“ There are alternatives to running a nation-state to failure, such as serious involvement in real politics, but are those as fun as Elon Musk liking your tweets? I think not.”
Does the author seriously propose that the online right, whoever they are though undeniably ostracized by corporate media and machine politics, are running the nation state to failure? It’s the shitposter, and not the neoliberal censors, who deserve the blame?
Check out his Twitter handle ‘Tinkzorg’, for some of his more serious and profound inner thoughts! Nary a shitpost to be found. A thoroughly decent Swedish chap and certainly not the sanctimonious, lazy-eyed commie people online make him out to be.
You misconstrued that sentence, he’s saying that the dissidents’ seething resentment towards the apparatus of decadent elites running the nation state into the ground is justified, as are they in seeking desperate yet viable alternatives with the objective to uproot their unrighteous pseudo-aristocracy; but shitposting isn’t one.
He’s talked at length about this on his Twitter handle; as in how the self-absorbed dissident cliques refuse to properly engage with populist demographics with actual potential to have a political future, snubbing them, only to withdraw into the recesses of irony-drenched, shitposting, cenobite internet enclaves – eventually deluding themselves into believing that it offers a viable “political solution” to society and their grievances with it, or a meaningful alternative to that (again, failing to convincingly lay out exactly what that alternative might be and how it shall be realized).
Check out his Twitter handle ‘Tinkzorg’, for some of his more serious and profound inner thoughts! Nary a shitpost to be found. A thoroughly decent Swedish chap and certainly not the sanctimonious, lazy-eyed commie people online make him out to be.
You misconstrued that sentence, he’s saying that the dissidents’ seething resentment towards the apparatus of decadent elites running the nation state into the ground is justified, as are they in seeking desperate yet viable alternatives with the objective to uproot their unrighteous pseudo-aristocracy; but shitposting isn’t one.
He’s talked at length about this on his Twitter handle; as in how the self-absorbed dissident cliques refuse to properly engage with populist demographics with actual potential to have a political future, snubbing them, only to withdraw into the recesses of irony-drenched, shitposting, cenobite internet enclaves – eventually deluding themselves into believing that it offers a viable “political solution” to society and their grievances with it, or a meaningful alternative to that (again, failing to convincingly lay out exactly what that alternative might be and how it shall be realized).
Last edited 1 year ago by Godwinson Leonard
Cho Jinn
1 year ago
“ There are alternatives to running a nation-state to failure, such as serious involvement in real politics, but are those as fun as Elon Musk liking your tweets? I think not.”
Does the author seriously propose that the online right, whoever they are though undeniably ostracized by corporate media and machine politics, are running the nation state to failure? It’s the shitposter, and not the neoliberal censors, who deserve the blame?
polidori redux
1 year ago
“It was only a matter of time before the American media delivered a story of a millennial forced to choose between pure posting and real politics.”
Could it be that “millennials” think that posting IS politics?
“It was only a matter of time before the American media delivered a story of a millennial forced to choose between pure posting and real politics.”
Could it be that “millennials” think that posting IS politics?
Daniel Lee
1 year ago
I know the writer doesn’t usually contribute the headline, but if either he or the editor think this is confined to the “online right” they are either completely blinkered or engaging in intentional agitprop for the Left.
It ends up being more detrimentally consequential for the Online Right in particular because that’s where the actual radical, “ideological” ammunition for the “Real Right” has become hyperconcentrated at, as opposed to the sociopolitical Left that already commands control over all of the relevant institutions – Cultural, Mass Media; even Judicial, Military and Deep State ones.
In other words, the Left can sort of afford to be delusional Online owing to the Leftward momentum that society’s already barreling onward with, whereas the Right – embroiled in a War of Survival, surrounded on all sides – cannot.
You seem to be missing the point about the subject. You’re trying to claim him for some kind of ideological war on the side of “the Real Right”, whereas Abbasi seems to have no serious ideology at all- that’s the definition of a “shitposter”.
Most of the comments here desperately want to claim this dribbling idiot as a soldier in the Great Culture War, a fellow fighter for the Right; but he isn’t. He will say anything that gets attention, regardless of the political content. He’s just an addict, desperate for his ‘fix’ of a spurious sense of notoriety and ‘influence’. There’s no meaningful point to his rubbish- no great worldview. Nothing.
You seem to be missing the point about the subject. You’re trying to claim him for some kind of ideological war on the side of “the Real Right”, whereas Abbasi seems to have no serious ideology at all- that’s the definition of a “shitposter”.
