The leafy, residential streets of Cambridge are about as far as you can get from the arid valleys of Utah. But with its grey concrete spire and squat mid-century gabled exterior, the chapel in the suburb of Cherry Hinton could have been transplanted directly from Salt Lake City. It is a striking sign of a little-known fact: that the Mormons are a force to be reckoned with in East Anglia.
The Utah-based religious movement — founded in 1830 in New York State — rebranded in 2018, calling for “Mormon” to be abandoned in favour of the official “Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints”. “It’s a bit of a mouthful,” admits Kevin Johnson, 56, who was raised in the faith in Norwich and now worships in Cambridge. But the focus on “latter days” is strategic: “we’re here now to make a difference in the world”. And for that, the Church needs funds.
On the other side of Cambridgeshire, it is doing God’s work, in the fertile earth of the fens. In the village of Woodwalton, near Huntingdon, it owns thousands of acres. Over the years, it has been variously reported to be the largest foreign purchaser of land in Britain; during a spree in the late Nineties, it spent £30 million on prime farmland in the space of six years. More recently, it came top of Farmers Weekly’s list of “unusual owners of UK farmland”. According to Guy Shrubsole, author of Who Owns England?, the Church is the 78th largest landowner in the country, with 7,716 acres.
Agriculture may seem like a surprising sideline, but it is in keeping with the Church’s history — the pioneers of Mormonism, Joseph Smith and Brigham Young, were both sons of farmers — and its central values. There is “an emphasis on self-reliance”, says Anne Thomas, a 27-year-old Latter Day Saint from California who just completed her PhD at the University of Cambridge — “just being prepared for anything”.
The Church’s control of land is usually indirect. It effectively runs a multinational firm named AgReserves, which was once reported to be America’s largest producer of nuts and is the largest private landowner in Florida — where it is planning a city almost 20 times the size of Manhattan. A subsidiary of the firm, Farmland Reserve UK Ltd, exists in this country as both a registered charity and a limited company, according to documents lodged at Companies House. Its principal activity is arable farming, and it has been reaping the rewards of soaring global cereal prices. It owns land worth almost £54 million and buildings worth almost £17 million.
While their religious activities — which include handing out literature on the street — are highly visible, their business enterprises are not. The church was quick to tell me that while its community members would be happy to be interviewed, “the farmland entity” would not.
It was not always so media-shy. Back in 1999, The Independent was invited into its boardroom on Manor Farm. A printed sign read: “Our business is farmland. Profit motivated: No Excuses.” In the Nineties, it was expanding — into Norfolk, Suffolk and Lincolnshire. Now, it is going into retreat. Accepting that the “scattered nature of some of the parcels of land do lead to some labour and equipment inefficiencies”, the company is consolidating its land holdings “around one major farm centre in Cambridgeshire”.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI lived in Utah until I was 40 and, despite being an unapologetic atheist, had plenty of Mormon friends, boyfriends and good neighbors. Mormons are upright, wholesome people, on the whole, and some of the most well-adjusted and gracious folks I ever knew. The church itself has any large organization’s problems with power seeking and corruption, hardly beyond reproach, but the state of Utah used to be well run with a lot more social services than one might expect from a conservative state. I’m sorry to learn that their enrollment is going down because they’ve held the line against the “queering” and degradation of modern society while most Protestant sects have just rolled over.
Thanks for the kind words! I would agree that the majority of members I come in contact with across the world are amazing people who sincerely love Christ and his teachings and try to emulate his example.
One comment on the article.. temple work for the dead doesn’t “convert” anyone.. it simply gives them the chance to accept the temple work (baptism, marriage, and family sealing) performed on their behalf in the after life
Do the Mormons ask payment from family members for this service?
I ask this because Protestantism was born out of the tithes family members had to pay the Catholic Church to raise the soul of a deceased relative out of purgatory and into heaven.
A bit of a con, I fear.
No. No payments are made in exchange for ancestor work performed in temples. A mormon can submit the name of an ancestor for temple ordinance-by-proxy to be done by others, or they can do it themselves.
No. We do provide resources for finding more about your ancestors on FamilySearch.org. It’s free and open to anyone who wants to use it.
Our tithes are used to build temples, church buildings, missionary work, etc.
We also don’t have paid clergy in our church.
No. No payments are made in exchange for ancestor work performed in temples. A mormon can submit the name of an ancestor for temple ordinance-by-proxy to be done by others, or they can do it themselves.
No. We do provide resources for finding more about your ancestors on FamilySearch.org. It’s free and open to anyone who wants to use it.
Our tithes are used to build temples, church buildings, missionary work, etc.
