In the nearby bazaar, I meet Fares Khalaf, a former sergeant in the fire department of the army and now a wheat farmer dressed in the traditional thawb. The market is a sensory assault: old electric fans recycle hot air; cuts of meat hang from hooks; sparks fly from welding tools. Rows of fake Prada and Hermes bags are lined up next to sacks of vegetables and nuts and fruit. “Life under Daesh [Isis] flipped upside down,” he tells me. “Before, we used to farm our barley and sell it to the government; under Isis there was no government — so we had to come to the bazaar to sell it. Wages for workers fell from 25,000 Dinars to 3,000. Many people tried to flee. But I stayed, where would I go? My family and my farm are here. And besides, you need money to flee.”
By this point, Isis’s violence had spread well beyond the city walls. “They killed nine from my village, one of whom was my son,” he says without changing his tone. “It was in 2014. My son and eight other men were driving in their cars and Isis shot them. They did an investigation afterwards and came to my house to say that they had killed him by accident and that they were sorry. I said: ‘What does your sorry get me? Does it get my son back?’”
It was this sort of barbaric behaviour that forced the Iraqi state to finally step in — even if it needed a lot of help to finish the job. On 13 June 2014, just days after Isis took Mosul, Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani, Iraq’s most senior Shia cleric, issued a call to all Iraqis to take up arms against the terror group. For the Shia it had the force of a Fatwa. Two days later, Al Maliki announced the formation of the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF), a group of (predominantly Shia) militias who would band together to fight Isis, and in so doing radically change the Iraqi state.
Only Sistani had the moral authority to unite these rival groups. Few noted the irony of him bringing them together in a de facto alliance with Tehran. The Iranians had been arming and funding Shia groups in Iraq since the fall of Saddam — the PMF was their chance to scale up this influence. Meanwhile, someone with sufficient military skills was needed to run them effectively, and with the charisma and political nous to keep them united. There was perhaps only one man in the entire Middle East who could do that: the commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) Quds Force, Qasem Soleimani.
Not just an accomplished military commander, Soleimani was a master of a particularly Iranian art: political warfare. For years he had overseen the killings of US soldiers and subverted US policy in Iraq wherever he could. Now he dreamed of turning the PMF into a centralised force like the IRGC.
Soleimani soon made his presence felt. He was, by all accounts, “fearless” — famous for never wearing a flak jacket, even on the front lines. His fame spread. In December 2014, Newsweek put Soleimani on the cover, while the accompanying article claimed that the Shia militias were the only chance the world had of defeating Isis.
In truth, the militias were just one part of a combined effort that involved the Iraqi army, Kurdish Peshmerga and, flying overhead providing air cover in what was an inescapable irony for all concerned, the US-led coalition. For the next two years, this alliance drove Isis out of cities across Iraq. By the end of 2016, it controlled just 7% of Iraqi territory. Its final stronghold was Mosul and both the Iraqi security forces and the coalition were determined that the PMF — whose militias were often brutal to the Sunni inhabitants of the towns they liberated — would be kept out of the fight.
Rebin Rozhbayani, was then an officer in the 3rd battalion, 1st brigade of the Kurdish Peshmerga, was part of the first push to retake Mosul on 16 October 2016. The battalion’s job was to pierce the Isis lines that surrounded the city, open the gates, and allow the Iraqi army to enter the city.
The fight was tough. On the first day, as they reached the village of Fazilia near Mosul, a suicide bomber drove into their convoy, destroying two Humvees and killing three of his comrades. Canadian air support then announced they were pulling out to another sector where other forces were taking heavy casualties.
“We continued,” he tells me. “But then a second car hit our PAK unit. We lost two more Peshmerga. Once the Canadians had gone, we had to stop and put our American armoured vehicles into a 360-degree defensive circle. We spent the night like that, though no one slept as we were surrounded by Isis not knowing when they would attack. We were two brigades, 200 Peshmergas, facing about 200 of them.”
The second day was perhaps worse: “We killed about 20 Isis fighters who emerged from tunnels they had dug around the city to attack us with RPGs and SPG-9s. Getting captured was always a big fear. In the beginning, they wanted to capture rather than kill us. I used to listen to their radio and they always said: ‘Take them as prisoners, it’s so much more effective.’ A lot of their power came from their beheading videos. That’s partly how they captured Mosul so quickly. Their videos were so violent that the Iraqis forces became scared to fight them.”
After losing 31 Peshmerga, the brigade managed to enter the village of Bashiqa, where the fight was easier since Isis were withdrawing to Mosul for their final stand. It was the beginning of the end.
Rozhbayani accepts that Iran played a role in fighting Isis but, he stresses, it always had its own agenda — it didn’t matter what was good for Iraq. “The plan was to push Isis out of Iraq and back into Syria. But [Syrian leader] Bashar al-Assad is Iran’s client and the Iranians didn’t want them there, so they pushed them toward Kurdistan instead. And then at the end of it all, the PMF got 40 seats in the Iraqi parliament,” he concludes with a slight laugh. Once more, Soleimani’s political skills played a role. After Isis’s defeat, the Iranian-backed militias proclaimed themselves the country’s saviours, organising victory parades and celebrations.
Even today, in parts of the city, images of Soleimani and Abu Mahdi Muhandis, the former deputy leader of the PMF, both killed in a US drone strike in 2020, are pinned to almost every lamppost. The checkpoint to the city is supposed to be manned by local police, but the guards are Shia militias dressed up in their uniforms. “Look at their beards,” Mohammed told me as we passed through. “No Iraqi policeman or soldier is allowed to have a beard like that.” They collect a tax of 10,000 dinars from every truck that comes through.
