X Close

Odesa is at war with itself People come here to have affairs, deal drugs and kill

A family ripped apart in Odesa (Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

A family ripped apart in Odesa (Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images)


June 1, 2022   9 mins

Odesa

Mounds of sandbags swaddle blocks of concrete. Soldiers stand in groups of two and three, bored but tense, idling but alert. Checkpoints dominate the streets of central Odesa. “Warning! Mines,” reads a sign in front of an especially fortified post near the city’s Bristol Hotel. Large metal crosses — designed to stop tanks are scattered in the street. Barbed wire stretches across pavements like bunting.

If war is a plague, then these are its symptoms: pustules and boils that have erupted across Odesa. This is a port city in which the port no longer works. Just miles from the shore, enemy warships are ready to take aim. Every few hours the nasal shriek of an air raid siren tears through the air. Russians are shelling this place from the Crimea, and the Caspian and Black Seas.

The war in Ukraine is over many things. It is not just territory that is at stake here, but language and culture and even history. Nowhere is this truer than with Odesa. Even its name is contested: is it Odes, Odessa, or Odesa? Ukrainians now prefer the latter in Cyrillic with its single s, Russians with two. Over the years, Odesa has been named by its inhabitants in Yiddish, Ukrainian and Russian. It is a city prominent in the Russian imagination. If Moscow is to annex Ukraine to a Greater Russia, it will need Odesa, along with Kyiv, to complete this imperial vision. If Ukraine is to survive as a coherent entity, Odesa cannot fall.

***

“Cosmopolitan, ambivalent, independent and… er… mixed. That’s me. I was born in central Asia to Ukrainian and Belarusian Jews who fled Hitler. My four grandparents were from four different parts of the Soviet Union, but basically I’m a Jew who inherited a Russian passport because we lived in Moscow in the Nineties. But I grew up in America and was educated there and in Europe.”

Vladislav Davidzon, journalist, editor, diarist, dandy, aspiring entrepreneur and my near-constant companion during the early part of my travels in Ukraine, takes a sip of water and continues. “I lived in Odesa for several years and my wife is an Odesan,” he says. “Now I’m back. It’s a lovely time to be Odesa, which is the loveliest city on the entire planet. And I say that without a trace of exaggeration. Probably.”

Vlad is right. Odesa is indeed lovely: the cobbled streets around us are filled with colourful neoclassical houses. But if it manages to be pretty without the chocolate-box banality of certain parts of northern Europe, it’s because there is a certain edge to Odesa. It is many things: a famous city of the Russian Empire; the key to the war’s southern front; but also, like Vlad, it is a place of ambivalence. It resists identification — a city that was, in the words of the author Charles King, “scouted by a Neapolitan mercenary, named by a Russian empress, governed by her one-eyed secret husband, built by two exiled French noblemen, modernised by a Cambridge-educated Count and celebrated by his wife’s Russian lover”.

When Mark Twain visited Odesa in 1867, he saw a place that could take a host of differing nationalities and mould them into something unique: Odesans. This is a city of Russians, Ukrainians, Greeks, Jews and Italians that has been successively governed by the Russian Empire, the USSR, Romania and now Ukraine. But it is also a port city, and port cities are places of darkness. People come here to have affairs, to do drug deals and to kill. Odesa may be an ethnic melting pot, but it is also the site of some of the worst antisemitic pogroms in Russian history (a high bar indeed).

Throughout it all, Odesa has remained discernibly itself: chaotic and oddly removed from any one national story. “Odesa did not have any tradition, but it was therefore not afraid of new forms of living and activity,” said the Odesan and Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky. He speaks to the city’s final truth: that it belongs to those who want to make themselves anew. It draws in people such as Vlad — a self-conscious product of self-fashioning.

