X Close

How the Online Right gave up on reality Millennials can't keep shitposting forever

Will Pericles go down with the ship? (Twitter)

Will Pericles go down with the ship? (Twitter)


February 7, 2023   5 mins

The millennial generation is beginning to show its age. This overeducated and underemployed generation, raised on social media, once sought solace from its diminished life opportunities behind video game controllers, computer screens, and smartphones. Even for those with good prospects, nothing felt more real than gaming, watching, and, above all else, posting.

It was only a matter of time before the American media delivered a story of a millennial forced to choose between pure posting and real politics. And with the past two decades as our guide, their decision was inevitable: they would choose the post. Emperor Nero was alleged to have fiddled while Rome burned, but a millennial poster would today logged onto Twitter, “shitposting” his way through the cancellation of everything prior generations might have held dear.

On 19 January, the Chicago Reader revealed that 36-year-old Pericles “Perry” Abbasi — a campaign attorney, who was running for office in Chicago’s 25th police district with the backing of the Fraternal Order of Police — had a history of posting bizarre and unseemly content on social media. In a leaked screenshot from a group chat, he had written that “the horrible black diet” was the reason for “13/50”, referencing a common internet meme about Black Americans’ percentage of the population (13%) and supposed share of violent crime they commit (50%).

Abbasi denied these accusations of bigotry. He claimed he didn’t remember everything he was alleged to have written (without necessarily denying his authorship, either), while also offering a second more general defence of his behaviour: this was the internet, he argued, and if he thought of something funny, he’d immediately post it. If this meant writing a tweet about how a relationship with a 36-year-old woman led him to conclude that child porn sentencing is far too long, then so be it. If it meant “making up insane things to stir shit up”, then it meant just that. Abbasi admitted he couldn’t even remember what he posted 48 hours ago; it was all just a blur of posting, retweets, engagement, and likes. He has posted nearly 104,000 times over the past four years, averaging roughly 70 tweets per day (one can also assume he retweeted hundreds of replies each day). In a sense, Abbasi was telling the truth: he was lost in the sauce, living from post to post.

Many of Abbasi’s clients were less than impressed by this. The original report in the Chicago Reader was quickly amended to insert various statements from political figures whose campaigns had him, each stating his comments were unacceptable. But Abbasi doubled down, posting a series of tweets about how being cancelled “was a choice”, that he was an “alpha male” and thus above apologising for things out of principle, and that Osama Bin Laden himself taught us that people will always prefer a “strong horse” to a “weak horse.” Then, he received a “like” on one of his tweets from Elon Musk and declared that the era of his cancellation had ended.

At first glance, this appears to be a fairly mundane story. Political candidates and semi-public figures have their improprieties revealed in the press all the time, and careless millennial posters have been ruining their careers for years, as people who remember the case of publicist Justine Sacco know. The story of Pericles Abbasi, however, deserves a second look. It shows a crash between two different worlds, and reveals what happens when millennial online culture collides with reality.

Abbasi’s field of work — being an attorney for political organisations and campaigns, where he had begun to make inroads with Right-leaning groups such as the Fraternal Order of Police despite earlier support for Black Lives Matter — is based on trust and professional reputation. But the Chicago Reader revelation put his other reputation at risk: his reputation in the online world of “posting”, where he was among the most prolific posters on social media — perhaps the most prolific, as far as sheer volume of content production is concerned. In this world, online micro-celebrities fight with each other tooth and claw for likes, attention, followers, and social position inside a myriad of private group chats and social circles on Twitter.

Abbasi thus faced not one but two risks of reputational loss. He could either jeopardise his standing as an attorney entrusted with major real estate transactions and real-world political campaigns, where he is implicitly trusted not to embarrass his employers in public — or his standing as a preeminent poster. Abbasi chose the latter, which begs the question: why exactly would anyone choose to protect his standing — his “clout” — online, over his real-world career, for which he devoted years of his life? It is impossible to imagine scandalous figures from decades past, a rogue’s gallery ranging from Ted Kennedy to Silvio Berlusconi, risking so much for so very little — for a handful of likes, shares, and retweets.