Most of the comments here desperately want to claim this dribbling idiot as a soldier in the Great Culture War, a fellow fighter for the Right; but he isn’t. He will say anything that gets attention, regardless of the political content. He’s just an addict, desperate for his ‘fix’ of a spurious sense of notoriety and ‘influence’. There’s no meaningful point to his rubbish- no great worldview. Nothing.
It ends up being more detrimentally consequential for the Online Right in particular because that’s where the actual radical, “ideological” ammunition for the “Real Right” has become hyperconcentrated at, as opposed to the sociopolitical Left that already commands control over all of the relevant institutions – Cultural, Mass Media; even Judicial, Military and Deep State ones.
In other words, the Left can sort of afford to be delusional Online owing to the Leftward momentum that society’s already barreling onward with, whereas the Right – embroiled in a War of Survival, surrounded on all sides – cannot.
Daniel Lee
1 year ago
I know the writer doesn’t usually contribute the headline, but if either he or the editor think this is confined to the “online right” they are either completely blinkered or engaging in intentional agitprop for the Left.
Allison Barrows
1 year ago
This author – from Sweden – claims that some guy in Chicago represents “the Online Right” (?) and that means “it” collectively gave up on reality? Ahem. Looks like he isn’t the only one. Malcom, go touch some grass.
It’s almost as if the internet was a global thing, whereas we both know that no-one in Sweden knows anything about what gets posted in the US, right Allison? How could he- what’s he doing, reading posts on his computer or something?
Silly man.
“Rando says what?”
I’m sorry you found the article difficult to understand (it’s pretty straightfoward), but you failed to answer my point- that anyone who complains that ‘Online culture’ cannot be understood from ‘abroad’ has a pretty confused idea about the nature of ‘online culture’.
The “Online right” exists online. People in Sweden (who, you’ll be surprised to hear, have computers) have the same access to ‘online’ as people in Chicago.
And thanks for that profound thought, d**k. The breadth of your intellect never ceases to impress.
Thanks the Lord we have people of your calibre defending Western civilisation from the hordes- the sheer force of your erudition will scatter your foolish, ill-educated enemies like ants flushed down the drain by a Powerwash hose….
“Woke t**d”. Genius. Remind me, is that `Milton?
By the way, could you quote the most “woke” thing I’ve said here?
Just to give me some idea of what’s ‘triggered’ you to quite such a dribbling fury; quote me a specific “woke” statement of mine that’s particularly upset you and made you feel so very, very cross.
Thank you.
Every time I think I’ve finally plumbed the depths of your stupidity, Dickie, you confound me with something even dumber. Can you tie your own shoelaces, or do you have those sticky things instead?
I honestly don’t think it can be possible to come upwith a more truly idiotic response than “Do one”.
Can you try? Give it a go. Don’t hit your head on the computer….
Every time I think I’ve finally plumbed the depths of your stupidity, Dickie, you confound me with something even dumber. Can you tie your own shoelaces, or do you have those sticky things instead?
I honestly don’t think it can be possible to come upwith a more truly idiotic response than “Do one”.
Can you try? Give it a go. Don’t hit your head on the computer….
And thanks for that profound thought, d**k. The breadth of your intellect never ceases to impress.
Thanks the Lord we have people of your calibre defending Western civilisation from the hordes- the sheer force of your erudition will scatter your foolish, ill-educated enemies like ants flushed down the drain by a Powerwash hose….
“Woke t**d”. Genius. Remind me, is that `Milton?
By the way, could you quote the most “woke” thing I’ve said here?
Just to give me some idea of what’s ‘triggered’ you to quite such a dribbling fury; quote me a specific “woke” statement of mine that’s particularly upset you and made you feel so very, very cross.
Thank you.
“Rando says what?”
I’m sorry you found the article difficult to understand (it’s pretty straightfoward), but you failed to answer my point- that anyone who complains that ‘Online culture’ cannot be understood from ‘abroad’ has a pretty confused idea about the nature of ‘online culture’.
The “Online right” exists online. People in Sweden (who, you’ll be surprised to hear, have computers) have the same access to ‘online’ as people in Chicago.
The problem as I see it there’s a difference between stating things from a viewpoint from far away and admitting it might not be accurate to stating you actually know what is going on regardless of whether you actually know. I see a lot of statements about the USA that are made through a lense of international liberal media.
