A great deal of discussion following the resignation of porn-watching Conservative MP Neil Parish has concerned sexism in Parliament, where the working culture is apparently a hotbed of pervy remarks, “noisy sex” in offices, “sex pest MPs” and vomit-spattered champagne parties.
But to me the resonant detail was less the pornography than the tractor. The search term “Dominator” is apparently a class of combine harvester, as well as having more lubricious connotations. This one word slid Parish sideways in a single click from the preoccupations of an old-fashioned Tory to the full-spectrum violence and nihilism of today’s culture of universal pornification.
And he did so in public view, scrolling pornography in the House of Commons — an act as obviously, flagrantly, socially unacceptable as walking out of your front door naked from the waist down. Ascribing behaviour this bizarre to so banal an impulse as sexism doesn’t add up.
Parish called it a “moment of madness”, but psychologists have long recognised that impulsive actions can be revealing. And if you were to read it as a cry of despair, Parish’s act would make eloquent sense — not just for him as an individual, but for those last surviving fragments of conservatism that still somehow cling on in the modern Conservative Party.
For Parish exemplifies a type of conservatism which is homeless. It is incompatible with the Tory Party today and is unrepresented in the increasingly influential “dissident Right”. For inasmuch as there is energy on the Right, it is in this febrile movement, which fizzes with energy — but is wholly estranged from the modern Tory Party, whose aggregate actions (accidentally or otherwise) look more like part of the problem than the solution.
Consider, for example, the current tussle over regulating imported Canadian beef. Canadian officials are pushing for a deal that would oblige us to accept hormone-treated meat, a practice banned by the EU in 1989 and that studies have shown uses carcinogenic chemicals. This is, for Boris Johnson, a difficult circle to square since, much like the once-again radioactive immigration debate, hormone beef pits the Party’s longstanding commitment to “free trade” (ie growth) against what’s left of the Party’s desire to conserve anything at all, including Britain’s increasingly strained and miserable (and hitherto loyally Tory) rural economy.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeWhat I still don’t understand about this story is the bit about “watching porn in public”.
Yes, he was in public. But was his phone-screen also?
Are the contents of every MPs phone visible to others every time they look at it? To which others?
There’s nothing pro-growth about the Conservative Party. It has spent the last two years deliberately crushing small business and is wrecking the economy with big government and oppressive regulations particularly concerning energy.
I had to suspend my disbelief when I read this headline. Does Mary Harrington really believe that Labour leaders and supporters don’t do porn?
The article is specifically about old-school Tory values and how they’re devoured by capitalism/gowth fetishism, illustrated by the particular case of a Tory MP. There’s no obligation to bring in the Labour Party.
Precisely, the late Jack Dromey for example.*
(*Died January, 2022.)
I don’t think she does believe that and she certainly doesn’t say so. I suspect their reasons for turning to it, assuming that they do, would be quite different and would definitely not involve tractors as a precursor.
I’ve just started reading Lady Chatterley’s Lover, out of curiosity really. Its a better book than I expected, and shot through with a very serious morality about sexual relations between men and women. Its ironic that a book which is now mostly remembered for the obscenity trial, is anything but obscene, certainly compared to what is laughingly called “adult” content now.
But this might actually be the problem – what was once considered obscene is no longer, because, just maybe, we have (or at least most of us in the West) have become coarsened by this constant feeding of “adult” content. I have always found this term “adult content” bewildering because mostly it contains the sort of stuff that an adolescent boy (and perhaps some girls) would find titillating.
…
Thank you – that’s a fine quotation!
“… turn to porn”? (From the headline).
I think porn has turned to society. And it drips down into everything. One may “turn” to drugs, but one may click on porn – and be accused of having “turned” to it. Porn has gained a sheen of respectability in modern pop videos: that kids watch. (That Cardi B nonsense, for example, merely heralded a new explicitness to come, no doubt). And nobody of importance ventures to say anything about that. What a ghastly world we live in now.
“And he did so in public view”. Spoken like Mary Whitehouse! Well, at least that’s something. No stone must be left unturned in the indictment.
Just as contentious, ir seems to me, is the fact that he was looking at tractor sites in the House, presumably while at ‘work’ taking the Queen’s shilling. Why are MPs allowed phones at all in the Chamber?
He was apparently waiting to pass through the voting lobby.
In the States, at least, one of the issues that lead directly to Trump realigning the conservative half of politics (and causing quite the reaction on the other half) was that the Republican “leaders” had completely lost their ability to see what the party base was seeing. They had led themselves into what sounds like a similar place that the Tory leadership is now occupying. And that is not a good space to be in.
Now, I am not a Tory, nor an Englishman even, but it seems that Brexit was one more sign of how the western world was realigning itself, and how the political leaders were being left behind. That is what it was on this side of the Atlantic, and I am sure that the same forces, the failure of Globalization hinted at in this piece is a good example of which, are still churning, still need to be taken account of.
Great article. The whole thing is sad more than outrageous. Sex and farming are both doomed to lose their subtlety and innocence to the march of technology. Dominators will rule in the field and the bed.
I mean it *might* have happened because of this convoluted, florid, over-intellectualised explanation.
Or maybe he just had urges that every man has since the beginning of time – the noonday daemons of medieval monks – and didn’t have the self-discipline to control them.
But probably not, the conclusions of some pretenious cod-literary criticsm essay must be a better explanation.
Very entertaining essay as ever. But surely Satan’s rectangle should be banned from the chamber? Would have saved Mr Parish from making a chump of himself, that’s for sure. Not as good as Ron Davis ‘observing badgers’, but still a great moment of madness.
He foolishly got caught. All MP’s and for that matter, humans, intrinsically know when they are doing something that should not be done at particular moments outside of of the confines of your home. If anything, his Sin was to not be careful enough to hide his addiction. If the value of his actual work(I don’t claim to know if he is worthy of re-election or not) is worth sacking him or not, then sack away!
You are discussing UK but it could soon be Australia as we imitate both US and UK trends: As usual entertaining and insightful.
.To illustrate, consider a by no means exhaustive list of things I’ve seen condemned lately as “problematic” or as having “shades of fascism”: farmers’ markets, going to the gym, beauty, classical architecture, talking about England before the Norman Conquest, Greek and Roman literature, gardening, sex dimorphism, punctuality, objectivity, enjoying the natural world, and mums. In other words: the stuff most ordinary people, and all ordinary conservatives, believed until about five minutes ago made life worth living. yes, well put. this is all lacking commonsense too.
Perhaps he stumbled on a new breed of ‘dominators’ who wear pant suits and have learned far more severe (and permanent) forms of domination and humiliation than whips and handcuffs. There’s nothing sexual about such things though, right? And only men have such dark impulses to destroy other people, just for the sport of it, right?
He’d be addicted porn.
O for the Bacchanalian days of Ancient Rome. They would find our* prurient, neurotic obsession with pornography laughable in the extreme.
(* The product of a Semitic, desert death cult, now known as Christianity.)