We also don’t have paid clergy in our church.
Do the Mormons ask payment from family members for this service?
I ask this because Protestantism was born out of the tithes family members had to pay the Catholic Church to raise the soul of a deceased relative out of purgatory and into heaven.
A bit of a con, I fear.
‘The church … has problems with power seeking and corruption …’. That doesn’t sound very churchlike? ‘Ah, but you see it’s a large organisation‘ OK, I get it, that explains everything!
Large organisations need scrupulous guards to prevent power seeking and corruption. But, who guards the guards? Some churches solve this by having a Grand Guard from whom there is no escape from justice. Good system: without it … well … best of luck.
Large organisations need scrupulous guards to prevent power seeking and corruption. But, who guards the guards? Some churches solve this by having a Grand Guard from whom there is no escape from justice. Good system: without it … well … best of luck.
Thanks for the kind words! I would agree that the majority of members I come in contact with across the world are amazing people who sincerely love Christ and his teachings and try to emulate his example.
One comment on the article.. temple work for the dead doesn’t “convert” anyone.. it simply gives them the chance to accept the temple work (baptism, marriage, and family sealing) performed on their behalf in the after life
‘The church … has problems with power seeking and corruption …’. That doesn’t sound very churchlike? ‘Ah, but you see it’s a large organisation‘ OK, I get it, that explains everything!
I lived in Utah until I was 40 and, despite being an unapologetic atheist, had plenty of Mormon friends, boyfriends and good neighbors. Mormons are upright, wholesome people, on the whole, and some of the most well-adjusted and gracious folks I ever knew. The church itself has any large organization’s problems with power seeking and corruption, hardly beyond reproach, but the state of Utah used to be well run with a lot more social services than one might expect from a conservative state. I’m sorry to learn that their enrollment is going down because they’ve held the line against the “queering” and degradation of modern society while most Protestant sects have just rolled over.
”“but the evidence clearly shows that they are a business dabbling in religion.””
I have had a lot of dealings with Mormons and think them a great strength in the coming chaos ahead of secular humanism turning into an atheist AI-Trans-Humanism hell. One of their many strengths (aside from their ferocity if attacked, which they hold as a tenant) is they believe in success. They hold success earned is a good thing and all should strive for it. Strong Moral stance as well – They are a rock in the coming storm.
Naturally they would believe in being successful financially, and in security, and that means success in business. That is the only way to prepare for a future, have resources – and you may know that is a big tenant of their faith – (keeping a years supply of food is required) as they will not be destroyed. Good for them. I do not know enough to compare them to Sikhs, but I find some commonality, and think in coming hard times organized hard people with strong Morals are vital – and those two groups have that.
It’s “tenet”, not “tenant” – unless you’re referring to tenant farmers?!
And in East Anglia, would they be farming ‘horrible’ land?
Some of the ‘best’ land in England, only exceeded by its near neighbour Lincolnshire!
Which is why perhaps Sir James Dyson has been buying up many square miles of it in recent years!* (God isn’t making anymore of it.)
(IHT Free, off course!)
I was expecting an ‘arable’ reply!
My apologies. After the battering Grimsby got the day I thought I would attempt to redress the balance!
My apologies. After the battering Grimsby got the day I thought I would attempt to redress the balance!
I was expecting an ‘arable’ reply!
Who is saying that it’s “horrible” land? I canb see no reference in teh article or the above comment – I could have missed it of course. Any how, it’s not, it’s very high-grade land which was why the Angles settled there in the first place.
Oh Linda!! It’s a play on the word ‘arable’ – following on from the misuse of the similar-sounding tenant/tenet.
(The use of single inverted commas was intended to provide the clue.)
Sorry, my bad. I’m obviously off my game.I shall now shuffle off to my meeting all shamed faced.:(
Ha! You probably have less ‘off’ days than me 🙂
Ha! You probably have less ‘off’ days than me 🙂
Sorry, my bad. I’m obviously off my game.I shall now shuffle off to my meeting all shamed faced.:(
Oh Linda!! It’s a play on the word ‘arable’ – following on from the misuse of the similar-sounding tenant/tenet.
(The use of single inverted commas was intended to provide the clue.)
Some of the ‘best’ land in England, only exceeded by its near neighbour Lincolnshire!
Which is why perhaps Sir James Dyson has been buying up many square miles of it in recent years!* (God isn’t making anymore of it.)
(IHT Free, off course!)
Who is saying that it’s “horrible” land? I canb see no reference in teh article or the above comment – I could have missed it of course. Any how, it’s not, it’s very high-grade land which was why the Angles settled there in the first place.