The problem as I see it there’s a difference between stating things from a viewpoint from far away and admitting it might not be accurate to stating you actually know what is going on regardless of whether you actually know. I see a lot of statements about the USA that are made through a lense of international liberal media.
It’s almost as if the internet was a global thing, whereas we both know that no-one in Sweden knows anything about what gets posted in the US, right Allison? How could he- what’s he doing, reading posts on his computer or something?
Silly man.
Allison Barrows
1 year ago
This author – from Sweden – claims that some guy in Chicago represents “the Online Right” (?) and that means “it” collectively gave up on reality? Ahem. Looks like he isn’t the only one. Malcom, go touch some grass.
Bryan Dale
1 year ago
Never apologize, never explain. Those of us on the right who have been paying attention to cancel culture understand that efforts to make amends when accused of “racism” only cause the left to double down on the attacks. This has nothing to do with protecting his online reputation. It’s about standing up to leftist lies and bullying.
Bryan’s “case” is merely confused- he thinks the article is about a racist (which makes him upset, oviously), but if he could manage a little English comprehension he’d realise that the article quite specifically doubts that this sad little online troll IS racist- the point being that he simply wants to “stir shit up”. He has no real beliefs about race either way.
So it’s ok, Bryan- no-one is being nasty about racists, or even the Right, per se. Read the article properly before flying off on one, that’s my advice..
Bryan’s “case” is merely confused- he thinks the article is about a racist (which makes him upset, oviously), but if he could manage a little English comprehension he’d realise that the article quite specifically doubts that this sad little online troll IS racist- the point being that he simply wants to “stir shit up”. He has no real beliefs about race either way.
So it’s ok, Bryan- no-one is being nasty about racists, or even the Right, per se. Read the article properly before flying off on one, that’s my advice..
There’s everything to explain and why wouldn’t you apologize? We all know that you are a woke racist (among other things) and you care desperately that everyone knows.
There’s everything to explain and why wouldn’t you apologize? We all know that you are a woke racist (among other things) and you care desperately that everyone knows.
Yes, Bryan. You’re a hero, just like the miserable little trolls hiding in their basements and posting crap online.
The Greatest Generation.
Bryan Dale
1 year ago
Never apologize, never explain. Those of us on the right who have been paying attention to cancel culture understand that efforts to make amends when accused of “racism” only cause the left to double down on the attacks. This has nothing to do with protecting his online reputation. It’s about standing up to leftist lies and bullying.
Matt Hindman
1 year ago
Congratulations Kyeyune, you discovered the internet.
Matt Hindman
1 year ago
Congratulations Kyeyune, you discovered the internet.
Laney R Sexton
1 year ago
Stopped reading this article halfway to find Pericles on Instagram. He’s a genius.
Your obsession with this Isla Bryson person is a little wierd, Dickie.
I have no interest in some inane online CultureWar crap between the ‘Woke’ and “Unti-woke’ gangs about pronouns. If you and your ‘Woke’ enemies want to indulge in your dumb online ranting matches about this fashionable issue, then you’ll have to find someone else to shout with- I’m not interested. Nothing intelligent or useful ever seems to come out of this idiotic game.
The issue clearly excites you- there must be many people on your computer who you can indulge your hobby with, thanks for the offer.
Well done for persisting with the “Rubber” thing, though. My name is John, and an old term for a condom was ‘rubber jonny’. It’s that sort of coruscating satirical mind that makes you so very much worth engaging with.
You’re exerting an awful lot of energy on me, Rubber. I wish I could say that I enjoyed living rent-free inside your head, but it’s really rather sad and sordid, not to say disturbing.
However, you’re quite right- I am spending more time than is healthy engaging with your comedically challenged intellect.
It’s funny, up to a point, but I really should be doing something more enlightening, such as inspecting my drains. They’re Victorian you see, and prone to collapsing.
However, you’re quite right- I am spending more time than is healthy engaging with your comedically challenged intellect.
It’s funny, up to a point, but I really should be doing something more enlightening, such as inspecting my drains. They’re Victorian you see, and prone to collapsing.
You’re exerting an awful lot of energy on me, Rubber. I wish I could say that I enjoyed living rent-free inside your head, but it’s really rather sad and sordid, not to say disturbing.
Your obsession with this Isla Bryson person is a little wierd, Dickie.