There is little proof that Abbasi was motivated by some sort of genuine racist belief. He has in the past shared strong views in support of civil rights and, in his pre-shitposting days, cautioned a more intimate circle of colleagues about heaping too much scorn on BLM protestors. If Abbasi ever entertained a racist thought, I suspect he would just have forgotten it 24 hours later; lost in the endless stream of posting and “doing a bit” as he played some sort of role or character online. Abbasi, for instance, is engaged to woman, has also devoted a good many tweets to jokes about logging onto Grindr, a gay hook-up app, for the purpose of “outing” cheating husbands or “something I’m doing for a Nathan Fielder type show I’m developing”. Clearly, his tweets have little grounding in reality.

All of this ties into a curious fact about the sort of online culture that Abbasi is a part of: it is openly, almost to the point of being parodic, a form of “youth culture”, where the rules do not matter and where the norms of ordinary adult society are scorned. But time is a cruel thing: what might seem irreverent or radical at the age of 20 takes on a whole other sheen at 35. When Trump famously descended that escalator and inaugurated his campaign, an entire online “alt-Right” or “dissident Right” subculture clung to him like limpets, constantly stressing the “vitalist” and “youth” pretensions of his movement.

But that was eight years ago. During that time, many former members of these subcultures found partners and started families, leading them to naturally drift away as they assumed the responsibilities of the adult world. But others such as Abbasi remain there, stuck like Peter Pan in a permanent, virtual Neverland.

The Abbasi story is interesting, then, because here was someone who had punched his ticket out of this overproduced netherworld of millennial losers: he had a good career, good education, good skills, and a good client base for law practice. He cultivated political patrons; he is preparing to get married. Yet there he is, posting under his own name at a prodigious rate others in his generation wouldn’t attempt to match unless masked by anonymity; posting his life away.

Historians and cultural theorists have argued that civilisations have collective “death drives” — fuelled by an oppressive atmosphere of decline and decay — and here is a new variation, the “posting drive”. Abbasi, who is continuing to run for office in Chicago now that he has secured the coveted endorsement of some New York-based “dissident podcasters”, is willing to go down with the ship, so irony-poisoned from years of hard posting that the pain of drowning will be nothing short of sweet relief from his need to respond to likes and notifications.

He is not the first such millennial to go out this way, nor will he be the last — as many in his entire generational cohort, along with the ageing, weakening American empire that subsidises its narcissistic waste, seem likely to follow suit in due course. There are alternatives to running a nation-state to failure, such as serious involvement in real politics, but are those as fun as Elon Musk liking your tweets? I think not.

***

An earlier version of this article wrongly stated that Pericles Abbasi retweeted a photoshopped image of himself over police officer Derek Chauvin. This was incorrect: Abbasi tweeted a photo of himself next to another of George Floyd.


Malcom Kyeyune is a freelance writer living in Uppsala, Sweden

SwordMercury

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

51 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cho Jinn
Cho Jinn
1 year ago

“ There are alternatives to running a nation-state to failure, such as serious involvement in real politics, but are those as fun as Elon Musk liking your tweets? I think not.”

Does the author seriously propose that the online right, whoever they are though undeniably ostracized by corporate media and machine politics, are running the nation state to failure? It’s the shitposter, and not the neoliberal censors, who deserve the blame?

Iris Violet
Iris Violet
1 year ago
Reply to  Cho Jinn

Good point – author appears unable to see that he is commenting from his own biased digital soap box

Merv Hearne
Merv Hearne
1 year ago
Reply to  Cho Jinn

Check out his Twitter handle ‘Tinkzorg’, for some of his more serious and profound inner thoughts! Nary a shitpost to be found. A thoroughly decent Swedish chap and certainly not the sanctimonious, lazy-eyed commie people online make him out to be.

Last edited 1 year ago by Merv Hearne
Godwinson Leonard
Godwinson Leonard
1 year ago
Reply to  Cho Jinn

You misconstrued that sentence, he’s saying that the dissidents’ seething resentment towards the apparatus of decadent elites running the nation state into the ground is justified, as are they in seeking desperate yet viable alternatives with the objective to uproot their unrighteous pseudo-aristocracy; but shitposting isn’t one.