If war is a plague, then these are its symptoms (BULENT KILIC/AFP via Getty Images)

Vlad has come to get his father-in-law out of the country and to safety in Paris with him and his wife. He is also — and he is adamant about this — here to get his tooth fixed, given how good and cheap Ukrainian dentistry is. It was damaged when someone punched him, he tells me. “Was that the guy in Kyiv?” I ask. “No, that was someone else,” he replies. He tells me that he has an NDA in place so cannot go into details. “And anyway,” he adds, “a gentleman does not discuss such matters.”

Things are fraught when we arrive on 15 April. The Russians are slowly making their way down Ukraine’s southern flank. They have almost destroyed the city of Mariupol (it would eventually fall on 20 May) and have taken Kherson, too. Only the neighbouring city of Mykolaiv, which is around 130km east, and which is still holding out, stands between them and Odesa. The land bridge from Russia to Crimea is more or less complete. If they take Odesa, not only can they link up with their separatist statelet of Transnistria in neighbouring Moldova, but they will cut off Ukraine’s access to the sea and strangle Kyiv economically.

So far, the city remains relatively unscathed, though shelling and air raids are frequent. There is also near-constant fear of what Ukrainians call “saboteurs” and “provocateurs” — Russian agents who are either sent in or live among the locals. This is what happens when you fight a nation that looks and speaks exactly like you. It breeds a paranoia that sometimes descends into farce. Odesa is ruled by curfew: no booze after 4pm; no going out after 9pm. The Ukrainian security expert Hanna Shelest sums up the mood: “Last week the security services caught someone skulking around post-curfew. When they grabbed him, he screamed: ‘It’s ok, it’s ok, I’m just a drug dealer!’”

Vlad and I are staying in a hotel in the centre of the city. The reception desk is manned by Aleksandsr, a man of fastidious temperament and bottomless suspicions. I don’t have cash and say I will pay tomorrow morning after I visit an ATM. Aleksandr barks at us in pointed Russian before we leave. “He’s really concerned you’re not going to pay him,” says Vlad to me as we walk out.

Over the next few days, I tramp the streets with Vlad and start to understand exactly what is happening in Ukraine. This is industrial, state-on-state warfare that we have not seen — especially on the European continent — since the Second World War. I was in Ukraine for the beginning of it all in 2014 and everything is now different. At a checkpoint near the Londonskaya Hotel, a soldier, after checking my documents, asks me to delete the photo I have just taken of a nearby building. He even makes me remove it from the “recently deleted” folder on my phone, something which has never happened to me before — in any conflict.

Time passes. The shelling increases. On 23 April, a Russian shell destroys several houses near the city centre and kills a three-month-old baby. But the violence is only half the story. Two things spiral in war: death and rumour. As the weeks roll on and Ukraine pushes Russia back in all directions, fears morph from Russia taking the city to what else an enraged Putin might do in the face of increasing defeat. One afternoon, I have coffee with the Greek-Ukrainian journalist Kostas Onisenko who, much to my surprise, whips out a film camera. I ask if he’s a photography buff. “No, it’s just that maybe there’ll be a nuclear attack here and if so we’re all going to die. I use film because all digital cameras will be fucked but they can find this in the rubble.”

More time passes. The Ukrainians beat back Russian forces from some of the villages surrounding Mykolaiv. Still, Moscow cannot let Odesa go. In late April, Russian commander Rustam Minnekayev announces that Russia’s new offensive goals are to seize control of southern Ukraine, which it palpably cannot do. “The Russians will never give this place up,” Hanna tells me.

***

“[Nationalists] Roman Shukevich and Stepan Bandera are heroes in western Ukraine — that part of the country that believes itself to be the real Ukraine — but not for us. They’re always telling us: ‘You have the wrong values. You don’t walk around wearing Vyshyvanka [traditional dress].’ But they come here and listen to Odesan music and eat Odesan cuisine. They say: ‘You have to put up a statue of Bandera.’ I don’t say: ‘Why don’t you put up a statue of [Odesan gangster] Mishka Yaponchik?’”