We aren’t required to store a year’s worth of food. We do what we can with the resources we have. It would be ideal, but most of us don’t. There a lot of inaccurate things in this article.
It’s “tenet”, not “tenant” – unless you’re referring to tenant farmers?!
And in East Anglia, would they be farming ‘horrible’ land?
We aren’t required to store a year’s worth of food. We do what we can with the resources we have. It would be ideal, but most of us don’t. There a lot of inaccurate things in this article.
”“but the evidence clearly shows that they are a business dabbling in religion.””
I have had a lot of dealings with Mormons and think them a great strength in the coming chaos ahead of secular humanism turning into an atheist AI-Trans-Humanism hell. One of their many strengths (aside from their ferocity if attacked, which they hold as a tenant) is they believe in success. They hold success earned is a good thing and all should strive for it. Strong Moral stance as well – They are a rock in the coming storm.
Naturally they would believe in being successful financially, and in security, and that means success in business. That is the only way to prepare for a future, have resources – and you may know that is a big tenant of their faith – (keeping a years supply of food is required) as they will not be destroyed. Good for them. I do not know enough to compare them to Sikhs, but I find some commonality, and think in coming hard times organized hard people with strong Morals are vital – and those two groups have that.
So. What about the the land the Mormon Church owns in East Anglia?
Starting off with a photograph of a group of women who are almost certainly NOT Mormons, the article looses the thread about half way through and turns to what looks like an uninformed criticism of some more esoteric doctrines.
Does anybody know about the land issue in East Anglia?
Yeah, that was my reaction to this article too. Are the Mormons inappropriately using their influence in East Anglia as major landowners? Do they have an agenda beyond using the land profitably?
The photo looks like a group of polygamist wives looking at a geyser in Yellowstone National Park in the western United States. Either that or some Mormon women dressing up to look like pioneers.
The Mormon church is losing members at a steady rate. Some are still joining or being born into the church, but more are leaving or dying. It’s sad to see.
MORONS not MORMONS?
So they’re consolidating their land holding in the Fens, and otherwise ‘going into retreat’. Meanwhile the number of conversions continues to drop. Hardly sounds like they’re ‘a force to be reckoned with’, in East Anglia or anywhere else.
Yeah, that was my reaction to this article too. Are the Mormons inappropriately using their influence in East Anglia as major landowners? Do they have an agenda beyond using the land profitably?
The photo looks like a group of polygamist wives looking at a geyser in Yellowstone National Park in the western United States. Either that or some Mormon women dressing up to look like pioneers.
The Mormon church is losing members at a steady rate. Some are still joining or being born into the church, but more are leaving or dying. It’s sad to see.
MORONS not MORMONS?
So they’re consolidating their land holding in the Fens, and otherwise ‘going into retreat’. Meanwhile the number of conversions continues to drop. Hardly sounds like they’re ‘a force to be reckoned with’, in East Anglia or anywhere else.
So. What about the the land the Mormon Church owns in East Anglia?
Starting off with a photograph of a group of women who are almost certainly NOT Mormons, the article looses the thread about half way through and turns to what looks like an uninformed criticism of some more esoteric doctrines.
Does anybody know about the land issue in East Anglia?
I am not a Mormon, but I have Mormon/LDS friends, and in my experience they are amongst the most decent people I know. All major religious institutions can fall prey to corruption. I would note however that when the Parker/Stone musical that openly mocks sacred tenets of Mormonism arrived in London, representatives of the church did not threaten violence, organise protests or seek legal avenues to shut down freedom of expression. Western culture sees fit to denigrate and mock religious institutions only when they are peaceful and tolerant. There is a profound moral cowardice in that.
A very good point in their favour.
A very good point in their favour.
I am not a Mormon, but I have Mormon/LDS friends, and in my experience they are amongst the most decent people I know. All major religious institutions can fall prey to corruption. I would note however that when the Parker/Stone musical that openly mocks sacred tenets of Mormonism arrived in London, representatives of the church did not threaten violence, organise protests or seek legal avenues to shut down freedom of expression. Western culture sees fit to denigrate and mock religious institutions only when they are peaceful and tolerant. There is a profound moral cowardice in that.
I am not a Mormon. However, this article writer has annoyed me because he is obviously anti Mormon because it is an organised religion.
He also operates in the mode of the Guardian.
Take a set of facts that show an organisation/ person has money and business resources – Then insinuate corruption and wrong doing as a result of that money.
i.e. you have money and therefore you are corrupt and must be using that money for nefarious purposes.
Every religion takes its congregants donations, and invests them for useful buildings and future investment returns to fund the financial needs of the organisation in the future.
This is normal.
