X Close

The cruelty behind white gold The bull semen trade relies on sickening methods

The market is bullish (Charles McQuillan/Getty Images)

The market is bullish (Charles McQuillan/Getty Images)


January 24, 2023   4 mins

As crimes go, it took balls. Just before Christmas, thieves stole 60 containers of bull sperm from a farm in Olfen, a small town near Cologne, Germany. You might wonder what you do with litres of bovine ejaculate. Well, bull semen from premium pedigree bulls can be worth its weight in gold. Literally. Hence its agricultural nickname, “white gold”. Even Jeremy Clarkson, who is worth £70 million and treats farming like a side hobby, complained that bull semen is “phenomenally expensive”. A single “straw” (a 0.25cm3 plastic vial) from a top line bull, sold by a reputable dealer, can cost thousands of pounds. Ten vials from one bull went for US$67,000 at a sale in Australia in 2019.

The bull sperm market is bullish thanks to the widespread practice of artificial insemination. More than 75% of all dairy cattle breeding in the UK is done via this consistent method, which allows cows to be impregnated with the juice of a tried and trusted sire. If you can afford one, these sires are an excellent investment. In February 2019, an Angus bull named SAV America 8018 sold for the record-breaking price of $1.51 million due to “superior genetics”. The buyer was Trump advisor Charles W. Herbster, who took the bull to his Virginia stud, North American Breeders Inc., and turned him into a cash cow. SAV America 8018’s straws went for $80 a pop.

Just do the arithmetic. A stud bull will have its semen extracted twice a day, three or four times a week, and deposit, on average, 5-8ml of semen. One British Charolais bull is on record for producing £800,000 worth of semen a month, but the world record for semen production goes to an American Holstein bull Toystory, who in his 13 years at stud produced 2.4 million units (or 2,700lbs) of semen, and sired an estimated 500,000 offspring.

Who was the lucky benefactor? Toystory was owned by the dystopian-sounding Genex Cooperative Inc, itself a component of URUS, the biggest artificial inseminator in the world. (“We inseminate one cow a second around the globe.”) The URUS group have sold over 3.1 million “straws” between them. Britain’s biggest bovine semen producer is Cogent, which began life on the Duke of Westminster’s Eaton Estate in Cheshire, but is now part of Texas-based STGenetics. With more than 100 bulls at stud, Cogent, like URUS, sells worldwide. Bull semen production is increasingly a multinational enterprise, a cross-borders commerce.

And the price of bull sperm is shooting up, not least because it is increasingly modified in the stud lab. (Cogent’s speciality is sexed semen, which enables dairy farmers to generate 90% female calves.) The likely consequence of the increased cost is that semen heists will also likely rise. Already the theft of bull sperm is a global phenomenon, not an incident isolated to Olfen. Perhaps the greatest heist, in monetary terms, occurred in Minnesota, USA, in 2015, when robbers rustled four pints of bull semen worth US $70,000. Such semen thefts are rarely opportunistic, because the ejaculate needs to be conserved carefully, supercooled with liquid nitrogen at -196°C so it doesn’t spoil.

If you think the money involved in bull semen is eye-watering, wait until you hear how the semen is collected in the first place. In the good old days, the bull mounted the cow, and the semen was extracted with a spoon or syringe. (Been there, done that: I am a traditional farmer.) These days, the methods are increasingly unnatural and cruel. The cow is replaced by a “teaser cow” — usually a castrated male, or a wooden dummy. To stimulate the bull, stud farms often employ techniques, such as a ransrectal massage (TRM), which can be very painful for the creature — but not as painful as electroejaculation (EEJ). This technique, in use since 1936, involves inserting a 75-90mm-wide electrified probe directly into the bull’s anus, and sending pulses of between 8 and 16 volts into it. The bull, meanwhile, is restrained in a metal cage known as a “crush”.

No one who has witnessed the process of EEJ could deny that it causes the bulls pain. They bellow (“vocalisation” in the euphemism of theriogenology, the veterinary science of reproduction) and the back legs may give way. Under the skin, there are increases in plasma cortisol, progesterone and heart rate — all signifiers of distress. As one recent scientific volume aimed at the industry, Reproductive Technologies in Animals, put it: “Obviously, EEJ is regarded as a stressful and painful procedure, which may negatively affect animal welfare.”