Gennadiy Trukhanov, the Mayor of Odesa is keen to set the record straight about Russkiy mir (Russian world). Yes, this may be a Russian-speaking city, he tells me, but Odesans don’t support someone else’s idea of who they should be. This is, after all, a city that erects statues to gangsters. “Just love us the way we are,” he says with a smile.

​​From here, he moves onto the practicalities. “Today the Ukrainian armed forces have changed their tactics to defend the cities. This time we are not allowing them within 30km so they cannot use their artillery — we will not be making the mistakes of the early part of the war.” Trukhanov understands how critical Odesa is to Moscow. “We believe that Russia has a specific plan for the capture of the city. Odesa has weaknesses; it has one view onto the sea, which is blocked by the occupiers’ naval forces. On our southern flank in Transnistria is the 14th Guards Army of the Russian Federation; in the east is an army which has thus far been stopped at Mykolaiv.” He starts to sketch out how Russia could take the city. “It could only begin if Russia’s land forces broke through the line at Mykolaiv, at which point they would then hit us from the sea too.”

But he remains confident. “Odesans don’t like to be told what to do,” he explains. “We don’t like force. The city is like our women.” I glance at the young lady sitting next to him whose translation skills have been rendered unnecessary by Vlad’s presence. “They may look very open and accessible” —I glance at her again, slightly alarmed this time — “but in fact they are proud and loyal,” he concludes with quiet satisfaction.

***

“50 hryvnia! Do you want my husband to beat me to death?” The trader on the stall is filled with faux indignation as I watch her and Vlad argue over a small 1980 Moscow Olympics badge. We are at the flea market in old Moldovanka, which was once the Jewish quarter. You can get almost anything here: second-hand shoes, skirts, harpoons, typewriters, squash rackets, dolls in varying states of collapse, and a disconcertingly high number of knives and other weapons.

“You haggle better than an Odesan”

Vlad, it soon becomes clear, adores haggling. “You haggle better than an Odesan,” the lady tells him with respect. The market is real Odesa: a city of peddlers and hustlers and con artists; a mix of the USSR and Russia and Ukraine and Judaism — all spread out across the streets and, critically, for sale. We go to leave and a stallholder calls out to Vlad: “Does your British friend want an axe?”

We dash off to see a local artist, Stas Zhalobniuk, who Vlad wants to meet. He is selling paintings about the war that are visually striking, politically attuned and that Vlad reckons he can knock-out for a profit in Brooklyn. The next day it is finally time for Vlad to fix his tooth. He leaves me at a restaurant to work. I look at the table in front of me. It contains the detritus of a month spent across the battlefields of Ukraine: four notebooks, an assortment of pens and pencils, several strange-looking cables, my helmet, and, propped up against a teapot, a large X-ray of Vlad’s teeth.

Two hours later he returns. He has, right in the front of his mouth, a new and gleaming white incisor. The only problem is that it’s longer than all the others. “Vlad, what the fuck?” I ask. “You noticed?” “Of course,” I tell him.

“Yeah, they actually had an argument about it. The technician came and said ‘I think it’s kind of long’ but the dentist said it was fine. Anyway, they’re going to have to file it down but the guy that normally does it is away fighting so I’ll have to wait.”

The one with the tooth

A few days later, it’s time for Vlad to leave. That evening, I enter the lobby of my hotel to see the receptionist waving at me . “Your friend was here, sir,” she says, “Which one? I ask. “He dropped off a painting for you.” “Ah, I see, Vlad.”

“Yes, sir. The one with the tooth.”

***

To understand Vlad you need to be aware of his father. Grigory Davidzon was a Soviet tough guy who left the USSR in 1989 with his wife and ended up in New York’s Little Odesa, where he became a local media tycoon, kingmaker, fixer and quasi-Don, controlling much of the vote in his district. He wanted a son who would go into the family businesses. Instead he got Vlad: a gallivanting fop who favours floral cravats, Romantic poetry and yellow espadrilles.