He’s talked at length about this on his Twitter handle; as in how the self-absorbed dissident cliques refuse to properly engage with populist demographics with actual potential to have a political future, snubbing them, only to withdraw into the recesses of irony-drenched, shitposting, cenobite internet enclaves – eventually deluding themselves into believing that it offers a viable “political solution” to society and their grievances with it, or a meaningful alternative to that (again, failing to convincingly lay out exactly what that alternative might be and how it shall be realized).

Last edited 1 year ago by Godwinson Leonard
Iris Violet
Iris Violet
1 year ago
Reply to  Cho Jinn

Good point – author appears unable to see that he is commenting from his own biased digital soap box

Merv Hearne
Merv Hearne
1 year ago
Reply to  Cho Jinn

Check out his Twitter handle ‘Tinkzorg’, for some of his more serious and profound inner thoughts! Nary a shitpost to be found. A thoroughly decent Swedish chap and certainly not the sanctimonious, lazy-eyed commie people online make him out to be.

Last edited 1 year ago by Merv Hearne
Godwinson Leonard
Godwinson Leonard
1 year ago
Reply to  Cho Jinn

You misconstrued that sentence, he’s saying that the dissidents’ seething resentment towards the apparatus of decadent elites running the nation state into the ground is justified, as are they in seeking desperate yet viable alternatives with the objective to uproot their unrighteous pseudo-aristocracy; but shitposting isn’t one.

He’s talked at length about this on his Twitter handle; as in how the self-absorbed dissident cliques refuse to properly engage with populist demographics with actual potential to have a political future, snubbing them, only to withdraw into the recesses of irony-drenched, shitposting, cenobite internet enclaves – eventually deluding themselves into believing that it offers a viable “political solution” to society and their grievances with it, or a meaningful alternative to that (again, failing to convincingly lay out exactly what that alternative might be and how it shall be realized).

Last edited 1 year ago by Godwinson Leonard
Cho Jinn
Cho Jinn
1 year ago

“ There are alternatives to running a nation-state to failure, such as serious involvement in real politics, but are those as fun as Elon Musk liking your tweets? I think not.”

Does the author seriously propose that the online right, whoever they are though undeniably ostracized by corporate media and machine politics, are running the nation state to failure? It’s the shitposter, and not the neoliberal censors, who deserve the blame?

polidori redux
polidori redux
1 year ago

“It was only a matter of time before the American media delivered a story of a millennial forced to choose between pure posting and real politics.”
Could it be that “millennials” think that posting IS politics?

Iris Violet
Iris Violet
1 year ago
Reply to  polidori redux

I thought the same!

Iris Violet
Iris Violet
1 year ago
Reply to  polidori redux

I thought the same!

polidori redux
polidori redux
1 year ago

“It was only a matter of time before the American media delivered a story of a millennial forced to choose between pure posting and real politics.”
Could it be that “millennials” think that posting IS politics?

Daniel Lee
Daniel Lee
1 year ago

I know the writer doesn’t usually contribute the headline, but if either he or the editor think this is confined to the “online right” they are either completely blinkered or engaging in intentional agitprop for the Left.

Godwinson Leonard
Godwinson Leonard
1 year ago
Reply to  Daniel Lee

It ends up being more detrimentally consequential for the Online Right in particular because that’s where the actual radical, “ideological” ammunition for the “Real Right” has become hyperconcentrated at, as opposed to the sociopolitical Left that already commands control over all of the relevant institutions – Cultural, Mass Media; even Judicial, Military and Deep State ones.

In other words, the Left can sort of afford to be delusional Online owing to the Leftward momentum that society’s already barreling onward with, whereas the Right – embroiled in a War of Survival, surrounded on all sides – cannot.

Daniel Lee
Daniel Lee
1 year ago

Good point.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago

You seem to be missing the point about the subject. You’re trying to claim him for some kind of ideological war on the side of “the Real Right”, whereas Abbasi seems to have no serious ideology at all- that’s the definition of a “shitposter”.
Most of the comments here desperately want to claim this dribbling idiot as a soldier in the Great Culture War, a fellow fighter for the Right; but he isn’t. He will say anything that gets attention, regardless of the political content. He’s just an addict, desperate for his ‘fix’ of a spurious sense of notoriety and ‘influence’. There’s no meaningful point to his rubbish- no great worldview. Nothing.