Obviously. Yet it is standardly practised throughout the world. Only Denmark and the Netherlands seem to ban electroejaculation. To reduce the pain of EEJ, bulls are sometimes given an intrarectal anaesthetic. Sometimes. Most countries allow anybody to operate the EEJ probe, although it widely acknowledged that good technique can minimise pain. In Britain, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) and the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists guidelines indicate that the EEJ procedure must be performed by a veterinary surgeon; however, the use of an analgesic is not a specified requirement.

All this is part of a bleak wider trend. The more agriculture industrialises, the more it seemingly becomes inured to casual cruelty towards farm animals. Our dwindling ethical standards are partly down to agriculture’s removal from the grass roots, and partly down to money. Both extreme poverty and extreme wealth in farming tend to produce harshness towards “dumb beasts”.

The argument for modern methods of collecting bull semen is that the “elite” cows produced will give humanity more beef, more milk. But ends do not justify means, and, anyway, the cruelties of commercial bull semen production are petrol for the flames of veganism. It gives farming in general a bad name. Some of us in agriculture think that the only place for a bull is in the field, servicing the herd naturally. Living a life, in the words of moral philosopher Martha Nussbaum in her recent book, Justice for Animals, that is “characteristic of its kind”. The real crime in the bull semen business? It’s animal welfare.


John Lewis-Stempel is a farmer and writer on nature and history. His most recent books are The Sheep’s Tale and Nightwalking.

JLewisStempel

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

22 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rhonda Culwell
Rhonda Culwell
1 year ago

What a sad and miserable way for a magnificent animal to spend its life.

Rhonda Culwell
Rhonda Culwell
1 year ago

What a sad and miserable way for a magnificent animal to spend its life.

CHARLES STANHOPE
CHARLES STANHOPE
1 year ago

Thank you Mr Lewis-Stempel for that, it will come in useful on ‘Judgment Day’, if not before.

Warren Trees
Warren Trees
1 year ago

Speaking of judgement day, I wonder what happens to the medical doctors who perform the millions of unborn baby killings each year? This bull thing seems like child’s play in comparison.

Billy Bob
Billy Bob
1 year ago
Reply to  Warren Trees

Stick to the subject at hand would you

Billy Bob
Billy Bob
1 year ago
Reply to  Warren Trees

Stick to the subject at hand would you

Warren Trees
Warren Trees
1 year ago

Speaking of judgement day, I wonder what happens to the medical doctors who perform the millions of unborn baby killings each year? This bull thing seems like child’s play in comparison.

CHARLES STANHOPE
CHARLES STANHOPE
1 year ago

Thank you Mr Lewis-Stempel for that, it will come in useful on ‘Judgment Day’, if not before.

Tom Lewis
Tom Lewis
1 year ago

The ‘upside’ however is, that it’s a lot safer than keeping bulls (particularly dairy) on the farm. It doesn’t excuse wonton cruelty for, maximising, profit though. Talk about, taking a good idea and milking it for everything it’s got. I’m surprised the author didn’t touch upon the other side though, if only for informing readers, if not because it’s less cruel (I don’t know). The technique, in the same vein as maximising ‘desired’ traits from bulls, flushes (harvests) eggs from ‘good’ cows, inseminates them with ‘desired’ bull semen before they are then inserted into the uteruses of cows with ‘poor’ quality traits. The main benefit, as far as I can tell, is that it vastly increases the speed at which desired traits can be spread around the herd (particularly when selecting for sex, bull calves are a wasted gestation for dairy farms).

Tony Goodchild
Tony Goodchild
1 year ago
Reply to  Tom Lewis

Selecting the sex of semen has other animal welfare benefits, too: it reduces the number of male calves born, many of which (because of having extreme milk-producing genetics) will be killed as newborns or be killed as veal.