It was not a good relationship. They did not even leave Russia together. Vlad instead escaped with his grandmother on the last flight out of the Soviet Union on the morning of the attempted coup against Boris Yeltsin on 18 August 1991. Grigory — who lost his own father to a political assassination in Uzbekistan — was demanding, controlling and authoritarian. Vlad was determined not to submit. And that is perhaps the most Odesan characteristic of all.

“Moscow wants Odesa so much because it had a central place in the culture and art and literature of the Russian 19th century,” Vlad told me. “Pushkin started writing poetry here, every famous Russian writer and composer passed through here — and passed out from drinking at the Londonskaya hotel.”

Now Ukraine is — understandably — determined to de-Russify the country. There is talk of removing all the Pushkin statues and memorabilia from the country. But Odesa without Pushkin is no longer Odesa. It is something else. And this speaks to a larger truth: The city is now caught between Moscow’s imperialism and, from some quarters, a counterforce that would seek to make it something it is not and has never been. If Odesa is to have a future as the city it has always been, it must resist those forces as ferociously as the Russian aggression it has faced every day of this war.


David Patrikarakos is UnHerd‘s foreign correspondent. His latest book is War in 140 characters: how social media is reshaping conflict in the 21st century. (Hachette)

dpatrikarakos

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

36 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jay Bee
Jay Bee
1 year ago

In such a lengthy and detailed essay, I’m a little surprised there is not one mention of the events that took place in Odessa in May, 2014. The utterly horrific deaths of mostly pro-Russian protesters, at the Trade Union House, is mostly what I recall when I think about Odessa.

Last edited 1 year ago by Jay Bee
Ian Johnston
Ian Johnston
1 year ago
Reply to  Jay Bee
Judy Englander
Judy Englander
1 year ago
Reply to  Ian Johnston

I’d recommend the Wiki article for a detailed and balanced account of the events.

Robin P Clarke
Robin P Clarke
1 year ago
Reply to  Judy Englander

I’d recommend you learn about how Wiki has been turned into a corrupt propaganda device, Hint, there won’t be a wiki article about it.

Robin P Clarke
Robin P Clarke
1 year ago
Reply to  Ian Johnston

There is also a whopping untruth in Patrikarakos’s romantic sketch, namely:
“They have almost destroyed the city of Mariupol (it would eventually fall on 20 May)”
You can confirm for yourself the reality in drastic contrast to this constant whopping untruth, in numerous videos, such as those liniked below.
Sky “News”: “Turning into another Mariupol”
BBC “News” Mariupol has been “turned into rubble”.
“completely destroyed”, etc.
See these reality laid bare in these videos of the liberation of Mariupol from eight years of the Nato warmongering industry’s regime of terror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1I8SZeXGFo
(The drone view was also on 9th May as reflected that you can see the huge St George ribbon in it.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kFGB6DqzrY

Hardee Hodges
Hardee Hodges
1 year ago
Reply to  Robin P Clarke

Good to see parts are intact. Likely why some residents are still alive. The steel plant is no longer usable. So something will still be there when Ukraine takes the city back.

Nigel Rodgers
Nigel Rodgers
1 year ago
Reply to  Robin P Clarke

What year was this video taken? There are no signs of any war damage in these panoramic shots. Whatever the current state of Mariupol, genuine views of it must surely show signs of the recent bitter fighting. If they don’t, they definitely cannot be showing the city as it now is.

Last edited 1 year ago by Nigel Rodgers
Antony Altoft
Antony Altoft
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Rodgers

It’s a shock when you see the reality versus the propaganda we are subjected to in the UK isn’t it?
If you watch TV from other countries you’ll realize why pretty much all of Latin America, Africa and a good chunk of Asia supports Russia either tacitly or openly.

harry storm
harry storm
1 year ago
Reply to  Antony Altoft

Oh please don’t be coy, tell us WHY “pretty much all of Latin America, Africa and a good chunk of Asia” supports the invasion of a neighbouring sovereign country.