I have no interest in some inane online CultureWar crap between the ‘Woke’ and “Unti-woke’ gangs about pronouns. If you and your ‘Woke’ enemies want to indulge in your dumb online ranting matches about this fashionable issue, then you’ll have to find someone else to shout with- I’m not interested. Nothing intelligent or useful ever seems to come out of this idiotic game.
The issue clearly excites you- there must be many people on your computer who you can indulge your hobby with, thanks for the offer.
Well done for persisting with the “Rubber” thing, though. My name is John, and an old term for a condom was ‘rubber jonny’. It’s that sort of coruscating satirical mind that makes you so very much worth engaging with.
If your definition of ‘genius’ is ‘cretin on internet’, rather than, say, Newton or Mozart, undoubtedly.
Laney R Sexton
1 year ago
Stopped reading this article halfway to find Pericles on Instagram. He’s a genius.
Liam F
1 year ago
It’s sad. Social media is designed to make you feel that you’re making a difference, being listened to. He’s not so different from Megan & Harry and many others who think they are helping change the world -one post at a time. Hopefully when he has kids of his own he’ll run out of hours in the day to rage against the machine..
“Woketard”?
Clever Dickie. Dickie see ‘libtard’ on internet, and then Dickie see ‘woke’ on internet, and then Dickie make ‘woketard.’ Dickie think new word good.
Dickie happy, because Dickie angry, and angry means Dickie doesn’t have to think. Think is bad- Dickie simple man.
Goodnight Dickie.
Excellent, Dickie.
Except that terrific bon mot doesn’t actually work, does it? Partly because I don’t actually call you ‘d**k’, but ‘Dickie’- which isn’t a word for c**k- and partly because you love to call me ‘Rubber’, which, being a schoolboy name for a sexual prophylactic, suggests it’s you who are the one who might be feeling ‘lonely’.
Well done for trying, though. It’s a small advance on your standard “Woke scum”.
Excellent, Dickie.
Except that terrific bon mot doesn’t actually work, does it? Partly because I don’t actually call you ‘d**k’, but ‘Dickie’- which isn’t a word for c**k- and partly because you love to call me ‘Rubber’, which, being a schoolboy name for a sexual prophylactic, suggests it’s you who are the one who might be feeling ‘lonely’.
Well done for trying, though. It’s a small advance on your standard “Woke scum”.
“Woketard”?
Clever Dickie. Dickie see ‘libtard’ on internet, and then Dickie see ‘woke’ on internet, and then Dickie make ‘woketard.’ Dickie think new word good.
Dickie happy, because Dickie angry, and angry means Dickie doesn’t have to think. Think is bad- Dickie simple man.
Goodnight Dickie.
It’s sad. Social media is designed to make you feel that you’re making a difference, being listened to. He’s not so different from Megan & Harry and many others who think they are helping change the world -one post at a time. Hopefully when he has kids of his own he’ll run out of hours in the day to rage against the machine..
Warren Trees
1 year ago
“In this world, online micro-celebrities fight with each other tooth and claw for likes, attention, followers, and social position inside a myriad of private group chats and social circles on Twitter.”
Glad I’m not a part of that world.
Warren Trees
1 year ago
“In this world, online micro-celebrities fight with each other tooth and claw for likes, attention, followers, and social position inside a myriad of private group chats and social circles on Twitter.”
Glad I’m not a part of that world.
Alan Hawkes
1 year ago
Is this so different to asking why a successful professional would ruin his life through alcohol, or drug, abuse?
Or rather they don’t have time to do it since their only goal is getting high or engaging in behavior to ensure that they will be able to get high in the future.
Or rather they don’t have time to do it since their only goal is getting high or engaging in behavior to ensure that they will be able to get high in the future.
“ There are alternatives to running a nation-state to failure, such as serious involvement in real politics, but are those as fun as Elon Musk liking your tweets? I think not.”
Does the author seriously propose that the online right, whoever they are though undeniably ostracized by corporate media and machine politics, are running the nation state to failure? It’s the shitposter, and not the neoliberal censors, who deserve the blame?
Good point – author appears unable to see that he is commenting from his own biased digital soap box
Check out his Twitter handle ‘Tinkzorg’, for some of his more serious and profound inner thoughts! Nary a shitpost to be found. A thoroughly decent Swedish chap and certainly not the sanctimonious, lazy-eyed commie people online make him out to be.
You misconstrued that sentence, he’s saying that the dissidents’ seething resentment towards the apparatus of decadent elites running the nation state into the ground is justified, as are they in seeking desperate yet viable alternatives with the objective to uproot their unrighteous pseudo-aristocracy; but shitposting isn’t one.
