More than two candidates can, in theory, reach the second round in French parliamentary elections. To qualify in third place, you need 12.5% of the registered vote. Since the national turnout is predicted to be around 47% (a record low), that means 30% of the actual vote in many constituencies.
There will therefore be very few three-cornered contests in the second round next Sunday — perhaps none. This could favour Macron. The leader of the Left-Green alliance, the anti-Nato, anti-EU Jean-Luc Mélenchon, is feared by voters of the centre-Left and moderate and hard-Right. If presented with only two choices, they are likely to vote anti-Mélenchon in round two rather than anti-Macron. If they vote at all, that is…
Macron has been accused, including by some in his own camp, of playing a dangerous game since his victory in the Presidential election on 24 April. Far from stoking interest in the parliamentary elections, he vanished from the domestic scene and took an unprecedented four weeks to choose what was mostly a predictable new government and Prime Minister — the former employment minister, Elisabeth Borne.
His strategy was to preserve the momentum from his presidential victory and prevent an anti-Macron counter-movement from developing. But how can you freeze-frame momentum? The effect has only been to deflate interest in a parliamentary campaign which was already regarded by many people as either a “done deal” or “one election too many”.
If Left-wing voters turn out in large numbers on Sunday and the Macron voters do not, the President’s camp could be in trouble. An outright victory for the Left in the second round — forcing Macron to appoint a Left-wing prime minister — may look unlikely. But an awkward, hung parliament in which the Macron alliance has most seats but no working majority is still possible.
The centre-right LR are also disturbing Macron’s calculations by showing more signs of life than expected. The party was pronounced defunct by many commentators after their candidate Valérie Pécresse scored only 4.8% in the first round of the presidential election on 10 April. However, LR candidates have been putting up a spirited fight in the parliamentary campaign. In the latest polls, the party is projected to win up to 55 seats — more than Marine Le Pen’s Rassemblement National, which has a much bigger share of the first-round popular vote.
I watched Vergne film a social media appeal in front of Chartres cathedral. He went through five or six takes. (You can see the results here.) His pitch was simple. You can choose Macron and “change-nothing-all-is-fine”. You can choose Mélenchon and “lets-turn-everything upside-down”. Or you can choose concrete action on inflation and insecurity with Les Républicains. Vote for a candidate like me who wants to work for Chartres rather than Paris.
Vergne, although only 30, is a very old-fashioned kind of French politician. In the new “Macronworld”, ambitious young people prefer to skip local involvement and parachute themselves into national politics (as Macron did in 2017). But Vergne has adopted the traditional French approach employed successfully by the likes of Jacques Chirac, François Mitterrand and François Hollande. He has implanted himself in a part of provincial France where he has strong family connections. He studied at two of the finishing schools of the French political elite, Science-Po and the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA), before winning a council seat in Chartres and then becoming assistant mayor.
“It’s an unfashionable approach these days but that’s not what worries me,” he explains. “Having roots in provincial France — understanding the way that things look from outside Paris — is as important as it ever was. What worries me is the future of centre-right politics in France. Can Les Républicains survive? Nobody can be sure of that. But I think the centre-Right, in some form, will thrive once again once Macron vanishes from the scene in 2027. There is no long-term future for Macronism without Macron.”
But after a day on the campaign trail, something else worries me. Why should so many people in a town like Chartres — with local problems but prosperous enough — refuse to engage with a young man who is willing to commit his life to moderate, democratic politics? The number of people who avoided political conversation was, frankly, unsettling. Most were over 50-years-old, in other words, from the generations who do vote.
The blame for such attitudes can be shared around: on the older generations of politicians, on the collapse of the old party allegiances, on social media, on mainstream media, on steeply rising prices, on exhaustion after two years of the Covid pandemic. Perhaps some blame should also be attached to the voters themselves.
But the plague-on-all-your-houses mood in a typical Macron-supporting medium-sized town seven weeks after he was re-elected was disturbing. Whether or not Macron wins a majority in parliament over the next two Sundays, he faces a tormented second term.
For one thing, meeting locals in Chartres can only be done on Saturdays or Sundays. Like Rouen or Orleans, Chartres has become a suburb of Paris….people take an early train and come back late.
What worries me as a Frenchman, is to see well off people ready not to vote paving the way to a Mélenchon who is clinically certified crazy. Does one has to like Macron to give him a majority over a bunch of self appointed guérilleros and a defunct socialist party ? What a joke !!!
If people decide not to go to the polling booth and see Mélenchon doing cartwheels Sunday evening, it will be Brexit revisited when these young people decided to stay in bed and went on whinging for the last 6 years…..only….it will be a lot more painful for the the French.
Writing from the shores of the Lake Constance in Bavaria, I realise, as if I needed to, how France is a divided unhappy country. It was always unhappy, just not divided in my childhood. It looks as if they want to hurt themselves. Sadly, I live in a suburb where Macron will score 70 % and wether I vote or not will not make any difference.
What nonsense. Mélenchon clinically crazy? He’s one of the most intelligent and interesting politicians in the public arena today, who has managed the unlikely task of bringing the France Insoumise, socialists, greens, and communists together for the first time in almost 100 years. Macron has disgusted the electorate (and especially the young electorate) by ruling France as a one-man-show, relegating the parliament to a body of yes-men who give him emergency powers and sit back to watch. The reason the French electorate is so unlikely to vote is because Macron has largely accentuated the democratic crisis already in place. The two-round elections have turned into a sham, with just enough people still voting for the candidate who happens to make it to round 2 against the far right. What France needs is a complete reform of its institutions, including how elections are decided, and the creation of a strong and sufficiently financed independent judiciary. I for one will happily vote for Mélenchon’s candidate on Sunday.
Good for you Vlad….a guy able to shout : do not touch me, la république c’est moi !!! On a judiciary mandated police search of his domicile, is….as far as I am concerned, certified loopy.
Chavez, Che Guevara, Fidel Castro and Robespierre are his heroes……glad you can sleep at night……and I hope you will not get a hangover in 3 weeks after Macron has got a majority.
Cuz…..like it or not and despite the media dribble …..he will get a majority and your hero will get his marching papers. But it seems the war in Ukraine is not scary enough. So here comes Melenchon. A month ago the European….the world press was heralding the return of Hitler in the shape of Marine Le Pen……look where she is now…. The same fate is awaiting this clown of Melenchon…..scary clown actuelly.
Last but not least……his admiration for the Great statesman Putin is. How come nobody among his followers……pretty pathetic followers….socialists…..greens ….who sold their soul to get a jump seat on the bandwagon, do not mention this rather embarrassing fact. Same for the press who seems to be mesmerised by the great speaker …….cynicism at its best.
Apathy is a major problem in France because people despair at the multiple dysfunctions of the state (police, judiciary, health system, etc.) but have no confidence in the political choices on offer. People look at the decadent state of the country and the political landscape and then wonder if there is any point. The situation is very grave but this article barely scratches the surface; it doesn’t ask any important questions.
I don’t understand anything about the politics in France and I’m sure I have no real sense of what is going on there but it seems to me that Le Pen would have been the sensible choice for making any real changes. I don’t understand the griping about Macron when they willingly voted him in; they voted for his policies.
Griping is a national pastime (about everything, not just politics). I suspect that most of the people who complain bitterly about Macron never seriously considered voting for anyone else. For many others, the policies of Macron are to their personal benefit so they prefer to ignore the broader damage being done by this government. As for Marine Le Pen, she is the perennial candidate (i.e. perennial loser). She has her qualities but she has also many flaws. This time, I thought her campaign lacked energy. If anything, she performed better than I expected.