Ian Johnston
Ian Johnston
1 year ago
Reply to  Jay Bee

I think it say a lot about the one-eyed nature of the people Patrikarakos hangs around with.
He was lauding Azov in his last article for Unherd.

M. Gatt
M. Gatt
1 year ago
Reply to  Ian Johnston

Suprised that Patrikarakos doesnt use a lower case ‘r’ when writing Russia ( as does Ukrainian Ministry of Defense) as he spreads his love for Banderaites.

Last edited 1 year ago by M. Gatt
Ian Stewart
Ian Stewart
1 year ago
Reply to  M. Gatt

I expect you think Zelensky is a Jewish fascist too?

Ian Stewart
Ian Stewart
1 year ago
Reply to  Jay Bee

Well the Russians are certainly getting their revenge now, so you must be pleased it’s balancing out?

tim hardacre
tim hardacre
1 year ago
Reply to  Jay Bee

JB A vital point. Opinions of Russian sympathisers do not get reported in the Western media .There are substantial arguments supporting the war by Russia against elements in the Ukrainian present government. We never hear about Mr Kolomoisky for example or the closure by Mr Zelensky of the opposition media over the last 8 years. To call Ukraine a democracy is laughable. On a lighter note I was in Odessa a few days before the fighting commenced to see Madama Butterfly-a wonderful performance in the beautiful Opera House-3rd Row of the stalls-cost under £10.

harry storm
harry storm
1 year ago
Reply to  tim hardacre

RE: There are substantial arguments supporting the war by Russia against elements in the Ukrainian present government.
I would love to hear one that justifies the invasion of a neighbouring sovereign country.

Russell Hamilton
Russell Hamilton
1 year ago

David informs us using his very impressive narrative, characterisation and description skills – great reading.

zee upītis
zee upītis
1 year ago

You, sir, are quite literally sick in the head. Your delusional imagery of how things are couldn’t be farther from the truth and your attempt to establish credibility is pathetic. Yes, exactly, you have never been to Ukraine but you are such a great psychologist, right? Psychology has nothing to do with primitive sociological extrapolation from skewed or outrightly fictional historical perspectives. Take it from someone who’s been spending a lot of time in Eastern Ukraine for many years working there with locals and speaking both Ukrainian and Russian: YOU HAVE NO CLUE.

Last edited 1 year ago by zee upītis
Robin P Clarke
Robin P Clarke
1 year ago
Reply to  zee upītis

It is not necessary to go to Ukraine in order to see on many videos the Nato lies laid bare. What is necessary is the objectivity which so many lack.

Judy Englander
Judy Englander
1 year ago

I fear for Ukraine. Not just because of the invasion but also because it may lead to a fragmentation of Ukrainian society, which appears to be a mosaic of many backgrounds. It’s understandable that UKR authorities want to draw a red line between all that’s Russian and them. But that could become a fault line driving a wedge between ethnic Ukrainians (descendents of the peasantry in the great empires that once occupied the area) and other cultures. Putin has a lot to answer for. He’s a force for destruction in more ways than one.

Jeff Andrews
Jeff Andrews
1 year ago
Reply to  Judy Englander

You could change President Putin’s name for Freeland’s and her mentor husband Robert Kagan’s names and it would be more accurate.
This pair of horrors are fermenting trouble in East Africa now so it looks as though they’ve given up on Ukraine.

John Aronsson
John Aronsson
1 year ago
Reply to  Jeff Andrews

Victoria Nuland is married to the arch-neocon Robert Kagan. Chrystia Freeland is married to some obscure but doubtless creepy NYT reporter.

Peta Seel
Peta Seel
1 year ago

A fascinating article and thank you. International ports across the globe have always had both colourful histories and a large underbelly of vice.

Ian Stewart
Ian Stewart
1 year ago

Jeez has Putin’s propaganda army suddenly targeted Unherd through reader comments as part of its Donbas offensive?