Daniel Lee
Daniel Lee
1 year ago

Good point.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago

You seem to be missing the point about the subject. You’re trying to claim him for some kind of ideological war on the side of “the Real Right”, whereas Abbasi seems to have no serious ideology at all- that’s the definition of a “shitposter”.
Most of the comments here desperately want to claim this dribbling idiot as a soldier in the Great Culture War, a fellow fighter for the Right; but he isn’t. He will say anything that gets attention, regardless of the political content. He’s just an addict, desperate for his ‘fix’ of a spurious sense of notoriety and ‘influence’. There’s no meaningful point to his rubbish- no great worldview. Nothing.

Godwinson Leonard
Godwinson Leonard
1 year ago
Reply to  Daniel Lee

It ends up being more detrimentally consequential for the Online Right in particular because that’s where the actual radical, “ideological” ammunition for the “Real Right” has become hyperconcentrated at, as opposed to the sociopolitical Left that already commands control over all of the relevant institutions – Cultural, Mass Media; even Judicial, Military and Deep State ones.

In other words, the Left can sort of afford to be delusional Online owing to the Leftward momentum that society’s already barreling onward with, whereas the Right – embroiled in a War of Survival, surrounded on all sides – cannot.

Daniel Lee
Daniel Lee
1 year ago

I know the writer doesn’t usually contribute the headline, but if either he or the editor think this is confined to the “online right” they are either completely blinkered or engaging in intentional agitprop for the Left.

Allison Barrows
Allison Barrows
1 year ago

This author – from Sweden – claims that some guy in Chicago represents “the Online Right” (?) and that means “it” collectively gave up on reality? Ahem. Looks like he isn’t the only one. Malcom, go touch some grass.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago

It’s almost as if the internet was a global thing, whereas we both know that no-one in Sweden knows anything about what gets posted in the US, right Allison? How could he- what’s he doing, reading posts on his computer or something?
Silly man.

Allison Barrows
Allison Barrows
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

Rando says what? Pretty much sums up analysis these days.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago

“Rando says what?”
I’m sorry you found the article difficult to understand (it’s pretty straightfoward), but you failed to answer my point- that anyone who complains that ‘Online culture’ cannot be understood from ‘abroad’ has a pretty confused idea about the nature of ‘online culture’.
The “Online right” exists online. People in Sweden (who, you’ll be surprised to hear, have computers) have the same access to ‘online’ as people in Chicago.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago

Thanks for dealing with the woke t**d.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

And thanks for that profound thought, d**k. The breadth of your intellect never ceases to impress.
Thanks the Lord we have people of your calibre defending Western civilisation from the hordes- the sheer force of your erudition will scatter your foolish, ill-educated enemies like ants flushed down the drain by a Powerwash hose….
“Woke t**d”. Genius. Remind me, is that `Milton?

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

By the way, could you quote the most “woke” thing I’ve said here?
Just to give me some idea of what’s ‘triggered’ you to quite such a dribbling fury; quote me a specific “woke” statement of mine that’s particularly upset you and made you feel so very, very cross.
Thank you.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

Do one.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

Every time I think I’ve finally plumbed the depths of your stupidity, Dickie, you confound me with something even dumber. Can you tie your own shoelaces, or do you have those sticky things instead?
I honestly don’t think it can be possible to come upwith a more truly idiotic response than “Do one”.
Can you try? Give it a go. Don’t hit your head on the computer….

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

Every time I think I’ve finally plumbed the depths of your stupidity, Dickie, you confound me with something even dumber. Can you tie your own shoelaces, or do you have those sticky things instead?
I honestly don’t think it can be possible to come upwith a more truly idiotic response than “Do one”.
Can you try? Give it a go. Don’t hit your head on the computer….

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

Do one.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

And thanks for that profound thought, d**k. The breadth of your intellect never ceases to impress.
Thanks the Lord we have people of your calibre defending Western civilisation from the hordes- the sheer force of your erudition will scatter your foolish, ill-educated enemies like ants flushed down the drain by a Powerwash hose….
“Woke t**d”. Genius. Remind me, is that `Milton?