He’s talked at length about this on his Twitter handle; as in how the self-absorbed dissident cliques refuse to properly engage with populist demographics with actual potential to have a political future, snubbing them, only to withdraw into the recesses of irony-drenched, shitposting, cenobite internet enclaves – eventually deluding themselves into believing that it offers a viable “political solution” to society and their grievances with it, or a meaningful alternative to that (again, failing to convincingly lay out exactly what that alternative might be and how it shall be realized).
Good point – author appears unable to see that he is commenting from his own biased digital soap box
Check out his Twitter handle ‘Tinkzorg’, for some of his more serious and profound inner thoughts! Nary a shitpost to be found. A thoroughly decent Swedish chap and certainly not the sanctimonious, lazy-eyed commie people online make him out to be.
You misconstrued that sentence, he’s saying that the dissidents’ seething resentment towards the apparatus of decadent elites running the nation state into the ground is justified, as are they in seeking desperate yet viable alternatives with the objective to uproot their unrighteous pseudo-aristocracy; but shitposting isn’t one.
He’s talked at length about this on his Twitter handle; as in how the self-absorbed dissident cliques refuse to properly engage with populist demographics with actual potential to have a political future, snubbing them, only to withdraw into the recesses of irony-drenched, shitposting, cenobite internet enclaves – eventually deluding themselves into believing that it offers a viable “political solution” to society and their grievances with it, or a meaningful alternative to that (again, failing to convincingly lay out exactly what that alternative might be and how it shall be realized).
“ There are alternatives to running a nation-state to failure, such as serious involvement in real politics, but are those as fun as Elon Musk liking your tweets? I think not.”
Does the author seriously propose that the online right, whoever they are though undeniably ostracized by corporate media and machine politics, are running the nation state to failure? It’s the shitposter, and not the neoliberal censors, who deserve the blame?
“It was only a matter of time before the American media delivered a story of a millennial forced to choose between pure posting and real politics.”
Could it be that “millennials” think that posting IS politics?
I thought the same!
I thought the same!
“It was only a matter of time before the American media delivered a story of a millennial forced to choose between pure posting and real politics.”
Could it be that “millennials” think that posting IS politics?
I know the writer doesn’t usually contribute the headline, but if either he or the editor think this is confined to the “online right” they are either completely blinkered or engaging in intentional agitprop for the Left.
It ends up being more detrimentally consequential for the Online Right in particular because that’s where the actual radical, “ideological” ammunition for the “Real Right” has become hyperconcentrated at, as opposed to the sociopolitical Left that already commands control over all of the relevant institutions – Cultural, Mass Media; even Judicial, Military and Deep State ones.
In other words, the Left can sort of afford to be delusional Online owing to the Leftward momentum that society’s already barreling onward with, whereas the Right – embroiled in a War of Survival, surrounded on all sides – cannot.
Good point.
You seem to be missing the point about the subject. You’re trying to claim him for some kind of ideological war on the side of “the Real Right”, whereas Abbasi seems to have no serious ideology at all- that’s the definition of a “shitposter”.
Most of the comments here desperately want to claim this dribbling idiot as a soldier in the Great Culture War, a fellow fighter for the Right; but he isn’t. He will say anything that gets attention, regardless of the political content. He’s just an addict, desperate for his ‘fix’ of a spurious sense of notoriety and ‘influence’. There’s no meaningful point to his rubbish- no great worldview. Nothing.
Good point.
You seem to be missing the point about the subject. You’re trying to claim him for some kind of ideological war on the side of “the Real Right”, whereas Abbasi seems to have no serious ideology at all- that’s the definition of a “shitposter”.
Most of the comments here desperately want to claim this dribbling idiot as a soldier in the Great Culture War, a fellow fighter for the Right; but he isn’t. He will say anything that gets attention, regardless of the political content. He’s just an addict, desperate for his ‘fix’ of a spurious sense of notoriety and ‘influence’. There’s no meaningful point to his rubbish- no great worldview. Nothing.
It ends up being more detrimentally consequential for the Online Right in particular because that’s where the actual radical, “ideological” ammunition for the “Real Right” has become hyperconcentrated at, as opposed to the sociopolitical Left that already commands control over all of the relevant institutions – Cultural, Mass Media; even Judicial, Military and Deep State ones.