Tony Goodchild
Tony Goodchild
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Goodchild

Let’s not forget that dairy farmers are under unacceptable pressure to produce milk as cheaply as possible, with dire cow welfare effects. We can blame the retail market for that

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Goodchild

The economics of milk production are dismal- as someone says above, we expect to pay less for milk than for fizzy water. The result is shockingly cruel practices in the industry, with each cow producing quite insane volumes of milk.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Goodchild

The economics of milk production are dismal- as someone says above, we expect to pay less for milk than for fizzy water. The result is shockingly cruel practices in the industry, with each cow producing quite insane volumes of milk.

Tony Goodchild
Tony Goodchild
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Goodchild

Let’s not forget that dairy farmers are under unacceptable pressure to produce milk as cheaply as possible, with dire cow welfare effects. We can blame the retail market for that

Betsy Arehart
Betsy Arehart
1 year ago
Reply to  Tom Lewis

Once again, the “men” are rendered disposable.

Tony Goodchild
Tony Goodchild
1 year ago
Reply to  Tom Lewis

Selecting the sex of semen has other animal welfare benefits, too: it reduces the number of male calves born, many of which (because of having extreme milk-producing genetics) will be killed as newborns or be killed as veal.

Betsy Arehart
Betsy Arehart
1 year ago
Reply to  Tom Lewis

Once again, the “men” are rendered disposable.

Tom Lewis
Tom Lewis
1 year ago

The ‘upside’ however is, that it’s a lot safer than keeping bulls (particularly dairy) on the farm. It doesn’t excuse wonton cruelty for, maximising, profit though. Talk about, taking a good idea and milking it for everything it’s got. I’m surprised the author didn’t touch upon the other side though, if only for informing readers, if not because it’s less cruel (I don’t know). The technique, in the same vein as maximising ‘desired’ traits from bulls, flushes (harvests) eggs from ‘good’ cows, inseminates them with ‘desired’ bull semen before they are then inserted into the uteruses of cows with ‘poor’ quality traits. The main benefit, as far as I can tell, is that it vastly increases the speed at which desired traits can be spread around the herd (particularly when selecting for sex, bull calves are a wasted gestation for dairy farms).

polidori redux
polidori redux
1 year ago

“A stud bull will have its semen extracted twice a day, three or four times a week, and deposit, on average, 5-8ml of semen.”
My ears pricked up.

CHARLES STANHOPE
CHARLES STANHOPE
1 year ago
Reply to  polidori redux

Errol Flynn?

Alan Gore
Alan Gore
1 year ago
Reply to  polidori redux

Hard numbers, indeed.

CHARLES STANHOPE
CHARLES STANHOPE
1 year ago
Reply to  polidori redux

Errol Flynn?

Alan Gore
Alan Gore
1 year ago
Reply to  polidori redux

Hard numbers, indeed.

polidori redux
polidori redux
1 year ago

“A stud bull will have its semen extracted twice a day, three or four times a week, and deposit, on average, 5-8ml of semen.”
My ears pricked up.

Alka Hughes-Hallett
Alka Hughes-Hallett
1 year ago

Too cruel to carry on reading! All the more reason to become vegan . If the author is only worried about the rise of veganism, it’s a sad reflection of his morality, his view of animal farming stems from the rationale that it’s justifiable just because enslaving animals is largely fine. In any case what this article proves is that the money in this business has left no space for morality & conscience in our hearts-none whatsoever, leaving the vacuum to become black like tar. So long as animal farming exists, so will evil practices of all sort.

My neighbour is a farmer, and she used to describe these horrible practices more than 10 yrs ago. She told us of the dirty little secrets of western animal husbandry . Including the life span of a cow has shrunk from 7-10 yrs to 3-5 yrs, all for making bigger and bigger beasts & the commercial life of a cow IS its real life. The young calves are separated from their mother within 2 weeks of being born. On my run, I can often hear the howling of youngsters and mothers in different fields. This anxiety both for the mother and calf could not be healthy, neither for their meat, nor for their milk. The male calves are sent for animal food as they are useless. The youngsters are fed some mixture that makes their poop totally liquid, so not only they are stressed without their mother but also physically debilitated on some gruel like food that their digestive systems are not ready for.

It has also been revealed how tons of milk went literally into the drain during covid because of closed restaurants/ hotels. Besides, there is no money in dairy farming as arla is powerful cooperative that controls the price so viciously, no wonder the consumer is bemused to see milk on shelves for less than £.50 a pint.