I am not a Mormon. However, this article writer has annoyed me because he is obviously anti Mormon because it is an organised religion.
He also operates in the mode of the Guardian.
Take a set of facts that show an organisation/ person has money and business resources – Then insinuate corruption and wrong doing as a result of that money.
i.e. you have money and therefore you are corrupt and must be using that money for nefarious purposes.
Every religion takes its congregants donations, and invests them for useful buildings and future investment returns to fund the financial needs of the organisation in the future.
This is normal.
7,000 odd acres hardly makes them a major force in the UK economy, or even UK farming.
In any case, I worry a lot more about the weird behaviours and beliefs of the National Trust (500,000 acres or thereabouts) than the decent straightforward Mormons
I’d think you should worry even more about the Qataris, Freddie’s recent interview with a middle east expert revealed they own an awful lot of old important Britain, surely there’s lots of land in there too.
I’d think you should worry even more about the Qataris, Freddie’s recent interview with a middle east expert revealed they own an awful lot of old important Britain, surely there’s lots of land in there too.
7,000 odd acres hardly makes them a major force in the UK economy, or even UK farming.
In any case, I worry a lot more about the weird behaviours and beliefs of the National Trust (500,000 acres or thereabouts) than the decent straightforward Mormons
I’d be more interested in the Mormons were buying up the city of Cambridge, rather than the shire. Now that would set the cat among the pigeons.
I’d be more interested in the Mormons were buying up the city of Cambridge, rather than the shire. Now that would set the cat among the pigeons.
I am not a Mormon or even believer in God but what is wrong about “the stickier parts of its history” such as not believing that women can join the priesthood? If that is part of their religion then why would it change? The CoE looks ridiculous for having all these God ordained beliefs that change when society does not accept these beliefs.
Though it is odd how polygamy was once fine but is not now. It, and I don’t care, should either be OK/right or never have been.
CoJCoLDS is about the only organised religion that deserves any respect: its charity work, consistency, self-reliance, hard work etc.
I am not a Mormon or even believer in God but what is wrong about “the stickier parts of its history” such as not believing that women can join the priesthood? If that is part of their religion then why would it change? The CoE looks ridiculous for having all these God ordained beliefs that change when society does not accept these beliefs.
Though it is odd how polygamy was once fine but is not now. It, and I don’t care, should either be OK/right or never have been.
CoJCoLDS is about the only organised religion that deserves any respect: its charity work, consistency, self-reliance, hard work etc.
The problem I have with the CotLDS is that they’ve slapped a copyright ban on the watching of all the old “Time Team” episodes by those of us living in the UK, of programmes dedicated to our own heritage. It’s a damned cheek.
You can get round it by judicious use of a vpn, and I do, but having sent the Church a tweet asking why they’re doing it, they haven’t even had the courtesy to send me an answer.
Am seriously miffed.
By what copyright mechanism are they allowed to do this? It’s a scandal!
I’ll update when I find out.
I’ll update when I find out.
I’ve tried googling this, and found only your post. Can you provide a link to any other source of this claim.? I’m intrigued.
Can you watch full episodes from Season 8, such as Rycote, Salisbury Plain or Lindisfarne (for example, this applies to other seasons), because what I see when I try is “This video contains content from LDS, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.”?
The “LDS” mentioned are the Mormons, as far as I can tell.
I’ve just pulled up ‘Time Team Season 8, Episode 4 A Waltham Villa’
It’s playing normally on YouTube. I’m not using a VPN.
I have found references to social media sites being blocked in LDS meeting houses.
You’re not by any chance using the wifi of a Mormon temple, are you?
Definitely not!!
Definitely not!!
I’ve just pulled up ‘Time Team Season 8, Episode 4 A Waltham Villa’
It’s playing normally on YouTube. I’m not using a VPN.
I have found references to social media sites being blocked in LDS meeting houses.
You’re not by any chance using the wifi of a Mormon temple, are you?
Can you watch full episodes from Season 8, such as Rycote, Salisbury Plain or Lindisfarne (for example, this applies to other seasons), because what I see when I try is “This video contains content from LDS, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.”?
The “LDS” mentioned are the Mormons, as far as I can tell.
I’ve just tried watching Time Team on YouTube without using a VPN and I’ve had no problem whatsoever. Could you oblige us with further details and an example?
By what copyright mechanism are they allowed to do this? It’s a scandal!
I’ve tried googling this, and found only your post. Can you provide a link to any other source of this claim.? I’m intrigued.
I’ve just tried watching Time Team on YouTube without using a VPN and I’ve had no problem whatsoever. Could you oblige us with further details and an example?