In other words, the Left can sort of afford to be delusional Online owing to the Leftward momentum that society’s already barreling onward with, whereas the Right – embroiled in a War of Survival, surrounded on all sides – cannot.
I know the writer doesn’t usually contribute the headline, but if either he or the editor think this is confined to the “online right” they are either completely blinkered or engaging in intentional agitprop for the Left.
This author – from Sweden – claims that some guy in Chicago represents “the Online Right” (?) and that means “it” collectively gave up on reality? Ahem. Looks like he isn’t the only one. Malcom, go touch some grass.
It’s almost as if the internet was a global thing, whereas we both know that no-one in Sweden knows anything about what gets posted in the US, right Allison? How could he- what’s he doing, reading posts on his computer or something?
Silly man.
Rando says what? Pretty much sums up analysis these days.
“Rando says what?”
I’m sorry you found the article difficult to understand (it’s pretty straightfoward), but you failed to answer my point- that anyone who complains that ‘Online culture’ cannot be understood from ‘abroad’ has a pretty confused idea about the nature of ‘online culture’.
The “Online right” exists online. People in Sweden (who, you’ll be surprised to hear, have computers) have the same access to ‘online’ as people in Chicago.
Thanks for dealing with the woke t**d.
And thanks for that profound thought, d**k. The breadth of your intellect never ceases to impress.
Thanks the Lord we have people of your calibre defending Western civilisation from the hordes- the sheer force of your erudition will scatter your foolish, ill-educated enemies like ants flushed down the drain by a Powerwash hose….
“Woke t**d”. Genius. Remind me, is that `Milton?
By the way, could you quote the most “woke” thing I’ve said here?
Just to give me some idea of what’s ‘triggered’ you to quite such a dribbling fury; quote me a specific “woke” statement of mine that’s particularly upset you and made you feel so very, very cross.
Thank you.
Do one.
Every time I think I’ve finally plumbed the depths of your stupidity, Dickie, you confound me with something even dumber. Can you tie your own shoelaces, or do you have those sticky things instead?
I honestly don’t think it can be possible to come upwith a more truly idiotic response than “Do one”.
Can you try? Give it a go. Don’t hit your head on the computer….
Every time I think I’ve finally plumbed the depths of your stupidity, Dickie, you confound me with something even dumber. Can you tie your own shoelaces, or do you have those sticky things instead?
I honestly don’t think it can be possible to come upwith a more truly idiotic response than “Do one”.
Can you try? Give it a go. Don’t hit your head on the computer….
Do one.
And thanks for that profound thought, d**k. The breadth of your intellect never ceases to impress.
Thanks the Lord we have people of your calibre defending Western civilisation from the hordes- the sheer force of your erudition will scatter your foolish, ill-educated enemies like ants flushed down the drain by a Powerwash hose….
“Woke t**d”. Genius. Remind me, is that `Milton?
By the way, could you quote the most “woke” thing I’ve said here?
Just to give me some idea of what’s ‘triggered’ you to quite such a dribbling fury; quote me a specific “woke” statement of mine that’s particularly upset you and made you feel so very, very cross.
Thank you.
“Rando says what?”
I’m sorry you found the article difficult to understand (it’s pretty straightfoward), but you failed to answer my point- that anyone who complains that ‘Online culture’ cannot be understood from ‘abroad’ has a pretty confused idea about the nature of ‘online culture’.
The “Online right” exists online. People in Sweden (who, you’ll be surprised to hear, have computers) have the same access to ‘online’ as people in Chicago.
Thanks for dealing with the woke t**d.
The problem as I see it there’s a difference between stating things from a viewpoint from far away and admitting it might not be accurate to stating you actually know what is going on regardless of whether you actually know. I see a lot of statements about the USA that are made through a lense of international liberal media.
Rando says what? Pretty much sums up analysis these days.
The problem as I see it there’s a difference between stating things from a viewpoint from far away and admitting it might not be accurate to stating you actually know what is going on regardless of whether you actually know. I see a lot of statements about the USA that are made through a lense of international liberal media.
It’s almost as if the internet was a global thing, whereas we both know that no-one in Sweden knows anything about what gets posted in the US, right Allison? How could he- what’s he doing, reading posts on his computer or something?
Silly man.
This author – from Sweden – claims that some guy in Chicago represents “the Online Right” (?) and that means “it” collectively gave up on reality? Ahem. Looks like he isn’t the only one. Malcom, go touch some grass.