Robin P Clarke
Robin P Clarke
1 year ago

The changes such as removal of a s from Odessa are not what “Ukrainians” want but only what a small minority of violent Russia-hating fanatics want. It seems that promotion of hate is fine if you are on the same side as Azov battalion “heroes”.
The double s usefully gives us the correct pronunciation in English. Likewise we do not spell Moscow as “Moskva”, or Rome as “Roma”.
Of course, changing the spelling also helps to distract from the inconvenient facts of the 2014 Odessa Massacre by our “heroic” “friends”currently being armed at our taxpayer expense. .

Leif Sachs
Leif Sachs
1 year ago

industrial, state-on-state warfare that we have not seen — especially on the European continent — since the Second World War.

Apart from the NATO bombing of Belgrade, and the Armenia-Azerbaijan war. (And yes, the latter two countries are part of the European continent.)

Last edited 1 year ago by Leif Sachs
Rick Frazier
Rick Frazier
1 year ago

“Odesans don’t like to be told what to do.” Americans used to harbor a similar attitude. Today, not so much.

Nick Bernard
Nick Bernard
1 year ago

Wow. Putin’s apologists, appeasers and propagandists are out in force. Pusillanimously tap tap tapping away in the comments.

Leif Sachs
Leif Sachs
1 year ago

Patrikarakos’ articles are so biased, they are unworthy of Unherd.

David M Pelly
David M Pelly
1 year ago
Reply to  Leif Sachs

You are correct Lief. Not worthy of Unherd.
Actually they are worse than biased. They are an attempt at delusional creative writing.

Antony Altoft
Antony Altoft
1 year ago

The city is like our women.” I glance at the young lady sitting next to him whose translation skills have been rendered unnecessary by Vlad’s presence. “They may look very open and accessible” —I glance at her again, slightly alarmed this time — “but in fact they are proud and loyal,” he concludes with quiet satisfaction.
Beautiful prose.

Stephen Magee
Stephen Magee
1 year ago

Putinbots out in force!

Last edited 1 year ago by Stephen Magee
David M Pelly
David M Pelly
1 year ago

I forgot to say that the people of eastern Ukraine, want to join up with Putin’s good gov. They are past fed up with Ukrainian bad gov and internal fighting and terrorism. There is no other way to fix not only eastern Ukraine, but all of Ukraine.

David M Pelly
David M Pelly
1 year ago

One more very important thing to know:
The neo nazis, the terrorists and gangs in Ukraine, are now financially supported by the multi billionaire globalists. George Soros is one of them. It is difficult to know who they all are. It is a quagmire of a mess. It is a real huge orgy.

They want to break or destroy Ukraine, because Ukraine is standing on their way to getting to Putin, who is holding out against the west. And for them to take full control of the world, under the leadership of Klaus Schwab and the WEF and company.

harry storm
harry storm
1 year ago
Reply to  David M Pelly

Incoherent, illogical and insane. Quite the trifecta.

M. Gatt
M. Gatt
1 year ago

Thanks David. I spent 3 years in the former USSR in the 90’s. Had many hours of conversations with Russians, Ukrainians and mixed Russo-Ukr people about their complex past. They all had a very deep understanding of their history. Putin will prevail. Peace will settle over the Russian Ukraine. Odessa ( with two ‘ss’es’ will return to her ways)

David M Pelly
David M Pelly
1 year ago
Reply to  M. Gatt

Thanks M. Gatt.
I have long thought good of Putin. He is a strong leader.
The highest and longest running public approval of Putin, highest and longest of all countries in the world in all of history, proves that.

I have friends in Russia and they think that Putin is doing a good job.
One is a couple who actually immigrated from the NY, USA to a small city NE of Moscow a few yrs ago. They love it there.

The problem Putin has is with young Russians, who have been warped and perverted by garbage on the internet, trying to take him down or and leave the country. Same as the young generations in all countries in the world.