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

By the way, could you quote the most “woke” thing I’ve said here?
Just to give me some idea of what’s ‘triggered’ you to quite such a dribbling fury; quote me a specific “woke” statement of mine that’s particularly upset you and made you feel so very, very cross.
Thank you.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago

“Rando says what?”
I’m sorry you found the article difficult to understand (it’s pretty straightfoward), but you failed to answer my point- that anyone who complains that ‘Online culture’ cannot be understood from ‘abroad’ has a pretty confused idea about the nature of ‘online culture’.
The “Online right” exists online. People in Sweden (who, you’ll be surprised to hear, have computers) have the same access to ‘online’ as people in Chicago.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago

Thanks for dealing with the woke t**d.

Kat L
Kat L
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

The problem as I see it there’s a difference between stating things from a viewpoint from far away and admitting it might not be accurate to stating you actually know what is going on regardless of whether you actually know. I see a lot of statements about the USA that are made through a lense of international liberal media.

Allison Barrows
Allison Barrows
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

Rando says what? Pretty much sums up analysis these days.

Kat L
Kat L
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

The problem as I see it there’s a difference between stating things from a viewpoint from far away and admitting it might not be accurate to stating you actually know what is going on regardless of whether you actually know. I see a lot of statements about the USA that are made through a lense of international liberal media.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago

It’s almost as if the internet was a global thing, whereas we both know that no-one in Sweden knows anything about what gets posted in the US, right Allison? How could he- what’s he doing, reading posts on his computer or something?
Silly man.

Allison Barrows
Allison Barrows
1 year ago

This author – from Sweden – claims that some guy in Chicago represents “the Online Right” (?) and that means “it” collectively gave up on reality? Ahem. Looks like he isn’t the only one. Malcom, go touch some grass.

Bryan Dale
Bryan Dale
1 year ago

Never apologize, never explain. Those of us on the right who have been paying attention to cancel culture understand that efforts to make amends when accused of “racism” only cause the left to double down on the attacks. This has nothing to do with protecting his online reputation. It’s about standing up to leftist lies and bullying.

Graeme McNeil
Graeme McNeil
1 year ago
Reply to  Bryan Dale

There’s nothing to explain and why would you apologize? We all know that you are racists (among other things) and you don’t care that everyone knows.

Steve Murray
Steve Murray
1 year ago
Reply to  Graeme McNeil

You’ve just proven Bryan’s case for him.

Graeme McNeil
Graeme McNeil
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve Murray

What “case” would that be?

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Graeme McNeil

Bryan’s “case” is merely confused- he thinks the article is about a racist (which makes him upset, oviously), but if he could manage a little English comprehension he’d realise that the article quite specifically doubts that this sad little online troll IS racist- the point being that he simply wants to “stir shit up”. He has no real beliefs about race either way.
So it’s ok, Bryan- no-one is being nasty about racists, or even the Right, per se. Read the article properly before flying off on one, that’s my advice..

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Graeme McNeil

Bryan’s “case” is merely confused- he thinks the article is about a racist (which makes him upset, oviously), but if he could manage a little English comprehension he’d realise that the article quite specifically doubts that this sad little online troll IS racist- the point being that he simply wants to “stir shit up”. He has no real beliefs about race either way.
So it’s ok, Bryan- no-one is being nasty about racists, or even the Right, per se. Read the article properly before flying off on one, that’s my advice..

Graeme McNeil
Graeme McNeil
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve Murray

What “case” would that be?

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  Graeme McNeil

There’s everything to explain and why wouldn’t you apologize? We all know that you are a woke racist (among other things) and you care desperately that everyone knows.

Steve Murray
Steve Murray
1 year ago
Reply to  Graeme McNeil

You’ve just proven Bryan’s case for him.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  Graeme McNeil

There’s everything to explain and why wouldn’t you apologize? We all know that you are a woke racist (among other things) and you care desperately that everyone knows.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Bryan Dale

Yes, Bryan. You’re a hero, just like the miserable little trolls hiding in their basements and posting crap online.
The Greatest Generation.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

Yes, Rubber. You’re a hero, just like the miserable little trolls hiding in their basements and posting crap online.The Greatest Generation.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

Well done for repeating my post. Clever Dickie.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

Well done for repeating my post. Clever Dickie.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

Yes, Rubber. You’re a hero, just like the miserable little trolls hiding in their basements and posting crap online.The Greatest Generation.