Never apologize, never explain. Those of us on the right who have been paying attention to cancel culture understand that efforts to make amends when accused of “racism” only cause the left to double down on the attacks. This has nothing to do with protecting his online reputation. It’s about standing up to leftist lies and bullying.
There’s nothing to explain and why would you apologize? We all know that you are racists (among other things) and you don’t care that everyone knows.
You’ve just proven Bryan’s case for him.
What “case” would that be?
Bryan’s “case” is merely confused- he thinks the article is about a racist (which makes him upset, oviously), but if he could manage a little English comprehension he’d realise that the article quite specifically doubts that this sad little online troll IS racist- the point being that he simply wants to “stir shit up”. He has no real beliefs about race either way.
So it’s ok, Bryan- no-one is being nasty about racists, or even the Right, per se. Read the article properly before flying off on one, that’s my advice..
Bryan’s “case” is merely confused- he thinks the article is about a racist (which makes him upset, oviously), but if he could manage a little English comprehension he’d realise that the article quite specifically doubts that this sad little online troll IS racist- the point being that he simply wants to “stir shit up”. He has no real beliefs about race either way.
So it’s ok, Bryan- no-one is being nasty about racists, or even the Right, per se. Read the article properly before flying off on one, that’s my advice..
What “case” would that be?
There’s everything to explain and why wouldn’t you apologize? We all know that you are a woke racist (among other things) and you care desperately that everyone knows.
You’ve just proven Bryan’s case for him.
There’s everything to explain and why wouldn’t you apologize? We all know that you are a woke racist (among other things) and you care desperately that everyone knows.
Yes, Bryan. You’re a hero, just like the miserable little trolls hiding in their basements and posting crap online.
The Greatest Generation.
Yes, Rubber. You’re a hero, just like the miserable little trolls hiding in their basements and posting crap online.The Greatest Generation.
Well done for repeating my post. Clever Dickie.
Well done for repeating my post. Clever Dickie.
Yes, Rubber. You’re a hero, just like the miserable little trolls hiding in their basements and posting crap online.The Greatest Generation.
There’s nothing to explain and why would you apologize? We all know that you are racists (among other things) and you don’t care that everyone knows.
Yes, Bryan. You’re a hero, just like the miserable little trolls hiding in their basements and posting crap online.
The Greatest Generation.
Never apologize, never explain. Those of us on the right who have been paying attention to cancel culture understand that efforts to make amends when accused of “racism” only cause the left to double down on the attacks. This has nothing to do with protecting his online reputation. It’s about standing up to leftist lies and bullying.
Congratulations Kyeyune, you discovered the internet.
Congratulations Kyeyune, you discovered the internet.
Stopped reading this article halfway to find Pericles on Instagram. He’s a genius.
If your definition of ‘genius’ is ‘cretin on internet’, rather than, say, Newton or Mozart, undoubtedly.
Do you respect Isla Bryson’s pronouns?
Your obsession with this Isla Bryson person is a little wierd, Dickie.
I have no interest in some inane online CultureWar crap between the ‘Woke’ and “Unti-woke’ gangs about pronouns. If you and your ‘Woke’ enemies want to indulge in your dumb online ranting matches about this fashionable issue, then you’ll have to find someone else to shout with- I’m not interested. Nothing intelligent or useful ever seems to come out of this idiotic game.
The issue clearly excites you- there must be many people on your computer who you can indulge your hobby with, thanks for the offer.
Well done for persisting with the “Rubber” thing, though. My name is John, and an old term for a condom was ‘rubber jonny’. It’s that sort of coruscating satirical mind that makes you so very much worth engaging with.
You’re exerting an awful lot of energy on me, Rubber. I wish I could say that I enjoyed living rent-free inside your head, but it’s really rather sad and sordid, not to say disturbing.
You love it.
Go on, say “woke scum” for me…
However, you’re quite right- I am spending more time than is healthy engaging with your comedically challenged intellect.
It’s funny, up to a point, but I really should be doing something more enlightening, such as inspecting my drains. They’re Victorian you see, and prone to collapsing.
You love it.
Go on, say “woke scum” for me…
However, you’re quite right- I am spending more time than is healthy engaging with your comedically challenged intellect.
It’s funny, up to a point, but I really should be doing something more enlightening, such as inspecting my drains. They’re Victorian you see, and prone to collapsing.
You’re exerting an awful lot of energy on me, Rubber. I wish I could say that I enjoyed living rent-free inside your head, but it’s really rather sad and sordid, not to say disturbing.