Bruce Luffman
Bruce Luffman
1 year ago

I am a retired dairy farmer who was in the business milking cows for 40 years – 1950s to mid 1990s and I do not recognise your assertions. Yes, calves are separted from their mothers after the first colostrum milk and if done so within 24 hours, there is not a problem with mothers and calves. She starts letting down her milk and the calf thrives on milk substitue as do human babies.
My cows averaged 9 lactations (11 years) and it is considerably more profitable to keep cows longer as every lactation gets larger and thereby more profitable against the loss of 2 years with every new heifer getting to first calf. I was producing yields of 8-10000 litres per cow per year with excellent husbandry and cow longevity as are many others. Many bull calves used to go for Bovril from Holsteins except mine were British Friesian and went for beef and up to 20 years ago, 70% of beef cattle came from the dairy herd.
Yes, the housewife wants absurdly cheap milk; less than sparkling water, but most dairy farmers love their cows and good husbandry is a must for high yielding cows where milk yields have been improved by breeding. I do not recognise the methods described for getting semen. We used to collect semen by diverting the bull’s p***s into a rubber tube and into a bottle as he mounted the cow. Semen used to be collected fresh unitl the mid 1960s every morning at articficial insemmination centres and then that was used that day by MMB inseminators in the farm. I was one of the first dairy farmers in UK to do DIY insemmination in 1976 and had various bulls’ semen in a liquid nitrogen flask for storage on the farm.
Our bulls would only perform for good semen twice a week and produce about 250 ampoules of semen per jump.

Betsy Arehart
Betsy Arehart
1 year ago
Reply to  Bruce Luffman

Thank you for that reply from knowledge of the other side of the issue. In the 1960s my uncle worked on a “bull farm” in Wisconsin and it was explained to us children what its purpose was. I presume the method was the same as that in your description. I don’t doubt that the animals were treated humanely.

Betsy Arehart
Betsy Arehart
1 year ago
Reply to  Bruce Luffman

Thank you for that reply from knowledge of the other side of the issue. In the 1960s my uncle worked on a “bull farm” in Wisconsin and it was explained to us children what its purpose was. I presume the method was the same as that in your description. I don’t doubt that the animals were treated humanely.

Bruce Luffman
Bruce Luffman
1 year ago

I am a retired dairy farmer who was in the business milking cows for 40 years – 1950s to mid 1990s and I do not recognise your assertions. Yes, calves are separted from their mothers after the first colostrum milk and if done so within 24 hours, there is not a problem with mothers and calves. She starts letting down her milk and the calf thrives on milk substitue as do human babies.
My cows averaged 9 lactations (11 years) and it is considerably more profitable to keep cows longer as every lactation gets larger and thereby more profitable against the loss of 2 years with every new heifer getting to first calf. I was producing yields of 8-10000 litres per cow per year with excellent husbandry and cow longevity as are many others. Many bull calves used to go for Bovril from Holsteins except mine were British Friesian and went for beef and up to 20 years ago, 70% of beef cattle came from the dairy herd.
Yes, the housewife wants absurdly cheap milk; less than sparkling water, but most dairy farmers love their cows and good husbandry is a must for high yielding cows where milk yields have been improved by breeding. I do not recognise the methods described for getting semen. We used to collect semen by diverting the bull’s p***s into a rubber tube and into a bottle as he mounted the cow. Semen used to be collected fresh unitl the mid 1960s every morning at articficial insemmination centres and then that was used that day by MMB inseminators in the farm. I was one of the first dairy farmers in UK to do DIY insemmination in 1976 and had various bulls’ semen in a liquid nitrogen flask for storage on the farm.
Our bulls would only perform for good semen twice a week and produce about 250 ampoules of semen per jump.

Alka Hughes-Hallett
Alka Hughes-Hallett
1 year ago

Too cruel to carry on reading! All the more reason to become vegan . If the author is only worried about the rise of veganism, it’s a sad reflection of his morality, his view of animal farming stems from the rationale that it’s justifiable just because enslaving animals is largely fine. In any case what this article proves is that the money in this business has left no space for morality & conscience in our hearts-none whatsoever, leaving the vacuum to become black like tar. So long as animal farming exists, so will evil practices of all sort.