Graeme McNeil
Graeme McNeil
1 year ago
Reply to  Bryan Dale

There’s nothing to explain and why would you apologize? We all know that you are racists (among other things) and you don’t care that everyone knows.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Bryan Dale

Yes, Bryan. You’re a hero, just like the miserable little trolls hiding in their basements and posting crap online.
The Greatest Generation.

Bryan Dale
Bryan Dale
1 year ago

Never apologize, never explain. Those of us on the right who have been paying attention to cancel culture understand that efforts to make amends when accused of “racism” only cause the left to double down on the attacks. This has nothing to do with protecting his online reputation. It’s about standing up to leftist lies and bullying.

Matt Hindman
Matt Hindman
1 year ago

Congratulations Kyeyune, you discovered the internet.

Matt Hindman
Matt Hindman
1 year ago

Congratulations Kyeyune, you discovered the internet.

Laney R Sexton
Laney R Sexton
1 year ago

Stopped reading this article halfway to find Pericles on Instagram. He’s a genius.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Laney R Sexton

If your definition of ‘genius’ is ‘cretin on internet’, rather than, say, Newton or Mozart, undoubtedly.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

Do you respect Isla Bryson’s pronouns?

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

Your obsession with this Isla Bryson person is a little wierd, Dickie.
I have no interest in some inane online CultureWar crap between the ‘Woke’ and “Unti-woke’ gangs about pronouns. If you and your ‘Woke’ enemies want to indulge in your dumb online ranting matches about this fashionable issue, then you’ll have to find someone else to shout with- I’m not interested. Nothing intelligent or useful ever seems to come out of this idiotic game.
The issue clearly excites you- there must be many people on your computer who you can indulge your hobby with, thanks for the offer.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

Well done for persisting with the “Rubber” thing, though. My name is John, and an old term for a condom was ‘rubber jonny’. It’s that sort of coruscating satirical mind that makes you so very much worth engaging with.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

You’re exerting an awful lot of energy on me, Rubber. I wish I could say that I enjoyed living rent-free inside your head, but it’s really rather sad and sordid, not to say disturbing.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

You love it.
Go on, say “woke scum” for me…

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

However, you’re quite right- I am spending more time than is healthy engaging with your comedically challenged intellect.
It’s funny, up to a point, but I really should be doing something more enlightening, such as inspecting my drains. They’re Victorian you see, and prone to collapsing.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

You love it.
Go on, say “woke scum” for me…

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

However, you’re quite right- I am spending more time than is healthy engaging with your comedically challenged intellect.
It’s funny, up to a point, but I really should be doing something more enlightening, such as inspecting my drains. They’re Victorian you see, and prone to collapsing.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

You’re exerting an awful lot of energy on me, Rubber. I wish I could say that I enjoyed living rent-free inside your head, but it’s really rather sad and sordid, not to say disturbing.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

Your obsession with this Isla Bryson person is a little wierd, Dickie.
I have no interest in some inane online CultureWar crap between the ‘Woke’ and “Unti-woke’ gangs about pronouns. If you and your ‘Woke’ enemies want to indulge in your dumb online ranting matches about this fashionable issue, then you’ll have to find someone else to shout with- I’m not interested. Nothing intelligent or useful ever seems to come out of this idiotic game.
The issue clearly excites you- there must be many people on your computer who you can indulge your hobby with, thanks for the offer.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

Well done for persisting with the “Rubber” thing, though. My name is John, and an old term for a condom was ‘rubber jonny’. It’s that sort of coruscating satirical mind that makes you so very much worth engaging with.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

Do you respect Isla Bryson’s pronouns?

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Laney R Sexton

If your definition of ‘genius’ is ‘cretin on internet’, rather than, say, Newton or Mozart, undoubtedly.

Laney R Sexton
Laney R Sexton
1 year ago

Stopped reading this article halfway to find Pericles on Instagram. He’s a genius.

