurt other people. The drugs didn’t sell themselves; a person sold them. The people who did those things had the same agency that every person has, and bear responsibility for their actions.
Are there circumstances that limit people’s options? Yes! And I am completely on board with solutions to those problems. Considering that 80% of all urban, black children are born to single mothers, I might suggest altering divorce and child support laws to make it VERY hard for fathers to abandon their families. I’m also on board with alterations in sentencing and alternative paths particularly for younger offenders. If we can rehabilitate a 20 year old to make him even a moderately productive member of society, that’s a win, for everyone, most especially him.
But denying the responsibility and agency that all people have as human beings is not the answer. “Se quebro” is fine for vases, not for human lives.