The problem I have with the CotLDS is that they’ve slapped a copyright ban on the watching of all the old “Time Team” episodes by those of us living in the UK, of programmes dedicated to our own heritage. It’s a damned cheek.
You can get round it by judicious use of a vpn, and I do, but having sent the Church a tweet asking why they’re doing it, they haven’t even had the courtesy to send me an answer.
Am seriously miffed.
Sounds nice, but before jumping on non-traditional bandwagons, you might consider our two most prominent Mormons were Senators Mitt Romney and the late Harry Reid, both excellent character studies in lies and betrayal.
Sounds nice, but before jumping on non-traditional bandwagons, you might consider our two most prominent Mormons were Senators Mitt Romney and the late Harry Reid, both excellent character studies in lies and betrayal.
For the record, the full name of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, has always been it’s name. We did not rebrand. People outside of the church gave us the nickname Mormons.
Thank you all for your positive comments! I seldom see things like this in other comment sections.
I am a practicing member.
For the record, the full name of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, has always been it’s name. We did not rebrand. People outside of the church gave us the nickname Mormons.
Thank you all for your positive comments! I seldom see things like this in other comment sections.
I am a practicing member.
If one wishes to understand mormons’ long-term interest in food production, agriculture and being prepared (beyond the purely religious components), one should look to the past. The following is a good narrative to start with. It’s an historical account of the mormons as they were driven west, written by a curious traveller who fell in with them.
The account was delivered by this individual before the Historical Society of Pennsylvania in 1850.
https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/51096/pg51096-images.html
If one wishes to understand mormons’ long-term interest in food production, agriculture and being prepared (beyond the purely religious components), one should look to the past. The following is a good narrative to start with. It’s an historical account of the mormons as they were driven west, written by a curious traveller who fell in with them.
The account was delivered by this individual before the Historical Society of Pennsylvania in 1850.
https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/51096/pg51096-images.html
This is the first time I’ve read an article from UnHerd. I am a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and I was confused and disappointed with this article.
In an attempt to try to understand the angle that UnHerd/the reporter was taking I reviewed their mission statement.
“UnHerd aims to do two things: to push back against the herd mentality with new and bold thinking, and to provide a platform for otherwise unheard ideas, people and places….
…”We are not aligned with any political party, and the writers and ideas we are interested in come from both left and right traditions. But we instinctively believe that the way forward will be found through a shift of emphasis: towards community not just individualism, towards responsibilities as well as Rights, and towards meaning and virtue over shallow materialism.”
Sadly this critique did not appear new or bold or unheard.
The good news is for future reporting, if you look with genuine curiosity you will find that we have plenty in common towards building communities, balancing responsibility with rights, and finding meaning and valuing virtue. Come and see 🙂
This is the first time I’ve read an article from UnHerd. I am a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and I was confused and disappointed with this article.
In an attempt to try to understand the angle that UnHerd/the reporter was taking I reviewed their mission statement.
“UnHerd aims to do two things: to push back against the herd mentality with new and bold thinking, and to provide a platform for otherwise unheard ideas, people and places….
…”We are not aligned with any political party, and the writers and ideas we are interested in come from both left and right traditions. But we instinctively believe that the way forward will be found through a shift of emphasis: towards community not just individualism, towards responsibilities as well as Rights, and towards meaning and virtue over shallow materialism.”
Sadly this critique did not appear new or bold or unheard.
The good news is for future reporting, if you look with genuine curiosity you will find that we have plenty in common towards building communities, balancing responsibility with rights, and finding meaning and valuing virtue. Come and see 🙂
And the point of this story is….?
m… men all satan?
(anagram of the author’s name)
m… men all satan?
(anagram of the author’s name)
And the point of this story is….?
Is it true that the Mormons helped to fund the casinos and hotels of Las Vegas? Is that another business activity?
No, the Mormon church has not funded the casinos or hotels of Las Vegas. It is interesting, though, that Las Vegas was founded by Mormons.
No, the Mormon church has not funded the casinos or hotels of Las Vegas. It is interesting, though, that Las Vegas was founded by Mormons.
Is it true that the Mormons helped to fund the casinos and hotels of Las Vegas? Is that another business activity?
It is clear what is really sought by those who seek that fullness of Christianity which includes Priesthood, a high theology of Baptism, a living earthly Teaching Office focused in a person on this earth, an intercessory relationship between those on this side of bodily death and those on the other side of it, and so much else besides.
It is clear what is really sought by those who seek that fullness of Christianity which includes Priesthood, a high theology of Baptism, a living earthly Teaching Office focused in a person on this earth, an intercessory relationship between those on this side of bodily death and those on the other side of it, and so much else besides.