Liam F
Liam F
1 year ago

It’s sad. Social media is designed to make you feel that you’re making a difference, being listened to. He’s not so different from Megan & Harry and many others who think they are helping change the world -one post at a time. Hopefully when he has kids of his own he’ll run out of hours in the day to rage against the machine..

Warren Trees
Warren Trees
1 year ago
Reply to  Liam F

The only way they make a difference is by consuming more electricity….while saving the planet.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Warren Trees

Says man posting online.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

Says woketard posting online.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

“Woketard”?
Clever Dickie. Dickie see ‘libtard’ on internet, and then Dickie see ‘woke’ on internet, and then Dickie make ‘woketard.’ Dickie think new word good.
Dickie happy, because Dickie angry, and angry means Dickie doesn’t have to think. Think is bad- Dickie simple man.
Goodnight Dickie.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

You seem to have a bit of a thing about d**k, Rubber. Are you not getting enough?

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

Excellent, Dickie.
Except that terrific bon mot doesn’t actually work, does it? Partly because I don’t actually call you ‘d**k’, but ‘Dickie’- which isn’t a word for c**k- and partly because you love to call me ‘Rubber’, which, being a schoolboy name for a sexual prophylactic, suggests it’s you who are the one who might be feeling ‘lonely’.
Well done for trying, though. It’s a small advance on your standard “Woke scum”.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

Excellent, Dickie.
Except that terrific bon mot doesn’t actually work, does it? Partly because I don’t actually call you ‘d**k’, but ‘Dickie’- which isn’t a word for c**k- and partly because you love to call me ‘Rubber’, which, being a schoolboy name for a sexual prophylactic, suggests it’s you who are the one who might be feeling ‘lonely’.
Well done for trying, though. It’s a small advance on your standard “Woke scum”.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

You seem to have a bit of a thing about d**k, Rubber. Are you not getting enough?

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

“Woketard”?
Clever Dickie. Dickie see ‘libtard’ on internet, and then Dickie see ‘woke’ on internet, and then Dickie make ‘woketard.’ Dickie think new word good.
Dickie happy, because Dickie angry, and angry means Dickie doesn’t have to think. Think is bad- Dickie simple man.
Goodnight Dickie.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

Says woketard posting online.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Warren Trees

Says man posting online.

Kat L
Kat L
1 year ago
Reply to  Liam F

No he should not help propagate our species.

Warren Trees
Warren Trees
1 year ago
Reply to  Liam F

The only way they make a difference is by consuming more electricity….while saving the planet.

Kat L
Kat L
1 year ago
Reply to  Liam F

No he should not help propagate our species.

Liam F
Liam F
1 year ago

It’s sad. Social media is designed to make you feel that you’re making a difference, being listened to. He’s not so different from Megan & Harry and many others who think they are helping change the world -one post at a time. Hopefully when he has kids of his own he’ll run out of hours in the day to rage against the machine..

Warren Trees
Warren Trees
1 year ago

“In this world, online micro-celebrities fight with each other tooth and claw for likes, attention, followers, and social position inside a myriad of private group chats and social circles on Twitter.”
Glad I’m not a part of that world.

Warren Trees
Warren Trees
1 year ago

“In this world, online micro-celebrities fight with each other tooth and claw for likes, attention, followers, and social position inside a myriad of private group chats and social circles on Twitter.”
Glad I’m not a part of that world.

Alan Hawkes
Alan Hawkes
1 year ago

Is this so different to asking why a successful professional would ruin his life through alcohol, or drug, abuse?

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Alan Hawkes

Maybe not, in some ways- although at least drug addicts have the decency to do their thing more or less in private.

Kat L
Kat L
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

Or rather they don’t have time to do it since their only goal is getting high or engaging in behavior to ensure that they will be able to get high in the future.

Kat L
Kat L
1 year ago
Reply to  John Holland

Or rather they don’t have time to do it since their only goal is getting high or engaging in behavior to ensure that they will be able to get high in the future.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Alan Hawkes

Maybe not, in some ways- although at least drug addicts have the decency to do their thing more or less in private.

Alan Hawkes
Alan Hawkes
1 year ago

Is this so different to asking why a successful professional would ruin his life through alcohol, or drug, abuse?

Kat L
Kat L
1 year ago

Why is the author headlining the far right when the article says he supported blm?