My neighbour is a farmer, and she used to describe these horrible practices more than 10 yrs ago. She told us of the dirty little secrets of western animal husbandry . Including the life span of a cow has shrunk from 7-10 yrs to 3-5 yrs, all for making bigger and bigger beasts & the commercial life of a cow IS its real life. The young calves are separated from their mother within 2 weeks of being born. On my run, I can often hear the howling of youngsters and mothers in different fields. This anxiety both for the mother and calf could not be healthy, neither for their meat, nor for their milk. The male calves are sent for animal food as they are useless. The youngsters are fed some mixture that makes their poop totally liquid, so not only they are stressed without their mother but also physically debilitated on some gruel like food that their digestive systems are not ready for.

It has also been revealed how tons of milk went literally into the drain during covid because of closed restaurants/ hotels. Besides, there is no money in dairy farming as arla is powerful cooperative that controls the price so viciously, no wonder the consumer is bemused to see milk on shelves for less than £.50 a pint.

Heather Peeters
Heather Peeters
1 year ago

I really appreciated this perspective on artificial insemination. I grew up on a dairy farm and we used artificial insemination for our cows. I had a number of friends (who were all from farms) who had bulls instead. Bulls are dangerous to keep and I remember being very afraid of them at the time. One of my friends was even attacked by the bull on his farm and narrowly avoided serious internal damage. I understand the convenience of artificial insemination, but the increase in demand is obviously leading the practice in the wrong direction.

Henry Mayhew
Henry Mayhew
1 year ago

Yes, well off to pay the gas bill.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Henry Mayhew

Nobody cares, Henry.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Henry Mayhew

Nobody cares, Henry.

Henry Mayhew
Henry Mayhew
1 year ago

Yes, well off to pay the gas bill.

Helen Murray
Helen Murray
1 year ago

I gave consuming milk and dairy 4 decades ago because of the animal welfare issues. However never knew about this horror. If occasionally given milk in tea or coffee, it tastes horrible to me now. All milk has some pus and cow feaces in it BTW. As long as it does’t reach a certain threshold, then it is allowed to pass.

Mônica
Mônica
1 year ago
Reply to  Helen Murray

“Disgusting” bits are not exclusive to dairy. All cereal has mice/rodents’ faeces in it and even drinking water has a threshold for faecal coliforms. We are a lot less clean than we’d like to think.

Warren Trees
Warren Trees
1 year ago
Reply to  Mônica

We also breath in particulates in the air. Hardly a reason to stop breathing.
By the way, if what they do to some bulls is offensive, wait until this practice comes to human “dumb beasts” some day. I won’t even bring up the fact that the practice of “exterminating” unborn human babies by the millions each year seems a lot more deplorable than jerking off some bulls.

Last edited 1 year ago by Warren Trees
John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Warren Trees

“I won’t even bring up the fact…”
But you have. Twice. And if you think this article is about “jerking off some bulls”, you haven’t been paying attention.

John Holland
John Holland
1 year ago
Reply to  Warren Trees

“I won’t even bring up the fact…”
But you have. Twice. And if you think this article is about “jerking off some bulls”, you haven’t been paying attention.

Warren Trees
Warren Trees
1 year ago
Reply to  Mônica

We also breath in particulates in the air. Hardly a reason to stop breathing.
By the way, if what they do to some bulls is offensive, wait until this practice comes to human “dumb beasts” some day. I won’t even bring up the fact that the practice of “exterminating” unborn human babies by the millions each year seems a lot more deplorable than jerking off some bulls.

Last edited 1 year ago by Warren Trees
Mônica
Mônica
1 year ago
Reply to  Helen Murray

“Disgusting” bits are not exclusive to dairy. All cereal has mice/rodents’ faeces in it and even drinking water has a threshold for faecal coliforms. We are a lot less clean than we’d like to think.

Helen Murray
Helen Murray
1 year ago

I gave consuming milk and dairy 4 decades ago because of the animal welfare issues. However never knew about this horror. If occasionally given milk in tea or coffee, it tastes horrible to me now. All milk has some pus and cow feaces in it BTW. As long as it does’t reach a certain threshold, then it is allowed to pass.