Your obsession with this Isla Bryson person is a little wierd, Dickie.
I have no interest in some inane online CultureWar crap between the ‘Woke’ and “Unti-woke’ gangs about pronouns. If you and your ‘Woke’ enemies want to indulge in your dumb online ranting matches about this fashionable issue, then you’ll have to find someone else to shout with- I’m not interested. Nothing intelligent or useful ever seems to come out of this idiotic game.
The issue clearly excites you- there must be many people on your computer who you can indulge your hobby with, thanks for the offer.
Well done for persisting with the “Rubber” thing, though. My name is John, and an old term for a condom was ‘rubber jonny’. It’s that sort of coruscating satirical mind that makes you so very much worth engaging with.
Do you respect Isla Bryson’s pronouns?
If your definition of ‘genius’ is ‘cretin on internet’, rather than, say, Newton or Mozart, undoubtedly.
Stopped reading this article halfway to find Pericles on Instagram. He’s a genius.
It’s sad. Social media is designed to make you feel that you’re making a difference, being listened to. He’s not so different from Megan & Harry and many others who think they are helping change the world -one post at a time. Hopefully when he has kids of his own he’ll run out of hours in the day to rage against the machine..
The only way they make a difference is by consuming more electricity….while saving the planet.
Says man posting online.
Says woketard posting online.
“Woketard”?
Clever Dickie. Dickie see ‘libtard’ on internet, and then Dickie see ‘woke’ on internet, and then Dickie make ‘woketard.’ Dickie think new word good.
Dickie happy, because Dickie angry, and angry means Dickie doesn’t have to think. Think is bad- Dickie simple man.
Goodnight Dickie.
You seem to have a bit of a thing about d**k, Rubber. Are you not getting enough?
Excellent, Dickie.
Except that terrific bon mot doesn’t actually work, does it? Partly because I don’t actually call you ‘d**k’, but ‘Dickie’- which isn’t a word for c**k- and partly because you love to call me ‘Rubber’, which, being a schoolboy name for a sexual prophylactic, suggests it’s you who are the one who might be feeling ‘lonely’.
Well done for trying, though. It’s a small advance on your standard “Woke scum”.
Excellent, Dickie.
Except that terrific bon mot doesn’t actually work, does it? Partly because I don’t actually call you ‘d**k’, but ‘Dickie’- which isn’t a word for c**k- and partly because you love to call me ‘Rubber’, which, being a schoolboy name for a sexual prophylactic, suggests it’s you who are the one who might be feeling ‘lonely’.
Well done for trying, though. It’s a small advance on your standard “Woke scum”.
You seem to have a bit of a thing about d**k, Rubber. Are you not getting enough?
“Woketard”?
Clever Dickie. Dickie see ‘libtard’ on internet, and then Dickie see ‘woke’ on internet, and then Dickie make ‘woketard.’ Dickie think new word good.
Dickie happy, because Dickie angry, and angry means Dickie doesn’t have to think. Think is bad- Dickie simple man.
Goodnight Dickie.
Says woketard posting online.
Says man posting online.
No he should not help propagate our species.
The only way they make a difference is by consuming more electricity….while saving the planet.
No he should not help propagate our species.
It’s sad. Social media is designed to make you feel that you’re making a difference, being listened to. He’s not so different from Megan & Harry and many others who think they are helping change the world -one post at a time. Hopefully when he has kids of his own he’ll run out of hours in the day to rage against the machine..
“In this world, online micro-celebrities fight with each other tooth and claw for likes, attention, followers, and social position inside a myriad of private group chats and social circles on Twitter.”
Glad I’m not a part of that world.
“In this world, online micro-celebrities fight with each other tooth and claw for likes, attention, followers, and social position inside a myriad of private group chats and social circles on Twitter.”
Glad I’m not a part of that world.
Is this so different to asking why a successful professional would ruin his life through alcohol, or drug, abuse?
Maybe not, in some ways- although at least drug addicts have the decency to do their thing more or less in private.
Or rather they don’t have time to do it since their only goal is getting high or engaging in behavior to ensure that they will be able to get high in the future.
Or rather they don’t have time to do it since their only goal is getting high or engaging in behavior to ensure that they will be able to get high in the future.
Maybe not, in some ways- although at least drug addicts have the decency to do their thing more or less in private.
Is this so different to asking why a successful professional would ruin his life through alcohol, or drug, abuse?
Why is the author headlining the far right when the article says he supported blm?