We later pass the Great Mosque of al-Nuri, its dome reduced to a torn and gaping turquoise shell swaddled in brown scaffolding. When Mosul was about to fall, Isis had a choice: either retreat from the site where the Caliphate had been announced or blow it up. It chose the latter.
Will Mosul recover? I ask Mohammed. “Life is back,” he replies. “Corruption is back. In fact, everything is worse — because so many people lost loved ones. There is a huge ditch in Khalsa in southwest Mosul, which contains the bodies of more than 14,000 civilians and police killed by Isis. And all this for what? WMDs? Oh please. The only WMD Iraq ever had was stupidity.”
A question repeatedly occurs to me as I travel through Iraq. If forced to choose, is it better to have freedom or stability? Twenty years after the 2003 invasion, it’s clear the people of Mosul have neither.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeSo, will someone arrest Tony Blair now, please. He will get off because he has money. But we need to go through the motions.
60% of Americans, plus former President George Bush Jnr believe that Saddam Insane and Iraq DID* 9/11.
So “they had it coming”, as they say over there.
(* whatever that may mean.)
Sounds like complete nonsense. But please do provide your source.
My apologies it should be BELIEVED, not believe.
Source: Countless US Media organs just prior to the dastardly deed.
Totally false. The reason given for invading Iraq was WMD. (Which, FWIW, was backed up by many intelligence agencies, including yours.)
I distinctly heard JB Jnr mutter something about Saddam and 9/11, as must millions of others!
However I agree that ultimately they, to their eternal shame, decided on the BIG LIE……….the totally fictitious WMD!
Much to my amazement they didn’t find any!
Why didn’t they PLANT them? How thoroughly bovine of them!
As to our (UK) intelligence agencies, utterly worthless lickspittle, and have been for eons.
Mostly Communists or Sodomites or both, and very few James Bonds among them, more’s the pity.
More tea?
Well that’s only true because the Intel agencies counted chemical weapons as WMD. (even though chem weapons have been around since WWI.)
I distinctly heard JB Jnr mutter something about Saddam and 9/11, as must millions of others!
However I agree that ultimately they, to their eternal shame, decided on the BIG LIE……….the totally fictitious WMD!
Much to my amazement they didn’t find any!
Why didn’t they PLANT them? How thoroughly bovine of them!
As to our (UK) intelligence agencies, utterly worthless lickspittle, and have been for eons.
Mostly Communists or Sodomites or both, and very few James Bonds among them, more’s the pity.
More tea?
Well that’s only true because the Intel agencies counted chemical weapons as WMD. (even though chem weapons have been around since WWI.)
Totally false. The reason given for invading Iraq was WMD. (Which, FWIW, was backed up by many intelligence agencies, including yours.)
My apologies it should be BELIEVED, not believe.
Source: Countless US Media organs just prior to the dastardly deed.
Sounds like complete nonsense. But please do provide your source.
60% of Americans, plus former President George Bush Jnr believe that Saddam Insane and Iraq DID* 9/11.
So “they had it coming”, as they say over there.
(* whatever that may mean.)
So, will someone arrest Tony Blair now, please. He will get off because he has money. But we need to go through the motions.
Interesting as to how Islamist incursion into British life and law, ditto Europe is going strong with hardly a shot fired as the unctuous, cowardly politicians prostrate themselves in avoidance of the weapon that fires no rounds, but has more power than a thermo nuclear missile, and cost nothing… Islamophobia…
Interesting as to how Islamist incursion into British life and law, ditto Europe is going strong with hardly a shot fired as the unctuous, cowardly politicians prostrate themselves in avoidance of the weapon that fires no rounds, but has more power than a thermo nuclear missile, and cost nothing… Islamophobia…
A very interesting read
This “on terrain” testimonies are part of what makes Unherd worth the subscription money
A very interesting read
This “on terrain” testimonies are part of what makes Unherd worth the subscription money
God is Great. We need to import more of this sort of thing into the West. God is merciful, compassionate.
I think you mean “God is greatER” if you are trying a translation from the arabic (so I am told).
It’s bizarre ; if my god is greater than your god, then logically I am accepting that there are two gods – so yours can’t be a god, or I am blaspheming. If there is only one, then logically there is nothing for him (her/it) to be ‘greater than’.
And yes, I agree. This is just the sort of thing we need more of in the West!
I think you mean “God is greatER” if you are trying a translation from the arabic (so I am told).
It’s bizarre ; if my god is greater than your god, then logically I am accepting that there are two gods – so yours can’t be a god, or I am blaspheming. If there is only one, then logically there is nothing for him (her/it) to be ‘greater than’.
And yes, I agree. This is just the sort of thing we need more of in the West!
God is Great. We need to import more of this sort of thing into the West. God is merciful, compassionate.
This is a great article. Very informative and a lesson about what can go wrong when you invade another country.
This is a great article. Very informative and a lesson about what can go wrong when you invade another country.
The last question of this article asks if people want freedom or stability. I think Saddam inflicted brutal tactics, including death, on many many people. And the people knew it mattered not how careful they were in their words and actions because Saddam was a madman who needed no reason at all to inflict his monstrous deeds. So I am not sure that the question is relevant. Thoughts?
The last question of this article asks if people want freedom or stability. I think Saddam inflicted brutal tactics, including death, on many many people. And the people knew it mattered not how careful they were in their words and actions because Saddam was a madman who needed no reason at all to inflict his monstrous deeds. So I am not sure that the question is relevant. Thoughts?